View Full Version : To Kill a Mockingbird


stanleyg
02-16-05, 09:10 PM
Allow this old cranky fool explain To Kill a Mockingbird. What I have to say may sound foolish. Yet, it may clarify why prosecutors wish to portray Michael Jackson as a monster rather than a Mockingbird.

Harper Lee’s To Kill a Mockingbird Pulitzer Prize Novel is about religious persecution. Harper’s ancestors had fled from Europe to America seeking refuge from religious persecution. She meticulously crafted fictional characters and notorious plot to capture the attention of the world to the religious persecution that exists here in America. Her story has such deep literary meaning that English teachers have taught it to students around the world her classic novel.

The plot commences with Scout, Jem and Dill being curious about a recluse Boo Radley. Boo’s father Arthur Radley was a devout Christian fanatic. He had imprisoned his own son for life on house arrest for the crime he committed as a youth. Boo’s strange life of secrecy made him appear as a monster rather than a human being. The strict punishment of his father had made Boo afraid of adults. Boo wanted to make friends with the kids. Boo hid gifts in the knot hole of an old tree for them to find. The kids found his gifts. They discovered that Boo was not a monster. Rather, he was a lonely man that never had a chance to live a normal life as other children.

Later in the plot, Mayella Ewell lured Tom Robinson a black man in the house to hang her curtains. Tom felt sympathy for Mayella and lent her a hand although his left arm was paralyzed. Mayella began flirting with Tom. Bob came home and caught her. Bob bruised Mayella’s face for daring to show affection towards a Nigger. Bob concocted a story to accuse Tom for raping Mayella and bruising her face. Sheriff Heck arrested Tom. The good White Christians of Maycomb County Alabama huddled around the court house to watch the spectacle unfold. Atticus Finch a reputable White attorney represented Tom’s defense. It stirred up hatred against his family and him. Atticus proved that Tom’s left hand was paralyzed. It was impossible for him to have placed the bruises on the right side of Mayella’s face. The jurors sentenced Tom Robinson anyway despite of the evidence. The prison guards murdered Tom claiming that he tried to runaway from prison.

The greater atrocity of the novel is that on one Halloween night Bob Ewell toted a knife and attempted to stab Scout in her costume. Boo Radley came out of the dark and took the knife to fatally stab Bob Ewell. Sheriff informed Atticus what had happened that night. He never pressed any charges against Boo. The reason is that Boo was a mysterious recluse, who wouldn’t have understood the charges of his own crime.

The plot of To Kill a Mockingbird is unfolding before our very eyes. The characters of Boo Radley and Tom Robinson are manifesting in the form of Michael Jackson. America is the small southern town of Maycomb County, Alabama. We the people are the citizens huddling around the courthouse and our television sets to watch the spectacle unfold.

Michael Jackson's father and brothers locked him up in a hotel to force him to grow up and experience sexual pleasures with women. Michael was torn with practicing abstinence to follow the convictions and teachings of his mother who was a Jehova Witness. Michael did right in the eyes of God.

The sexual abuse he encountered as a child forced him to fear adults and live his life as a recluse. Michael slipped into a world of his own where he could live as Peter Pan. In his mind he never grew up as other children do.

If anyone were prosecuted it would be his promiscuous father or brothers for trying to force a child to have sex agaisnt his will. As a society of Christian people we owe Michael for taking a stand for abstinence.

Related Links:

http://mockingbird.chebucto.org/
http://www.lausd.k12.ca.us/Belmont_HS/tkm/
http://www.gradesaver.com/ClassicNotes/Titles/killmockingbird/
http://memory.loc.gov/ammem/ndlpedu/lessons/98/mock/intro.html
http://www.courttv.com/trials/jackson/
http://www.eonline.com/News/Items/0%2C1%2C8795%2C00.html

Bells
02-16-05, 09:59 PM
The plot of To Kill a Mockingbird is unfolding before our very eyes. The characters of Boo Radley and Tom Robinson are manifesting in the form of Michael Jackson. America is the small southern town of Maycomb County, Alabama. We the people are the citizens huddling around the courthouse and our television sets to watch the spectacle unfold.

Excuse me while I retch at your attempt to compare one of the greatest books written in the last hundred years(and one of my personal favourites) to one of the greatest freaks that came out of the last century.

You dare compare the characters of Boo and Tom to a person who covers his children's faces with veils, who dangled his son over a balcony, who sleeps with other people's children because it's a loving thing to do, who has had so much plastic surgery that his face looks like it's been put through a blender, who still lives the life of a child and who still thinks like a retarded child? You're comparing that nightmare figure to Boo and Tom? What in the hell are you smoking?

Let me guess, you'd gladly send your child to sleep in bed with MJ, because MJ just loooooves children so much and the only way to show that love is to flood them with expensive gifts and sleep in his bed. The man is a sexual predator. The only reason he's gotten away with it for so long is because he's rich. When a small child describes a man's genitals to the point of describing certain features of that individual's genitals, something is not right there.

Michael Jackson's father and brothers locked him up in a hotel to force him to grow up and experience sexual pleasures with women. Michael was torn with practicing abstinence to follow the convictions and teachings of his mother who was a Jehova Witness. Michael did right in the eyes of God.
They were probably worried when they saw him attracted to young children and tried to force him to have sex with a grown woman instead. And Michael did right in the eyes of God? Hmmm... Now there's a line for all peadophiles to use. 'I did right in the eyes of God your Honour'. Give me a break. When you are a grown man and you invite small children to come over for sleep overs in your bed, that is not right, be it in the eyes of any God or human being. The man lives in a mansion that looks like it's the dumpsite for disney memorabilia. You're telling me that he could not find other beds for those kids to sleep in? They had to sleep in his bed? And you think he did right in the eyes of some God? Ha!

The sexual abuse he encountered as a child forced him to fear adults and live his life as a recluse. Michael slipped into a world of his own where he could live as Peter Pan. In his mind he never grew up as other children do.
If he suffered sexual abuse, it would go some way to explain why he now sexually abuses children. He doesn't fear adults. Adults just don't do it for him. His mind has grown up. He just chooses to be a mental child so that children flock to him and view him as one of their own and he can then sit back and see which child is the ripest for the picking. The man is a predator. He picks children who are usually ill and poor, kids who'd be so happy that a star like him is paying them attention that they're either struck dumb or don't say anything because they probably think who'd believe them over someone like Wacko. He picks his victims well.

He acts like a child because it suits his purpose to do so. He sings about love and all that crap and about saving and loving the children, because in some sick part of his mind, hopping into bed with a child is a means to show love and to save them. Probably why he picks kids who are sick and poor. Peadophiles have been known to be the loving and adoring uncle or aunt, the great school teacher who's so good with kids, etc. Just because he sings about love and was UNICEF's rep doesn't mean a thing. He was simply trying to put himself in a better position to give himself more access to the children. Don't compare him to Boo or Tom from 'To Kill a Mockingbird'. You insult the book by doing so.

Dr Lou Natic
02-16-05, 10:52 PM
You're both right and wrong.
I don't believe there's anything cold and calculated about jackson's kidfucking antics.
He really does care for them. Kids with cancer really do make him sad.
He really does have a wierd complex about living as a child caused by his strict father.
He really does have children over because he legitimately likes playing with them, and he likes helping the disadvantaged ones and showing them a good time.
But he's immature. He does things like feed them alcohol because that makes him cool.
All the while he's not planning on fucking them. He's just enjoying himself like the rest of the kids, having water balloon fights, trampolining, go-kart racing, playing with the orang and feeding the girraffe.
After this fun day they're all tuckered out and it's time for a slumber party.
Senses are inflamed by games of truth or dare and cheeky kid talk under the covers.
Then jackson gets his boner, now the sexual thoughts are running through his mind. His wierd complex prohibits him from wielding his wang in the direction of adult females. He only feels comfortable around children, so thats his outlet for his sexual urges.

It's obvious he's a fucked up creature, but not a diabolical scheming villain.
He probably can't even grasp whats so wrong about it. I doubt there's any forced entry. It's like kids giggling around and looking at eachothers weiners, mj's just like the other kids he's hanging with, but jackson is physiologically a man, so he naturally desires more.

I'm not sure what to do with such a criminal. I think law is generally flawed because I don't believe anyone can really help being what they are. They're the result of their biology's reaction to their experiences.
But at the same time we can't have people fucking kids or eating babies or raping dogs just because "they can't help it".

Logically we're insulting our own intelligence to feel "anger" towards him, but at the same time we were never supposed to know this much about ourselves and anger is the natural reaction.
What should have happened by now is the parents of jackson's victims should have followed their urges to beat jackson to death.
Not necessarrily because he really "deserved" it, but because thats the way the world is.
The runt of the litter hasn't done anything to deserve being tormented to death by his fitter siblings, but it happens.

He can't help it, but his behaviour doesn't mesh with society so he simply has to be destroyed. Not with any malice, he simply has to be culled, removed.
He's not the only one by a long shot.

Gambit Star
02-17-05, 11:30 PM
I think that is a bit far fetched bells !

Michael Jackson is not a sexual predator, infact it is the media that he was once so indulged in that created that false character within him.
I believe Michael is extremely intimate being and that he just got carried away with the physical communication between him and his fellow children.

It is a big intimidating world out there and people like michael jackson have the presure of world-wide predators like the media.

Yes the man has done something extreme that should be review by the law (dangling his child over a balcony) and he does prove to show that he will go to any level to make a stance on his point.

Without people like him in this world, we are screwed. He spread the word of love and prosperity to millions around the world and we just throw him away like some McDonalds Big-Mac wrapper.

Judge yourself first and we will all see that alot our shit, isnt our shit at all !

cosmictraveler
02-18-05, 08:31 AM
I can't comment on what MJ is or isn't for his day in court has yet to come. To just think that a person is guilty of something isn't what law is all about. That is why we have the courts to find the truth,not the media trying to tell us what he is.

Perfect
02-20-05, 09:08 AM
Well gambit, he might spread the 'word of love and prosperity' all he wants, it wont change the fact that he likes to stick hes cock inside little kiddies.

As for dangling his child over the balcony... it's not hes child he was dangling. I'm pretty sure a child whose looks would make Hitler proud did not come from a black man.
He most likely has a skin disorder which destroys the pigmentation of the skin (vitiligo), but destroying melanocytes from your skin deliberately is pretty much impossible at the moment. And as for the kid.. well.. genes hold no matter what your decease is.

Why not find some kiddies who like getting raped everynight by a guy who looks like a burn victim, make everyone happy.

Assassin565
02-25-05, 04:41 PM
Fools to kill a mockingbird was not a story about religious persecution. If that was any part of the plot watsoever it was an incrediably small one. To kill a mockingbird was a story about innocence and about the persecution of black people in the south. As well as one man's idea that everyone should be treated as eqauls. Reilgion has almost nothing at all to do with the book