View Full Version : Tibetan Buddhists hate China's freedom


mountainhare
11-20-05, 12:27 AM
I was looking through some of my old threads on other forums, and I found one which made me smile. It relates to the 'Muslim terrorists hate our freedom!' generalization. The article is old (because I did post it last year, after all...)

http://www.studentsforafreetibet.org/article.php?id=504


Tibetan involved in terrorist bombing still in prison

Xinhua (Chinese state news agency)
December 30th, 2004

BEIJING, Dec. 30 (xinhua) -- The two-year probation period of an Tibetan monk, A'an Zhaxi, also known as Tenzin Delek Rinpoche sentenced to death is set to end on Jan. 26 next year, said the provincial court of southwest China's Sichuan Province Thursday.

According to Chinese law, the death sentence will be commuted to life in prison if the criminal does not violate the law again during the two-year probation, the court said.

Presently, A'an Zhaxi has abided by the rules in jail and committed no further crimes, said the chief warden of the prison.

The Tibentan monk was sentenced to death and two-year probation on Dec. 2, 2002, for financing and supporting a series of terrorist bombings and secession activities by the Intermediate People's Court of Tibetan Autonomous Prefecture of Garze in western Sichuan.
...
A'an Zhaxi was born in Litang County of Garze in Sichuan. From 2000 to 2002, he and another Tibetan man Lobeang Dondrup had plotted to commit a series of terrorist bombings and hand out leaflets advocating splittism, the court said.

A'an Zhaxi had provided explosives and funds for Lobsang Dondrup and written the leaflets, according to the court.

The latter man was convicted of detonating bombs and handing out leaflets in the downtown of the prefectures capital, at the house of a local living Buddha, at the front gate of the prefecture organ of Communist Party of China (CPA) and a public park at Chengdu, the provincial capital, which caused one person seriously injured, two lightly wounded and economic losses of about 800,000 Yuan(96,735 US dollars), from January 2001 to April, 2002.

He also committed a bombing in the office building of the local traffic police station in Garze on Oct. 3, 2001, killing one person and causing a loss of 290,000 Yuan (35,066 US dollars)

Lobsang Dondrup was sentenced to death on Dec. 2, 2002.


I've said it again and again in the past, and I'll say it once again. It's obvious that these Tibetan butcherers hate China's freedom. After all, China with its one-party 'democracy', its wonderful tolerance of varying religions, its great history of treating Chinese and Tibetans with compassion and dignity, and its gentle occupation of a 'land without people for a people without land' just demonstrates what a kind and benevolent occupier it is.

China walked into a land filled with barbarians, and taught them how to read (aka. it increased literacy). The average life expectancy of a Tibetan citizens has increased dramatically since Chinese occupation. So obviously, these Chinese are benevolent, caring parents to the children of Tibet. Since they took the 'empty' land and built it up into a 'successful' dominion, their land theft was justified. These ignorant Buddhist savages need to stop murdering poor innocent Chinese women and children.

Neildo
11-20-05, 01:57 PM
Heh, funny.

What's with his sentencing though?


The Tibentan monk was sentenced to death and two-year probation

Does that mean he's killed and then his spiritual appartition is on probation before being reincarnated or something?

- N

guthrie
11-20-05, 04:47 PM
I assume your being sarcastic about the CHinese occupation of tibet.

Neildo
11-20-05, 11:17 PM
I assume your being sarcastic about the CHinese occupation of tibet.

It depends on which side of the fence you're on. To some, that can be the god honest truth.

- N

Hapsburg
11-20-05, 11:22 PM
I assume your being sarcastic about the CHinese occupation of tibet.
Let us hope so.
But, just in case:
Mt. Hare, you do realize that when China took over and occupied tibet, they slaughtered thousands of tibetans, and forced the D.Lama into exile. Does that sound like good parenting to you? :bugeye:

mountainhare
11-21-05, 01:02 AM
guthrie:

I assume your being sarcastic about the CHinese occupation of tibet.

I think it's quite obvious that I'm being sarcastic when I say this:

After all, China with its one-party 'democracy', its wonderful tolerance of varying religions, its great history of treating Chinese and Tibetans with compassion and dignity, and its gentle occupation of a 'land without people for a people without land' just demonstrates what a kind and benevolent occupier it is.


Does my parody remind you guys of any other situations in the world (more than one at the moment...)?

guthrie
11-21-05, 01:06 PM
Sure. Its just I get confused sometimes, they all sound the same. And when the intelligent design crowd is making self parodying statements I really get confused.

mountainhare
11-22-05, 03:20 AM
guthrie:

Sure. Its just I get confused sometimes, they all sound the same. And when the intelligent design crowd is making self parodying statements I really get confused.

LOL, that's OK. I shouldn't be sarcastic so often, but it's become a habit. After listening to the same shit on forum after forum, you start to become rather cynical when regarding the intelligence of human beings.

Baron Max
11-22-05, 07:01 AM
..., you start to become rather cynical when regarding the intelligence of human beings.

Damned hard not to be cynical, ain't it! And what's worse is finding that the more you find out/know about humans in general, you realize that the "intelligence of humans" of which people love to claim, is really only a very damned small sampling of the human population.

Einstein was damned intelligent, but for all of HIS intelligence, what of the gazillion people who lived at the same time? Millions, perhaps billions, of humans are NOT intelligent, yet we cling to the idea that we're intelligent because of a few like Einstein, et. al. What is it ...wishful thinking? ...fantasy?

I don't see how people can look around at the world today and make any great claims to human "intelligence", do you? Really?

Baron Max