Theory / feminism/ blah yo ha yo see yo do

Discussion in 'Free Thoughts' started by Tnerb, Nov 9, 2008.

  1. Tnerb Banned Banned

    Messages:
    7,917
    As far as the whole debate/theory on feminism is concerned it is IMO that mens and womens superority rightly considered secret and to his or her self go unchallanged as far as men are concerned.

    Why do I make such a statement. I for one have not had the fortune or the fortunate, chance to have a woman explain such superority to me in front of me, it seems that men seem to get by with a seeming superority and this is evident, but mostly here I stress the women not expressing it to perhaps just myself.

    Regardless I ask with some concern or thought weather or not you think that men do have an uncontested and priviliged position to hold superority to those females?
    Any females, if the male is uncontested secretly in his superority.

    My opinion is that when a man is considering woman being inferior on whatever plane it is considered (it is considered afterall), he is considering the superority itself in face value, wondering if they could plesae explain it, as he feels a possibile superority.

    I came to the conclusion (yes, this is deep inbeded in theory, so feel free to bash, ridicule and delusional self-egocentirty yourselfs to death!) that a woman is blah, nothing, there is nothing there, there missing so much.

    But of course superority depends on different things, and the subject is not superority alone, or which gender you would prefer, to be or exist as, or anything similar, it is simply asking the question, how do you feel about uncontested or unchallanged superority?

    How would you feel a woman having a man say you are inferior all the time, with no good reason?

    or, a better one,

    What do you believe constitutes a womans superority (think hard).

    there is probably a different or better question, but I can't seem to find it. It evolves around mostly sex differences themselves.

    Sex differences, what do they revolve around. Feminism, I said, feminism, what contests what has been said in the past?

    What are we truly fighting aganist here people?
     
  2. Guest Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. cosmictraveler Be kind to yourself always. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    33,264
    I have not read a post yet that a woman says anything about being superior. It is only you that is making that allegation against them. I think that men have always belittled women and held them back throughout time. Equality is what I think they strive for just to have an even field to play upon.

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  4. Guest Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. Tnerb Banned Banned

    Messages:
    7,917
    Hosh.
    Total f'ing hosh

    (see itallics)

    Equality is what feminism and such is trying to abolish. Please read wikipedia or something which is aganist your ego.
     
  6. Guest Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. one_raven God is a Chinese Whisper Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    13,433
  8. Tnerb Banned Banned

    Messages:
    7,917
    You raven are basing your opinions on some book which ends with the best statement (one tiassa recently quoted, and by no means "deep"); it is therefore my opinion that you base your opinions on unfounded theory and have given far too little thought to the matter yourself (much less any genuine life experiences).....
     
  9. one_raven God is a Chinese Whisper Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    13,433
    No I'm not.

    Then you'd be dead wrong.

    I base my opinion on MANY books and articles written by the people within the movement and the actions I see those people taking.

    Judging by what I could decipher from your post above, you know absolutely nothing about the movement, what the people within it have/had to say or anything they have done.

    In other words, you silly, biased, uninformed opinions are worthless in the real world.
     
  10. Tnerb Banned Banned

    Messages:
    7,917
    Sorry raven but I give you no credit!

    You could easily re-read what I have said more sentimentally to get an understanding what I mean here.

    Your opinions are based off of some book, as is contrasted here with mine.
    Your many books are only many books and once again contested with mine due to the fact you suggest a book which I say in defense in previous post that you read such hosh instead of the full picture (the full picture being all of the books you have, read, of course....)

    But I see no instance of anything supportative or informative in regard to any of my posts.

    I await none, as they likly will not exist. You will run away calling me stuipd in your foolish manner......
     
  11. Tnerb Banned Banned

    Messages:
    7,917
    it is also obvious that the first sentence,

    As far as the whole debate/theory on feminism is concerned it is IMO that mens and womens superority rightly considered secret and to his or her self go unchallanged as far as men are concerned.

    Is a call out to those who appear to understand theory... in other words, asking those who believe to have some idea to consider the ideas presented (the ideas being entirely reasonable)

    That is to say... it is speculation, and it is not like I do not understand what I am saying... If you see above, I call simon de beavours final words the better of the words spoken (although not deep) through out the entire book; what then is needed, but a better explaination?

    Poor criticism of me I would believe.
    Terrible marksmenship of the sciforum bin.
     
  12. one_raven God is a Chinese Whisper Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    13,433
    The first sentence doesn't even make any sense.
    Try it in English this time.
     
  13. draqon Banned Banned

    Messages:
    35,006
    too bad there is no word that combines "sexualism" and "egocentrism" , sexualistic egocentrism.

    egosextruism perhaps?
     
  14. Tnerb Banned Banned

    Messages:
    7,917
    Why should I try again, if you can't even understand it?


    It is terrible to be criticized for something I understand you wrong as, should I really try again.

    To make you come back and respond perhaps?
    It makes sense if you read it. I'll stop there because it does.
     
  15. Mr. Hamtastic whackawhackado! Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    4,492
    sisyphus-marksmAnship. Do I have to follow you around? And the first post was pretty nonsensical, I'm afraid. Don't try to sound smart. Just make it so that people don't have to translate what you're saying to respond to it.
     
  16. Mr. Hamtastic whackawhackado! Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    4,492
    It is terrible to be criticized for something I understand you wrong as, should I really try again.

    Sisyphus. Read that aloud.
     
  17. Tnerb Banned Banned

    Messages:
    7,917
    bla bla bla here is some of that delusional self egocentricity as i mentionend.
     
  18. Mr. Hamtastic whackawhackado! Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    4,492
    As far as the whole debate/theory on feminism is concerned it is IMO that mens and womens superority rightly considered secret and to his or her self go unchallanged as far as men are concerned.

    what?
     
  19. Tnerb Banned Banned

    Messages:
    7,917
    Hamster,

    It is,

    TERRIBLE,

    to be cricized for,

    something I understand YOU,

    WRONG,

    AS.


    That makes perfect sense to me....
     
  20. Mr. Hamtastic whackawhackado! Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    4,492
    What are we truly fighting aganist here people?

    This one makes sense. Good job! What are we truly fighting against, indeed.
     
  21. Tnerb Banned Banned

    Messages:
    7,917
    As far as theory on femenism is concerned?>>>

    Perpahs theory of, feminism?

    it's my opinion,

    that men and womens (both of them!) superority go considered secret?
    That is, they hold it to theirselves (every one does)...

    And it goes secretly unchallanged.
    It's a simple beliefe held by someone , everyone, of course.

    ANd if this is not english then wtf
     
  22. draqon Banned Banned

    Messages:
    35,006
    Q: Are women the 2nd sex they proclaim themselves to be, meanwhile they are actually the controlling 1st sex?
     
  23. Tnerb Banned Banned

    Messages:
    7,917
    Eventually after understanding and understanding perfectly well what i've said (wondering where you fucked up the first time),

    You'll find that it makes entire sense, although it is a little maddening to read I do guess.
     

Share This Page