Taken from: http://www.actualfreedom.com.au/library/topics/i.htm 1. actual I – What I am is this flesh and blood body being apperceptively aware. The first person pronoun is not used here to refer to any psychological or psychic identity because in actuality there is nothing other than the physical – this carbon-based life-form being conscious. There is a consistent quality of perfection – an unvarying purity. Here is an on-going innocence, an ever-fresh magnanimity, which ensures a nobility in character that is vitalized as an endless benevolence – all effortlessly happening of its own accord. Thus probity is bestowed gratuitously – dispensing forever with the effort-filled vigilance to gain and maintain righteous virtue. One is free to be me as-I-am, benign and beneficial in disposition. One is able to be a model citizen, fulfilling all the intentions of the idealistic and unattainable moral strictures of ‘The Good’: being humane, being philanthropic, being altruistic, being beneficent, being considerate and so on. All this is achieved in a manner any ‘I’ could never foresee, for it comes effortlessly and spontaneously, doing away with the necessity for morality and ethicality completely. One is swimming in largesse. The Thesaurus particularly sums up ‘I’ very well. ‘I’ can only have a subjective sense of the actual world, for ‘I’ look out through these eyes, ‘I’ hear through these ears, ‘I’ touch with this skin, ‘I’ taste with this tongue, ‘I’ smell through this nose – for ‘I’ am located inside my head. The little man, or woman, inside the head who is pulling the levers and desperately trying to control ‘the show’. Given that ‘I’ exist inside my head (and heart), ‘I’ can only have a subjective view of the world and certainly not a direct sensate experience of what is actual. The spiritual view is that ‘I’ as the thinker is the issue and then one is extolled to actively encourage ‘me’ as the feeler to run rampant. My experience when I started to run with the question ‘How am I experiencing this moment of being alive’ was that it was feelings which continually and relentlessly emerged as my experiencing. "
Spatio-temporal Telekinetic Manifestation By Russell E. Rierson "Out of the multitude of our sense experiences we take, mentally and arbitrarily, certain repeatedly occurring complexes of sense impression... we attribute to them a meaning — the meaning of the bodily object. Considered logically this concept is not identical with the totality of sense impressions referred to; but it is an arbitrary creation of the human (or animal) mind. On the other hand, the concept owes its meaning and its justification exclusively to the totality of the sense impressions which we associate with it" --(Albert Einstein) The differing qualia states and the mind's "I" are nonalgorithmic processes - according to Penrose and others. If true, then the brain is a type of "quantum computer". Quantum mechanics is modeled on infinite linear spaces. But nonlinearity, nonalgorithmicism and nonlocality would all be intertwined within the universal quantum computer, not necessarily being an infinite space. For all intents and purposes, this universal quantum computer is equivalent to a gigantic self aware mind - qualia state - consciousness. The hypothesis is that Sub-space is a non-metric space with specific properties, such, that all points on a metric space are at the same point on sub-space, where the sub-space is in immediate contact with all points of the space-time metric. All events on subspace generate event ripples with curvature of constant radius, that overlap - intersect with other "circular" events. These events define the metric of space-time in accordance with Mach's principle. Space is a perception of separation between objects, events, phenomena i.e. reference points, because the concept of length, or distance interval is intimately connected to the notion of an event, which is irrevocably intertwined with space-time. An event is observed to be an occurrence or "happening" at one point in space and one point in time. A complicated phenomena, can therefore be analyzed in terms of a series or succession of individual events. The first event in the sequence is the initial happening. The sequential events/process spreads out as it evolves by contact with other events. The speed of a physical[massive] object moving at constant velocity, can only be defined in terms of another physical object. Each object's path becomes a sequence of events and the information of those events expands outwardly at the speed of light, with a closed curvature of constant radius. Events can only occur with respect to past events, due to the finite propagation speed of light. Space has no meaning if there are no events happening in it. All past event light-curves contain all future event light-curves. The metric of spacetime is therefore defined by events, such, that the events generate the metric of space-time. Because all points on the space-time metric are the same point on the sub-space and as events continue to overlap and evolve, certain invariant redundancies appear and re-appear. These redundancies are known as the "laws of physics" and they are the inevitable consequence of the geometric "invariance" properties of the continual "event overlap" process. Thus the observed macroscopic Lorentz invariance. When events A and B overlap - intersect, then, if the laws of physics for point A - must hold for point A on the space-time metric, then they MUST also hold for point B. Also, if the laws of physics for point B - must hold for point B on the space-time metric, then they must also hold for point A. Thus non locality is explained. When two events intersect, a third event is produced. Specific events can only be characterized with respect to other events and those overlapping of events can only occur within the metric of antecedent[past] events on the space-time metric, due to the fact that the propagation speed of light is finite. When the new event, X, is produced via the overlapping of events A, B, C, ... D,... then the new event is the combination of the informational states of A, B, C,...D,... Therefore the laws, and constants, of physics can evolve with time. The new laws that are derived, must still be logically consistent with the previously derived laws. By definition, sub-space is a non-linear space[noise] that allows deterministic signals and fluctuations to emerge and be sustained via stochastic resonance. It is an An infinite tower of strange looping - self similar turtles without the paradox. Consciousness is the inevitable combination of the information processing/computation of the universe with the apparent "non locality" of sub-space. Telekinetic phase synchronization occurs when the human psyche manifests a trans-temporal[ostensibly non-local] self referencing feedback loop with the apparent "outside" world/environment. This phenomena is essentially a stochastic resonance effect, where extremely weak deterministic signals become amplified via nonlinear noise factors. Small "self deterministic" perturbations in the phase synchronization occur from within the psyche itself and consequently become amplified manifestations, beholden to the biologic will OF the psyche itself. Of course, these strange psychic effects are extremely difficult to linearize into specific localized phenomena that would satisfy the strict criteria of the James Randi million dollar prize, due to the poor establishement of subcortical/limbic to outer cortex communication pathways. Alas, humans are only just at the beginning of their evolutionary journey. Due to the everpresent *one point* of sub-space connection to *all points* of the metric space, there is no actual mind separate "out of body" experience, because all points of space-time are the *same point* in sub-space. Though it is possible to shut down specific regions of a brain[and thus consciousness] with highly concentrated electromagnetic radiation, in effect, separating the cortex from the sub-cortex, inducing a coma for any particular "remote viewer" via scalar[longitudinal wave] technology.
