why are the size of male genitalia almost polite dinner conversations ,when the mention of the size of womens sexual dimensions would be so ungentlemanly ?

...I wasn't aware that such a topic was considered a "polite dinner topic." Maybe we have different definitions of such.

~Fatal

why are the size of male genitalia almost polite dinner conversations

Who the hell do you have dinner with?!

Perhaps he means the conversations which happen at Macdonalds, after a hard-nights drinking by teenagers?

Originally posted by twobob
why are the size of male genitalia almost polite dinner conversations ,when the mention of the size of womens sexual dimensions would be so ungentlemanly ? Yes, I can see how this is philosophically perplexing! You're not even allowed to talk about a woman's 'Kant' at the dinner table. It would be interesting though: "Have a seat Tom and Jenny. Nice of you to visit us after all these years. Food's gonna be ready in a minute. By the way, do you guys have a 'good fit' in the genital area? You know, do you have 'incongruous counterparts'?!" (my Kant joke - sorry - I'll get my coat...)

Its true.
Maybe not polite dinner conversation with the duke of york or something but it is generally more accepted to discuss the size of wangs than the size of tangs.
Dicks seem to be more the equivalent of tits in todays society.
Me and my friend were once approached by drunk girls outside a club who said they would show us their tits if we showed them our cocks, of course we obliged but the next day I thought "why?"
We should have demanded to see vaginas and given them no more than an eyeful of scrotum in exchange for the amateurish glimpse of tits we recieved.
:mad:
Its accepted sexism and it must stop! I demand to see more vaginas!

Originally posted by The Duke
You're not even allowed to talk about a woman's 'Kant' at the dinner table.

Kant? What kind of screwed up spelling/pronunciation is that? Just don't want to be TOO vulgar on the forums? Just come right out and say it, cunt cunt cunt cunn-y cun- cunt!

Also I don't know that it's more appropriate to talk about the genitals of a male or those of a female in any universal sense. I think it depends who you're talking to, I've never experienced this kind of separation.

Well, I wouldn't call it polite dinner conversation, but true that it is generally more acceptable to talk about male parts than female parts.

Is this sexist? You bet it is!

That is quite strange, i have never discussed the dynamics of male genitalia at a dinner table before......only with a girl though,alone with her, to get her hot,and...........and then i......................well anyways, i dont think that it is acceptable to talk about either genders parts at a formal dinner table......unless someone else other than yourself strikes up the conversation.....so atleast you cant be frowned upon for talking about such poppycock(always wanted to use that word)...:p

Originally posted by Dr Lou Natic
Dicks seem to be more the equivalent of tits in todays society.


Good point.

Discussing the size of dicks is about on par with social acceptibility of discussing the size of tits.

Unfair, maybe, but that's what we get for being so free with showing OUR tits.
If our tits were less available than they are (like women's are), maybe they would be a more valued commoditiy and we would have an equal number of naughty bits.

maybe they would be a more valued commoditiy and we would have an equal number of naughty bits.-oneraven





now who would want that..........:p

Originally posted by Guyute
maybe they would be a more valued commoditiy and we would have an equal number of naughty bits.-oneraven





now who would want that..........:p

Good point.
But it is better than the opposite approach.
If all women showed their tits all the time they wouldn't be so exciting anymore.
If you eat chocolate everyday then chocolate is not such a treat anymore.

I prefer tits to be treats.

"I prefer tits to be treats."-oneraven






What a qoute(applause)........i love you man(tear):p

Originally posted by Dr Lou Natic
Its true.

Its accepted sexism and it must stop! I demand to see more vaginas!

Is this the new-man mantra or what ? ;)

Male genetalia the topic of discussion at a dinner table...I've heard women talking about dildos but not guys talking about their pride and joy (or shame) at the table. Not with other guys....nor with a group of women. As Guyute says only with a woman and on her own. That's all I've done. Do you know how inappropriate it is just to walk up to someone and talk about your manhood?
And that is a valid point about penis' becoming the equivilent to breasts.
What about tounges, I consider that to be a sexual part of the anatomy? Though I've rarely experienced a full blown conversation about tounges and their sizes and ability to move about :bugeye:

But let me get this clear, because men only have 1 thing and women have 2, they can pick and choose which one is more important while men have to deal with what they have? This is an outrage, I demand that breasts be relegated to a more lowly position! I mean guys have them, just without the...protrudingness (is that a word?)

where are the buckets ,caves, chasms of lore? the re-boned legs of lamb ?
come on guys, wheres your imagination? the girls have let the cat out of the bag, why cant we snigger at their wedding tackle?

You want us to use crude words like that? I for one won't. I prefer to treat this area with respect and wonder.

Oh man I'm so prudish, honestly I'm not that prudish!!

Originally posted by Mystech
Kant? What kind of screwed up spelling/pronunciation is that? Just don't want to be TOO vulgar on the forums? My apologies. I thought that this was a PHILOSOPHY forum, which was why I mentioned the great Kant (http://www.arts.cuhk.edu.hk/Philosophy/Kant/cpr/). All you lot who've studied philosophy will understand (I think!).

Thor I am one of the most prudish man you could know ...but I am so proud to be part of a forum that excepts the true meaning of our discussions, without a kneejerk reaction to expletives..
we need a womans perspective here I think.

I agree with fataltalon (again): 'why are the size of male genitalia almost polite dinner conversations?' As far as I'm aware...it isn't!