"The universe can be described as a series of infinitely multiplying negative-positive relativities that interact by the very matter of their own complexity"


...Agree/Dissagree?

I don't understand it, so I can't say either way.

I agree to disagree. A series of infinitely multiplying negative-positive relativities would by its own definition be so inherently complex, that its interaction would require an infinite amount of energy between the negative-positive relativities in such a way that the very matter of the complexity involved, would become complex as opposed to real.

In other words: English please. And we mean that particular brand of "English" that most people speak.

Bye!

Crisp

Imagine this..you have marble. Inside this marble is a charge; it is neither negative nor positive because there is no other charges to compare it to. This charge splits in half--only because it can. It is now two different charges, which can be designated 'negative' and 'positive'. These charges keep splitting and interacting forming energy, and some fuse together based on their denomination. They continually grow and each fusing interacts differently with the others producing varying complexities which can only be described as relative to eachother. These interactions produce the existence of..well, basically anything.

...Imagine this being the universe


I apologize for my lack of clarity earlier on this matter

Unreg

Sure, why not. If something is wrong with this, it would probably be the simplicity.

There is one troubling issue: it spits because it can. I'm going to say that I disagree with this.

The Rights of Existence--I can do anything I am capable of without explanation or law just because I can; It is equally your right to stop me.

Or in other words your trying to expand your usual and fairly useless political outlook into the realm of physics?

Originally posted by guthrie
Or in other words your trying to expand your usual and fairly useless political outlook into the realm of physics?

No, chief, my usual and fairly useless political outlook was already in physics and thats were I found it..the right of existence..doing anything merely because you can and/or want to is found in my political manifest as well was my atomic and physical manifestos.

Ahhh, your the sort of person that civilisation was set up to keep under control before you damaged things. So randroids are trying to bend physics to their will now?

Originally posted by guthrie
Ahhh, your the sort of person that civilisation was set up to keep under control before you damaged things.


Guthrie, dear...civilization was not set up to keep people under control...civilization is about oppurtunity in survival.



Unreg

And, oddly enough, limiting peoples behaviour to some extent helps their survival. funny that.

Originally posted by guthrie
And, oddly enough, limiting peoples behaviour to some extent helps their survival. funny that.


...I said it didn't. funny that.


Unreg

And yet, civilisation is also good at keeping people under control. Does that still mean it was not set up to keep people under control?