So you want to know about the Jew, do you? Deceptive, hypocritical, the perceptive acuity of Cheerios and snot, he will pillage a forum with threads such as

Ok this thrrad kinda talks about s*x so sorry don't read it if it if y don't like that kinda stuff.

So my friends were like talking about how i'm a virgin. They were basicly saying how great it is and how they feel sorry for me that I don't do that...
This and
Ok just for SHICH...since he wanted equal opportunity lol
Who do you think are the "hottest, studliest" SciForums men?
Off the top of my head from what I remember or from the pictures I have seen.

Nietzschefan
Shichimenshyo
Enmos ( but he doesn't have a pic here i can post)
this...yet accuse little Gendanken of covering the forum in ‘shit’. Rich!!

An infant caught with his diapers down with the gall to accuse someone else of taking a dump- that’s what Jew are.

Oh, when willy Jew ever learn that I won? I came here, yelled and yelled an infantile ‘cunt’, and the meek, impressionable little female sheep that ewe are you bit- that’s right, you bit as in baited as in look-at-you-now-that-I-am-done-with-my-‘rampage’.
Jew, who actually sit here threatening to cut someone’s balls for disagreeing with your quantum theory on Crayolas and soap, were literally inveighing for Gendanken's banning on account of her being exactly what Jew are.

And how many moderators had to put up with your moral outrage thereafter?


Your gift to me was showing precisely how much these moderators, putting up with your moral bigotry and bullshit on a daily basis with little executive power to actually ban you, actually hate Jew.

We’ve all read the god-offal posts; yet I’m the one that’s covered Sciforums in shit.
Twenty nine thousand five hundred and sixteen members, all of which have procured a colossal 1,717,363 posts on this site, 1/5 of which is Shorty_37 rubbing her clit for the nerds, 4/5 of which are nerds posting back and forth about it.

And for all those that have presumed I'm a Nazi based only on the employment of language, thank Jew dearly but, as Garry Kasparov would say, checkmate and game over.
Mwahhahahahahhahaa.............
On to moderate!!

Jew are so clever when jew get anti-termite.

This is only the beforemath.

(Can you believe these people?)

What's the point of reading the threads, man, if it entails rummaging through pages and pages and pages of bric-a-brac.

*edit: but as I understand it, as moderator, you are suppose to, if not obligated, to read each and every post. Ha.

Twenty nine thousand five hundred and sixteen members, all of which have procured a colossal 1,717,363 posts on this site, 1/5 of which is Shorty_37 rubbing her clit for the nerds, 4/5 of which are nerds posting back and forth about it.

With your 4,076 posts you have a part in it ...

Oh, the self-irony.

With your 4,076 posts you have a part in it ...

Oh, the self-irony.
Guano.
I can only presume you're an old timer- has it ever been this bad?

A thread barely makes it 5 minutes in here and its suddenly soared to 10 pages. You come back and can barely find your last post in the noise.

edit: but as I understand it, as moderator, you are suppose to, if not obligated, to read each and every post. Ha.
OOOHhhhh...

Call me a moderator again. Do it....

No, my g-spot would be learning you had Kaposi's sarcoma.

(come on..say it)

Just another religion that wants to manipulate people within it to adhere to their own views on life and death. Just like every other religion we have they are only there to convince others that they are the way to GOD. I've met very shrewed Catholics, Chinese and many others that would take advantage of anyone when and if they could. Greed has no boundaries and people in general are greedy no matter what they call themselves.:(

Guano.
I can only presume you're an old timer- has it ever been this bad?

A thread barely makes it 5 minutes in here and its suddenly soared to 10 pages. You come back and can barely find your last post in the noise.

It's the human condition to post that much.
It's the human condition to be upset over such posting.

Call me a moderator again. Do it....Gendanken is really mod.

Offensive - again.

Offensive - again.

Islamofascism anyone?

So you want to know about the Jew, do you? Deceptive, hypocritical, the perceptive acuity of Cheerios and snot, he will pillage a forum with threads such as


This and

this...yet accuse little Gendanken of covering the forum in ‘shit’. Rich!!

An infant caught with his diapers down with the gall to accuse someone else of taking a dump- that’s what Jew are.

Oh, when willy Jew ever learn that I won? I came here, yelled and yelled an infantile ‘cunt’, and the meek, impressionable little female sheep that ewe are you bit- that’s right, you bit as in baited as in look-at-you-now-that-I-am-done-with-my-‘rampage’.
Jew, who actually sit here threatening to cut someone’s balls for disagreeing with your quantum theory on Crayolas and soap, were literally inveighing for Gendanken's banning on account of her being exactly what Jew are.

And how many moderators had to put up with your moral outrage thereafter?


Your gift to me was showing precisely how much these moderators, putting up with your moral bigotry and bullshit on a daily basis with little executive power to actually ban you, actually hate Jew.

We’ve all read the god-offal posts; yet I’m the one that’s covered Sciforums in shit.
Twenty nine thousand five hundred and sixteen members, all of which have procured a colossal 1,717,363 posts on this site, 1/5 of which is Shorty_37 rubbing her clit for the nerds, 4/5 of which are nerds posting back and forth about it.

And for all those that have presumed I'm a Nazi based only on the employment of language, thank Jew dearly but, as Garry Kasparov would say, checkmate and game over.
Mwahhahahahahhahaa.............
On to moderate!!

what in the holy fuck is your problem?

what in the holy fuck is your problem?

For real. Makes you wonder what she's like in person.

For real. Makes you wonder what she's like in person.

I bet she loves to hug and kiss. Among other things. :p

Pulling the chain again.:(

Islamofascism anyone?

I'm sorry: does that mean all Muslims? Like any fascism must mean all of a given country's inhabitants or something? Or not? In the way that Gendanken's little phrase means.

Hmm. Points to ponder, Samwise.

Wow....this thread makes you look like a real bitch.

I'm sorry: does that mean all Muslims? Like any fascism must mean all of a given country's inhabitants or something? Or not? In the way that Gendanken's little phrase means.

Hmm. Points to ponder, Samwise.

Are all Muslims profiled by Islamofascism?

No. Are all Jewish people profiled by Gendanken's phrase? Yes. Next?

No. Are all Jewish people profiled by Gendanken's phrase? Yes. Next?
Both false, explicitly so.

Any Muslim is profiled under Islamofascism

And some non Muslims (Is Obama secretly a Muslim??????????????)

And spidergoat is not offended by gendy.

Well, these two threads have been just a fascinating exploration of Gendanken's bigotry, and Sam's willingness to defend and use that bigotry. If you'll excuse me, good day.

Best,

Geoff

Your paranoia you mean

Your paranoia you mean

:roflmao:

Both false, explicitly so.

Nope. Define how "the" separates a group of political thought from the whole, or how it refers to a particular subset of the group being described, especially when used without any adjectives, as Gen and you use it. Should be easy.

Any Muslim is profiled under Islamofascism

Nope. Salim Mansur. Next.

And spidergoat is not offended by gendy.

And? Hitler wouldn't have been offended by Oberst Gendanken either.

Good day.

Geoff

Nope. Define how "the" separates a group of political thought from the whole, or how it refers to a particular subset of the group being described, especially when used without any adjectives, as Gen and you use it. Should be easy.



Nope. Salim Mansur. Next.



And? Hitler wouldn't have been offended by Oberst Gendanken either.

Good day.

Geoff

You just called a Jewish guy Hitler.

ANTI-SEMITE!!!!:eek:

Bizarre thread we have here.

Geoff is too easy :D

And you are appalling provocative.

Edit: No.. it's really is appalling, sorry.

So you want to know about the Jew, do you?

Jew say the sweetest things...

And you are appalling.

Darn I was aiming for provocative. :(:bawl:

Darn I was aiming for provocative. :(:bawl:

Fine. ^^

Fine. ^^

You should know me by now. :D

You should know me by now. :D

Seriously though SAM, why are you so dishonest in certain discussions. Pretending you don't understand what is meant etc... why ? Is it entertaining to you ?

Seriously though SAM, why are you so dishonest in certain discussions. Pretending you don't understand what is meant etc... why ? Is it entertaining to you ?

Socratic dialogue.

Socratic dialogue.

I don't see the connection.

Twenty nine thousand five hundred and sixteen members, all of which have procured a colossal 1,717,363 posts on this site, 1/5 of which is Shorty_37 rubbing her clit for the nerds, 4/5 of which are nerds posting back and forth about it.


Not quite sure what this has to do with "The Jew" :shrug: but anyway.
Has anybody told you that you are doing a great job as the new Mod? :rolleyes:
Maybe you could just have me and all the nerds banned, since we don't meet your intellectual standards.

Socratic dialogue.
:shh: :spank:

I don't see the connection.

Skilled debators are usually sure they will win the debate, more than that: they are sure their position is morally higher than the opponent's, or at least they aim that their position will be morally higher than their opponent's.

Those debators don't necessarily know yet in advance how exactly they are going to win (using what means, what arguments?), but they are pretty sure they will win.

This gives them a sense of holding the higher ground.

From that sense of higher ground, they can deliberately employ even logical fallacies or pretend to be stupid if they anticipate that this way, they will be able to elicit an admission from the opponent that the opponent would normally not give or not be aware of.

:shh: :spank:

I'm blushing. :p

But - If you do hold the higher moral ground, then my speaking the way I do should not threaten it, no?

I'm blushing. :p

But - If you do hold the higher moral ground, then my speaking the way I do should not threaten it, no?

I enjoy your posts, they make me feel positively transparent. Its a unique feeling. :o

Thank you. :)

Skilled debators are usually sure they will win the debate, more than that: they are sure their position is morally higher than the opponent's, or at least they aim that their position will be morally higher than their opponent's.

Those debators don't necessarily know yet in advance how exactly they are going to win (using what means, what arguments?), but they are pretty sure they will win.

This gives them a sense of holding the higher ground.

From that sense of higher ground, they can deliberately employ even logical fallacies or pretend to be stupid if they anticipate that this way, they will be able to elicit an admission from the opponent that the opponent would normally not give or not be aware of.

If you refrain from discussing in any meaningful way, you can't say you've won the argument. In fact SAM tries to deliberately kill the discussion so she will not lose. That's not winning.
Furthermore, if winning an argument is more important to her then being honest I won't be discussion anything with her again.

Skilled debators are usually sure they will win the debate, more than that: they are sure their position is morally higher than the opponent's, or at least they aim that their position will be morally higher than their opponent's.

Those debators don't necessarily know yet in advance how exactly they are going to win (using what means, what arguments?), but they are pretty sure they will win.

This gives them a sense of holding the higher ground.

From that sense of higher ground, they can deliberately employ even logical fallacies or pretend to be stupid if they anticipate that this way, they will be able to elicit an admission from the opponent that the opponent would normally not give or not be aware of.

Is there a cure for that?:D

Is there a cure for that?:D

There is no cure for arrogance.

If you refrain from discussing in any meaningful way, you can't say you've won the argument. In fact SAM tries to deliberately kill the discussion so she will not lose. That's not winning.
Furthermore, if winning an argument is more important to her then being honest I won't be discussion anything with her again.

Lord, give me strength http://us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/mesg/emoticons6/24.gif

Lord, give me strength http://us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/mesg/emoticons6/24.gif

Say it isn't true then.

Say it isn't true then.

The objective is not to "win" the debate, but to WIN the debate. ;)

The objective is not to "win" the debate, but to WIN the debate. ;)

The distinction being.. ?
So you try to win even though you KNOW you are wrong ? Seriously, is that what you are saying ?

Jew guys are just proving her right.

Jew guys are just proving her right.

Jew are right. :p

No answer then.. ? :rolleyes:

I came back!

You just called a Jewish guy Hitler.

ANTI-SEMITE!!!!

:rolleyes: No, I didn't, and no, I'm not. Yet another difference we have?

Geoff is too easy :D

You wish. ;)

From that sense of higher ground, they can deliberately employ even logical fallacies or pretend to be stupid if they anticipate that this way, they will be able to elicit an admission from the opponent that the opponent would normally not give or not be aware of.

This explains much.

Jew guys are just proving her right.

No, not really.

Geoff

The way the word "Jew" is being thrown around. I would love to know why I got infracted for this, and then I was accused of being rude and racist.

http://www.sciforums.com/showpost.php?p=1451194&postcount=43

Im rubbing my clit right now!

You can't, so who's is it ? :D

I dont know I got if off some dead chick

I dont know I got if off some dead chick

Yikes, what good does that do ?

Yikes, what good does that do ?

:shrug: Not sure I just wear it as a necklace.

Its always interesting to see who gendy brings out of their closets. :D

Sams rubbing all over her clit right now.

:shrug: Not sure I just wear it as a necklace.

omg lolz....
Oh come on... you were like rubbing it!
It must be like some good luck charm or something...

So omg please like me.. ok

omg lolz....
Oh come on... you were like rubbing it!
It must be like some good luck charm or something...

So omg please like me.. ok

Omg you are like totally mocking me omg like ok Im like totally about to cry cud you maybe like try 2 be nicer, omg like could anyone help me find the clit?

Omg you are like totally mocking me omg like ok Im like totally about to cry cud you maybe like try 2 be nicer, omg like could anyone help me find the clit?

:roflmao:

Awesome !

If you refrain from discussing in any meaningful way, you can't say you've won the argument. In fact SAM tries to deliberately kill the discussion so she will not lose. That's not winning.

One, the fact is that some arguments can't be won by regular humans. I mean this seriously.

Two, during a debate, it might turn out that Debator 1 is perceived as immoral by Debator 2. It is impossible to reasonably discuss with those one perceives to be immoral, so in such cases, Debator 2 will cut the debate short (which can be done simply by quitting in silence, but also by throwing a few more stones).

Three, the reason why we have Q fests seems to be that SAM thinks Q is also employing similar strategies as she does; ie. that his cheap shots and low blows are not his genuine stance, but merely a strategy. This way, the debate between them can go on until they are too exhausted to continue.


Furthermore, if winning an argument is more important to her then being honest I won't be discussion anything with her again.

To me, this is a false dilemma.

Just because someone declares they have won an argument does not mean I have to agree with them. If in my estimation, they have not won the argument, then this is what matters to me, not their declaration of victory.

Winning an argument is what debates are there for. We are after the truth and when we try to arrive at it via debate, winning is what matters.

One, the fact is that some arguments can't be won by regular humans. I mean this seriously.

Two, during a debate, it might turn out that Debator 1 is perceived as immoral by Debator 2. It is impossible to reasonably discuss with those one perceives to be immoral, so in such cases, Debator 2 will cut the debate short (which can be done simply by quitting in silence, but also by throwing a few more stones).

Three, the reason why we have Q fests seems to be that SAM thinks Q is also employing similar strategies as she does; ie. that his cheap shots and low blows are not his genuine stance, but merely a strategy. This way, the debate between them can go on until they are too exhausted to continue.




To me, this is a false dilemma.

Just because someone declares they have won an argument does not mean I have to agree with them. If in my estimation, they have not won the argument, then this is what matters to me, not their declaration of victory.

Winning an argument is what debates are there for. We are after the truth and when we try to arrive at it via debate, winning is what matters.

I object.
Debates are not for winning arguments, debates are for getting to the truth.
I consider SAM's tactics to be dishonest in a debate.

Its always interesting to see who gendy brings out of their closets. :D

...the aggrieved?

Just a guess.

Debates are not for winning arguments, debates are for getting to the truth.

And how are you going to get to the truth in a debate,
unless you win the argument?

Is there a cure for that?:D

Yes. Pick your battles wisely.

Three, the reason why we have Q fests seems to be that SAM thinks Q is also employing similar strategies as she does; ie. that his cheap shots and low blows are not his genuine stance, but merely a strategy. This way, the debate between them can go on until they are too exhausted to continue.

You have doubts?

And how are you going to get to the truth in a debate,
unless you win the argument?

By being honest.

You have doubts?

I find it hard to accept that Q's presented stances are what he really believes. He droppped a few hints here and there that made me reconsider his input, like the brain in a vat avatar or when he said he doesn't deal in truths. I might be wrong, of course.
But be that as it may, his militant atheist ways have actually diverted me from entering many discussions with him and those who hold similar stances as he does; which has spared me some time and energy - which I have used for better purposes. :)

I find it hard to accept that Q's presented stances are what he really believes. He droppped a few hints here and there that made me reconsider his input, like the brain in a vat avatar or when he said he doesn't deal in truths. I might be wrong, of course.

Yeah, he's pretty careful, so its hard to tell.:D

But be that as it may, his militant atheist ways have actually diverted me from entering many discussions with him and those who hold similar stances as he does; which has spared me some time and energy - which I have used for better purposes. :)

I should take a leaf out of your book.

By being honest.

For one, this is so idealistic, and unrealistic.
What does it mean to be "honest"?
I started a thread How come people lie? (http://www.sciforums.com/showthread.php?t=79566) - check in there.
People normally have a mess of thoughts and intentions present in their minds, and to be "honest" would mean to communicate all of them. Which is impossible.
So for all practical purposes, we normally come up with narratives where each one action is said to have one cause - and this we then call "honesty". But which is really far from the truth.

Which brings me to my second point:
If one is seeking to arrive at the truth via debate, then one has to win the argument in order to arrive at the truth.
If you have a problem with the notion of winning arguments, then you need to rethink why you enter debates in the first place and what exactly is your stake in them.

For one, this is so idealistic, and unrealistic.
What does it mean to be "honest"?
I started a thread How come people lie? (http://www.sciforums.com/showthread.php?t=79566).
People normally have a mess of thoughts and intentions present in their minds, and to be "honest" would mean to communicate all of them. Which is impossible.
So for all practical purposes, we normally come up with narratives where each one action is said to have one cause - and this we then call "honesty". But which is really far from the truth.

Which brings me to my second point:
If one is seeking to arrive at the truth via debate, then one has to win the argument in order to arrive at the truth.
If you have a problem with the notion of winning arguments, then you need to rethink why you enter debates in the first place and what exactly is your stake in them.

What is the point of any debate if the debaters can't be trusted to be honest ?
Also, do you say that whoever wins the argument decides what the truth is ?
The winner is always right, even when he's not ???

In soviet Russia, forum shit on Jew!

What is the point of any debate if the debaters can't be trusted to be honest ?

As far as the debate is concerned, this is beside the point.
The debate is not about the debaters, but about the arguments they present. If you choose a debate as your way to arrive at trtuh, then you must take this into consideration.


Also, do you say that whoever wins the argument decides what the truth is ?
The winner is always right, even when he's not ???

If someone wins a debate, how could they not be right?
They must have won for some reason - their arguments have obviously defeated the opponent's arguments.
Again, if you choose a debate as your way to arrive at trtuh, then you must take this into consideration.

As far as the debate is concerned, this is beside the point.
The debate is not about the debaters, but about the arguments they present. If you choose a debate as your way to arrive at trtuh, then you must take this into consideration.




If someone wins a debate, how could they not be right?
They must have won for some reason - their arguments have obviously defeated the opponent's arguments.
Again, if you choose a debate as your way to arrive at trtuh, then you must take this into consideration.

I'm sorry but I don't agree.
Thanks for your answers though :)

Why are you sorry for disagreeing?

Why are you sorry for disagreeing?

Heh, it originally said something else, but I thought you might take offense at it.

Also, I'm disagreeing to such a extent that I won't be debating you about it anymore.

I just thought it was appropriate to say sorry :)

Sweets, debates are for people with rhinoceros hides, not for those who might take offense at a few words typed on an internet forum.

Sweets, debates are for people with rhinoceros hides, not for those who might take offense at a few words typed on an internet forum.

I said that your take on it was lame. That was uncalled for, and frankly I just meant that I disagreed :)

I'm being nice. :)
A nice smile on my face.

hehe

Its always interesting to see who gendy brings out of their closets. :D
Whose gay?
Oops. I mean 'who's gay?'.

hehe

http://blogsimages.skynet.be/images/000/090/576_Rasist,%20hehe.jpg

Not quite sure what this has to do with "The Jew" :shrug: but anyway.
Has anybody told you that you are doing a great job as the new Mod? :rolleyes:
Maybe you could just have me and all the nerds banned, since we don't meet your intellectual standards.

i don't think that person has intellectual standards but thinks everyone should like like they do

I find it hard to accept that Q's presented stances are what he really believes. He droppped a few hints here and there that made me reconsider his input, like the brain in a vat avatar or when he said he doesn't deal in truths. I might be wrong, of course.
But be that as it may, his militant atheist ways have actually diverted me from entering many discussions with him and those who hold similar stances as he does; which has spared me some time and energy - which I have used for better purposes.

Better purposes, meaning that you have yet to demonstrate a single theist claim you've presented thus far and know damn well that's where you'll save time and energy; remaining impotent.

I don't use the same tactics as Sam or many other theists here, that of being intellectually dishonest and bold faced lying.

Better purposes, meaning that you have yet to demonstrate a single theist claim you've presented thus far and know damn well that's where you'll save time and energy; remaining impotent.

I don't use the same tactics as Sam or many other theists here, that of being intellectually dishonest and bold faced lying.

1. He's not a thiest, he's agnostic

2. Damn, so there really isn't anything more to you? What a waste of time!:bawl::wave:

At least I'm not a liar. :wave:

Spider:

Jew guys are just proving her right.
Aren't they.
These sweet, fragile children of god so Jung and easily Freudened?
Its amazing what falls out when you fondle the dark parts.

pj:
pjdude
what in the holy fuck is your problem?

You.

Shorty;

Not quite sure what this has to do with "The Jew" but anyway.
Has anybody told you that you are doing a great job as the new Mod?

I've yet to mod, suckling.

Maybe you could just have me and all the nerds banned, since we don't meet your intellectual standards
Why should I?
I too dedicate my philosophical hour (3 a.m) to the mysteries of who could possibly be the hottest guy on the forums, April Fool's pranks, and the teleological subtelties of Saw movies.

I too do not consider this a McDonald's happy meal but "amazingly imaginative and detailed" art-
http://img517.imageshack.us/img517/6224/shortysartip2.png


And you've not only bred, but have about 7 years worth of that brat atoning for you being damaged goods.
Enmos:
Debates are not for winning arguments, debates are for getting to the truth.
I
Truth is only what each 'debater' is prepared to believe.

Ever got enraged at the car in front of you only to find that his car was stalled?
You can sit there for hours screaming that he move but some hour it will hit you that he's completely incapable of moving.
You, like every one else in the world, are completely incapable of motion when the applied force is external; you will only mobilize what you call 'reason' when your emotions prepare you for it.

Whatever comes out is what you call 'truth'.

Well, these two threads have been just a fascinating exploration of Gendanken's bigotry
"Exploration" requires that you read the fucking things.

Which you don't.
Pretty cheeky, eh? Running all over the place with a progress report like a drunken imbecile with a secret he's barely deciphered.

Actually, I do read the fucking things. Do you?

Don't bother to insult me. You're a kindergarten reject. Seek help. Or show us your marvellous secret, if you knew what it was.

Spider:

Aren't they.
These sweet, fragile children of god so Jung and easily Freudened?
Its amazing what falls out when you fondle the dark parts.

pj:

You.

Shorty;

I've yet to mod, suckling.


Why should I?
I too dedicate my philosophical hour (3 a.m) to the mysteries of who could possibly be the hottest guy on the forums, April Fool's pranks, and the teleological subtelties of Saw movies.

I too do not consider this a McDonald's happy meal but "amazingly imaginative and detailed" art-
http://img517.imageshack.us/img517/6224/shortysartip2.png


And you've not only bred, but have about 7 years worth of that brat atoning for you being damaged goods.
Enmos:

Truth is only what each 'debater' is prepared to believe.

Ever got enraged at the car in front of you only to find that his car was stalled?
You can sit there for hours screaming that he move but some hour it will hit you that he's completely incapable of moving.
You, like every one else in the world, are completely incapable of motion when the applied force is external; you will only mobilize what you call 'reason' when your emotions prepare you for it.

Whatever comes out is what you call 'truth'.


"Exploration" requires that you read the fucking things.

Which you don't.
Pretty cheeky, eh? Running all over the place with a progress report like a drunken imbecile with a secret he's barely deciphered.

your problems are clearly more deep rooted than me. what were you rejected by a jew and now you hate them

your problems are clearly more deep rooted than me. what were you rejected by a jew and now you hate them

Interestingly, I have never even met a Jew in my life, nor heard much about them as far as actual personal interaction goes. I only know of them from books, films, other people's stories.

My first emotional reaction connected to the notion of Jew is negativity.
It can't be personal, since I never had anything personally to do with any Jews, nor did my relatives.

In common parliance, we have phrases like "the stingy Jew", "weep like a Jew", "the eternal Jew", "holocaust survivor Jew", "the Jews killed Jesus". Common parliance already teaches us negativity toward Jews, in a similar manner that common parliance teaches us negative bias toward blondes. It happens before one even becomes aware of it, long before one is able to create oneself one's own image of Jews.

Not to mention that from early on, we were shown pictures and films of Jews in Nazi concentration camps, all skin and bones, hollow eyes. Those were not appealing images. Those images didn't instill in me a positive evaluation of being Jewish.

So how can I -and those like me- be blamed for having a negative image of Jews, when from early on, we were fed a negative image of Jews. Society has basically taught us to think of Jews in negative terms.

Geoff,

Actually, I do read the fucking things. Do you?

Do you?
Then, you know that this thread is not even about jews, yes?


Greenberg,

This thread has nothing to do with Jews. You're off-topic.

This thread has nothing to do with Jews. You're off-topic.

I have my own agenda.

Ah. Now I'm seeing what's going on. A strong wind blew in from the East, and now all those pretty and colorful balloons are being bursted. Pop. Pop. Pop.

(Gendanken: that was hilarious. You even caught her looking straight into the headlights. Lol)

Ever got enraged at the car in front of you only to find that his car was stalled?
You can sit there for hours screaming that he move but some hour it will hit you that he's completely incapable of moving.
You, like every one else in the world, are completely incapable of motion when the applied force is external; you will only mobilize what you call 'reason' when your emotions prepare you for it.

Whatever comes out is what you call 'truth'.

I see your point but it entails perceived truth, not actual truth.
What if I never found out the car was stalled and remained pissed off about the ordeal ?
While my perceived truth is that the driver for some reason refuses to move the actual truth is still that the driver was incapable of motion because his vehicle was stalled, whether I know it or not.

My truth trumps yours.

While my perceived truth is that the driver for some reason refuses to move the actual truth is still that the driver was incapable of motion because his vehicle was stalled, whether I know it or not.So, while being incognizant of the relevant "truth", you'd have be at least candid enough with yourself to admit that you were also assuming. And while stalled at a standstill along with all the other cars in the tie-up, you'd have loads of time to screw your head out the window and look around.

So, while being incognizant of the relevant "truth", you'd have be at least candid enough with yourself to admit that you were also assuming. And while stalled at a standstill along with all the other cars in the tie-up, you'd have loads of time to screw your head out the window and look around.

Yes, but that would be a little difficult on an internet forum where the only one that knows the truth is the one lying about it.

Yes, but that would be a little difficult on an internet forum where the only one that knows the truth is the one lying about it.Well, I had no problem weighing the merits of the various types involved in this and related treads. Perhaps you should try driving a convertible. Or better yet, avoid the rush hour.

Well, I had no problem weighing the merits of the various types involved in this and related treads. Perhaps you should try driving a convertible. Or better yet, avoid the rush hour.

This wasn't about this or related threads though.. is off-topic I'm afraid.

This wasn't about this or related threads though.. is off-topic I'm afraid.Is there a vehicle that pretends that it is something that it is not? A Ski-doo perhaps? But I think I'd much prefer a hand glider—much more versatile.

Is there a vehicle that pretends that it is something that it is not? A Ski-doo perhaps? But I think I'd much prefer a hand glider—much more versatile.
It started on page 2.

It started on page 2.Ah then I guess I must have been speed reading.

Geoff, Do you?
Then, you know that this thread is not even about jews, yes?

:yawn: And it is about, then? An absurd moral equivalency play, O bearded one? Do tell your mysteries.

Yes, but that would be a little difficult on an internet forum where the only one that knows the truth is the one lying about it.

I always find that traffic jams are caused by Jews.

And it is about, then? An absurd moral equivalency play, O bearded one? Do tell your mysteries.

Are you serious?
I know you're not stupid, so you're joking or something.

Are you serious?
I know you're not stupid, so you're joking or something.Yup. It's all about being witty and creative. Added humor, though, is stretching demands just a bit too far.

Are you serious?
I know you're not stupid, so you're joking or something.

Gendanken wants to express her mind.

Her mind is offensive, or offensively cast. Specifically in the area of Jewish people.

That's about it. If you want to add more, do so.

Hmm.
Well.
This thread has nothing to do with jews. Sorry about your comprehension difficulties.

As the targets of Gendanken's aggression, they have a great deal to do with the issue.

Good day.

Dear smurf I want a smurf!

Hey! Peewee wants a smurf!!

A smurf?

A smurf.

Peewee is a smurf!

For those unused to written communication, pictographs are often encouraged.

Good day.

I agree.
You've got serious problems, Geoff.

Mods with avoidance issues, seemingly.

Yes, but that would be a little difficult on an internet forum where the only one that knows the truth is the one lying about it.

A truth-seeker and truth-pursuer you are.

At first, I opposed you. But let's see where your search gets you, how happy it makes you.

Shorty;

And you've not only bred, but have about 7 years worth of that brat atoning for you being damaged goods.


Lets just all pray you never breed. It would be a little difficult though since I doubt you could ween yourself off the drugs for more than a couple days. I see you quoted everything I said except for being sexual frustrated! Oh you poor thing, don't worry it looks like you and Invert are in the same boat.

It's funny that some ppl say that when you talk it is so creative, and almost and artform we should appreciate. All I ever read are insults, vulgarity and nothing but
trailer trash talk with just a little more flair.

Lets just all pray you never breed. [...]

It's funny that some ppl say that when you talk it is so creative, and almost an artform we should appreciate.Art is breeding, Shorty. That's why your idea of balloon blowing as an art form missed the mark.

A truth-seeker and truth-pursuer you are.

At first, I opposed you. But let's see where your search gets you, how happy it makes you.

It works fine in real life.
What, if not truth, is the purpose of discussion ?

Art is breeding, Shorty. That's why your idea of balloon blowing as an art form missed the mark.

I didn't think it was art moron. I thought it was kinda cool that's it.

You think of twisting balloons together as entertainment for little kids, but these photos taken at a 'Balloon Fashion Show' in China illustrate how far it has come as an art form. Some are amazingly imaginative and detailed!I didn't think it was art moron. I thought it was kinda cool that's it.—Interesting that you should call me moron over something that dangerously proves to be the case: you didn't think... you consented.

—Interesting that you should call me moron over something that dangerously proves to be the case: you didn't think... you consented.

Wow you are so smart, you can quote what I did from the article I posted.
Where did I say I thought it was art? Why didn't you quote what I personally said which was:

A friend of mine sent me these. I thought they were really cool.

Lets just all pray you never breed. It would be a little difficult though since I doubt you could ween yourself off the drugs for more than a couple days. I see you quoted everything I said except for being sexual frustrated! Oh you poor thing, don't worry it looks like you and Invert are in the same boat.

It's funny that some ppl say that when you talk it is so creative, and almost and artform we should appreciate. All I ever read are insults, vulgarity and nothing but
trailer trash talk with just a little more flair.

Shorty, how come you have a problem with Gendanken saying shit,
but you have no qualms about saying the same shit yourself?

It works fine in real life.
What, if not truth, is the purpose of discussion ?

We've talked about it and you said my take on it was "lame".
So there.

uhhhoh!

Shorty, how come you have a problem with Gendanken saying shit,
but you have no qualms about saying the same shit yourself?

Careful, you don't want to shit to hit the fan again.. do you ? ;)

Shorty, how come you have a problem with Gendanken saying shit,
but you have no qualms about saying the same shit yourself?

Because it is the only language she understands.

What if shes bilingual?

Because it is the only language she understands.

What does it matter to you if she understands you or not?

We've talked about it and you said my take on it was "lame".
So there.

:bugeye:
Ok, I can see why you won't answer.. since I said myself I didn't want to discuss it anymore. But it was more or less a rhetoric question, besides you brought it up again.. :shrug:
And I think it's a bit pedomorphic (lol) to use the 'lame'-thing now, don't you think ?

What does it matter to you if she understands you or not?

What does it matter to you what I respond to her insults?

What does it matter to you what I respond to her insults?

From what I gathered, you seem to wish that your moral position be respected above Gendanken's.
I want to see your arguments for that.

Do you ask questions like this in real life ?

Sometimes.

All I ever read are insults, vulgarity and nothing but
trailer trash talk with just a little more flair.


Which you save for pms, but without the flair.

Sometimes.

I bet you've seen a few eyebrows raised then ;)

Shorty:
Oh you poor thing, don't worry it looks like you and Invert are in the same boat.

*funeral grin*
You've no clue how amusing that is.

Lets just all pray you never breed.
And let's cringe that you already have.

What's your spawn destined to be anyway, has it told you? An astronaut or a doctor? Does he know that its mother's genetic material will only fuel a career as a cashier at the Wal-Mart?

There are millions just like you, Shorty.


All I ever read are insults, vulgarity and nothing but
trailer trash talk with just a little more flair
What 'flair', girl?

I refuse to believe your bigotry would actually scoff at a little coprolalia. All you ever read is vulgarity as that's all you're looking for.

Have you read all my posts? How about this one (http://www.sciforums.com/showthread.php?t=80009), can you make it through that one?
Come back when you do.

It would be a little difficult though since I doubt you could ween yourself off the drugs for more than a couple days.
Considering the genetic pool is swollen with Shortys, breeding would actually require them.

Riply:
h. Now I'm seeing what's going on. A strong wind blew in from the East, and now all those pretty and colorful balloons are being bursted. Pop. Pop. Pop.

(Gendanken: that was hilarious. You even caught her looking straight into the headlights. Lol)
Straight from Shorty's thread here (http://www.sciforums.com/showthread.php?t=77467)

Its what she finds beautiful and imaginiatve and- wait for it- "breathtaking"

Greenberg:

Those images didn't instill in me a positive evaluation of being Jewish.
But they do try instiling guilt for not being Jewish.

Geoff:
f
Actually, I do read the fucking things. Do you?
No you don't, hun.

Quick- what did I say about health care reform?

Enmos:
I see your point but it entails perceived truth, not actual truth.
What if I never found out the car was stalled and remained pissed off about the ordeal ?
While my perceived truth is that the driver for some reason refuses to move the actual truth is still that the driver was incapable of motion because his vehicle was stalled, whether I know it or not.
And if what you term actual truth was that puppy blood was essential to fixing the war in Iraq would your emotions allow you to believe it?

S.A.M. is a bipartisan dream and should dictate foreign policy in both spheres. What does that do to you?

slumming with the riff raff, dearie?

/amused

I love Gendanken
Still scracthing fleas?
/amused

I love Gendanken

context, dear

thats in response to.....I have always loved Gustav.

But they do try instiling guilt for not being Jewish.

True. It is only the Jews and terminal cancer patients that are usually presented as people who have a "good reason to live" - who are "morally upright", "the bigger person", "rise above the mere material existence".
I envy them sometimes.

WTF is this thread? :eek:

Geoff:

No you don't, hun.

Quick- what did I say about health care reform?

No idea, Xev.

Quick - can you get the trains to run on time?


True. It is only the Jews and terminal cancer patients that are usually presented as people who have a "good reason to live" - who are "morally upright", "the bigger person", "rise above the mere material existence".
I envy them sometimes.

Excuse me? I believe your hamster has fallen from his modus.

Best,

Geoff

Hum...

what is this thread about?

is gustav a jew?

/confused