By Wesmorris

Greetings!

Have you accepted jesus christ as your personal lord and savior?

LOL. Pardon, starting again.

You have clicked on the 2nd installment of our dubius HED's obligatory appreciation threads. Do you love you? Well we do. Sure it might be that we love to love to hate you, but that's still love right? Okay whatever fine, be a stickler.

Tripe? We've got more than you can handle.

You see the HED has determined that it is once again time to lavish us with criticism objectively sliced.

The HED has determined it is time for us to blow ourselves. We are all now imaginary males with double jointed gifts of infinite distraction and must by the mandate of that distraction, suck ourselves off.

I don't know the categories, I don't know the details, I don't even know why I'm writing this except that in the spirit of sciforums, it must be written. So says the HED and so it becomes.

I appreciate you people. You are part of my me now. You have access to my head and abuse it accordingly, as I do myself. I willingly display it for you to see and shit upon. We all do it. Apparently, we're defective. I mean uhm.. we're perfectly imperfect.

Eh whatever, dig that the HED loves you.

Show the luvs my bitches, show that love!!!!

On with the show!!!!!!

HED:
Let’s all give a warm applause to wesmorris for a pathetic introduction. But hey, what else can we expect from a dork? Thank you wesmorris….

Now, I do not feel a need to express to you all why I decided on an awards thread or why I have decided to continue it; you will also not question my intent. Realize that I have tried to be objective and will present the criteria (ion) used in picking each category. Therefore, I will not condone any bitching, whining, ass-kissing, flaming, hated… ‘sevi’? Nah, fools, be my fucking guest. Realize that these are the TRIMESTER awards; if you need a definition, go here: http//www.dictionary.com . On a serious note, I would like to apologize to the geeks under the science subforums that through prerequisite conditions, are not mentioned—tough fucking luck.

Without further ado, on with the nominees:

Best Posters:

Criteria:
1. Makes well-developed and supported arguments devoid of obsessive generalizations and fallacies (especially ad hominen).

2. Provides original and enlightening perspectives otherwise missed by the masses.

3. Presents a valid viewpoint regardless of backlash

4. Language

5. Diversity in subjects

6. Posts within the past 3 months



Nominees:
1. lethe
2. Canute
3. Raithere
4. Ghassan Kafani
5. wesmorris
6. hypewaders
7. James R
8. stryderunknown
9. Tiassa
A. Jan Ardena

Dropped out:
1. kmguru – not enough posts
2. Tyler – not enough quality posts—does not fit criteria
3. Spookz – does not fit criteria
4. The Fetus – not enough posts
5. Flores – does not fit criteria
6. Xev --- does not fit criteria

Worthy mentions:
1. river-wind
2. Mephura
3. guthrie
4. gendanken
5. Cris


New, yet noteworthy:
1. WANDERER
2. leeaus
3. Quantum Quack
4. dapthar
5. neuromancer


Most Resourceful posters
Definition: Main Entry: re·source·ful
Pronunciation: ri-'sOrs-f&l, -'sors-, -'zOrs-, -'zors-
Function: adjective
Date: 1851
: able to meet situations : capable of devising ways and means
- re·source·ful·ly /-f&-lE/ adverb
- re·source·ful·ness noun

Usage/Criteria
Too lazy:
Use the def.

Nominees:
1. Proud_Syrian
2. Lethe
3. Spookz
4. Porfiry
5. Cris
6. okinrus
7. guthrie
8. Xeviuos
9. Don Hakman
A. BigBlueHead


Best Flamers:
1. Wraith
2. gendanken
3. Spookz
4. Tiassa
5. Xev

Best Jokers:

1. Sargentlard
2. spuriousmonkey
3. chthulus slave
4. spookz
5. wesmorris -- he tries

Best Avatars
1. Fafnir -- boobs
2. Spuriousmonkey
3. Xev
4. Wraith-- "gendanken's pimp"
5. grazzhoppa
6. neuromancer
7. Wraith -- 'sufi..'
8. Avatar
9. chagur
A. Jerrek

Best signatures
Too lazy


Needs to be Shot:
1. Proud_Syrian
2. and200x
3. Zero
4. curiocity
5. Xerxes
6. wesmorrisbabe
7. spuriousmonkey. :D. with glee
8. Jerrek
9.
A. CounslerCoffee


Best Threads
Impossible


The popularity award:
1. Xev
2. sargentard
3. spookz
4. wesmorris
5. Tiassa



The thread will be edited; nominees will not be changed, and the winners shall be announced 5-7 days from now…


DISCLAIMER: Ideas are welcome. Originators of stupid ideas shall be shot. There are some I will inevitably miss, but TRUST ME, they will be very fucking view; and next time, I will miss none.

EDIT: DISCLIAMER: Due to the obvious lack of imagination from you fuckers, the HED shall remove his name.

Ummm Neuromancer is wellcookedfetus......name change dude.

Ah. well neuromancer, tough luck.

Third time i corrected you....

can i do a victory dance please?

The 2nd Orginal HED's Trimester Sciforums Awards--Special Introduction by wesmorris

How is it original when it's the second one?

Counselor:
How is it original when it's the second one?
Irrelevant, and hence, you shall be shot. "2nd" for mere continuation of title


sargentlard

Third time i corrected you....

can i do a victory dance please?
Fuck you. Sure why not?

I feel that I am being punished for not posting in the shitty forums.

I feel that I am being punished for not posting in the shitty forums.
Obviously this is incorect as I believe I have read over 50% of your posts.
I will give you your grading as I happento have it here:

1. 7
2. 7
3. 7
4. 6
5. 7

You average: 6.8. The average for the "best poster" nominees is 8.3

Oh wow, I'm on Hed's list. I feel a warm emotion all over my body. Wait, nope, I've got the flu.

I see...I didn't realize you lacked taste.

I see...I didn't realize you lacked taste.
BAH. I gave you the criteria. You have an explanable objection, voice it. Else be fucking quiet mate.

Oh wow, I'm on Hed's list. I feel a warm emotion all over my body. Wait, nope, I've got the flu.
This is bitching guised in scarcasm; in order words, it is pathetic.

Originally posted by thefountainhed
Else be fucking quiet mate.


the nature of a written forum is to be quiet.

This is bitching guised in scarcasm; in order words, it is pathetic.

The only thing here that’s pathetic is your lackluster attempt at getting people to like you. “Hey, I put Tiassa on my list. Now we’re best buds.” Tiassa now likes you and enjoys your company. All because you put him on your list for an award that no one gives a shit about.

*Tiassa, sorry for using you as an example.

the nature of a written forum is to be quiet.
This is pathetic

The only thing here that’s pathetic is your lackluster attempt at getting people to like you. “Hey, I put Tiassa on my list. Now we’re best buds.” Tiassa now likes you and enjoys your company. All because you put him on your list for an award that no one gives a shit about.
This is likewise pathetic. And I included gendanken and Xev on both "awards" and yet "fought" with them because? Listen you whining fuck, you fit no fucking category except that which you were included, if you do not like, fuck off. If I intended to make people "like" me, I'd include the whole fucking forum. Heck the majority of the people included, I mostly disagree with their view or do not even debate or discuss with. Go bitch to your mommy little panzy. The hed hates whinny little effimeninate fucks.

*Tiassa, sorry for using you as an example.
this is also pathetic.

You put yourself on the list. That is pathetic.

You put yourself on the list. That is pathetic.
No, not really. If I had to be objective, I deserved to be on the list-- simply go over my posts for the past month. What is pathetic is why you are stll bitching. Hey spurious, you did not deserve to be on the list and you can bitch all you want, but it won't change a fucking thing. You can also go ahead and write better posts and threads--this I advise; but it still won't change a fucking thing when it comes to these awards.,

Nominees:
1. lethe
2. Canute
3. Raithere
4. Ghassan Kafani
5. wesmorris
6. hypewaders
7. James R
8. thefountainhed
9. Tiassa
A. Jan Ardena

At least he didn't put himself in the number one slot.

The whinning bitch:

You claim that you do not give a shit, and yet you are viewing this thread and bitching about my nominees. You are pathetic because you do care, and because you do care, you will keep coming backand looking at the progression of this thread. Counsler, you are bitching and you are annoying the fuck out of me, and I do not want to be fukcing annoyed for then I will start...
For the last fucking time, if you fit the prerequisites for nomination, I'd have included you. You do not, and as such, fuck off.


At least he didn't put himself in the number one slot.
These are nominations and the order is irrelevant. Also, no, I am not the best poster.

na ja...aren't we easily agitated.


maybe we can make a category for that.

Hows Xev on most popular? And I know he doesnt have it now, but Wes morris's dancing and changing coloured backgrounds avatars were good.

Originally posted by thefountainhed
Also, no, I am not the best poster.
Thanks for the heads up:rolleyes:
No pathetic is too ideal a word for this scenario.
You are now officially on MY list of the top 10 saddest fucks on the internet, but you are just a nominee at this stage, get your self out there, slay a few elves, cyber-fuck some 'babes' at teenchat.com, who knows how far you might make it?

LOL. Spurious and Dr. Lou need to go on for funniest. CC is pretty funny too damnit.

I get's no props for my sucking ourselves off commentary? Man you people are a tough crowd.

Yea, well, best avatar must go to fafnir.....hands down.


um, hed, yea........

Out of respect for boobies I'm inclined to agree but did you see that thing spurious did? Man it's hypnotic.

Originally posted by wesmorris
Out of respect for boobies I'm inclined to agree but did you see that think spurious did? Man it' hypnotic.



This is also true, also i beleive that Wraith had some good one's.


Then agian I do like Raithre's....hmmm...and Grazzhoppa's...there all good...shit cant forget your's wes.


Hed is the master of the awards....let him decide.

Originally posted by CounslerCoffee
How is it original when it's the second one?

Well it's the orginal second one right? :D

Shit...What about the most courtious poster's award?



;) ;)



-Guyute;)

I nominate these award threads as the stupidest repetitive events, only consisting of hauty contestants nominating themselves for self-congratulations and revel in their arrogance as they make known how better they are than the rest, or by nominating people they would like to "intellectually get into bed with"... whores.

Further, in the spirit of "playing along"... I nominate myself for the most bitter post about this stupid thread. :) Congratulations to the other nominees... hope you rot in hell.

PS. I really don't give a sh*t. Just givin' ya'all hell.

Originally posted by wesmorrisbabe
I nominate these award threads as the stupidest repetitive events, only consisting of hauty contestants nominating themselves in order to congratulate themselves in the presence of others, or nominating people they would like to "intellectually get into bed with"... whores.

Further, in the spirit of "playing along"... I nominate myself for the most bitter post about this stupid thread. :) Congratulations to the other nominees... hope you rot in hell.




I'd say that you got a very good chance.;) :p:

Hehe. Uhm.. damn that's bitter! I nominate you too!

You love me! You truly love me!

Originally posted by wesmorrisbabe
You love me! You truly love me!

Hmmm.. two babies, house, marriage... backrubs, etc.

Hey it's true!

Best Sciforums Couple: Mr and Mrs. WesMorris and WesMorrisBabe!!!!


The crowd goes wild *aaahhhhhhh*

So far I'm the only one in the "Needs To be shot" category. This pleases me for some reason.

Wesmorris, I liked your introduction. Of course only three out of one thousand guys can suck themselves off (Source: Playboy Magazine).

Dr. Lou:
Go fuck a monkey for Chrissake

Counsler:
So far I'm the only one in the "Needs To be shot" category. This pleases me for some reason.
You are not the only one; in fact there shall be 10-- as before...

Yuck. As if the hed couldn't have predicted the stupid responses about "self" ass kissing.

1. Makes well-developed and supported arguments devoid of obsessive generalizations and fallacies (especially ad hominen).

Seems like a good qualifier.

But then I read wesmorris(sp?) is nominated and I couldn't let this go...

This is an actual post by wes.., word for word:
"Politicians are faced with impossible choices."
(hmmm, impossible choices huh. That sounds impossible)

He goes on to say:
"They should be elected based on character, because it takes character to make impossible decissions."
(Unsupported argument and a generalization presupposed by fallacies -- "impossible choices")

And....:
"Of course the character of the voter comes into play and tastes blah blah blah."
(So, if I follow the logic above then the voter -- because they have character -- can make impossible decissions. Sounds impossible to me.)

Finally he asserts...:
"Effectively, matter of taste -> popularity contest."
(Completely illogocal, unsupportive assertion derrived from generalizations and an absurd argument.)

My vote is for wes.!

Great job folks.

fireguy...

Ignore that specific argument by wesmorris...I believe more than one, including I, showed it to be defunct. Nevertheless, one thread or post is surely not enough evidence to contradict. Also, there is scaling from 1 to 10; and there are 6 categories which are averaged...

/This is an actual post by wes.., word for word:

Oh goody, it's the "let's take pieces of a post out of context and put it in another thread to try to make you look stupid" hour.

I'll play!

(I'll be back with goodies later)

Nevermind. I though about it a bit and I don't like that game. It seems like something a seething little cunt might do. Hmm. Why bother? Cya!

I sense a hug coming on.....groping included.....

I am quietly relieved to not see my name mentioned anywhere here. It seems unfortunate that seemingly divisive threads, such as this one, are becoming a regular feature of sciforums

**slips back into peacefull anonymity**
Dee Cee.

And this is precisely the problem. There isabsolutely no reason why this thread should be divisive-- not when a conscientuous effort has been made to explain the nature of categories and the like. Attacking the originator of the thread for you were not mentioned is divisive; and so is attacking the nature of the 'nominees" without any support.

I support thee. Now, and till the end!!!!


Nicest User Award would be good;)




Uherm;) ;)




-Guyute

Originally posted by thefountainhed

Best Posters:

Criteria:
1. Makes well-developed and supported arguments devoid of obsessive generalizations and fallacies (especially ad hominen).

2. Provides original and enlightening perspectives otherwise missed by the masses.

3. Presents a valid viewpoint regardless of backlash

4. Language

5. Diversity in subjects

6. Posts within the past 3 months



Nominees:
1. lethe
2. Canute
3. Raithere
4. Ghassan Kafani
5. wesmorris
6. hypewaders
7. James R
8. thefountainhed
9. Tiassa
A. Jan Ardena

Can you get any more biased?
I nominate cool skill for best poster award.

Okay fine. Then here's another to chew on fountain...

Is it possible to have awesome sex if you're not a pervert of some kind?
(This is a loaded question. It presupposes that you MUST be a pervert to have awesome sex. I mean the question is answered in the question. Another absurd argument.)

C'mon wes... Get into it.. I challenge you to show where "I" have been absurd.

Just as I thought, you disagree.

Guyute--- I will give you an 'appreciation" award.

coolskill -- A support of your statement is preferred.

fireguy-- The thread you again present was subjected to the same sort of treatment as the first you brought up. Here are some good wesmorris threads within the past 3 months(& thus eligible...):
"Intellligence and awareness", "you are a sex object" [ignore the original argument as it is self evident], "why is the bible the word of go"[although he needs to be shot for a pathetically biased opening] , etc.. But really his contributions have been in threads from otherposters: On langauage and being controlled, etc. His highest score is a unique perspective...

guthrie;
Hows Xev on most popular?
I believe this is self evident, but either way, post count + number of views on threads, etc. Popularity does not necessarily mean well liked-- simply well known. It is a ... award.

What for? I didn't see anybody else getting any support. This is an outrage.

Because If you have an assertion about bias, present support for it. The other morons who challeneged the 'awards' presented ad hominem counters.

No seriously, this is ridiculous, get your stupid name off the stupid list you idiot.

I don't care about winning a non-award at all, but if you want know why you're a fucktard...

/This is a loaded question.

You caught that? Wow! I almost wish I would have done that on purpose. I mean, if I had, it might have illustrated a number of rational questions that can be asked about the word "pervert" and how loosely it's used, it's scope.. etc. Good point. I'll have to remember to include that kind of thing the next time I start questioning words and labels and such.

/It presupposes that you MUST be a pervert to have awesome sex.

Sure. That might lead some people to ask the question "what does pervert really mean anyway"? I can see that you're not one of those people. With that considered, do you really think philosophy is your thing?

/I mean the question is answered in the question.

Did you catch the part wheer the question asked was intended to generate questions?

/Another absurd argument.

What argument are you referring to? You merely quoted a rhetorical question that you obviously didn't understand, made incredibly shallow remarks about it and presumed that it wasn't YOU that is doing what you accuse me of doing. I didn't see you commenting on an argument, nor presenting one of any relevance.

/C'mon wes... Get into it..

What exactly would you like me to get into.. and why would you expect that I would, considering the apparent incompetence of the requestor?

/I challenge you to show where "I" have been absurd.

Already done, what did I win?

/Just as I thought, you disagree.

With what? Man isn't that kind of pathetic of you to presume you know what I'm thinking, when it's blatantly obvious that you can't even comprehend what I'm saying after I've written it down?

Hey you dog fucking freak of nature, why don;t you go be the bitch to your bulldog. I bet that beast is aching to make you his bitch. Fukcing nitwit. You come to this thread to whine and fucking bitch. Lets see, because no Resourceful for you? Boo fucking hoo. If you have a complaint that is supported, you will get a mature reponse. If you want to stick to the current tripe you are presently spewing, be my fucking guest.

geez HED I wasn't even talking to you. gawd. sorry for trashing your thread..

*flips hair*

*storms off*

:D

Save your big "zinger", you can't be serious with this shit. you objectively decided that you should be on the best posters list? Thats insane, am I dreaming? wTF?
Like if you are joking i do think its pretty funny, if not you must be missing a chunk of your brain, the part that says "don't act like a douchebag"
I seriously don't think i deserve to be on any lists and I don't care, my problem is that YOU are on the list for best posters and that YOU put YOU there and you are now claiming that you made that choice objectively, give me a break.
Can't you see the problem?
I think this is funny whether you intended it to be so or not, I just hope that was your intentions because, you know, fuck, its pretty strange if you expect to be taken seriously.

wesmorris,
You don't fuck a dog do you? I was referring to Dr. Lou.


Dr. Lou:
So it seems like you are finally using your brain. From the last awards, I omitted my name and people still bicthed about subjectivity. I placed my name there to make a point about subjectivity. If you had any sense, you'd wait to see how I would grade myself. Fucking pathetic.

EDIT: The second fucking clue would the flamers nominees.

In order to avoid this type of obvious conflict I'd think the smart move would be for the conductor of the awards to abstain himself from consideration, but optimally it shouldn't be of concern.

Due to the obvious lackof imagination from you fuckers, the HED shall remove his name.

Actually, that kind of sucks.
Maybe you do deserve to be on the list. I don't know I haven't been reading many threads lately.
My concern arose when you started defending putting your own name on the list like it was scientific fact that you should there.

How about you take everyones name off the list and then make it that people have to be nominated and then seconded(or maybe even thirded) to become a nominee? Makes sense no?
You shouldn't be taken out of the competition just because you made the thread but at the same time its just bad form to automatically nominate yourself. Next thing we know cool skill will be making lists and nominating himself.
hehe, cool skill, haha classic.

Although I am under the 'needs to be shot' category, I agree with the awards. These are all excellent posters that deserve such merit. Keep contributing. :)

If I could put Hed in a category it would be "The Poster who rips on others without providing any positive input to validate his criticism."

. Attacking the originator of the thread for you were not mentioned is divisive; and so is attacking the nature of the 'nominees" without any support.
I do not seek to attack anybody. I am mearly pointing out that any thread that seeks to single out posters for whatever reason is open to misinterpretation.

Such is human nature.
Dee Cee

I would also make a category called longest fighters. These are people who will carry on an argument longer than the French. I nominate Ghassan for that one. Sheesh man.

I also nominate that beefcake Sargentlard for the "sexiest tub of gelationus fat" award.

He should win IMHO.

Lou:
How about you take everyones name off the list and then make it that people have to be nominated and then seconded(or maybe even thirded) to become a nominee? Makes sense no?
This obviously won't workfor it becomes a popularity contest. The criteria I have provided work-- as I was close to objecive as I can be. I read more than 25 posts from all the qualifying members...

DeeCee:
In truth, I was not talking about you...

and2000x:
The Poster who rips on others without providing any positive input to validate his criticism
If I rip someone off, they most likely started it. Also, they would be undeserving of the time it would take to put forth a constructive argument.

Originally posted by thefountainhed
Guyute--- I will give you an 'appreciation" award.







Well, at least I am satisfied.:p

Originally posted by thefountainhed
Due to the obvious lackof imagination from you fuckers, the HED shall remove his name.

LOL.

he CAVES!

I had to wes, I was getting annoyed. :cool:

About time dammit!
You better replace it with somebody else's name.
Hmmm. . .
Let's see.
After lots of deep thought and careful consideration, I have come up with a prefect solution:

I think cool skill would be the best replacement in this predicament.

This post is a fucking bore. I came here looking for entertainment.. i got boredom instead.

Airavata- you have no taste in entertainment. I've found htis thread ratehr funny. And quite stupid as well, of course.

You know, with all you geeks about, surely somebody could write something that is effectively a poll, a complex one, in which people can vote for those in the various categories. Or would that be too hard?

Wes.. for the sake of argument I will agree that I am illogical, stupid, dumb whatever else pleases you. Happy?

Now, prove to me your are this higher intellect and logical person you claim to be.

I want to hear your thoughts on the following argument.

For those of you who have studied philosophy you'll recognize the following. Please do not respond, I wish to see wes's insight on the following. Then, we'll see if wes is who he claims to be)

"God is omnipotent and the creator of all things"
"Can god create a rock he cannot lift?"

I'm waiting wes..........

Also wes.. tell me what this argument is called in philosophical circles.

Originally posted by fireguy_31
Wes.. for the sake of argument I will agree that I am illogical, stupid, dumb whatever else pleases you. Happy?

Now, prove to me your are this higher intellect and logical person you claim to be.

I want to hear your thoughts on the following argument.

For those of you who have studied philosophy you'll recognize the following. Please do not respond, I wish to see wes's insight on the following. Then, we'll see if wes is who he claims to be)

"God is omnipotent and the creator of all things"
"Can god create a rock he cannot lift?"

I'm waiting wes..........

Start a thread and give a link bright boy.

And if you don't mind show where I claimed I am "this higher intellect and logical person".

Please note that I have never taken a course in philosophy (nor claimed that I have).

I have a decent education which in my opinion served the purpose of furthering my own philosophy (among other purposes).

I don't think you're an idiot. As a matter of fact, you're pretty bright. From my perspective though, you appear quite shallow. That doesn't mean you aren't bright, just that you are incapable from comprehending me because you simply lack the depth the do so. I'm sure you could run circles around me regarding something, but I don't know what that something is.

Originally posted by fireguy_31
Also wes.. tell me what this argument is called in philosophical circles.

I have no idea. Why do you find the name pertinent?

You see I find that question wholly shallow.

I wonder if you can fathom why?

Wes..

Do not respond to a question with a question. It is illogocal. Just give me your thoughts on the argument, thats all.

And if you don't mind show where I claimed I am "this higher intellect and logical person".

Allow me to propose the concept of subtleties, and that you are subtle in what you claim.

Originally posted by fireguy_31
Wes..

Do not respond to a question with a question. It is illogocal. Just give me your thoughts on the argument, thats all.

NO, it is illogical to ignore that your question was answered, followed by a question.

Who the fuck are you to tell me what to do?

Originally posted by fireguy_31
Allow me to propose the concept of subtleties, and that you are subtle in what you claim.

Okay. Uh, propose away.

What have you done to upset this dude Wes?

Originally posted by DeeCee
What have you done to upset this dude Wes?

I believe I've shown him sides of himself he doesn't like so he's trying to return the favor. LOL

Maybe not I suppose. *shrug*

Maybe get on HED's list whereas he didn't? Heh! Shallow! (I paid for my place on that list fair and square! LOL)

Honestly, I don't know. Somehow he's determined to show how stupid I am I guess. Oh wait, maybe he's in love with Xev and tryign to impress her by doing what she couldn't! I see!

LOL

Okay I don't really know.

What do you think DeeCee, does he have a point? Am I missing something?

I believe I've show him sides of himself he doesn't like so he's trying to return the favor.
You held a mirror to his arse?
Well I guess that'll learn ya;)

Wes Morris. Flashlight in the war against the forces of darkness:D
Whoever would have guessed?
Dee Cee

Trying to out edit me eh?
We'll see about that!
What do you think DeeCee, does he have a point? Am I missing something?
I've always found you pretty straight Wes. One of the few round here who posts for fun rather than profit if you know what I mean.

Maybe thats what happens when you pass twenty;)
Dee Cee

C'mon wes... I have responded to your threads even though I thought they were rediculous, pay me the same respect. Why can't you respond to it?

It's simple wes... "God is omnipotent and the creator of all things."
"Can god create a rock he cannot lift?"

I know it's a bit of a mind bender so ease into it slowly, I got time.

P.S.
Hey guys, I am having fun too. As I type this I have a smile on my face. Why Wes..? Because, he's fun!

As far as xev is concerned, i just want to marry that chick not love her..

/C'mon wes... I have responded to your threads even though I thought they were rediculous

But I NEVER asked you to.

/pay me the same respect.

You have shown me little respect, asshole.

/Why can't you respond to it?

Why are you so fucking stupid as to think that I cannot? Start a fucking thread, provide a fucking link and I'll grace you with my thoughts.

/It's simple wes... "God is omnipotent and the creator of all things."
/"Can god create a rock he cannot lift?"

No, that's not a simple idea you fucking asshole. It is however, ill-conceived.

/I know it's a bit of a mind bender so ease into it slowly, I got time.

LOL. What an asshole. LOL. Ease up there shallow boy.

As I stated, provide the link and I'll address your bullshit.

*cough cough*

You know, with all you geeks about, surely somebody could write something that is effectively a poll, a complex one, in which people can vote for those in the various categories. Or would that be too hard?

But I NEVER asked you to.

By virtue of starting a thread you have.

You have shown me little respect, asshole.

Au contrare! I have refrained from using profanities directed at you, that is respect.

No, that's not a simple idea you fucking asshole. It is however, ill-conceived.

Why?

LOL. What an asshole. LOL. Ease up there shallow boy

As I stated, provide the link and I'll address your bullshit.

Disrespect at its finest.

Wes.. you have clearly demonstrated an inability to logically address my question, continually disrespect me by calling me names, shown disregard for the spirit of on-line forums and that is why I think you do not belong on any list for recognition.

Thank-you for proving my point. Judges???

/By virtue of starting a thread you have.

An open invitation is in no way specific, jerky. (meaning that your comments in my threads are in no way a sign of respect in and of simply that you posted there, asshole)

/Au contrare! I have refrained from using profanities directed at you, that is respect.

So in your simple little world "using profanities" is disrespectful, but attempting to ass-rape someone's character by taking them out of context is a sign of respect? Maybe your idea of respect significantly varies from what I deem respect to be... ya think?

/Why?

Because your question is wholly off topic. I told you I'd discuss it with you in the appropriate thread.

/Disrespect at its finest.

I never said I respect you.

/Wes.. you have clearly demonstrated an inability to logically address my question, continually disrespect me by calling me names, shown disregard for the spirit of on-line forums and that is why I think you do not belong on any list for recognition.

No, I have not-so-clearly asked that you stay on topic, asshole. I call you names because your smarmy antagonistic manner begs it. You're a punk bitch asshole for whom I have little to no respect. Clear enough?

/Thank-you for proving my point. Judges???

I judge you: ASSHOLE. Oh sorry: SHALLOW, PUNK BITCH ASSHOLE. Yup.

God is omnipotent and the creator of all things."
"Can god create a rock he cannot lift?"
'God' is already defined. The question answers itself. Now fireguy, leave it be before I rip you to shreds.


guthrie...
Want some attention? I thought so. Shut up.

"guthrie...
Want some attention? I thought so. Shut up."

HHmm, are you sure its not the other way around?

I thought my little idea was worthy of consideration. Anyone care to comment on it?

Failing that, if you want a fight I have a large sword here......

'God' is already defined. The question answers itself. Now fireguy, leave it be before I rip you to shreds.

Hmmm, interesting. Umm, it is not an argument focussing on the definition of god. I think it's impossible for you to think the question answers itself, because you misunderstood the question.

Try again.

Hey bright boy.

The question is moot and irrelavent as it cannot be examined directly via logic, as the conditions it specifies (e.g. "omnipotent") necessarily exclude it from the boundaries of logic. Omnipotence is not logically possible. Again that is not to say it is impossible, but simply, illogical. An omnipotent being must by definition be able to contradict itself and be correct in both accounts.

The inclusion of the term omnipotent in your question renders it logically invalid.

The inclusion of the term omnipotent in your question renders it logically invalid.

In other words: Wesmorris just dissed you and your hommies, big time.

Originally posted by CounslerCoffee
In other words: Wesmorris just dissed you and your hommies, big time.

*kowtow*

Hey bright boy.

I concede that title to you wes.. Good job. Very good!

In other words: Wesmorris just dissed you and your hommies, big time.

I disagree. No dissing here. It was the perfect answer to a question.

*Fireguy tips his hat to wes...*

In all seriousness wes.. where did you find out about the ontological argument? I'm not assuming you had to look it up but it is a difficult one that most people get wrong their first time at it.

C'mon, tell me....

If you didn't look it up, then I am VERY impressed.

If you didn't look it up, then I am VERY impressed.
Don't be it was pretty obvious.
Dee Cee

Originally posted by DeeCee
Don't be it was pretty obvious.
Dee Cee

That's what I was thinking.

Well, I have another avatar, hoefully it will be recieved witht he same warmth as the last!

Originally posted by thefountainhed
wesmorris,
You don't fuck a dog do you? I was referring to Dr. Lou.


Dr. Lou:
So it seems like you are finally using your brain. From the last awards, I omitted my name and people still bicthed about subjectivity. I placed my name there to make a point about subjectivity. If you had any sense, you'd wait to see how I would grade myself. Fucking pathetic.

EDIT: The second fucking clue would the flamers nominees.

Sorry, but you really only make sense to youself apparently. I would also postulate that because you cannot make a subjective evaluation of yourself you did not possess the necessary qualities to assess the position of other posters.

I don't see the need for virual back slapping. What a joke.

Why will you morons not realize that I could give a shit about your 'opinions'. Give me a fucking break. The joke lies on the pathetic individual who considers this a joke and yet still bothers to make a "serious' comment. Your asinine comments change nothing and I don't care for your oponions. You are simply annoying me; so fuck off.

Monkey:
I would also postulate that because you cannot make a subjective evaluation of yourself you did not possess the necessary qualities to assess the position of other posters
This "postulation" of your makes absolutely no sense. Any opinion of me, by me, is by nature, subjective. Even then, it does not extend beyond its immediate implication-- subjectivity.

Originally posted by thefountainhed
Realize that I have tried to be objective and will present the criteria (ion) used in picking each category.

Realize that I have tried to be objective and will present the criteria (ion) used in picking each category.

What does this have to do with me judging me and how it extrapolates to judging others? How can I not be subjective when I judge myself? Why don't your present a cohesive argument? For as of now, your assertion is moronic.

Criteria: 1. Makes well-developed and supported arguments devoid of obsessive generalizations and fallacies (especially ad hominen).


I think you just disqualified yourself.

Originally posted by spuriousmonkey
I think you just disqualified yourself.

He just disqualified my mom for sure. :D

Mothers are easy victims...What a terrible world we live in.

I don't know what you guys are fussing about. The man called it the HED's award.....He's free to award whomever he pleases....He's nobody.......let him strike his own beard and massage his own balls..It's a free forum......nothing wrong with that.

Originally posted by spuriousmonkey
Mothers are easy victims...What a terrible world we live in.

Victims? So my mom's failure to formulate a reasonably logical argument makes her a victim? She doesn't even post here. That's why is was so darned funny see.

I think you just disqualified yourself.
I said your assertion was moronic. You say that I cannot make a subjective judgement of myself and thus am unqualified to judge others. That makes no sense because

1. Any judgement I make of ME is subjective by definition. I have by nature of my humanity, the ability to subjectively judge myself.

2. My ability to subjectively judge myself has no implication whatsoever on my abilities to judge others objectively.

Is this easy enough for you to to comprehend?


BTW,
While I make a lot of adhoms, I try to limit them to "flames"-- where they are by definition, the only logically form of argument.
Besides, if that criterion was strict in use, very very few would qualify.


He's nobody
I'm the HED.

'nuff said.:D

Originally posted by Flores
I don't know what you guys are fussing about. The man called it the HED's award.....He's free to award whomever he pleases....He's nobody.......let him strike his own beard and massage his own balls..It's a free forum......nothing wrong with that.

I am trying to learn from the best posters on how to post well. What better place to learn excellent posting than in the thread with the best posters.

It is the same as going to a scientific meeting and during the postersession they serve some drinks and snacks. But not everybody is hanging around the buffet table, no, they are hovering around the nobel prize winner, asking how his children are doing and putting a fake smile on their ugly faces.
You go there and you soak up nobel prize potential.

I go here and I soak up Hed's post-genius/magic (at this high level of posting I think we may call it magic).

Originally posted by thefountainhed
I said your assertion was moronic. You say that I cannot make a subjective judgement of myself and thus am unqualified to judge others. That makes no sense because

1. Any judgement of I make of ME is subjective by definition. I have by nature of humanity, the ability to subjectively judge myself.

2. My ability to subjectively judge myself has no implication whatsoever on my abilities to judge others objectively. Is this easy enough for you to to comprehend?


BTW,
While I make a lot of adhoms, I try to limit them to "flames"-- where they are by definition, the only logically form of argument.
Besides, if that criterion was strict in use, very very few would qualify.


He's nobody
I'm the HED.

'nuff said.:D

Excuse me.... Don't tell me that I am moronic because you confused objective with subjective.

Excuse me.... Don't tell me that I am moronic because you confused objective with subjective.
Nonsense. I said your assertion was moronic-- even Einstein makes moronic assertions.

Even if you meant that I cannot make an objective judgment of myself, it would still be moronic. I cannot make an objective judgement of me! This was the whole point of inlcuding myself amongst the nominees--- the awards by nature of being decided by a human(me) is still subjective, no matter how objective I try. Get it????

As to whether the nature of posts within this thread is low, I would agree. None of the fools who posted here set any precedent that warranted a well thought out response. If you want good posts from me, look elsewhere; and most likely not under Free Thoughts.



EDIT:
Any by the way, this was your original "postulation": I would also postulate that because you cannot make a subjective evaluation of yourself you did not possess the necessary qualities to assess the position of other posters.

Originally posted by thefountainhed
I'm the HED.


You got little potential, if you can get over your annoying self.

Originally posted by thefountainhed
Nonsense. I said your assertion was moronic-- even Einstein makes moronic assertions.


Your posts suck. Mind you, I am not saying that you suck. Even Einstein made calculations that sucked.

:D

Your posts suck. Mind you, I am not saying that you suck. Even Einstein made calculations that sucked.
:cool: LOL.

Not bad, not bad at all. A blatant ripoff but hey, what can I say?

Seriously though Monkeyboy, leave it be-- you are simply not up to par.




You got little potential, if you can get over your annoying self.
Eh? :( I thought I was the fountain of wisdom, Flores. :p

Originally posted by thefountainhed
I thought I was the fountain of wisdom, Flores. :p

I like my wisdom subtle for most effective punch. Nothing subtle about the HED's 2nd Trimester Awards hosted by Wesmorris. Again, my very personal taste just like your very very personal thread.

Originally posted by thefountainhed


Seriously though Monkeyboy, leave it be-- you are simply not up to par.



and that is your objective opinion probably.

Flores,

LOL. This thread is not about wisdom. Besides, the subtlety intented in a simple inclusion of a name, and whose real intent would have been known at the end of the thread generated too much fuss. Nevertheless, ....

Hey I just did the introduction. I never commited to be host, but I'll gladly be as gracious as possible to non-assholes like everyone who's posted here so far except fireasshole. ;)

and that is your objective opinion probably.
Lets hope this is a pathetic attempt at a trap and not an idication of extreme thickheadedness.

It is the most objective I could be, yes--- using the categorizations I picked. I'm sure that if I had decided to give 10points for being named "spuriousmonkey", you'd make the nominees.

Could you remove me please. I am a serious scientist after all.

LOL. You are not included anywhere. Besides you a science student and so am I, so quit bitching. But now that you mention it, you need to be shot.

na ja...and editor in chief of a very important journal...

Hehe.. damn you spurious, you're making my eyes bleed.

I will probably get an PM from porfiry soon...I might just as well take it away now.

BAH. I am also the editor in chief of a very impotant thread: THIS!
Hell besides, you are becoming pathetic. You reached a high point with the Einstein retort--but hey, it was a direct ripoff, which is why it had any semblance to wittiness.

You tried to be smart and failed is how I would assess the situation subjectively.


fortunately i realized a long time ago that I am not smart.

I "tried to be smart" and "failed"? Let's hope you are referring to the inclusion of my name.

My subjective take would be that you are pathetic fools who bitch about a "pathetic" thread and still post in it....but you in particluar are merely bitter; same for the ex-resourceful Lou, and Counsler. MUAH HA HA HA HA.

This is insane.

what a fiery thread.......

na ja, another interpretation could be that we are just killing some time inbetween incubation steps.


and gosh, now you really broke your no.1 rule i think

you are pathetic fools


or is it ok, because it is your subjective interpretation?

or is it ok, because it is your subjective interpretation?

H he he he. It is merely a guideline. Like I said, a strict definition cannot be used. I take the overall body of work and place the irreverent with the like, and the serious with the like. This is why there exists a special "Flamers" catergory. There is a certain art to adhoms....but this must have a context.


na ja, another interpretation could be that we are just killing some time inbetween incubation steps.

Yep, yep yep. But subjectivity is a bicth, neh?

na ja...it is nice for your mother I guess that at least one person thinks that you are the smartest boy in the classroom (or forum).

na ja...it is nice for your mother I guess that at least one person thinks that you are the smartest boy in the classroom (or forum).
:bugeye: Where the fuck did that come from?

And we exploring a hidden psyche here, monkeyboy?

Originally posted by spuriousmonkey
na ja...it is nice for your mother I guess that at least one person thinks that you are the smartest boy in the classroom (or forum).

Hmm... I bet if my mom read the forum she'd be all sweet on the spurious one like he's the bright boy and whatnot. *sigh*

LOL. Pardon. Mom are such easy targets. What a horrible world we live in. ;)

...easy targets

:bugeye:

Wes... you are disturbing me...

HED,

I meant "victims"... pardon.

Originally posted by spuriousmonkey
Mothers are easy victims...What a terrible world we live in.

I shouldn't poke the monkey though. I've seen them throw shit all over people for less.

I shouldn't poke the monkey though. I've seen them throw shit all over people for less.
Don't worry too much; they always lick it off. They have such a strange affinity for shit. Hell they are always wallowing in shit. I suppose we could drop a banana for the monkey?
***Here you go, monkeyboy. Don't lick your mammy's ass too much. There, that's a good boy*** Boom. There goes Wesmorris using the monkeymom as target practise. Jeez man....:bugeye:

Best Flamers:
1. Wraith
2. gendanken
3. Spookz
4. Tiassa
5. Xev

Winner: gendanken



Best Jokers:
1. Sargentlard
2. spuriousmonkey
3. chthulus slave
4. spookz
5. wesmorris -- he tries

Winner: spookz

Best Avatars
1. Fafnir -- boobs
2. Spuriousmonkey
3. Xev
4. Wraith-- "gendanken's pimp"
5. grazzhoppa
6. neuromancer
7. Wraith -- 'sufi..'
8. Avatar
9. chagur
A. Jerrek

winner: grazzhoppa


Most resourceful:
1. Proud_Syrian
2. Lethe
3. Spookz
4. Porfiry
5. Cris
6. okinrus
7. guthrie
8. Xeviuos
9. Don Hakman
A. BigBlueHead

winner: Proud_Syrian

Needs to be Shot:
1. Proud_Syrian
2. and200x
3. Zero
4. curiocity
5. Xerxes
6. wesmorrisbabe
7. spuriousmonkey. . with glee
8. Jerrek
9.
A. CounslerCoffee

winner: None. Don't feel like wasting the bullet.




Best Poster:
1. Makes well-developed and supported arguments devoid of obsessive generalizations and fallacies (especially ad hominen).

2. Provides original and enlightening perspectives otherwise missed by the masses.

3. Presents a valid viewpoint regardless of backlash

4. Language

5. Diversity in subjects

6. Posts within the past 3 months


1. lethe 1) 9 2) 9 3) 8 4) 8.5 5) 6 6) 10 => 8.4
2. Canute 1) 8 2) 9 3) 8 4) 8.5 5) 8 6) 9 => 8.4
3. Raithere 1) 8.5 2) 8.5 3) 8 4) 8.5 5) 8 6) 8 => 8.3
4. Ghassan 1) 8 2) 10 3) 9 4) 8 5) 8 6) 10 => 8.8
5. wesmorris 1) 7.5 2) 9.5 3) 8 4) 8 5) 9 6) 8 => 8.3
6. hypewaders 1) 8.5 2) 8.5 3) 8 4) 8.5 5) 7 6) 9 => 8.3
7. James R 1) 9 2) 9 3) 8 4) 8.5 5) 7 6) 8 => 8.3
8. stryderunknown 1) 9 2) 10 3) 8 4) 8.5 5) 6 6) 9 => 8.4
9. Tiassa 1) 8 2) 9 3) 8 4) 9.5 5) 8 6) 9 => 8.6
A. Jan Ardena 1) 8 2) 10 3) 9 4) 8.5 5) 6 6) 8 => 8.3

Winner: Ghassan Kafani

worthy: Tiassa

shutout: lethe

My avatar should be considered.

cool skill 1) 10 2) 10 3) 10 4) 10 5) 10 6) 10 => 10

Mine go to 11 => 11!