From the center of ganymede to the near surface, the following list is the compostion of ganymede exstending the radius. Neon is the center where Gallium is near the surface.

576.88 miles Neon
140.98 miles Sodium
93.420 miles Magneseium
181.02 miles Aluminium
7.6100 miles Silicon
20.000 miles Phosphourus
198.93 miles Sulfur
14.630 miles Clorine
27.000 miles Argon
47.800 miles Potassium
71.200 miles Calcium
32.500 miles Scandinium
1.0000 miles Titianium
5.0000 miles Vanadlium
6.5000 miles Chromium
10.500 miles Manganese
2.2500 miles Ferrum(iron)
0.4000 miles Cobalt
0.3000 miles Nickel
10.480 miles Copper
3.4000 miles Zinc
15.900 miles Gallium

All other atomic elements exist in the remaining 26.7 miles of the surface of Ganymede.
It would appear that ganymede is a rather heavy moon, as well that ganymede is soild from its surface untill a depth of 261.37 miles where the soild nature of ganymede is interrupted by a layer 27 miles thick of Argon, most likly any terrestial motion is due to the disturbance of the Argon layer.

Ganymede has a radius of 1,494.886364 miles, a total of 603.37 miles of that radius is composed of gases, with the remaining half 891.51 miles being composed of solids (as known on earth). This distribution seem to present ganymede as not only a heavy moon but also a subject of interest in balanced motion.

DwayneD.L.Rabon

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/0/0e/PIA00519_Interior_of_Ganymede.jpg/180px-PIA00519_Interior_of_Ganymede.jpg (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ganymede_%28moon%29#Internal_structure) :bugeye:

Dwayne, please provide sources.

Well Q I have to think a little bit when you say provide sources, most of the calculation were preformed by me, however various sets of facts where gathered from different soruces, such as the diameter for the planets of the solar system ect...
I would say that observation by satilites, and suggestion from that data seem to provide a match, The Terriestial compostion of Io and Europa appear to be simular to speculation based upon satilite data from various space agencies (Nasa).

The compostion of the solar systems bodies that i have calculated are based upon stars of the Local Group of Stars and that of the planets of our solar system and their formation of atomic structure (effect on atomic structure).

DwayneD.L.Rabon

Well Q I have to think a little bit when you say provide sources, most of the calculation were preformed by me
DwayneD.L.Rabon

That's all I need to know.

Ladies and Gents it appears that Q a moderater has preduices, and behaves rather childish when dealing with subjects of calculation preformed a indivdual. or ideas of a individual

Q you could not be a real scientist

DwayneD.L.Rabon

Ladies and Gents it appears that Q a moderater has preduices, and behaves rather childish when dealing with subjects of calculation preformed a indivdual. or ideas of a individual

Q you could not be a real scientist

DwayneD.L.Rabon

So, pulling numbers out of your ass is scientific? :shrug:

Ladies and Gents it appears that Q a moderater has preduices, and behaves rather childish when dealing with subjects of calculation preformed a indivdual. or ideas of a individual

Q you could not be a real scientist

DwayneD.L.Rabon

There are several professional scientists here and not a ONE of them (nor anyone else, I suspect) accept ANY of your sheer nonsense.

Why don't you develop a new hobby??? Perhaps following in Madam Curie's footsteps? :D That one would be beneficial for the people here. ;)

for unknown reasons I did the sum you total at 1467,700 miles with is 269 km short... It's also unlickly that a gas would be on the inside and a solid metal (galium) on the outside.

Further on Ganymede is a interesting moon/planet (they chould really make up a special name for moons that would be clasified as planets if they didn't revolve around a other planet)
It's glaciers and tectonic evidence give a interesting surface. It's theorised liquid ocean gives with its potential for life (not liklely) gives it a interesting subsurface and it's magnetosphere gives it a interesting core.

Neon at the core? Perhaps the creator god "designed" it that way.:rolleyes:
Otherwise that idea flies in the face of everything that we know about the formation of planets amd moons. As orcot said " unlikely". I'd say physically impossible.

Neon at the core? Perhaps the creator god "designed" it that way.:rolleyes:
Otherwise that idea flies in the face of everything that we know about the formation of planets amd moons. As orcot said " unlikely". I'd say physically impossible.

And I would agree with you. All that "information" is nothing more than the idle ramblings of a mind with no responsibility to the truth and with nothing else to do. What a waste and disgrace!!:mad:

Any thoughts on the composition of Nibiru?

Any thoughts on the composition of Nibiru?

Yes, it is made up entirely from imagination :rolleyes:

Yes, it is made up entirely from imagination :rolleyes:

Then that would be right up Rabon's alley. He could claim the the surface was a thin candy shell covering a much thicker layer of chocolate and that there was a peanut at the core! :D

Then that would be right up Rabon's alley. He could claim the the surface was a thin candy shell covering a much thicker layer of chocolate and that there was a peanut at the core! :D

Roger that

I love crossing Pseudosciences in my imagination. It's kind of like crossing Sci-Fi shows.

Well guys i guess i give a little entertainment,

For starters the rarest atomic element on Ganymede is Lutetium

Lutetium presence on Ganymede 69,882.5 cubic miles, which is just about the size of the country Syria.

The most abundant element on Ganymede is Sulfur. Sulfur comprieses 22.4% of the terrestial compostion of Ganymede or 3,138,245,367 cubic miles.

It is very likly that the white feild lines, streaks in ganymedes surface are those of Calcium deposits. Calcium has a very large presence on Ganymede, just about 1,604,468,601 cubic miles (calcium) which has a normalization depth of about 70 miles below the surface, calcium is the third most abundant atomic element on ganymede At 11.4% of the terrestial compostion.

However the white streaks on ganymedes surface maybe Potassium
as potassium also has a very large presence on ganymede.(7.2%)

DwayneD.L.Rabon

Well guys i guess i give a little entertainment,

For starters the rarest atomic element on Ganymede is Lutetium

Lutetium presence on Ganymede 69,882.5 cubic miles, which is just about the size of the country Syria.


Now that's a pretty dumb statement! How can anyone possibly compute the CUBIC size of a country?!?!?!?!?!?:bugeye:

Read-Only. Based on what is above sea level. Duh!

Read-Only. Based on what is above sea level. Duh!

What?!?! You should feel embarrassed for that.

For starters the rarest atomic element on Ganymede is Lutetium

Lutetium presence on Ganymede 69,882.5 cubic miles, which is just about the size of the country Syria.

DwayneD.L.Rabon


:bugeye: and how did you decide the 'cubic' size of Syria? :confused: what the heck is the cubic size of Syria or any other country?

hint: CUBIC measurement is used to measure VOLUME....not area. countries are measured in SQUARE miles.

You are either having juvenile fun or are a seriously disturbed individual. :rolleyes:

Read-Only. I am embarrassed for you at your inability to understand that the cubic area of a country can be measured by what is above sea level, as effectively what is above a smooth spherical globe of the Earth. Of course every country has the ability to dig down below that level as far as they wish, but as that is uniform worldwide, it is pointless measuring it.

Hey Oreodont!

Read-Only. I am embarrassed for you at your inability to understand that the cubic area of a country can be measured by what is above sea level, as effectively what is above a smooth spherical globe of the Earth. Of course every country has the ability to dig down below that level as far as they wish, but as that is uniform worldwide, it is pointless measuring it.

That is pure nonsense! Such a number would have no useful purpose whatsoever. :bugeye:

Dwayne. Some interesting information. Lutetium is usually found with ytterbium. It does has some uses on Earth but the main problem is it's rarity so it's costly (Over $100 a gram). A tough metal with a high melting point, it could have some new future uses if there are quantities of it available. Potassium is very reactive with water so any astronauts landing there would have to be very careful not to accidentally carry any on their space suits into their craft.

Do you always have problems with trolls like Read-Only when you are trying to educate them?

Read-Only. Stop whining. You were proved wrong. Next you'll be saying it's a waste of time knowing the area of any country.

Read-Only. Stop whining. You were proved wrong. Next you'll be saying it's a waste of time knowing the area of any country.

Whining?!?!?!?!?! Hardly - you and Rabon were both spewing nonsense about cubic measurements of countries, a totally meaningless and useless number. And of course areas have a use - no one in their right mind would deny that.

Just exactly WHAT is your problem??? It seems that you have some issues that you need to bring to the attention of a medical professional.

Read-Only. What use is any knowledge? Dwayne found a use for this knowledge and you started showing your ignorance in an effort to show him wrong. I just helped you show your ignorance.

I had hoped that you might be able to provide meaningful debate but you just seem to be a nasty character who pretends intelligence so he can insult everyone else here.

DwayneD.L.Rabon
You have peaked my interest can you find me a (any) body in the solar system who's at least 50% gold with the cubic size of belgium (or of russia if that's easier)

Well Orcot, I did a breif search for a totally gold solar bodie as you requested, I thought it would also make a good target for some to look at to define so accruracy measurements, something that would give a good signiture. A very good suggestion thank you. So in the search i found a lot of gold, none of them so far are 50% gold, I have been to Uranus,Neptune and Jupiter just doing spot checks for gold, it seems that if a soild gold lunar bodie (or a lunar bodie that surface crust is made of gold) is to exist it will have to be in the orbit of Saturn, i have not checked Saturn as of yet, and to mention I have only did a random check. ( this is not done by computer so it takes time)


In addition i have to make a correction appearantly i have mixed up several lines in the list for ganymede and so the list for ganymede got posted different to two times, the below is the orginal list for ganymede and the correct one. several things posted change as a result, such as the amount of gold and other element abundances posted.

Kaneda , The rarest element on ganymede become Ytterbium. As for Lutetium it Comprises 5,796,456.3 cubic miles of ganymedes compostion, a considerable increase being about the surface area of Antartica. Lutetium has a normal layer placementabout 3.64 miles below the surface. Ganymede has a surface area of 28,067,407.65 square miles and so it seems that Lutetium will be present on the surface,however
it is a rather heavy element and so may be parceled to the interior.

As well Phosphours becomes the most abundant element on ganymede in the correction, the white streaks on ganymedes surface are likly Potassium as potassium comprises 11.4% of ganymede for 1,604,468,601 cubic miles. and has a normaized layer 186 miles below the surface.

From the center of ganymede to the near surface, the following list is the compostion of ganymede exstending the radius. Florine is the center where Zinc is near the surface.

576.88 miles Florine
140.98 miles Neon
93.420 miles Sodium
181.02 miles Magnesium
7.6100 miles Aluminium
20.000 miles Silicon
198.93 miles Phosphourus
14.630 miles Sulfur
27.000 miles Clorine
47.800 miles Argon
71.200 miles Potassium
32.500 miles Calcium
1.0000 miles Scandinium
5.0000 miles Titanium
6.5000 miles Vanadium
10.500 miles Chromium
2.2500 miles Manegnese
0.4000 miles Ferrum (iron
0.3000 miles Cobalt
10.480 miles Nickel
3.4000 miles Copper
15.900 miles Zinc

All other atomic elements exist in the remaining 26.7 miles of the surface of Ganymede.
It would appear that ganymede is a rather heavy moon, as well that ganymede is soild from its surface untill a depth of 234.37 miles where the soild nature of ganymede is interrupted by a layer 27 miles thick of Argon, most likly any terrestial motion is due to the disturbance of the Argon layer.

Ganymede has a radius of 1,494.886364 miles, a total of 764.86 miles of that radius is composed of gases, with the remaining half 730.02 miles being composed of solids (as known on earth). This distribution seem to present ganymede as not only a heavy moon but also a subject of interest in balanced motion.

For some reason i was unable to go back and re-edit the first page, I guess i will have to give my eyes a little rest and save myself some typing and retyping.
DwayneD.L.Rabon

576.88 miles Florine
140.98 miles Neon
93.420 miles Sodium
181.02 miles Magnesium
7.6100 miles Aluminium
20.000 miles Silicon
198.93 miles Phosphourus
14.630 miles Sulfur
27.000 miles Clorine
47.800 miles Argon
71.200 miles Potassium
32.500 miles Calcium
1.0000 miles Scandinium
5.0000 miles Titanium
6.5000 miles Vanadium
10.500 miles Chromium
2.2500 miles Manegnese
0.4000 miles Ferrum (iron
0.3000 miles Cobalt
10.480 miles Nickel
3.4000 miles Copper
15.900 miles Zinc
No gold?:(

Dwayne's a pseudoscience artist LOL.

Most celestial bodies have iron ya know. :P

actually moons contain verry little iron and are generally more composed out of silicates and ice with the exeption of our own moon and io

actually moons contain verry little iron and are generally more composed out of silicates and ice with the exeption of our own moon and io
Ah silly me he did include iron I just missed it.

Well the obvious question is how is he arriving at such figures. What math is he using? What are his sources? How is he determining the composition of the moon?

Read-Only. I am embarrassed for you at your inability to understand that the cubic area of a country can be measured by what is above sea level,

So, say the Netherlands, where land has been reclaimed from the sea, and that reclaimed land is below sea level, but protected from the sea by polders, ... do you subtract volume there, because this land is _below_ sea level?

What about salt flats, .. some of those are below sea level, do you subtract that volume from the nation they are in too?

Are you full of BS?

So, say the Netherlands, where land has been reclaimed from the sea, and that reclaimed land is below sea level, but protected from the sea by polders, ... do you subtract volume there, because this land is _below_ sea level?

What about salt flats, .. some of those are below sea level, do you subtract that volume from the nation they are in too?

Are you full of BS?

Ahh-ha-ha-ha!! Go get him, phlo - his "perception" is about the goofiest thing I've ever read! :D (Well, next to the stupid concept of trying to measure a country in cubic units in the first place!) LOL!!!!

Ah silly me he did include iron I just missed it.

Well the obvious question is how is he arriving at such figures. What math is he using? What are his sources? How is he determining the composition of the moon?

The truth is that he's not using ANY math and has No sources at all. He's just making it up as he goes along.

In fact, his nutty stuff isn't any more informative than saying the Moon is made of green cheese. ;)

There are several professional scientists here and not a ONE of them (nor anyone else, I suspect) accept ANY of your sheer nonsense.



Even the forum's stoner can see it's impossible to estimate the composition of a celestial body to that degree of accuracy. I'm just wondering where you got your initial data that you based your calculation on. (maybe your ass?) Do we have some new, star trek-like scanning technology that I'm not aware of?

So, say the Netherlands, where land has been reclaimed from the sea, and that reclaimed land is below sea level, but protected from the sea by polders, ... do you subtract volume there, because this land is _below_ sea level?
god might have made the world but the dutch made holland
To bad for those pesky dutch people who live there, otherwise the entire country should have to be clasified as a world wonder

The truth is that he's not using ANY math and has No sources at all. He's just making it up as he goes along.

In fact, his nutty stuff isn't any more informative than saying the Moon is made of green cheese. ;)
Thats very likely but I'd rather press him for some sort of answer regarding his calculations.

After all its better to have someone admit their own errors rather than have everyone else admit them for him.

Thats very likely but I'd rather press him for some sort of answer regarding his calculations.

After all its better to have someone admit their own errors rather than have everyone else admit them for him.

Heh - it's a LOT more than just "very likely." :D And he'll never admit it. When you have some time to kill, go back at look at some of his older posts. You will be both amused and dismayed.

Read-Only. What use is any knowledge? Dwayne found a use for this knowledge and you started showing your ignorance in an effort to show him wrong. I just helped you show your ignorance.

I had hoped that you might be able to provide meaningful debate but you just seem to be a nasty character who pretends intelligence so he can insult everyone else here.

Just a note here; "knowledge" and "imagination" actually mean two very different things. If dwayne has provided us with any "knowledge" whatsoever I must have missed it. Could you provide a post #?

Read-Only. What use is any knowledge? Dwayne found a use for this knowledge and you started showing your ignorance in an effort to show him wrong. I just helped you show your ignorance.

I had hoped that you might be able to provide meaningful debate but you just seem to be a nasty character who pretends intelligence so he can insult everyone else here.

People cannot have "meaningful debate" when there is only nonsense being submitted.

Here's odd, Kaneda is posting on other threads, but not responding to this one. Do we think this is a silent admission by Kaneda that his statements are indefensible? ;-)

I didn't bother reading all of his 202 posts but he seems to be coherent now and then. Perhaps he likes to stir the pot?

Well Certainly i have provided plenty of knowledge to disscussion: only a lose and undecicated mind would be so versitle in the manner of jibberish that exist in this topic as to the orientation of the compostion of a lunar bodie (mainly Ganyamede).
Lets be simple, you have to want to have a disscusion about terrestiial compostion not just gab at the mouth like a infant. Really it seems that several of you are more teenagers with nothing to do. So I take it that you find your awnsers to science in your ability to say no thats not true, simular to a school girl that belives the moon is made out of blue cheese. Honesty i know that none of you have done the math in any concern regarding the terrestial composition as it takes to long and if confronted with such a suggestion as mine for the compostion of ganyamede you would have more liberation with exspression of certain conditions that have some oppostion to may inference of the compostion of ganymede.

Be cause the lot of several of you agree to post phrases of disagreance as poetry it does not make you correct, well in end you guys might feel better but your science is still trying to boil water.

Aside from the usual hecklers, I have calculated the compostion for jupiters and its satilites it appears that of the 64 bodies of jupiter, 46 of the lunar moons listed by NASA are radioactive material and decay products.

Ganymede is much simular to Io, Europa, and Callisto. Size was the main difference in compostion of these four lunar moons of jupiter. It is size also that gives us a different feature of behavior seen on the four lunar satilites, currently we see a dramatic difference from Io to Callisto, Io and europa Are volcanic or appear more active and ganymede and callisto are relativly silent but they have the same compostion or near compostion as Io and Europa.

Something to think about.

DwayneD.L.Rabon

Aside from the usual hecklers, I have calculated the compostion for jupiters and its satilites it appears that of the 64 bodies of jupiter, 46 of the lunar moons listed by NASA are radioactive material and decay products.
So you're saying you will not share with us how you are arriving at these numbers correct?

So you're saying you will not share with us how you are arriving at these numbers correct?

Heh! If he does, be ready for some awful mumbo-jumbo that will make late-night TV commercials' claims look like gospel truth! :D

Well, Grandtheftcow
To be plain i am writting a book on the terrestial composition of the solar system, which includes the composition for the planets and their lunar bodies. Sharing some of what i was able to learn from my new calculation, or now just getting around to asserting those prior calculation to my personal use, I kind of would like to keep the calculation process to my self untill I my self can make good use of it. Where also the calculations for the composition of earth and other planetary bodies(including lunar bodies) seem to be accurate in depth to composition and composition effect on structure of the planetary bodies, thier still remains some mastering as to accuracy throughout the solar system of which i am working on trying to define how to determine
the level of accuracy through out the solar system.
The accuracy level for earth was perfect in exsplaining earths compostion,facts already gained by other reserchers help to determine that accuracy, other facts tabulated such as the compostion of meteroids and asteroids helped to confirm the reaching accuracy for distant solar space.
I am currently looking at suggestions from NASA who has a actual speculation and data on different compositions of planetary bodies within the solar system. And I am open to opinions from other people on the issue of composition.
The Calculations really need solid confirmation and that appears to be what I am getting from existing Data. As well the calculation is one that was designed to be used as a means of Calculating the compostion of planetary bodies in any solay system, ours or a distant solar system as i inaddition have a tendency to calculate the solar systems within the local group of star (159 local stars) so i kind of think of it as a special formula.

Even so its accuracy needs to be defined fro the solar system, for example the for main lunar bodies of jupiter are really of the same compostion, but yet of different volumes of each periodic element. For the largest moon, Ganymede the most abundant element was Phosphourus. For the smallest of the four, Europa the most abundant elements was Phosphourus. yet the two moons have different appearances.
As i understand it, it has been thought that europa may be a moon with lots of water according to some speculation, I did not find that to be the case. europa has a surface area of 9,880,299.509 square miles to give it a fairly uniform surface in appearance, it then requires at least that much material give it that appearance.
There are only a few atomic elements given my calculations on compostion that could be the atomic element that gives europa that appearance. they are as follows:
Palldium
Rubidium
Rb
Bromine
Selenium
As
Ge
Ga
Zinc
With Zinc its abundance was 145,076,917 cubic miles located from the 26 mile depth mark to the 42 mile depth mark. Zinc is probally just about where we would define the end of a mass that would become the surface crust.
It seems that several other elements may define the crust in a compound chemical for the surface crust, the moon europa also conatined in composition 1,738,710 cubic miles of heavy gas Xeon, at the 6.3 mile depth mark as well 7,82,462 cubic miles of iodine near the same level of depth.

DwayneD.L.Rabon

Oh you people ! Dwayne has clearly stated how he gets his data, can't you guys read !?


So in the search i found a lot of gold, none of them so far are 50% gold, I have been to Uranus,Neptune and Jupiter just doing spot checks for gold, it seems that if a soild gold lunar bodie (or a lunar bodie that surface crust is made of gold) is to exist it will have to be in the orbit of Saturn, i have not checked Saturn as of yet, and to mention I have only did a random check. ( this is not done by computer so it takes time)


:eek:

Well Enmons here is a a little bit on gold in the jupiter sector of the solar system, this might also be of interest to Orcort.
It appears that IO a lunar moon of jupiter just might be covered in gold amoung other things, Io has a abundance of gold equal to 1,002,825.73 cubic miles of gold which was located at a depth of 3.2 miles from the surface, it constitutes a layer of gold 396 feet thick covering the sphere of the planet at that depth. Given Io's geological activity it is quite possible that this gold has been brought to the surface, as a suspect we would exspect that molten flow of material would come from such a depth on Io,(perhaps deeper) 3.2 miles is less than the distance to the top of Mt. Everest, but deeper than the oceans on earth. Humans have only been able to dig about two miles in depth into the earth, so the gold still would have orginally been deeper than humans can dig, gold
have a low melting tempiture and mallablity may have over time been worked to the surface of Io.
If all the gold in the moon Io was on the surface it would be slightly less that 325 ft. thick covering the entire Moon.

One thing remains about Io that is not consistant with speculation about the mooons composition, that is the presence sulfur, sulfur on the moon Io was calulated to be a abundance of 108,259,346 cubic miles located at a depth of 276 miles, in other words actually very deep in the Moon interior.
There remains a lot to look at in the structure of the galliean moons but the most dominate atomic element in the surface region was gold increasing the possiblity that what we are looking at on the surface of Io is gold.
Atomic Element that could exist as a crust for the entire moon Io are as follows
Indium 11,344,523 cubic miles
Molybdeium 11,856,418 cubic miles
Bromine 26,944,047 cubic miles
Selenium 31,497,320 cubic miles

The Mantel is surfaced with zinc, being a layer 15.9 miles thick, it also appears that bromine and selenium are the most likly suspects for the appearance of sulfur, exspecial the selenium, selenium is located at the 23.7 miles depth mark and bromine at the 21 mile depth mark, the bromine appears to be uplifted by krypton, where the Krypton layer is just above the bromine depth mark, the krypton layer is 953 feet thick.
However the Xeon depth mark is the same from all the galliean moons and has a layer of simular thickness as that of krypton, xeon layer thicknes is 942.48 ft. located 6 miles from the surface.
other fluid dynamics existed such as that of the atomic element Mercury which was 802,365 cubic miles of the Moon Io's Composition it has a depth mark near that of gold in this case being just abotu 3.1 miles from the surface, and so there exist a means of fluid dynamics by which gold could have been brought to the surface. mercurys layer thickness was 316.8 feet thick.

And there you have for the Gold sighting....

In other news in the solar system it appears that the black grey surface of Ganymede just might be that effects of Iodine.

DwayneD.L.Rabon

I think he (and me too) has more of an issue with the fact you claim to have BEEN to all these places.

I think he (and me too) has more of an issue with the fact you claim to have BEEN to all these places.

Exactly lol :D

Exactly lol :D

Aww, c'mon, folks! When you have nothing better to work with than a highly exaggerated imagination, you are free to 'go' anywhere and 'do' anything you like! Perhaps he will next tell us what he "learned" from visiting the very core of a black hole. :D

Aww, c'mon, folks! When you have nothing better to work with than a highly exaggerated imagination, you are free to 'go' anywhere and 'do' anything you like! Perhaps he will next tell us what he "learned" from visiting the very core of a black hole. :D

That would be so interesting lol

Well ladys and gents, it is a phrase in that i have calculated the bodies of theose planets, and understand the terresital composition of them.
At any rate i have to say good bye to you folks the subject has not generated any interesting conversation, which was mainly the reason for posting the topic.

Good luck in your understanding of the planets and moons within our solar system.

DwayneD.L.Rabon

Good luck with your next trip to Uranus...watch out for Kling-ons. :)

Well ladys and gents, it is a phrase in that i have calculated the bodies of theose planets, and understand the terresital composition of them.
At any rate i have to say good bye to you folks the subject has not generated any interesting conversation, which was mainly the reason for posting the topic.

Good luck in your understanding of the planets and moons within our solar system.

DwayneD.L.Rabon

Thank you. We'll happily wait for the people who do this sort of thing for REAL instead of listening to someone's made-up pipe-dreams.

You are with out fortune Read-only, as I do it for real, and it is your sorry mistake. As I have told you before your ignorance is clear. I hope that you do go on ignoring the things i have lent for conversation that way you will not prosper in furthur intelligence and you can recivie your just reward of ignorance, really you had nothing when you statred but poetry.

good luck nutcase.

DwayneD.L.Rabon

You are with out fortune Read-only, as I do it for real, and it is your sorry mistake. As I have told you before your ignorance is clear. I hope that you do go on ignoring the things i have lent for conversation that way you will not prosper in furthur intelligence and you can recivie your just reward of ignorance, really you had nothing when you statred but poetry.

good luck nutcase.

DwayneD.L.Rabon

Wow - look who's talking!:D

You are with out fortune Read-only, as I do it for real, and it is your sorry mistake. As I have told you before your ignorance is clear. I hope that you do go on ignoring the things i have lent for conversation that way you will not prosper in furthur intelligence and you can recivie your just reward of ignorance, really you had nothing when you statred but poetry.

good luck nutcase.

DwayneD.L.Rabon

Nutcase ? I don't even see how that is an insult.. lol
https://www.assetmanagement.abnamro.co.in/pms/images/nutshell.gif

You are with out fortune Read-only, as I do it for real, and it is your sorry mistake. As I have told you before your ignorance is clear. I hope that you do go on ignoring the things i have lent for conversation that way you will not prosper in furthur intelligence and you can recivie your just reward of ignorance, really you had nothing when you statred but poetry.

good luck nutcase.

DwayneD.L.Rabon
Sick'em Dwayne. That was a very eloquent put-down! Read-only couldn't even muster a decent come-back. :D

Sick'em Dwayne. That was a very eloquent put-down! Read-only couldn't even muster a decent come-back. :D

Why should I even bother a come-back against someone who has such an obvious mental deficiency to the point that he even believes he's actually VISITED other planets and moons??? That would be just like arguing with a three-year-old child. :shrug:

No gold?:(

Raxacoricofallapatorians mined it all out years ago.

Why should I even bother a come-back against someone who has such an obvious mental deficiency to the point that he even believes he's actually VISITED other planets and moons??? That would be just like arguing with a three-year-old child. :shrug:
I worry about your comprehension, Read-Only. I understood what Dwayne meant to begin with, but you and some of the other members seem to take every phrase literally and failed to understand even when Dwayne explained what he meant by his phrase.
Well ladys and gents, it is a phrase in that i have calculated the bodies of theose planets, and understand the terresital composition of them.
Furthermore, when Dwayne said he did it for real, it was in response to this statement by you: We'll happily wait for the people who do this sort of thing for REAL instead of listening to someone's made-up pipe-dreams.
Please try to keep up. I have nothing against you, but I advised you before to lay off the personal insults to our old buddy Dwayne. You are right to point out his errors, but do not make fun of him personally or be ready to receive ridicule yourself.

Furthermore, when Dwayne said he did it for real, it was in response to this statement by you:


Hmmm not exactly:


So in the search i found a lot of gold, none of them so far are 50% gold, I have been to Uranus,Neptune and Jupiter just doing spot checks for gold, it seems that if a soild gold lunar bodie (or a lunar bodie that surface crust is made of gold) is to exist it will have to be in the orbit of Saturn, i have not checked Saturn as of yet, and to mention I have only did a random check. ( this is not done by computer so it takes time)

Hmmm not exactly:
No, dumbass, he meant he hadn't done his calculations yet. :rolleyes:

I worry about your comprehension, Read-Only. I understood what Dwayne meant to begin with, but you and some of the other members seem to take every phrase literally and failed to understand even when Dwayne explained what he meant by his phrase.

Furthermore, when Dwayne said he did it for real, it was in response to this statement by you:
Please try to keep up. I have nothing against you, but I advised you before to lay off the personal insults to our old buddy Dwayne. You are right to point out his errors, but do not make fun of him personally or be ready to receive ridicule yourself.

On the contrary - I worry about your comprehension. You're only about four years younger than me and that's plenty old enough to be able to tell fact from fantasy. And he has nothing - NOTHING - but fantasy. He wouldn't recognize a fact if it ran up and bit him! If you want him as a pet, you are welcome to him.

No, dumbass, he meant he hadn't done his calculations yet. :rolleyes:

So... resorting to insults I see ? Intelligent of you.
He might want to be more careful with his wording next time. You might want to think about that as well..

No, dumbass, he meant he hadn't done his calculations yet. :rolleyes:

Interesting... Didn't you just tell me a minute ago to watch the personal insults????? Best be taking some of your own advice, I'd say!

Interesting... Didn't you just tell me a minute ago to watch the personal insults????? Best be taking some of your own advice, I'd say!
No, I said to not make fun of him personally based on your ignorance of what he posted. Anyone with half a brain should know that he did not mean that he had physically visited those asteroids and moons. I have no problem with insults personally. Want to challenge me? :)

No, I said to not make fun of him personally based on your ignorance of what he posted.

What a strange and silly thing to say! How can anyone be ignorant of nonsense???

I have no problem with insults personally. Want to challenge me? :)

Another silly thing to say. What could possibly be gained from such childish behavior - trading insults back and forth?!?!?

No, I said to not make fun of him personally based on your ignorance of what he posted. Anyone with half a brain should know that he did not mean that he had physically visited those asteroids and moons. I have no problem with insults personally. Want to challenge me? :)

Challenge you ? :roflmao:
Next time I'll just report you, how's that ?

No, I said to not make fun of him personally based on your ignorance of what he posted. Anyone with half a brain should know that he did not mean that he had physically visited those asteroids and moons. I have no problem with insults personally. Want to challenge me? :)

No he hasn't physically visited the planets, donkey head.

Challenge you ? :roflmao:
Next time I'll just report you, how's that ?
ooh
a threat
/quiver

No he hasn't physically visited the planets, donkey head.

I always thought of myself as more of a redneck than a donkey head, but call it as you see it. :)

ooh
a threat
/quiver

Let me get this straight.. are you actually defending his views or what ?

Let me get this straight.. are you actually defending his views or what ?
No. I'm saying don't make fun of people with disabilities, because of their skin color, or because of their sexual orientation. You started a series of posts attacking Dwayne based on your own misinterpretation of an inconsequential remark by him about 'visiting' asteriods and moons. You attacked him personally, not the content of his post. If you are intelligent enough to challenge his content, do it. For instance, what is the prevalence of neon in our solar system? Do you think it possible that neon could possibly be the main component of Ganymede? If not, why not.

No. I'm saying don't make fun of people with disabilities, because of their skin color, or because of their sexual orientation. You started a series of posts attacking Dwayne based on your own misinterpretation of an inconsequential remark by him about 'visiting' asteriods and moons. You attacked him personally, not the content of his post. If you are intelligent enough to challenge his content, do it. For instance, what is the prevalence of neon in our solar system? Do you think it possible that neon could possibly be the main component of Ganymede? If not, why not.

I made a harmless joke about it, get over it.

Oh you people ! Dwayne has clearly stated how he gets his data, can't you guys read !?



:eek:

I don't see any point in attacking this. I have given some evidence to the contrary (as did many others) in previous threads of him, but he doesn't react to that. He just goes on and on, not responding to our requests for his sources/calculations.
I've mostly left his posts alone, but in this case I couldn't help myself.
And how do you mean disability ?

Really enoms what did you want, the subject was the composition of ganymede.

DwayneD.L.Rabon

Really enoms what did you want, the subject was the composition of ganymede.

DwayneD.L.Rabon

I'm not Enmos, but I'll tell what I want - tell us, in ordinary but precise terms, exactly HOW you came up with all of those silly numbers!

If you can do so, and with something to substantiate your method, I'll be more than happy to apologize.

From the way this thread reads, Dwayne miscommunicated what he'd actually done and Enmos picked up on it. It seems from that point you guys got a little out of hand with Dwayne and chased him off into the sunset.

Admittedly Dwayne's calculations do seem nonsense because for one thing he hasn't exactly explained how he reached his figures. (In essence for figures to be put forwards you have to be prepared to put forwards your mathematics for others to check to see if they arrive at the same conclusion or not.)

Usually such calculations and speculation would be done with a College/University, if you are doing calculations and speculations outside of an academic schema then the likelihood is that you will find it incredibly difficult getting people to accept your work, which has been all too readily proven here.

Dwayne, if you are still listening out there I'd suggest you look to approach Amateur Astrophysics enthusiasts but do be prepared to find out there are things wrong with your calculations or speculations, otherwise you'll enter into hostility with people for the wrong attitude.

I'm not Enmos, but I'll tell what I want - tell us, in ordinary but precise terms, exactly HOW you came up with all of those silly numbers!

If you can do so, and with something to substantiate your method, I'll be more than happy to apologize.

I second that.
I will apologize now for that joke I made.. it got blown out of proportion a bit though..
My apologies.