Synchronous Harmonic Interference Theory - A brief Overview

I have been developing my own theory of the universe for some time now, and I am ready to present it. I call it “Synchronous Harmonic Interference Theory”. As we all know, space consists of a virtual sea of quantum fluctuations. These fluctuations represent a virtual matrix of points in 3D space. There are three transition energy levels and four metastable states associated with this matrix that give rise to all observed natural phenomena.

The first state is the ground state. This is observed as the vacuum.

The second state after the first transition level is the force level. This is described by the special hypothesis known as “Force Unification in Compact Kinetic Energy Domains”. All forces can be visualized as varying degrees of local “distortion” of the virtual matrix. The strength of the force (remember there are four fundamental forces - weak-nuclear, strong-nuclear, electromagnetic, and gravity) is a measure of the metastable degree of distortion at a given matrix point.

The third state after the second transition level is the unstable particle level. This is the range of distortion of the matrix point field that gives rise to the unstable particles (particles with decay times of 10^9 seconds or less).

The fourth state after the third transition level is the stable particle level. This is the range of distortion of the matrix point field that gives rise to the stable particles such as protons, electrons, etc...

I have submitted my paper to a well respected science journal and hope to have a peer-reviewed presentation available soon in the Journal of Undestanding, Nature, and Knowlege (a publication of the Center for Research And Cosmic Knowlege at Pottsdam University).

I have gotten some technical feedback already. It was pointed out that my theory predicts the existence of Asymmetric Swartzchild Singularity type black holes and that these are not observed in nature. I assured them that with sufficiently powerful telescopes, ASS holes would indeed be found to exist. Also, if they looked closely enough, they would see that Synchronous Harmonic Interference Theory (SHIT) leads directly to the concept of “Parity Interference String Symmetry” which completely falsifies the two competing theories of the universe, namely:

“Cosmological Renormalization of Anisotropic Paths”, and “Dipole Universal Normalized Gravity”. These throries will surely fall under the overwhelming weight of SHITand PISS. CRAP and DUNG clearly do not have the explanatory power of SHIT.

Of course, “Force Unification in Compact Kinetic Energy Domains” is still only an hypothesis, but my colleagues at CRACK, Pott U. are confident that under the right experimental conditions, FUCKED will turn out to be the truth. Anyone interested in a copy of the journal JUNK, please contact the media center at CRACK, Pott U.

That has to easily be the funiest thing I have read in quite some time.

Hmm.
Now. I'm no expert, but it would seem to me that what you have done is akin to the physician-examiners from Moliere's "The imaginary invalid" answering the question of how opium induces drowsiness and sleep by stating emphatically that it possesses a 'soporific factor'.

What you've done is simply rename things. Shift things around. From abstract to abstract. You have not touched the concrete reality of anything solid. Not from what you've posted above anyway.

Oh. Wait.
You bastard.
I glanced over the last couple of paragraphs.

Ha.
You've given an excellent example of this abstract shuffling.
Bravo.

It would have been funnier if you'd not put the last couple of paragraphs in.
What you've got there is called an ass penny. But you gave it up too soon. Even so., here I was about to give it a rub for you.
Asshole.

Sorry. Not.

hmmmmm...well done........ha

Oh. Wait.
You bastard.
I glanced over the last couple of paragraphs.

Flexed a little too quickly, eh?

Flexed a little too quickly, eh?

Should've kicked some sand, I suppose.

Wow. I'm suprised this little peice of comic relief is back on page one!

and so it should be.......ha

Synchronous Harmonic Interference Theory - A brief Overview

I have been developing my own theory of the universe for some time now, and I am ready to present it. I call it “Synchronous Harmonic Interference Theory”. As we all know, space consists of a virtual sea of quantum fluctuations. These fluctuations represent a virtual matrix of points in 3D space. There are three transition energy levels and four metastable states associated with this matrix that give rise to all observed natural phenomena.

The first state is the ground state. This is observed as the vacuum.

The second state after the first transition level is the force level. This is described by the special hypothesis known as “Force Unification in Compact Kinetic Energy Domains”. All forces can be visualized as varying degrees of local “distortion” of the virtual matrix. The strength of the force (remember there are four fundamental forces - weak-nuclear, strong-nuclear, electromagnetic, and gravity) is a measure of the metastable degree of distortion at a given matrix point.

The third state after the second transition level is the unstable particle level. This is the range of distortion of the matrix point field that gives rise to the unstable particles (particles with decay times of 10^9 seconds or less).

The fourth state after the third transition level is the stable particle level. This is the range of distortion of the matrix point field that gives rise to the stable particles such as protons, electrons, etc...

I have submitted my paper to a well respected science journal and hope to have a peer-reviewed presentation available soon in the Journal of Undestanding, Nature, and Knowlege (a publication of the Center for Research And Cosmic Knowlege at Pottsdam University).

I have gotten some technical feedback already. It was pointed out that my theory predicts the existence of Asymmetric Swartzchild Singularity type black holes and that these are not observed in nature. I assured them that with sufficiently powerful telescopes, ASS holes would indeed be found to exist. Also, if they looked closely enough, they would see that Synchronous Harmonic Interference Theory (SHIT) leads directly to the concept of “Parity Interference String Symmetry” which completely falsifies the two competing theories of the universe, namely:

“Cosmological Renormalization of Anisotropic Paths”, and “Dipole Universal Normalized Gravity”. These throries will surely fall under the overwhelming weight of SHITand PISS. CRAP and DUNG clearly do not have the explanatory power of SHIT.

Of course, “Force Unification in Compact Kinetic Energy Domains” is still only an hypothesis, but my colleagues at CRACK, Pott U. are confident that under the right experimental conditions, FUCKED will turn out to be the truth. Anyone interested in a copy of the journal JUNK, please contact the media center at CRACK, Pott U.

SL, you must be physic, or is it psychic?

I have revised my original response to this thread.

Rupert Sheldrake, PhD, Botonist, author of, "The presence of the past - morphic resonance - and the habits of nature." long title, necessary reading for any 3rd mellenium scientist. Darwin's focus was such that "Origins" could have just as well been titled, 'the habits of nature' which he seriously considered for a title of ,"Origins".

You need to know what the book is about? Consider the developing fetus: Why doesn't the impregnated woman simply produce a bag iof protein slush? Why does the form of the fetus take the shape it does? Yes, yes, DNA, but explain how DNA knew how to sculpt my face, yes . yes, genes, but how does the gene know how to sculpt my features parllel to those of my mother? to be strinkingly similar to my mother's features.? And why my sister favored our father's efatures? Isn't the DNA in toes the same DNA in the nose?

Why does a spider, separated at birth from the the Mother Spider and all the hundreds of brothers and sisters, isolated from all other possible spider entities, begin to spin a web, and complete that web, with all the recognizable efficient design sophistication and grace, while simultaneously manifesting construction expertise and systems engineering protocols equivalent to those of any spider reared normally?

At what point does the morphic field come into thought? About the same time as nonlocal forces? or concepts of organizing forces in resonant vibration with observed phenomena, the forming of substance? Actually your description was not overly simple minded. I don't care what you say the silly metaphorical structure was intended, random, or other, dramatic, inane etc? maybe so, but I saw a rational forming thread, as you must have sensed when you wrote it. Mother nature conserved the consciousness field by providing only one, which all organic entitles share at discrete vibration patterns unique to the individual mass center of organic objects as 'fingerprints'.

The organic entities share the field wih all other of natures's subtancees.

Many have believed they were Napolean, all were correct. Each Napolean had a curcuit malfunction in the main signal processing unit of the set that drove the receiver mode to match Napolean's "ghost structure" to a resonant mode of the malfunctioning circuit. Last Easter I was surfing the net loking for the bestplace to se the Pope's Easter Message; because of a tuning circuit flaw in my television I instead received replays of bull fights taped in Madrid, Spain; the matador, El Cordobes was featured. I remember the originals that then reminded me that as a unique stylist in the El profession del matador, Manuel "el Cordobes" Benitez, lotienese una manera tre'z u'ni'co intere'z del matadoras.

It goes like this Supinal: This time when you thought you were bullshitting you gave us your best stuff so far. You made some interesting points, but does it not seem so natural and nonmysterioso? despite the total void in recognizable physical structure?

Outstanding Supinal, simply outstanding.


geistkiesel


.

Geist, you wrote:

...but I saw a rational forming thread, as you must have sensed when you wrote it. Mother nature conserved the consciousness field by providing only one, which all organic entitles share at discrete vibration patterns unique to the individual mass center of organic objects as 'fingerprints'.

Your post is amazing to me for one outstanding reason. I agree with it. Here I will give you another insight into my psyche that I think may represent many highly rational thinkers here (I have been accused of bieng overly rational in my life).

Yes, you indeed saw a rational forming thread. The ideas in it are completely mine as far as I know. I have other, even wilder ideas that make a kind of sense to me. Using the known ideas of the energetic vacuum among many others, I postulate all kinds of interesting things in my head and follow them through as far as I can, playing them off of known physics. Some, like the "virtual vacuum matrix" idea stick with me. I'll bet you most, if not all, hard-ass scientists do this.

Now, take no offense, implied or otherwise, from the following.

The difference between myself, and you G, seems, seems, to be that I know for sure that these wild speculations are just that and I would never bring them up in a serious physics discussion. I know you will not believe this, but my humility runs very deep regarding my position in the pecking order of science and physics. I know where I stand. I would have to have some incredibly strong feelings that my theory explained nature so much better than existing ones, before broaching it with a physicist. I have neither the advanced math, which I know is essential to taking most physical theories beyond the "gee whiz, cool idea" phase, nor the deep physics background. I crank out embedded microprocessor systems and code for a living, for cryin out loud.

But the thread was fully intended as some physics humor. The best ass pennies look and feel genuine, right?

SL, thanks. Needed a good laugh today. :D

And I know what you mean regarding the wild ideas in your last post. I've had some whoppers myself. I believe that before you can consider yourself a physicist, amatuer or professional, you have to have convinced yourself at least one of your wild ideas was true, only to finally solve the math and prove to yourself that that idea was _absolutely_horribly_and_stupidly_wrong_. That's the only way to drive home the magnitude of the capacity we humans have for self deception regarding our own "cool ideas".

Absolutely K. That was the point of the 'Fear of the dark' thread (it got kinda lost). This is probably off topic, but I think religious thinking falls into the same category. If religions kept it to themselves, I'd have no problem with it. But they don't do they. They bring it out into the world of objective reality and insist they are right. No math. No experimental evidence. Then they kill people who don't agree. Bummer.

Geist, you wrote:



Your post is amazing to me for one outstanding reason. I agree with it. Here I will give you another insight into my psyche that I think may represent many highly rational thinkers here (I have been accused of bieng overly rational in my life).

Yes, you indeed saw a rational forming thread. The ideas in it are completely mine as far as I know. I have other, even wilder ideas that make a kind of sense to me. Using the known ideas of the energetic vacuum among many others, I postulate all kinds of interesting things in my head and follow them through as far as I can, playing them off of known physics. Some, like the "virtual vacuum matrix" idea stick with me. I'll bet you most, if not all, hard-ass scientists do this.

Now, take no offense, implied or otherwise, from the following.

The difference between myself, and you G, seems, seems, to be that I know for sure that these wild speculations are just that and I would never bring them up in a serious physics discussion. I know you will not believe this, but my humility runs very deep regarding my position in the pecking order of science and physics. I know where I stand. I would have to have some incredibly strong feelings that my theory explained nature so much better than existing ones, before broaching it with a physicist. I have neither the advanced math, which I know is essential to taking most physical theories beyond the "gee whiz, cool idea" phase, nor the deep physics background. I crank out embedded microprocessor systems and code for a living, for cryin out loud.

But the thread was fully intended as some physics humor. The best ass pennies look and feel genuine, right?

As long as you label your post a WAG, who is to be concerned that errors exist. It is only when oferred as "the only truth" that problems can expand. If the generaL thesus is somewhat hdden for any reason, expsoing the totality too scrutiny will oftern result in a working model wih a minimum of errors. The WAG may be replaced by something resembkling a better described structure that is not necessar9ily mathematical., Whatever your math background he mathematical midels of SRT and Q<T are fraught with many illicit forms. When the math is used to direct the force of the theory contrary to acceptable sandards. and desires even math has reached a degenerate state. math takes over from observation This no different than surrending reality when the power and talent of artists assumes ultimate difference resolving powers contrary to using the approach of scrutiny and analysis y aanyone wih a point of view rhat is rationally established instead of an arvitrary assessment by authority.

Geistkiesel