Post deleted; innane comments contribute nothing.

I would disagree with the phantom moderator who deleted my post. If my post was eligible for deletion, then it is questionable, why you have not deleted posts made here over many months - that were more than eligible for deletion. Those are double standards.

It indeed is hypocritical, that Avatar ridicules ETI and it's proponents, yet, so openly supports lost technical civilizations. I beleive that criticism is valid.

In addition, I have contributed to this discussion, by outlining the D and M Pyramids on Mars in Cydonia. If Avatar considers the Pyramids to be such a wondorous structure, that even today we would struggle to accomplish, then he should know that there are Pyramids on Mars. Hence his objection to ETI is most definitely hypocritical.

I do not know with what justication you consider this point to be innane. It has everything to with this topic.

It indeed is hypocritical, that Avatar ridicules ETI and it's proponents, yet, so openly supports lost technical civilizations.

There is a huge difference, Mikey, between terrestrial civilizations and ETI. We may find physical evidence of these civilizations but there is no physical evidence to support ETI.

since I have a suspicion that these posts ar targeted at me, I'll view them.

1. HAHAHAHAHA (too bad didn't see the first one)

2. It indeed is hypocritical, that Avatar ridicules ETI and it's proponents
not relly, but your "evidence" proves nothing and that's the whole point. your ultra brave (crazy) assumptions would make a deadly ******** man smile. Everyone is invited to read the mars face thread at Astronomy forum (though it should be in Pseudoscience due to the byassed data posted there by mikey)

supports lost technical civilizations
ancient history is my hobby and I have my reasons to assume such probability. I don't have enough evidence for it (or for an arguable theory that could be put under serious discussion) and I'm not making threads promiting pre egyptian/summerian civilization idea, unlike the aliens which you grab from thin air and post in the strictly scientifical Astronomy forum.

then he should know that there are Pyramids on Mars
I'm not born yesterday and I try to follow everything that deals with space science and history and I know of these pyramids. All the crackpot theory websites and the crackpots themselves try to use the images taken by Viking 2 back in 1976. the "quality" of those images is quite doubtful.
But luckly there are images taken in 2003 by a lot more advanced spacecraft
here are high resolution nowaday images:

smaller version, 6 m/pixel (1.6 MBytes) (http://www.msss.com/mars_images/moc/2003/09/15/DandM50.gif)
Full size, 3 m/pixel (6.6 MBytes) (http://www.msss.com/mars_images/moc/2003/09/15/DandM100.gif)

please have a look at the MSSS website for additional info on the images and also for another image

why has your pyramid a melted/deformed base, mikey?
why is the bottom so unproporcional to the pyramid "wall" angle?
why does it have 5 corners?
don't see any signs of an alien craftmanship

http://www.msss.com/mars_images/moc/2003/09/15/

that's strange, the word p-o-i-s-o-n-e-d was censored :-\

you will be ********.

edit: odd indead.

Yeah, been that way for quite some time. I think numerous people have noticed it, but none of them cared to comment.
I don't see how it's a problem anyhow.

could be a problem in biology forum

not relly, but your "evidence" proves nothing and that's the whole point. your ultra brave (crazy) assumptions would make a deadly ******** man smile. Everyone is invited to read the mars face thread at Astronomy forum (though it should be in Pseudoscience due to the byassed data posted there by mikey)

:


ancient history is my hobby and I have my reasons to assume such probability. I don't have enough evidence for it (or for an arguable theory that could be put under serious discussion) and I'm not making threads promiting pre egyptian/summerian civilization idea, unlike the aliens which you grab from thin air and post in the strictly scientifical Astronomy forum.

So on one side, you completely dismiss extraterrestrial civilizations as pseudoscience and crackpot, but, accept ancient technical civilizations as a probable hypothesis of "ancient history" and make statements like the "Pyramids would be too difficult to construct by modern engineers." Hence, it's you that is the crackpot. Not because of your hypothesis, but because of your outright rejection and ridicule of one "extraordinary" hypothesis, while accepting another "extraordinary hypothesis" to be probable and legitimate. That is called hypocrisy, and those who practice it, are called hyprocrits. That would be you.

What is even more ironic. You have absolutely no evidence of this lost technical civilization, other than some mythology and wishful thinking. What a complete and utter hypocrit.

"Pyramids would be too difficult to construct by modern engineers."
that's funny - I've never said such a thing
again we see that "lie" factor arise
I suggest crazymikey is banned from Sciforums for constant lying

I am only using your sub-text.

"pyramids cost an enormous sums of money and resources to build. "

Avatar, did you not proclaim to the entire forum, you are putting me on your ignore list, or was that a, ahem, lie? Hence, punishable by banning, as per your thinking.

So, let's see lost civilizations, with nothing but wishful thinking. I also find it hilarious, how you suggested the thread "Were we visited before" should be moved to history forum, simply because your "lost civilizations" ideas were being discussed as of late, that you don't consider to be "pseudo scientific" right.. lost civilizations :D

Today, 07:01 AM
Remove user from ignore list
crazymikey
This message is hidden because crazymikey is on your ignore list. View Post

"pyramids cost an enormous sums of money and resources to build. "
and you say that this is equal to " "Pyramids would be too difficult to construct by modern engineers.""
what an idiot!
besides , if you had read the discussion then you'd see that it's not about lost civilizations , but about the great pyramid, egyption view on the life after death (and that that view isn't depicted in the great pyramid) and the ships and voyages of vikings which are not pseudoscience at all

I'll ask the mods to ban you. your idiotism is harmful to any being that has brain larger than that of a goldfish

besides you lie about what other members have said (not just me) and don't contribute to this community at all

Today, 07:01 AM
Remove user from ignore list
crazymikey
This message is hidden because crazymikey is on your ignore list. View Post


and you say that this is equal to " "Pyramids would be too difficult to construct by modern engineers.""
what an idiot!
besides , if you had read the discussion then you'd see that it's not about lost civilizations , but about the great pyramid, egyption view on the life after death (and that that view isn't depicted in the great pyramid) and the ships and voyages of vikings which are not pseudoscience at all

I am looking at the sub-text Avatar:

Lost civilizations
Pyramids too difficult

It's just math.

The topic is actually about, "Were we visited" if you did not know already.

You do not consider it pseudoscience to entertain the ideas of lost civilizations, in the face of history, despite having no evidence whatsoever. Yet consider it pseudoscience to entertain the ideas of extraterrestrial civilizations, in the face of current accepted science, despite tons of evidence.

In other words, it's you, who has the intelligence of a gold-fish. Again I reiterate, not because of your hypothesis, but because of your idiotic hypocrisy.

And your constant demands for me being banned: On what grounds, that I can think for myself, and have opinions? In regards to "I don't contribute to this community" and what gives you the right to say that? I have discussed religion, supernatural, psychology, science, technology, morals and extraterrestrials. I have always had an opinion and a thought to share, and have played a part in injecting some creativity in this forum. I have written a lot of informative and thoughtful posts on various matters, and more so, tolerated so much negativity towards me, simply because I endorse ETI. However, from as long as I've known you, all I've seen you do, is ridicule or attack, or simply gang-up with others. I've done very little to constitute banning Avatar. In fact, though you have openly insulted me, I am trying to be as polite as I can towards you. I shouldn't, because you are hypocritical, narrow-minded, and rude, but I am, and be thankful :)

I have nowhere said "pyramids too difficult" - liar
and your "evidence" is worth nothing

ciao, crazy
hope you reincarnate as a bacteria living in one of your eti's waste products