Have you seen it.........? The plesiosaur,, or flipper footed brontosaur type dino. Video shows clear footage from Lake Champlain in upstate New York, where sightings have been going on for 30 years. You gotta check this out. http://abcnews.go.com/Video/playerIndex?id=1648662
Just so you know the spelling, its plesiosaur, and i feel compelled to direct you to some educational sites, though have a feeling you wouldnt bother reading them, simply put if anyone else would like them to recieve the other side of a story, please ask. As for your "clear" footage, take a break from whatever is causing you such stress as you're eyes are playing tricks on you. Even if this was at all relevant to evolution, it doesnt disprove it.
It's obviously one of those giants Visitor described from the bible that adapted to a marine environment, and evolved a streamlined shape.
I saw a film with a snakelike thing moving around in the water. The size isn't really speaking "plesiosaur" to me, unless it were a small one. Speaking personally, it would be beyond cool to have an actual plesiosaur and clearly there's something alive in the water but I don't know if that's a flipper, per se and it seems pretty dubious. It kind of looks like an anaconda to me. I wish I had access to the tape so I could see more clearly. You could opine that plesiosaurs survived the extinction event - after all, large fish, sharks and Latimeria did, so why not a big herp? hell, it's what they eat - but the odds of one surviving in a North temperate lake that's experienced what? Ten glacial advances, maybe? are pretty remote. Deep sea...maaaaybe. Like I say, it would be pretty cool. But at the same time, they'd have to make it through the Cretaceous Event and then compete with mammalian predators occupying the same niche space...risky. A bit dubious. But, again, sharks made it and they could be argued to be in the same ecological space. And why would this disprove evolution, again? On another note, this thread should prob be in Evolution not World Events. Geoff
I feel that if there's no Evolution forum, the idea cannot possibly exist. After all, don't you think that if the idea did exist that it would have been posted already? Clearly, the absence of this thread means that the idea is not real. Sadly you have all been duped and brainwashed into thinking.... Sorry. I was channeling Happeh there for a moment. Geoff
And why would this disprove evolution, again? --------------- Because the dinosaurs were still alive and kicking till modern times. Scientists have a code of silence on anything that disproves Darwin, or their "asteriod therory" There is so much evidence that Dinosaurs didn't become extinct "Millions" of years ago.....they couldn't bury, burn it, hide it, or buy it all back from the people who found it. This is just one site, in the crusade against their agenda....... http://www.christiananswers.net/q-aig/aig-c026.html
That's odd ... I'm studying science and haven't been shown so much as a secret handshake yet. Maybe they only reveal their foul secret and initiate you when you graduate? Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA A plesiosaur isn't even a dinosaur!!!!!!! HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!! sorry about that...it is just so fucking funny. Edit: a link to classification of 'reptiles' from the semi-trusted wikipedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reptile#Reptile_Groups
Your missing the point.......it may not be a reptile, who said dinosaurs had to be repitles..? A). - The same idiots that say we came from monkeys. The very scientists that I'm trying to disprove. If you read my other posts....they may be related to apes.... I'm not.....I was created by God. But, thats a diferent subject. Read Job: 40 and chapter 41.....It describes a behemoth with a tail as large as a cedar tree. And a Levithan, sea monster. Elephants tails are about as thick as a rope.... not as thick as a California redwood. Look at a bronto's tail on Jurasic Park....now think "cedar tree" There is a resemblence, how could they write of it in Job, if they never saw "Jurasic park"...? Use a brain cell or two for independant thought..... They were still around back then, obviously.
I took out the website as I don't repost nonsense. Why would the random persistence of even one ancient taxon - and I've got news for you, there's more than one - disprove anything about evolution? Why would all ancestrals have to be extinct? The coelacanth is still alive and kicking. The tuatara as well. What, exactly, do they disprove about evolution? Should no ancient taxa have survived the impact of the meteor? That would mean there'd be no life left on the earth. Evolutionary stasis in a tiny, tiny handful of extant forms is not exactly a ringing endorsement of creationism. Come on. Use your noggin. Geoff
