READERS: I am taking the unusual step of creating a file about myself. This is not a matter of ego or tooting my own horn but will be used exclusively as a means of offsetting historical and currently ongoing slander, innuendo and false allegations being made primarily by Yuriy and to a lesser extent some others. Yuryi has adopted a habit of posting negative commentary about me in all of his posts, even when I have not posted in the thread. It is outrageous. Rather than argue with him regarding my education,. knowledge, experience and achievements I have gathered here only some of that information. But it should be ample to show that his comments are baseless liable. I will therefore not be making rebuttal arguements against such ludricrus trash comments but merely refer the reader to this post. I do this knowing that most members here really don't give a damn but recognizing that readership is about 20/1 by guests which do not know me nor the history of this site, I do wish to defend my honor, etc. The photographic attachments when referenced a,b,c,d, etc means pictures reading left to right and top down. If you do not see the attachment move your cursor to the right of the screen and then back to the upper left where you will see a small dot. When the orange square appears click on it to enlarge the attachment. RECITAL: In 1965 I attended college courses in Mechanical, Electrical and Nuclear Engineering; plus post graduate studies as a speciality in Process Control Instrumentation Systems (electronics, hydraulics and pneumatics). I have been a certified 1st Class Nuclear Reactor Operator and have handled both new and spent fuel bundles. I graduated 2nd in a class of 26 by only 0.1 percentage point. These courses were not degreed but Universities recognize them and taking one year of electives at a University would have resulted in a four year degree. Nuclear Power 5R358 http://groups.msn.com/McCoinUniKEFTheory/groupphotos.msnw?action=ShowPhoto&PhotoID=22 http://www.sciforums.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=3787&stc=1 a - Me dressed out and standing atop the reactor pressure vessle head of the MH1A nuclear reactor aboard the nuclear power ship Sturgis. b - A view of the reactor core being loaded. It is under 30 feet of super pure water. Starting in 1973 I was a founder of a Research Corporation which over the years peaked having 46 stockholders made up of the local elite and wealthy class and had 16 full time employees and 5 part time. We did numerous client based contracts for example doing design and modification of Hughes Helicopter Main Rotor and Tail Rotor Transmissions. It was during those years that I designed, patented, manufactured an Infinitely Variable Transmission (IVT), installed and drove it in a 1961 Studebaker Hawk (3,700 pound vehicle) and got 53 Mpg. http://www.sciforums.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=3788&stc=1 a - Me with a machinist assemblying the first prototype IVT. b - Me with Mr John Dobbs, the Head of General Motors New Devices Division, looking on as a test stand demonstration of the IVT was being made. c - A 220 pound flywheel made by stacking Hayes Racing Flywheels on a common mandrel, operated at 25,000 Rpm in the Studebaker. The flywheel manufacturer would not specify a rating above 6,500 Rpm but ultimately agreed and gave me material specifications such that I could do my own calculations about how fast it could spin and not self destruct (along with anything in its path). d - The S. Hawk being repaired and modified e - IVT Control Computer Installed in the Hawk. It was mounted in the overhead, center of the car and had the feel of flying an airplane in that the engine throttle was a "T" lever in the center of the floorboard hump which was used to rev up the flywheel. Once charged the engine was shut off and you drove using energy from the flywheel. When you applied the brakes it down shifted re-generating the kenetic energy of the vehicle into the onboard flywheel for re-use. f - Inside the computer and a schematic drawing of the controls. This project resulted in being awarded a NASA Contract. NASA CVT http://groups.msn.com/McCoinUniKEFTheory/groupphotos.msnw?action=ShowPhoto&PhotoID=39 I personally was responsible for the design concept and much of the transmission detail design but worked with engineers that did most of the manufacturing detail work. Therefore all patents are in my name personally. Optimized Traction Control Computer http://groups.msn.com/McCoinUniKEFTheory/groupphotos.msnw?action=ShowPhoto&PhotoID=55 I personally designed and built the "Optimized Computer Control" in its entirety. I hold several patents on the transmission design and the computer controls. NASA concluded it would double "In-City" fuel economy of automobiles. In comparison to other CVT units available at that time for the same 100 horsepower they weighed as much 4,500 pounds where my design weighed 75 pounds. Where others cost as much as $16,000.00 my mass production costs came out at $330.00. These are not mere percentage point gains in technology. I changed the world of variable drive transmission design. My work became cited in a College Mechanical Engineering Text Book listed as a "Modern Industrial Development". It was reported by AP, numerous regional news papers and several professional engineering magazines, on radio by Paul Harvey News and TV by NBC and CBS. In the late 70's early 80's I also concieved, fabricated and operated my first prototype "Rotary Opposed Piston Engine (ROPE)". It was a 265 in^3 displacement, 4 cylinder, 4 cycle, internal combustion design (a Ford Mustang used a 289 V-8 for comparision) but my block weighed 50 pounds and was 6 inches long by 10 inches around. ROPE 1988 http://groups.msn.com/McCoinUniKEFTheory/groupphotos.msnw?action=ShowPhoto&PhotoID=18 This article was written during the time we manufactured Hovercraft (hence the title of the article) and we were anticipating using the ROPEngine in future production due to its lightweight (high horsepower/pound weight). Over the years I have improved on the design and my eldest son Mark has manufactured several engines. It is currently being built for specific applications by other corporations as their prototype for test and is an ongoing enterprise, The following was my 62nd birthday surprise in Phoenix, Az where he held a public demonstration which prompted the following news article. The head of Boeing Phantom Works (an engineering Think Tank) when interviewed commented that it was "Breakthrough Technology". This engine while an IC engine operates with the efficiency, quietness to that of a Stirling Engine and is less polluting than conventional engines. Can get 4-5 Hp per pound and a typical % combustion volume of 80-90% while detroit engines are typically 3-4% and get 1 Hp/pound. Again not some few percentage point improvements but a new technology substantially better than anyother available. ROPE 2003 http://groups.msn.com/McCoinUniKEFTheory/groupphotos.msnw?action=ShowPhoto&PhotoID=95 http://www.sciforums.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=3789&stc=1 c - a front view of a 100 Hp engine. d - Side view f - Me with my son showing the relative size of this engine. Not only did I design each mechanical part but I wrote computer programs that resolved the thermodynamics of the cycle. a - Is a Hovercraft that I helped design we manufactured in production and sold. On that one I also designed my own propeller blade to enhance performance. b - Is me piloting the craft on Horizon Lake. e - Is a minature CVT designed for Coca Cola to drive conveyor belts. My biggest contract was $1,000,000.00 and involved several pieces of unique equipment design. It involved a 1/4 mile long spiral belt, which stood 40 feet high as an oven operating at 180 F and was used to dry 27 strips of Jerky. That is almost 7 miles of continuous Jerky. I was the primary designer of the system (not the belt) with an engineering staff that did much of the manufacturing details. We extruded the meat onto the belt, measured and controlled the strip thickness, cut the Jerky into pieces for packaging and had to seperate cut Jerky from uncut strips. The specifications for the product made it a highly complex system. Since each strip was extruded radially displaced on the spiral belt each strip had a different velocity. The strips had to maintain a given thickness and be cut to selectable lengths with an orthogonal end cut. So we were cutting a moving product and had to have square end cuts. http://www.sciforums.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=3790&stc=1 a - The extruder was made from all stainless steel since it was used for a food product. Each channel required an individual control valve. To get the distribution to flow according to plan we had to do viscosity testing of the Jerky at various temperatures from 40F to 60F, use a tappered main cavity design for pressure drop as the material passed down the channels of the extruder. b - Ultra-sonic Thickness Monitor. This device used sound waves to determine the Jerky thickness and sent signals to the control computer to regulate the flow of each channel. c - The main control computer cabinet. d - One of many custom circuit boards designed and manufactured by MRI (McCoin Research Institute, Inc) for the Jerky project. e - Rear view of Cutter Head control rack. f - One water jet cutter mounted on the test stand. These devices produced cutting pressure locally on demand compared to other systems that used a central pressure system and required high pressure tubing, fittings an valves etc., to carry the pressurized water from the pump station to cutters. My system used tygon tubing to distribute the water to the local cutters. The cutters operated at 40,000 psi and were destruct tested up to 80,000 Psi where we split a 2 inch diameter stainless steel piston. A 0.004 inch diameter stream would take your finger off if you put it in the path of the high pressure stream. BTW contrary to general belief even degased water will compress in volume. Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image! http://www.sciforums.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=3791&stc=1 a - Front view of (9) cutters (each had three orifices) mounted with controllable angles such that the moving cutting orifices via the computer measuring the speed of the belt would create the orthogonal end cut. The cuts had to be made for selectable lengths and with variable belt speed to regulate the drying time based on temperature and moisture of the Jerky. b - another rear view of cutters on the rack. There were two racks of cutters. One could be raised and rolled out of the dryer for service while the other was placed into service to preclude shutting down the dryer belt for cutter maintenance. c - Jerky guides that picked up the strips and channeled them through the cutter heads. The water collection tank below the cutters (6 inches) had to be filled with ball bearings in that the water jet was slicing holes in the botom of a 16 gage stainless steel tank.! d - Retrieval unit under construction. Spacing in this conveyor allowed cut Jerky to fall through onto a packaging conveyor. Uncut strips would be picked up and carried over the side and dumped into a collection receptical for reprocessing or disposal. e - Extruder control panel f - Extruder head and a custom pump designed and built just to operate the extruder. It had to have a flow in cc's but high pressure to operate the control valves (which we also designed and built) to regulate the highly viscous raw Jerky material. MORE: Page two follows:
I designed a plastic pellet distribution system for G.E. for their injection plant. It consisted of designing a vacuum hopper filling system feeding into an auger 1/4 mile long. The auger had machine drops with photo cells such that when any machine needed material the auger would operate carrying pellets to the machine. To preclude the system from jamming the auger consisted of 1/4 inch rod being formed into a 3 inch diameter spring. The auger had to be manufactured in sections and assembled (forming a 1/4 mile long spring. This auger would carry material down the tube but if a machine didn't need material it just passed over and continued to the machine that did need material. For machines at the end of the line that needed no material the hollow core spring auger design allowed material to slip past the auger such that other machines up stream could still get pellets. I took over total production of A.O.Smith hot water heater burner tubes for the USA and Canada. I personally designed a brazing process for fittings and end caps to the tubes, fixtures and programming for tapping holes in the tubes for insertion of gas orifices, wire welding fixture for mounting brackets and a tube leak tester. There were 6 different models that had to be accomadated. I improved the production capacity from 100 tubes per day to 1,000 tubes per day and reduced leak rates from 20 % to under 5%. I manufactured all tubes for 2 years. But after NAFTA diverted most of my business I layed off the staff but continued to operate the company by myself. Doing all design, fabrication, assembly, etc. During that period I did a design for Rapid Design out of Ohio, for a heat sink cabinet with four panels for electronic components. The heat sink had to mount 100 solid state modules per panel which needed to disappate 100 W (1Kw per heat sink) of electrical heat each and maintain temperature to within 4F. The system had to use a binary coolant mixture. I calculated the proper fluid mixture, designed the cooling channel to carry off the heat, programmed the CNC mill to produce the parts, assembled and shipped the units. Anybody knowing thermodynamics understands the complexiety involved in achieving these specifications. The amount of heat removed is not only a function of the coolant mixture and flow but is also a function of differential temperature, heat sink materials, thickness and exposure area. Most engineers would need to use calculus to compute the design parameters. I did it with no calculus and they worked perfectly. http://www.sciforums.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=3792&stc=1 a - Heat sink being milled on a CNC. I did all the programming. b - View of the coolant channels geometry and "O" ring grooves. c - Two halves of a heat sink before assembly. d - An assembled heat sink with copper coolant fittings and main electrical buss bar for component connections. I also designed every part, programmed the CNC and manufactured the components, assembled and delivered several dozen circuit breaker tester units to Siemens Corp. These devices had to have 300 amp capacity contacts and be water cooled. They used pneumatics which I designed and manufactured my own cylinders made of various plastics to provide electrical isolation between the operting cylinders and the electrical contacts. These units tested (4) breakers simultaneously. The equipment had to be UL approved before production installation in their plant. As a side note they had to change their equipment specifications once they tested my units because my contact resistance was less than half of their expectations. (That is better than other units they had been using). http://www.sciforums.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=3793&stc=1 a - Front view of one tester. b - Wooden shipping crate with (5) units packaged for delivery. c - Side view of a tester. d - Some electrical silver plated/copper stabs (contacts) designed to mate correctly with a variety of different breaker designs. 8 models were accomadated by the same tester. e - Testers being assembled. f - Rear view of testers. Miscellanious: My UniKEF Theory is admittedly at a lay level of development and is clearly stated as not being proven but given as a general concept for consideration. The Geodetic Institute of Germany granted me permisison to publish UniKEF incorporating referances to their work and findings regarding gravitational shadowing, where I provided an explanation for their findings. An affect predicted by UniKEF. UniKEF Publishing Permit http://groups.msn.com/McCoinUniKEFTheory/groupphotos.msnw?action=ShowPhoto&PhotoID=26 My Home page is a MSN site where other members discuss all sorts of alternative thoughts about physics, cosmology, etc. UniKEF Home Page http://groups.msn.com/McCoinUniKEFTheory UniKEF Gravity is the furthest advanced part of the UniKEF Theory. It has some calculus performed by a physicist friend and has some test data which, if duplicted by others would show that Einstein's General Relativity is a false concept. UniKEF Gravity Theory http://www.unikef-gravity.com/ (See Testing Section) UniKEF Gravity Testing Photos http://groups.msn.com/McCoinUniKEFTheory/unikefgravitytesting.msnw Comments by others: [post=769604]Post[/post] Much more news and magazine articles, letters, etc., regarding my history and achievements. Historical Documents Photo Album (5 Pages) http://groups.msn.com/McCoinUniKEFTheory/groupphotos.msnw SUMMARY: As I stated in the beginning this file is not meant to be a form of bragging in that I am not and do not claim to be a professional but hopefully it will show that indeed I am more than just a long way from the descriptions which Yuriy seems to want to convience others that I am. According to him, I have no education, have achieved nothing and don't even know highschool physics. THAT IS A LIE AND HE IS WELL AWARE OF THAT. Yes I have made mistakes but at least I admit them when I do but inspite of that there are many issues which I have raised that todate have not been properly rebutted by the professionals here. Grabbing onto an error and trying to trash me is in no manner a scientifc rebuttal. Thanks for listening. Now beat me up easy. Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!
It will be unjustly to forget to mention this highest achievement of the mechanical engineer MacM in field of disproving of foundations of the contemporary Physics.
MacM, you continually mislead, lie and distort what actual scientists say. Your 'rebuttals' consist of nothing more than you saying "this is the way I think it works". Regardless of your past history, you have been demonstratably incoorect even in topics you had post graduate studies. You make claims which are completely unsupported, then complain that people don't bite. Then you say "but I'm smart... really", and try to use your past history as support for an unrelated theory. Then you complain when people point out problems in what you claim about your past history. To be quite honest, your 'resume' isn't all that impressive. You are little more than a tinkerer who doesn't actually understand the science of what he works on. I mean hell, your are bragging about designing a heat sink (which is a junior ME task) without using calc (which could have saved you a ton of time, and would have most likely given you a better design in terms of material costs). Furthermore you are somehow using a form letter to imply that actual scientists actually support your work. This is just sad, and we have been through most of this before: http://www.sciforums.com/showthread.php?t=42551 http://www.sciforums.com/showthread.php?t=22891 More faults just within this thread: Not by any measurable amount. You can change the density easily using temperature/soluables... but it's effectively impossible to do by applying pressure. Interesting for someone who understands no calc. Does 'do my own calculations' mean you had someone intelligent do it, or that you used a lookup table? Not to piss on your parade, but slip/slide feedback systems were not and are not new and novel ideas. Your specific application was, but that is all. The majority of your 'historical documents' document your half baked and unworkable ideas. The remainder are little more than novel applications of existing technology. All this does is support what everyone has already said... you have no experience in physics beyond your misinterpretations of popular science articles. Your knowledge of science in general is only on the surface. As with the rest of your career, you are mearly tinkering.
Your typical, unsupported inuenndo and unqualified comments. Lets start by stating you have far less education than myself and are considerably less technically inclined and unaccomplished. By your own admissions on this forum you thought yourself superior even to your superiors and go behind their back and do things your way inspite of instructions to do things differently. You are an egotist hung up on your own worth. As I also said before, I hired and fired many better than yourself and you certainly would not survive in one of my companies since you lack any integrity what-so-ever and even less technical knowledge. More unqualified innuendo. You lack any mental resource to make judgements. Funny I haven't seen you post simular comment to Yuriy's repeated references to his Vacuum Theory. It too is totally supposition and unsupported. Your anti-MacM posts are clearly in direct response to the fact that I have repeatedly caught you short in numerous areas. Funny. Please post one reference to where I have said "I am smart". I have said and continue to say I am not stupid or dumb as you and some others would have readers believe. How so? I see no place that I have said "UniKEF must be correct look at my record". That is your deliberate distortion. Indeed my theory is introduced with a list of disclaimers as to its literal validity and is stated as being put forth as "By way of example". I only have complained about total fabrication and lies put forth by you and others. Get a dictionary and study because you do not know the meaning of the word. Now this is funny. Coming from a total failure. Right, which you couldn't achieve even with calculus. Again funny. You are talking through your ass and have absolutely no idea of what you speak. The fact is I was successful because I consistantly produced products cheaper, quicker and functionaly better than competitors. I have no idea what this is in reference to "form letters" but it obviously is total unsupported innuendo and nonsense. The only thing sad here is the degree of distortion and mis-representation you attempted to promote by your threads. I suppose you have experience and worked with water under 80,000 Psi conditions. http://groups.msn.com/McCoinUniKEFTheory/groupphotos.msnw?action=ShowPhoto&PhotoID=82 ******************* Extract ******************** http://www.analyticalultracentrifugation.com/compressibility_of_water_and_organic_solvents.htm It is a common belief that compressibility is an important issue for organic solvents, but not for aqueous. I think this is a myth, perhaps conveniently avoiding the computational challenges of taking solvent compressibility into account: The numerical value of the compressibility coefficient for water is 4.59 x 10-4/MPa, while that for toluene is 8.94 x 10-4/MPa - that's only a factor of ~ 2 difference, and it's only a factor of ~ 3-4 for the most compressible organic solvents! Obviously, this is not a qualitative difference. *************************************************** Facts show you in gross error on this point. Again you have no idea of what you speak. I not only write my own engineering programs that resolve calculus type problems but I use polynomial curve generators to develope my own simplified formulas. They work just as well as the formal stuff are much easier, faster and efficient but go ahead kid yourself and continue to believe only those that memorize text books can be correct. What "slip/slide" feed back system are your talking about. You sound like you are in kindergarten. If you are referring to my advanced understanding of traction drives, then perhaps you would be so kind as to show us just how smart you are and tell us all about the Hertzian Contact pressures over the elliptical contact area of a cone and roller under high pressure and compute the spin losses in the traction junction, as well as the shear and torque transfer capacity of the junction at various speeds using a Sanotrac fluid. Funny. I have made a pretty good living and a rather impressive list of clients that think you are full of crap. Right. 75 pounds vs 4,500 pounds and $330.00 vs $16,000.00 are just novel applications of existing technology. You pathetic imbecile. I haven't had to refer to my own work as advanced, unique or breakthrough, others have done that. I have infact altered variable drive technology, am currently altering internal combustion engine technology and this coming April my patent will be revealed which will alter Wind Energy Conversion technology. How many College text books cite your work? Again a totally unqualified innuendo which happens to be absolutely false. A damn good tinkerer BTW. But in any case as I stated I posted this with full knowledge what sort of idiots pretend to be intelligent here that make such unqualified and stupid statements that you have just made and I posted only for the casual reader "Guests" since I have no ambition what-so-ever to impress you or anybody but neither will I sit back and let the likes of you look down your ignorant nose and pretend to be better. You are not. Indeed you are only knee high to a piss ant compared to me. So stuff it.
This is your achievement by sending an e-mail to that site. I have made a simular achievement by sending an e-mail submitting you and your Vacuum Theory for listing as well. Further that site does no peer review and states it is for fun. So have fun I am, particularily as soon as my submission becomes published about you and your pet theory. The biggest difference here is that I state up front that my theory is presented as "By Way of Example" and is not tested nor proven and is not to be taken literally. You on the other hand take yourself as totally serious and even compare your own work to the Bible and Koran. HeHe the "Bible" of science, what an egotistical joke. "Riplons" indeed. :bugeye: :m: Since you didn't publish the INTRODUCTION: I just know it was an oversight so I do it here:
Ah yes, that must be it... I have two degrees, you have a few classes you took, of which you can't even remember the details. I'm not quite sure what you consider 'educated'. As for unaccomplished, that's an entertaining assertion with no basis. Yet another distortion. You seem to be practicing. If you recall correctly (I know, it's alot to ask of you), it dealt with our company's IT department locking down our computers, feeling that engineers didn't need to install anything. This prevented us from being productive when in the field, so I fixed it. This was with upper management's go ahead.... but regardless, the IT department is not our 'superior' but a section of the company that was created to assist the engineers. Ah yes, the same old claim. I have listed your many mistakes on technical subjects, as have others. You continue to imply that you're right anyway, and that everyone else is wrong. I and others have already made the judgement. I wasn't aware this took much intelligence. Funny, I haven't been here much in the last two months, and I don't see any threads he started about it. This entire thread of yours boils down to "I am smart". And? You continually bring up your past history when people point out flaws in your theory. This has nothing to do with whether you say 'UniKEF must be correct'. Of which you have been completely unable to demonstrate. Come on now. You do remember what a heat sink is, right? Please explain how you determined your fin size, layout, etc. This is an incredibly easy problem which my heat transfer co-ops are capable of doing in short order. Ah yes, that must be it. Ten to one your heat sink was overdesigned and based completely on guesstimates. While I wish the best competitor always got the bid, you and I both know that isn't the case. Regardless, before FEA, calculus was the only good way of optimizing this type of design... yet you somehow didn't do that. Your 'permission to publish', which isn't really evidence of anything at all. Actually, yes. Compressibility is not an issue you need to worry about. If you are going to link to a table to demonstrate your knowledge, at least make sure your conversions are correct. Lol... 'polynomial curve generators'. So you use log tables and turn them into equations... very funny and self defeating.
I have no idea who is correct in this debate....since I know absolutely nothing about what you are discussing....
HeHe. That is OK, neither does he. Actually as I pointed out this post is not for local consumption anyhow. It is to defend myself from the distortions that you see above. Persol has historically been one of several ninkumpoops that go around sounding off when they really know jack crap.
Lets see 1 - Home Economics. 2 - Maybe art? Certainly not physics or mechanical, electrical or nuclear engineering. Now you chose to alter your prior coments. You openly stated you were instructed by upper management to follow IT's instructions and that upper management knew jack crap. But that is OK. You are on the run now. The balance of our selfserving dribble doesn't merit response. I stand on my posts above.
Mechanical and electrical... but I'm a damn good cook if that counts... So, I have to ask.... are you illiterate, or just lying yet again? http://www.sciforums.com/showthread.php?t=26872 If you are going to try and lie about something, make sure the thread isn't still around.
I thought I would just blow off your post but I see some specific responses that need correcting. I am however skipping those simple minded personal attacks. You do of course understand the difference in "reference" as in postings and starting a thread on the subject? You apparently didn't look at the design or understand "Binary Coolant". This was liquid cooled, no air cooling fins. You aren't even in the right state much less the same ball park. You bet your ass I didn't but you can also kiss it off in that the design was not over designed it was virtually perfect and done at a fracton of competitors cost. And actually thanks for making my point about your repeated false assertions based on no knowledge what-so-ever. See my above addtional link on the subject. Further by what false method did you conclude this was my data. This comes from engineering books. Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image! Boy you are stupid. Funny, I don't recall saying anything about logs or tables. I guess you don't know what a polynomial is. No where in the industry will you find the terms slip/slide. You are talking garbage. BTW I didn't just work on it I designed it and patented it built it and made it work and got a NASA contract because of it. Now please list your publications and NASA contracts for us.
Let me respond: are you clever or just stupid. I don't see me discussing this with you anywhere in this thread. This is not the discussion of which I referred.
What I found out of MacM’s self-biography? 1. While his education consist of 3-4 years (“In 1965 I attended college courses…”. I can not even imagine that he attended only one year long courses – in 1965. It would be a joke to call it “an education” at all!): of college courses in Mechanical, Electrical and Nuclear Engineering + “post graduate studies as a speciality in Process Instrumentation Control Systems (electronics, hydraulics and pneumatics)”. 2. As a result of whole that education he was certified as “1st Class Nuclear Reactor Operator”. After college he was working 5-6 years (till 1973) as maintenance personal (Whole mine professional life I worked in Institutes that exploited and/or built … nuclear reactors: Georgian Institute of Physics with Georgian Research Nuclear Reactor and Khurchatov Institute of Atomic Energy – the main creator of major nuclear reactors of USSR; the windows of my office were looking on the roof of the first Russian reactor built by Khurchatov’s team… All people handling the process of reload of nuclear fuel in any shift we always called as “maintenance stuff” ) In 1973 this carrier of MacM as Nuclear Power Plant Engineer was finished (no reports of any promotions…) 3. Starting 1973 he made livings (I hope so…) as independent Mechanical Engineer- Inventor being self-employed in some Corporation, founded with his participation. No more data of any other education are available. No more official hiring was reported. 4. During his work in this Corporation MacM (I guess together with some co-authors) obtained several patents for several types of particular inventions in area of Mechanical, Electromechanical and Electrical devices. No one engine, which he has invented, was reached the level of mass production (no data of any mass production of his engines are submitted). 5. That is it. Usual life, usual biography of usual initiative Mechanical Technician with some talent of creation of some innovation in area of his practical expertise. Not a shred of some educational, self-educational or person-to-person educational experience in area of the professional Science! (Technical Sciences, which are studied in the Technical Colleges and Institutes and provide qualification “Engineer”, have very little with Fundamental Science that provides the qualifications like “Physicist-theorist” and/or “Physicist-experimentalist”). To understand what I am talking about, please, notice that no one College that qualifies its graduated students as “Highest Class Nuclear Reactor Operator” teaches them SRT, GRT, QM, QFT, etc, etc… Therefore, MacM has no professional education in any of fundamental Science. His skill in Math well known for any visitor of our Forum… 6. And on that ground there comes the best “achievement” of MacM – his UniKEF! He likes to call it “theory” and many people, trying to be polite call it the same, even being totally rejecting its content… I told it many times and I repeat it here: UniKEF is a collection of the absolute nonsensical statements and has nothing to do with a theory in any sense! I have difficulties to find in UniKEF even the one (1) non-trivial statement that would be though … self-consistent …semantically, not mentioning scientifically! This MacM’s “achievement” is a honorable exhibit of Crank-Museum of whole World… MacM many times gave us examples of his dishonesty, capability to forge facts and documents, to falsify evidence and events… He easily can lie, accuse people of lowest misbehavior, and assault them on the lowest level of intelligence (somewhere between sniffing they asses and direct sick dreams to fuck it) only for calling his “theories” by name they really deserve – stupid. MacM is the lowest type of human being I ever meet in whole my life…
Yuriy, What a joke. You pretend to know so much and even know about another persons history from 40 years ago. "Maintenance man?, "No promotions?. In 1980 I contracted as a nuclear technician at Shoreham Nuclear Station within a year I was made Foremen, the following year I was the Startup Coordinator of the plant. Deleted by author to remain in compliance with site standards As far as "Course". The fact is the program was recognized by universities and to have received a 4 year degree I would only have had to spend one year taking english, history and crap I don't like. The balance of your post merits no further rebuttal it is pure extrapolated crap.
So, according new submitted information, MacM during period of time 1973-1981 (at least!) was working as maintenance worker in Nuclear Power plant of USA and ... as chef of private Corporation! In that regime of life he was even promoted to position of ... the Startup Coordinator of the Nuclear Power Plant! Poor USA! Who is responsible for Startups of your ... Nuclear Power Plants! Acting Chefs of Invention Corporations... seeking for additional earnings! Does MAGATE know that your practice? Now it will. And not because I will e-mail them….
You do of course understand that I don't read every thread, and see not what you are are accusing me of not calling Yuriy on? So an even simpler design task. You should have left it be. And you know this... how? Your engineering books come with incorrect psi units handwritten in them? If so, I think you need a new book. And I suppose you're going to pretend you derived your polynomial equations from scratch, without using calculus... even though that isn't possible. The simple fact is that any engineer will find simpler equations for the tasks he commonly works on. You don't know calc, so you obviously didn't derive it. Your only other option would have been log tables. *sigh* http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&q=slip slide control systems&btnG=Search As I've said, your techninque was not unique. The fact is that it is the same as a slip/slide control system. Yeah, cause that's just what I want... some quack on the internet knowing where I work.... Are you senile? You said "You openly stated you were instructed by upper management to follow IT's instructions and that upper management knew jack crap." This is the thread, as there isn't anything else even vaguely saying what you claim.
I was made President of the corportion in 1975 you Deleted by author to remain within site standards. I did the hiring and firings of the likes of you. Well you guessed wrong again youDeleted by author to remain within site standards. All patents are mine and only mine. No "co-authors" or team achievement. Mine and mine only got it? True. However, you are only showing your lack of understanding on how this all works. It takes years to get such radical change to occur. Detroit won't do it because they would need to completely redesign cars because of the light weight, further they have billions in tooling producing conventional engines that sell, they will only change when they must replace such tooling or some other issue forces such change. Now what you don't know is smaller companies are currently building my engine and testing it for their application. My guess is withing two years it will indeed be in mass production in one or more companies. So stuff it youDeleted by author to remain within site standards. To understand what I am talking about please notice I did not say "Highest" of anything. that is your ignorance making such assumption. Also notice that you don't know what you are talking about. I never said a college qualified the 1st Class rating. Again stupidity on your part. You show your ignorance about the industry. 1st Class means a "Control Room Reactor Operator", 2nd Class means the operator of the secondary steam plant. http://www.sciforums.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=3797&stc=1 Now that we know you are ignorant about the issues you are discussing should we continue? All coming from a man that advocates a theory which has been shown to parallel UniKEF in (13) areas. A theory that is totally assumption and without any proof but for which he takes as the worlds greatest achievement. If this were not via internet I would sue your ass off for liable. You stupid Deleted by author to remain within site standards show one case of any such conduct. The fact is I have the highest of reputation for integrity. This blurb qualifies your professinalisim - None. You are a pathetic piece of Delteted by author to remain within site standards.
Then you shouldn't make negative remarks based on lack of knowledge. He is advocating what he calls Vacuum theory, which is based on nothing but assumptions, no testing or data; to which in UniKEF Analysis I have shown (13) parallels to UniKEF. Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image! Sure, of course it couldn't be difficult at all if MacM did it. You are talking though your hat. Why do you suppose I got these contracts, because I was high bidder? Really get real. Don't be stupid we are discussing the graph of volume change vs pressure, not some scratch notes done by hand on the perimeter. I don't have to claim anything. I'm making a statement. I use a polynomial curve generator. Did I say I wrote the polynomials? - No. It is a program that takes data points and writes the polynomial expression for the curve. Wrong. Sigh indeed. :bugeye: You do assume to know to much. You have got to be kidding. This is your knowledge and understanding of traction drive transmissions. HeHeHe.. Nope. You and I had another pissing contest and this issue was openly discussed. I do not appear in this thread, so you have the wrong thread.
Whatever, I haven't seen it. I have seen your kook theory. I made no 'negative comment' about Yuriy's theory, because I haven't seen a damn thing about it to comment on. I am glad to know that you work in the only industry on the planet where the best bidder techincal bid actually gets the job. It must be refreshing. All I said was "If you are going to link to a table to demonstrate your knowledge, at least make sure your conversions are correct." The conversions on the page are NOT correct. So you used data points, but claim you didn't use precalulated tables. What did you do, waste time and money doing experiments so you could get your equations... when all it would have taken is a few minutes of calc? If so, the amount of time and money you waste is showing. Would you care to correct me? I thought not. You do this all the time. You claim something, I show you it was never said, then you claim it was said elsewhere. The simple fact is that it wasn't said. If you disagree then show us. This is just another example of how your selective/fading memory causes problems.
