Silicon based life.

Just a question.

Life-forms may be silicon based...I imagine that they would exist in very cold conditions because silicon polymers forms fragile strings...Is this true?
Has anybody got any insights into this?.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

silicon lif forms exist in warm fake breasts
if u freez them, they mutate in2 real breast but turn fake again wen u warm them up

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

The problem with silicon is that it has a tendencies to be too stable as a oxidized polymer. This would mean that to over come this you would need very high temperatures! Lets say silicon life could exist on Venus. If it did the next problem would be what is its transporting fluid? All life needs as fluid medium to carry out reactions and transport products. If silicon life were to exist at 400C it would need lead or aluminum as a working fluid! Also these critters would weigh much MUCH more then carbon base life… mainly from being made of silicon and having a liquid metal for cytoplasmic fluid and all. At such high temperatures weird things will happen with chemical reaction: most reactions that we use to live would not be stabile enough to exist here. Most likely silicon life would need D orbital reactions and would need heavy elements that are rare here in this section of the galaxy.

Silicon life might be possible but considering the conditions it needs to occur I doubt it is very common.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

silicon, probably not

http://nai.arc.nasa.gov/astrobio/feat_questions/silicon_life.cfm

 

How about inside rocky planets? or a planet that orbits very near to its sun...?

 

sounds good to me... we have not found anything yet that is a problem: so it remains just a hypothesis.

 

are there any other contenders?

 

The only other contenders can think of are really just the carbon based life form that are found deep 20-100(?)km down in the earths crust. They use hydrogen sulfide(?) as `food`... perhaps there is as much biomass inside the earth an on top...

How plausible are gaseous creatures that live in interstellar space (still carbon based)?

 

There was a hypothesis that life could live using Methane or ammonia as a working fluid. this would allow life to live on a moon like Titan. the problem is at such low temps (Below 100K) chemical reactions are so very sloooooooooooow, these reactions also demand a lot of energy beacuse of the lack of any thermal energy in this situation. So deep cold life would live grow and evolve very VERY SLOWLY. In fact if we go to Titan I will bet all we will find is nothing more complex then prebotic molecules like RNA.

so far what seems to define life is water and temps and pressures at which water can exist. So no life floating in outer space (unless this life is hibernating).

 

Yeah, but finding that soup will be in some ways better than finding something alive. Might give some insight as to what can happen between the phases of dead organics and life. Just wish we had some nuclear engines on Cassini so it was there already and could work longer.

 

2006 just three more year!

 

Less than that...

 

That soup may be found between the stars...?
It takes a long time for life to evolve in a cool environment? Yes probably...but there has been over 4 billion years of time to do it...And it may have been evolving long before that in deep space.

i think i mentioned in another thread that all DNA lifeforms (on earth) have right handed helixes...why?
i also remember that organic(?) sugars can be left-handed or right-handed but only one form is utilised by life-forms...why?

Perhaps ONE ancestral life-form pre-seeded the early earth...

(digressing from silicon)

i think Deep space 1 is nuclear powered...

 

I have nothing against the seeding theory

Right and left hand DNA,RNA, peptieds are not compatable with each other. As a result both forms had to compete and it was a random flip of the coin which one won.

 

Not directly, it's powering an ion engine.

In Niven's The Mote In God's Eye, he used the right vs left handed molecules idea, where the alien life could not break down our version, so they could eat it, but it passed through without being digested at all. Led to an accidental strawberry infestation...

Is this plausible, that the two types are incompatible, even in terms of diseases? Or do we even a have a clue yet?

As for silicon, it's not impossible, but I think conditions are going to have to be even more perfect than for carbon to exist, due to silicon not being as good at bonding as carbon is. Carbon rules.

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

 

Carbon exhibits a handedness...yes?
Silicon doesn`t, but it doesn`t matter, does it?

i`m not sure about carbon being that much better to silicon in forming long chains.

 

http://www.physics.hku.hk/~tboyce/sfseti/21strange.html

Silicon has two problems...weaker bonds, and an affinity for oxygen.

 

So would they use something else for respiration?

 

HeHe, we may as well say Carbon has two problems...stronger bonds, and an affinity for oxygen,

CO2?

As for `breathing` i don`t know, how about sulphur?
what about metals?

Sulphur is fairly abundant in the universe.

 

Sulfur “breathing” life exists here on Earth in volcanic water… usually hot. Nothing seems to prevent a whole plant from living off sulfur instead of oxygen. The sulfur would need to be very plentiful though. Think of the planet like the moon IO but with a very thick atmosphere of Sulfides and temps supporting liquid water: very good chance we would see some evolved creatures breathing this stuff. Though sulfur is not as efficient in the electron ladder as oxygen so the chemistry of bio-sulfurics would be very different to be competitive with the easy of use of oxygen. Halogens would be even better oxidizers (taking away electrons) then oxygen but there is no real viable situation for planets with atmospheres and oceans contains large amounts of halogens. As of yet there is no life on earth that oxidizes using halogens as a primary source of non-aerobic metabolism. Life could also live by reducing (giving electrons) organics. Such life would breath Hydrogen (or very unlikely considering its nature: alkaloid metals) Life like this does exist on earth, in fact farting is a good example of such life forms byproducts. Unfortunately hydrogen does not seem very productive metabolically and my not support the evolution of higher life forms. Hydrogen breathing life would live on planets with a Hydrogen atmosphere like Jupiter. Only problem with living on a planet that has no surface is that there would need to be a very long retention time in the atmosphere so that life forms would not have to worry about getting sucked down to their horrible deaths near such planets cores.