In an ideal world, they would

were is the voting thingy?

Working on it.

Yes! But my employer must guarantee they are STD free!

and free rubber tools in every bathroom as well...

I hope they offer a gender option....:confused:

I hope they offer a gender option....:confused:

you mean for the ones that go down the drain?

This is a ridiculous thread. If an employee were to do so, not only would it be illegal, but also immoral - it would ruin lives and destroy marriages.

Finally !

A poll worth voting in !

Sure the sons of bitches should offer prostitutes as an employment benefit !

Or at least some O' them there "happy ending" rub downs.

LoL !

Problem is - next thing you know, Ted Kennedy would be bitching that welfare should cover 'em for all the scum-sucking LixLiuke types too lazy to get off their asses & work for their "extracurricular activities" !

Should employer's cover the cost of buying prostitutes?
Sure! What are employers for after all!
But they must also give everyone a catalog! I mean... what's the point of getting a prostitute for free if you get an ugly one with pimples and hair on the face!?! :bugeye:

I believe the Japanese army did this back in WW2. They were called comfort girls, and I think they even worked for free! (not that they had any choice).

Sweet, cesspool. That pushes my posts back down to 7772. 5 more posts until I get Jesus' digits!!

It says that I may not vote on this poll.

Discrimination.

Discrimination.

Indeed !

Especially as this fine, fine poll has been cesspooled, while that 'derenzi's prunt-assed ones flourish like some sort of nauseating fungoid growth !
:grumble: :grumble: :grumble:

My answer is no. The employer does not need to cover the cost of buying a prostitute.

They do have to cover the cost of hiring the services of a prostitute on at least one day a week.

Most definately the employees need a little morale booster

Wow, look how I spelled "employers".

Don't worry. It's the college influence.

How would five more posts get Roman the finger bones of Jesus?

How many sensible employers would hire someone loser enough to need a prostitute?:D
I vote no.

How many sensible employers would hire someone loser enough to need a prostitute?:D
I vote no.

It's not an uncommon practice to offer prostitutes to seal business deals in Texas and Nigeria.

How many sensible employers would hire someone loser enough to need a prostitute?:D
I vote no.
What about dorky software companies?

My answer is no. The employer does not need to cover the cost of buying a prostitute.

They do have to cover the cost of hiring the services of a prostitute on at least one day a week.

semantics

What about dorky software companies?
Real geeks don't need prostitutes - they pull women by brain power alone :D

dead women.

dead women.
What? You're suggesting that employers should buy dead women, for some as-yet-unspecified purpose?

Yes. more details to follow.

Dead people never ask for a cost-of-living raise. That's got to be a point in their favour as employees.

Yes. more details to follow.
I salivate copiously.

I salivate copiously.
Yes you do, and we've told to stop it.

I haven no doubt had I begun this thread I would be banned again from this place. Having said this I vote yes for Roman's ingenuity and clear vision of a better world :C~