Hello. Between march 2007 and march 2008 I was involved in testing a physics engine with a Japanese company called Polyphony Digital who make a driving simulator called Gran Turismo. During this process a brilliant Japanese cryptographer/physicist who was hired by Polyphony Digital developed a new type of code, which was used to control how the grip of the car would behave. This new code was then developed even further after I did a lot of testing with it.

This code worked like a chain so it could also run at a speed. I was able to make the speed of this chain run very quickly, quite easily. After about 1 week I managed to bring this code all the way to the speed of light. In order to do this I had to think and move at the speed of light over a short time, about 3 or 4 seconds each effort. When I did, the last decision I made with my left hand broke through the fabric of space -time. At this moment my arm became light. By the time I looked away from my arm all the matter around me had become light and then space. For about 10 seconds I could see nothing but perfect white light and it was conscious, powerful and infinite. Then the light seemed to draw my attention to my left where there was somebody sitting down. At the time I didn’t recognise this person as I was very shocked and the whole thing caught me by surprise.

With binary code travelling the speed of light it was now possible to run scientific equations in 3 dimensions. This allowed for the equation/test that found the points of inertia in the car. I found all these points and they made up the shape of a cross in the base of the chassis. For the cross to function it had to be placed somewhere. Another physicist who was hired later on by Polyphony Digital figured out that it went above the car. I then suggested that there might be a halo around the car and there was. Another physicist found that the weight of the car is shaped like a pair of balls.

So this was confirmation that the light I saw was God and the person sitting to his right was Jesus. This system of inertia symbolises what it took for him to go through with his own crucifixion. You have to see it.

To add to this proof, as the process went on I began finding weak points in this new 3 dimensional code. I kept on breaking it, each time showing them exactly where to make it stronger. This continued until I couldn’t break it anymore. As I couldn’t do anything more with it, I suggested that they assume there is only light because that is what I saw when I broke through the fabric of space-time. This worked and they managed to create an environment made of light and it was more proof of what I had seen. I then made this environment of light perfect using mind power. Hard to believe I know but I developed a connection with the code, which had grown over 6 months and which always happened at the moment of inertia. So now the code is exactly what I saw when I broke through the fabric of space-time, which makes it God’s image. It isn’t hard to believe when you see it. It’s made of perfectly balanced positive and negative and every colour in the spectrum but perfect, white light travelling at the speed of light. I created something that just, is.


So to clarify everything shortly; this new code was a great piece of mathematics and after a lot of work from me it was perfectly filled with inertia information. Then I managed to take this code all the way to the speed of light. I made one last decision at the speed of light and accidentally broke through the fabric of space-time. Everything became light and it was conscious and there was a person sitting to my left who resembled Jesus but at that time I couldn’t say for sure who it was. Later on the points of inertia were found in the car by me. They were in the shape of a cross and this left the physicists with a cross. They eventually figured out that it went above the car in a system of inertia that controls how the weight of the car works. This confirmed who was sitting to my left earlier. A halo was then found around the car after I suggested it. Another physicist found that the weight of the car is shaped like a pair of balls. This system represents what it took for Jesus to go through with his crucifixion. It was built into the laws of physics so it could be found later on and everything I have just described has been recorded and can be watched from start to finish.

You have to believe me on what happened and what I saw because the owner of this video game, Kazonori Yamauchi decided to keep me in Ireland during the testing. Him and his employees would have also seen the light and what happened. There would have been more than one witness and it probably would have been recorded on video but seeing what’s there now is enough to believe I wouldn’t lie about it. The proof and evidence of everything I am saying is there but this sad old Japanese man has ended up with it.

There are some issues that have to be addressed. They haven’t made this public because a scientist would have to make this system of inertia work before they could say it is scientific proof or that it even exists. Even with the unfinished system of inertia, its very important that people see what has been found so far so that they can make their own decisions based on what is there.

This is my third attempt at writing this in 8 months. The first version was too short, the second version was too long and in total I have received 3 open minded replies out of a few thousand. This should have been made public in a serious and respectful manner but thanks to this soulless, sad little man, Kazonori Yamauchi, its all gone wrong. He caused all the problems and he is the reason there is only one witness. On top of that he stole a year of my life after I put everything into this process and he’s the reason you have to believe me under these unbelievable circumstances. He was just there all the time, contributed nothing but money and was even being emotionally needy at times and needed constant reassurance he was involved as there was a lot of genius going on by various people and he felt stupid because all he did was just sit there. Sad, really.

For anyone who reads this, please tell everyone you know. If you have the means to investigate it, I would advise it. It’s the biggest and most important story to break in about 2000 years and before that, 14 billion. I’m not a religious person and I have questioned my own sanity more than all the people who I’ve tried to share this information with so don’t bother.

I advise a boycott of Sony and Polyphony Digital so they have to show the proof now. Further action would be necessary to make sure that no individual or company should be the sole beneficiaries of this code, this information and this progress. This boycott would be a good step towards making sure that everyone benefits from this progress equally. I’m not looking for a following or anything. I’m trying to let people know what has been found, what they have to do to see it, that its rightfully there’s and what they have to do to get it. I can’t even launch legal proceedings so it’s out of my hands.

If you have any questions please ask. Any constructive criticism is welcomed. Any legal advice is greatly appreciated concerning international employment law intellectual property law and how to make public finding the points of inertia so I get my noble prize. Anything else, keep it to yourself.


Colm.



“One giant leap for mankind. One decision for Colm.” The decision that broke through the fabric of space-time and made everything after that possible.

A car held all the secrets.

Inertia was the key to everything.

No.

Well, I'm convinced.

Yes.

You will be convinced after you see what I'm talking about.

Did you ever hang out at the delphi flight sim forum? Play redbaron 3d?

12 year old kids on video game forums have been saying that kind of thing to me for months.

It's a pretty unique handle, and he is a cool guy. Oh well.

it seems every age group responds the same to this news. ok, I'm very fast and very strong and because of that I made that decision and the rest happened. just think about that part it.

the thread killer strikes again!

I see the part where everybody gets lost is when I mention breaking through the fabric of space-time. So I will try to explain how this happened in more detail. As I mentioned this new code looked like 2 dimensional squares. The testing I did perfectly filled these squares with information. So now these squares were solid with inertia information. Inertia is a very special force. When a car is drifting, the slightest touch will make the car skim along the track in a different direction. These squares behaved the same way. Each one was a perfect copy of the last so they had an unlimited supply which allowed them to fire them at my steering wheel indefinitely. When they were being fired at the steering wheel one touch at any time in any direction would send one square flying. If you shook your hand you would get quite a few and the speed would increase but you had to do all of this while drifting. I was able to get this chain to go so fast that they couldn’t build faster. There seem to be a few speed barriers that I had to get the code through. Each time I did, I had to consciously make it happen. So when I managed to make it work at the speed of light my last decision in an increasing number of decisions broke through the fabric of space-time. I had to break through the fabric of space-time to be fast enough to make that one last decision and I did. I didn’t know or think I was going to break through the fabric of space time but I had to in order to make it work. After that everything became light and the squares that were travelling in a straight line were now attached to each other in what looks a spring made of 3 dimensional squares. Does that make it easier to believe?

Does that make it easier to believe?

Why should we believe you?

believe me for your own sake. its important people see this and do something about it. Every person has a right to this. The only way I can thin of making this happen is to do a boycott. Take a companies income away and they have to do everything you say. To make this happen, you would have to do nothing.

I could actually make sonic move so fast that it went of the screen, call that a break of the space time continium if you like. I yust called it a crappy sega

I saw god when I played Black Sabbath at 78 RPM.

http://img142.imageshack.us/img142/8099/dogbuttjesusxb3.gif (http://imageshack.us)
http://img142.imageshack.us/img142/dogbuttjesusxb3.gif/1/w316.png (http://g.imageshack.us/img142/dogbuttjesusxb3.gif/1/)

The lord moves (and appears) in mysterious ways (and places).

The question is:
Did you play the game or did the Game Play You?

Kids on video games forums were leaving replies like that. I thought people on a science forum would have something more constructive to say. Forget about video games. This was testing a physics engine. do a search for newtonian physics engine and see what you get. it wont be video games.

I think the jist of what everyone's trying to say is show us the objective evidence. Your claims mean nothing otherwise.

believe me for your own sake. And so the cry rang down through the ages: "Believe me without evidence, for I appeal to your emotions!"
Sorry, but you will have to do better than that.

do a search for newtonian physics engine and see what you get. it wont be video games. Hmm, lets see what the almighty google search yields:

First hit (I'm Feeling Lucky): Wikipedia entry on physics engines, to quote the intro paragraph:
A physics engine is a computer program that simulates Newtonian physics models, using variables such as mass, velocity, friction and wind resistance. It can simulate and predict effects under different conditions that would approximate what happens in real life or in a fantasy world. Its main uses are in scientific simulation and in video games. (emphasis mine.)
Guess you weren't feeling too lucky afterall, eh?

2nd result: Wikipedia entry on video game physics.

3rd result: http://www.alecrivers.com/physical/overview_physics.htm Quote of site description: A Physics-Based Game Creation System

I must say, your credibility really shines through with that remark. Should I mention the irony that you yourself said that the physics engine you were making was specificaly for a video game? Now, perhaps you can see why a certain level of evidence is being demanded? (At this point, any at all would be great.)

That said, I must be fair and say that your quote could be taken to mean that no actual video games will come up in a search (as opposed to video-game oriented pages, or pages containing the phrase "video game".) In this case, there are far fewer results of actual video games [none on the first page, and I won't bother looking past that] (not too many people seem to be marketing their "newtonian physics engine.") However, 5 of the 10 first results were pages oriented around programming physics specificaly for a video game (and that number doesn't even count the first result, see how leaniant I'm being?)

Kids on video games forums were leaving replies like that. When you act like a kid, people treat you like a kid (which means they talk to you like a kid.) Fact of life.

I thought people on a science forum would have something more constructive to say Alright, constructive it is:
You could be charged with slander by posting these messages: Sony in particular does not take kindly to anything that could potentialy damage their sales (ever heard of a compani called Lik-Sang?) And with the lack of success they are currently experiancing, it would not be wise to give them an excuse to sue you. Hence, I sudgest that you cease and desist now, before you get those words in letter form. Of course, it is entirely up to you. Maby they won't care.

Finally; there are people who can help you with your problem: start by seeing your doctor, and telling them everything. Make sure you follow what they say; they are there to help you.

Get well soon.
-Andrew

voodoochile

First off, what you say here isn't worth the paper it's printed on. We don't know if you are just some bored pot smoking forums wanderer that's decided to stalk the forums with some delusional tale, or somebody promoting something for some internal reason, perhaps to undermine a company by extraordinary tales... In any case anything you submit to the forum for people to read is going to be taken with a pinch of salt, since there is no evidence to independently evaluate.

Lets just try to break this down a little for you to understand, no matter what physics an engine is running it's not going to be able to run any faster than the computer runs. If the Machines in use are standard Semi-Conductor systems and weren't surround by large Halon cooling systems, then what you suggest is more than like Impossible.

Even if it was possible, what makes you think the "Religious Iconage" is real? Most religions know that over the computer 10 years is their most trialling period, this is because Science is right on the boundaries on making discoveries that could well show how false those religions are and they would lose their followers in droves. This is why to me it looks fraudulent, either you are trying to pull the wool over peoples eyes, or you are delusional or your colleagues at work had a laugh at your expense and now you are delusional from it.

In any case I really suggest you are more Critical of what you think happened, consider it was just some Stunt that you got played with.

(Kind of reminds me the "Don't go for it Electric Boy" event.)

Yet Another Woo-Woo Presenting His Crackpot "Theory" on the Intertubes.

Your going to need to present some kind of theory that we can test for ourselves, the enviroment and scenario need to be replicated. Video footage of the event would be a very good start. I don't think your a liar or your telling the truth, im indifferent, I would like to be able to somehow test what you are suggesting.


peace.

And so the cry rang down through the ages: "Believe me without evidence, for I appeal to your emotions!"
Sorry, but you will have to do better than that.

Hmm, lets see what the almighty google search yields:

First hit (I'm Feeling Lucky): Wikipedia entry on physics engines, to quote the intro paragraph:
(emphasis mine.)
Guess you weren't feeling too lucky afterall, eh?

2nd result: Wikipedia entry on video game physics.

[/url] Quote of site description:

I must say, your credibility really shines through with that remark. Should I mention the irony that you yourself said that the physics engine you were making was specificaly for a video game? Now, perhaps you can see why a certain level of evidence is being demanded? (At this point, any at all would be great.)

That said, I must be fair and say that your quote could be taken to mean that no actual video games will come up in a search (as opposed to video-game oriented pages, or pages containing the phrase "video game".) In this case, there are far fewer results of actual video games [none on the first page, and I won't bother looking past that] (not too many people seem to be marketing their "newtonian physics engine.") However, 5 of the 10 first results were pages oriented around programming physics specificaly for a video game (and that number doesn't even count the first result, see how leaniant I'm being?)

When you act like a kid, people treat you like a kid (which means they talk to you like a kid.) Fact of life.

Alright, constructive it is:
You could be charged with slander by posting these messages: Sony in particular does not take kindly to anything that could potentialy damage their sales (ever heard of a compani called Lik-Sang?) And with the lack of success they are currently experiancing, it would not be wise to give them an excuse to sue you. Hence, I sudgest that you cease and desist now, before you get those words in letter form. Of course, it is entirely up to you. Maby they won't care.

Finally; there are people who can help you with your problem: start by seeing your doctor, and telling them everything. Make sure you follow what they say; they are there to help you.

Get well soon.
-Andrew

I get what your saying and I believe you don't know how a driving simulator works. I'm not good at writing so I advise looking into how the laws of physics work with binary code in a driving simulator . As for my proof, you believe it when you see what I'm talking about.

Also, Fuck Sony.

Also, Fuck Sony.


Now people are just going to think your some dude who is working for panasonic or microsoft, trying to make sony's sales go down the drain.

peace.

voodoochile

First off, what you say here isn't worth the paper it's printed on. We don't know if you are just some bored pot smoking forums wanderer that's decided to stalk the forums with some delusional tale, or somebody promoting something for some internal reason, perhaps to undermine a company by extraordinary tales... In any case anything you submit to the forum for people to read is going to be taken with a pinch of salt, since there is no evidence to independently evaluate.

Lets just try to break this down a little for you to understand, no matter what physics an engine is running it's not going to be able to run any faster than the computer runs. If the Machines in use are standard Semi-Conductor systems and weren't surround by large Halon cooling systems, then what you suggest is more than like Impossible.

Even if it was possible, what makes you think the "Religious Iconage" is real? Most religions know that over the computer 10 years is their most trialling period, this is because Science is right on the boundaries on making discoveries that could well show how false those religions are and they would lose their followers in droves. This is why to me it looks fraudulent, either you are trying to pull the wool over peoples eyes, or you are delusional or your colleagues at work had a laugh at your expense and now you are delusional from it.

In any case I really suggest you are more Critical of what you think happened, consider it was just some Stunt that you got played with.

(Kind of reminds me the "Don't go for it Electric Boy" event.)
Stryder;
This is my first post on the internet.
They could see where the speed was going so they had time to prepare.
There was no religious intention. It was a scientific process to predict a car's movement according to the laws of physics. It turned out a car held all the secrets and I found the majority of them.

Your going to need to present some kind of theory that we can test for ourselves, the enviroment and scenario need to be replicated. Video footage of the event would be a very good start. I don't think your a liar or your telling the truth, im indifferent, I would like to be able to somehow test what you are suggesting.

EmptyForceofChi; Thats exactly what needs to happen. I would want everybody to see it and understand it.


peace.

EmptyForceOfChi; no agenda other than the truth.

I'm completely open to out of the box possibilities but you have to understand that without more information, links, or anything else that might help support your experience then even someone as open as I am can not accept your story to the point of taking action (not buying sony) without more relevant info.

If you can not understand why someone would not jump on your band wagon with only the information you have provided thus far then that in itself shows you lack a balanced and practical perspective in general.

I've seen metalic flying saucers so believe me, I'm not resistant to out of the ordinary occurences, lol... but please deliver more info, preferred links, etc.

Even if your full of shit your ideas might make for a good movie:)

Stryder;
This is my first post on the internet.
They could see where the speed was going so they had time to prepare.
There was no religious intention. It was a scientific process to predict a car's movement according to the laws of physics. It turned out a car held all the secrets and I found the majority of them.

Why not just show us. Sneak an mpeg recorder into work and make a video.

Stryder;
This is my first post on the internet.
And congratulations: it's been a long time since someone manged such pure unmitigated drivel in their first post.

It was a scientific process to predict a car's movement according to the laws of physics. It turned out a car held all the secrets and I found the majority of them.
Utter crap: ever heard the term GIGO?
"The laws of physics" do not exist at all, anywhere, in any computer software.
All there is is what has been programmed in of what we know of the laws so far.
That would be why the term is "modelling" - it's an approximation to indicate the likeliest outcomes, and these results are then modified (and sometimes the software itself also) by results obtained in the real world (depending, of course, on the intended purpose of the software).
A computer game does not have (and would not require) fully-accurate physics modelling - just an idealisation to approximate reality.
Take fewer drugs, learn something about the real world (and computers) and come back in a couple of years.

I like Nuts.

I really doubt anyone who works on physics engines, and is so good at it he can break through space time would have never posted on the internet before.

I would completely believe you if it weren't for that.

I'm completely open to out of the box possibilities but you have to understand that without more information, links, or anything else that might help support your experience then even someone as open as I am can not accept your story to the point of taking action (not buying sony) without more relevant info.

If you can not understand why someone would not jump on your band wagon with only the information you have provided thus far then that in itself shows you lack a balanced and practical perspective in general.

I've seen metalic flying saucers so believe me, I'm not resistant to out of the ordinary occurences, lol... but please deliver more info, preferred links, etc.

Even if your full of shit your ideas might make for a good movie:)

The only thing you have to believe is that one decision. Thats when everything got a little outside the box. All the proof and information is in owned by Kazonori Yamauchi. There is no band wagon just an idea on how to force him to make this public now. Got any better ideas on how to do that? The movie would be short. I show up, do about 20 impossible things and fuck off at the end.

Oli; A computer game does not have (and would not require) fully-accurate physics modelling - just an idealisation to approximate reality. This whole process was about making a fully accurate physics model.

I like Nuts.
Prove it.

I really doubt anyone who works on physics engines, and is so good at it he can break through space time would have never posted on the internet before.

I would completely believe you if it weren't for that.
Are you judging my honesty based on my previous level of activity in internet forums?

This thread isn't even worthy of the Pseudoscience subforum. I vote it gets moved to the Cesspool.

All those in favor say, "aye."

[QUOTE=SkinWalker;2009994]This thread isn't even worthy of the Pseudoscience subforum. I vote it gets moved to the Cesspool.

All those in favor say, "aye."[/QUOTE
If you dont like it dont read it

Aye!

That's what I'm talking about. Anymore votes?

your looking for a group to go, nay

If you're just going to be a "nay-sayer" then you'll have to go somewhere else.

dude, what I'm saying is good news. Its just a lot to believe and comprehend. You go somewhere else. Somebody might have something constructive to add.

I don't have to go anywhere. This is clearly an open thread since the topic is "anything goes."

No evidence is required for you wild (and really silly) claims, therefore anything that is uttered is both supportive and constructive.

Oh. And I'm going to continue being just as inane and banal as your OP and will respond each time you do.

Don't make me get my posse. :cool:

your really silly

Isn't that the point of this thread?

You're not showing any evidence of your wild and silly claims, so the discussion phase is done. What's left but to be silly.

It reminds me of a related story:

A helicopter was flying around above Seattle when an electrical malfunction disabled all of the aircraft's electronic navigation and communications equipment.

Due to the clouds and haze, the pilot could not determine the helicopter's position. The pilot saw a tall building, flew toward it, circled, and held up a handwritten sign that said "WHERE AM I?" in large letters. People in the tall building quickly responded to the aircraft, drew a large sign, and held it in a building window. Their sign said "YOU ARE IN A HELICOPTER."

The pilot smiled, waved, looked at his map, determined the course to steer to SEATAC airport, and landed safely. After they were on the ground, the copilot asked the pilot how he had done it.

"I knew it had to be the Microsoft Building, because they gave me a technically correct but completely useless answer."

Isn't that the point of this thread?

You're not showing any evidence of your wild and silly claims, so the discussion phase is done. What's left but to be silly.

It reminds me of a related story:

A helicopter was flying around above Seattle when an electrical malfunction disabled all of the aircraft's electronic navigation and communications equipment.

Due to the clouds and haze, the pilot could not determine the helicopter's position. The pilot saw a tall building, flew toward it, circled, and held up a handwritten sign that said "WHERE AM I?" in large letters. People in the tall building quickly responded to the aircraft, drew a large sign, and held it in a building window. Their sign said "YOU ARE IN A HELICOPTER."

The pilot smiled, waved, looked at his map, determined the course to steer to SEATAC airport, and landed safely. After they were on the ground, the copilot asked the pilot how he had done it.

"I knew it had to be the Microsoft Building, because they gave me a technically correct but completely useless answer."
You spend too much time on the internet and you dont seem to understand that the whole reason I am writing this post, is so that everybody gets to see this proof. Boycott = Proof

Oh. You're right. I did misunderstand. When are you posting the "proof?"

I should have called this thread. Scientific proof that God exists, exists, but a sad old little japanese man has it and he has been keeping it quiet.

Is there anybody here who can think of anything constructive to add?

Is there anybody here who can think of anything constructive to add?

If you can't, what hope do the rest of us have?

I declare this thread silly. Voodoochile-Faith is what God requires from us. I should slap you around with a large trout, but I won't. Faith is belief in something wihout proof of its existence. Proof of God's existence, would, in fact, eliminate much of the foolishness of Religion. You seem to be a skilled programmer, perhaps you should focus on creating something amazing, rather than attempting to "prove" something that one group refuses to believe, and another believes without proof. Use your talents for something more.

Hmmm...maybe your just not good with social perspective.
You are neck deep in what would normally be called metaphysics with what your sharing.
That's right next door to religion in a sense.
Basically your asking us to rearrange our entire world view and quite possibly our own identity at such a level.
Sorry friend, I think you might be out of luck on these here forums.
Not even any links to entertain your idea.
Oh well, at least you tried.

Boycott = Proof
You know, I had a strikingly similar experiance once actualy, except a Microsoft employee shoved my code up their ass. The only way to recover it is to rape the employee, and forcibly remove the proof from their rectum. Due to legal constraints, I am unable to do this. Will you help me recover the proof, and be the salvation for humanity? You will believe it when you see what I'm talking about.
Rape = proof.

(The above is an example of a Reductio ad Absurdem, and is meant to be humerous while simultaniously demonstrating the flaw of your proposal. Please do not take it too personaly.)
-Andrew

I vote it gets moved to the Cesspool.

All those in favor say, "aye."
aye.

This whole process was about making a fully accurate physics model.
Then it failed miserably - I can tell you now that there is no possible way that the "points of inertia" will form a cross - it's dependant upon the mass distribution.

Are you judging my honesty based on my previous level of activity in internet forums?
Honesty? Probably more your sanity. Anyone who believes that code moves at a measurable speed (let alone greater than C) isn't very tightly wrapped.
And even if it did its speed would be set by the hardware.
Major fail all round.

Most religions know that over the computer 10 years is their most trialling period, this is because Science is right on the boundaries on making discoveries that could well show how false those religions are and they would lose their followers in droves.


This has to be the most whacked out conspiratorial nonsense I have ever read. Smoke more :m: as I am certain it would best define where you are coming from.

Do you have one single shred of proof to back this up? Now if I am reading this wrong, when I should be interpreting what you wrote as a joke that you're making, then the joke is on me, but...

No, go read what the Atheists like to toss about in the Religion sub-forum. They really think they're going to discover something that "disproves" God. It's entertaining to watch their fits of apoplexy when you start trying to get them to prove some of the very simplest things.

I declare this thread silly. Voodoochile-Faith is what God requires from us. I should slap you around with a large trout, but I won't. Faith is belief in something wihout proof of its existence. Proof of God's existence, would, in fact, eliminate much of the foolishness of Religion. You seem to be a skilled programmer, perhaps you should focus on creating something amazing, rather than attempting to "prove" something that one group refuses to believe, and another believes without proof. Use your talents for something more.

I think that once you see the proof that is in Japan and watch the process in 3D and with mathematics travelling at the speed of light you will then understand as opposed to believe. If it wasnt meant to be found it wouldnt be there and its confirmation of eveything important.

Hmmm...maybe your just not good with social perspective.
You are neck deep in what would normally be called metaphysics with what your sharing.
That's right next door to religion in a sense.
Basically your asking us to rearrange our entire world view and quite possibly our own identity at such a level.
Sorry friend, I think you might be out of luck on these here forums.
Not even any links to entertain your idea.
Oh well, at least you tried.
I'm not asking you to rearrange anything. I'm just telling you that if you managed to think and move at the speed of light, if only for half a second, you would break through the fabric of space-time and what will be there is infinite conscious light. I saw it and later made it so you could see it.

Then it failed miserably - I can tell you now that there is no possible way that the "points of inertia" will form a cross - it's dependant upon the mass distribution.


Honesty? Probably more your sanity. Anyone who believes that code moves at a measurable speed (let alone greater than C) isn't very tightly wrapped.
And even if it did its speed would be set by the hardware.
Major fail all round.


Then it failed miserably - I can tell you now that there is no possible way that the "points of inertia" will form a cross - it's dependant upon the mass distribution. Nobody knew where the points of inertia were in a car until I found them. Ask any scientist or physicist you know. They will not be able to tell you. Its the information flowing through these points thats dependant on mass distribution.

Honesty? Probably more your sanity. I have ego mani because I'm right but I am very, very pissed off because a sad, old, useless, jaoanese man has my proof.

electrafixion
Do you have one single shred of proof to back this up?

THATS THE WHOLE REASON I AM WRITING THIS POST. this is the only way I can think of to force a company to show the proof. If you could think of another way, that would be constructive.

No, go read what the Atheists like to toss about in the Religion sub-forum. They really think they're going to discover something that "disproves" God. It's entertaining to watch their fits of apoplexy when you start trying to get them to prove some of the very simplest things.
No what? Also, when this process is explained with all the pieces, and you see all the evidence of everything I'm saying, it will be understood to be the information that God left in the laws of physics that will provide clarity on everything. It could only be found with binary code that was travelling at the speed of light and I took it there. The quicker people do something, the quicker they see this. Especially the atethiests, and another thing aethiests, if this is a cosmic coincidence, explain the continuity of time. Could something so systematic be an accident? Whatever about the rest.

electrafixion
Do you have one single shred of proof to back this up?

THATS THE WHOLE REASON I AM WRITING THIS POST. this is the only way I can think of to force a company to show the proof. If you could think of another way, that would be constructive.


Uh oh, me thinks you misunderstood my post. Please go back and read what I wrote with respect to the quote I included. It should become more clear.

electrafixion
my bad and I agree with you. on the subject, black holes appearently break matter down to less than 0. which means that they exist outside the universe, somewhere we cant see.

mathematics travelling at the speed of light
Mathematics does not travel at any speed, let alone C.

I'm just telling you that if you managed to think and move at the speed of light
Thinking at a "speed" is a meaningless phrase. Thoughts do not travel.

Nobody knew where the points of inertia were in a car until I found them. Ask any scientist or physicist you know. They will not be able to tell you. Its the information flowing through these points thats dependant on mass distribution.
Utter utter crap.
I'm an engineer and calculating moments of inertia (and mass distributions) is an everyday ocurrence for me.
"Information flowing through points"?? More specious crap.

It could only be found with binary code that was travelling at the speed of light and I took it there.
Once again: code does not travel, therefore your entire premise is flawed.

Oh yeah: I second the move to Cesspool.
Nothing has been offered except baseless fantasy with no correlation whatsoever to what is generally accepted as the "real world".

Mathematics does not travel at any speed, let alone C.

OK but these squares were a great piece of mathematics. All my testing made them perfectly solid with inertia information. This strength allowed them to expand at C and take on a 3D form. They were now information travelling at C and could facilitate 3d mathematical equations at the speed of light. They then proceeded to try string theory for 4 months with this new code.


Thinking at a "speed" is a meaningless phrase. Thoughts do not travel.
Mine did.


Utter utter crap.
I'm an engineer and calculating moments of inertia (and mass distributions) is an everyday ocurrence for me.
"Information flowing through points"?? More specious crap.
Do the boycott and you will be able to see me finding them. All this information should be made public and given to the public. Your job would be a lot easier and to a much higher standard.


Once again: code does not travel, therefore your entire premise is flawed.
This japanese cryptographer made it happen. My testing made it strong enough to travel.

Oh yeah: I second the move to Cesspool.
Nothing has been offered except baseless fantasy with no correlation whatsoever to what is generally accepted as the "real world".

I'm Right. Prove me wrong. The proof is there.

Mathematics does not travel at any speed, let alone C.


Thinking at a "speed" is a meaningless phrase. Thoughts do not travel.


Utter utter crap.
I'm an engineer and calculating moments of inertia (and mass distributions) is an everyday ocurrence for me.
"Information flowing through points"?? More specious crap.


Once again: code does not travel, therefore your entire premise is flawed.

Thoughts may very well have a dimensional travel to them. Forms of information could move throughout the imaginary space dimension, as Penrose and Wolf seem to agree on.

There is an imaginable realm, where things seem to be created on thought alone. In fact, if you remove the pool of thought, what is there really? There is no relativity between the world of matter, because it is not defined by some intelligent recording system, like us.

Just don't be closed on what the imaginable properties of thoughts and memory really are. Thoughts seem to tunnel into existence, almost as quick as the human will desires. How we come to know this, is still a mystery to neuroscience and psychophysics.

Dr Shiuji Inomata of the physics institution in Japan, certainly believes that thoughts and memory tunnel into existence from the zero-point field. Thoughts have manifestation of information, similar to the forms of information interpreted by zero's and one's, or binary digits, and even the kind of information we attribute to two atoms sharing energy (1).

Thoughts are types of information, and therefore, could by theory, take on the ethereal types of information we take for granted that rushes by us at superluminal speeds. This is not to be taken as woo woo, but something being taken seriously by quantum physics.

Why?

For the tunelling side of things, if we are to take relativity seriously, then energy and matter is only one dependant mix. According to Hawking, you can't have a universe like ours, without information. This information is just as unique and important as energy and matter, and somehow the same thing.

So what we come to know, is also a type of information, which must follow the same quantum mechanical rules, which state that just like all forms of matter, and all forms of energy, all forms of information also tunnel into existence from the zero-point field.

(1) - because they don't just share energy, but information as well.

Now, anyone who truely believes in God, may as well call all science, God Herself.

Anyone who doesn't, has something big to disprove. Those who do believe, don't need any real proof.

Also note... i said it may have some kind of dimensional travel, but i don't believe thoughts do. I believe we all make up some collective, and yet, dimensionless pool of existence, we call consciousness. Now, Dr Walker explains it well.

‘’The observer – indeed the whole system are coupled to the extent that agreement on the final state of the system that is involved… The will arises from the pool of all consciousness – a pool formed by small contributions of each without spatial or temporal bounds.’’

Our ability to communicate on the universal scale we can with each other, gives rise to a sea of thought, and even though there are individual thinking systems there, there is still unity in a unique sense, that somehow everyone makes up one whole of something, that is, as Evan Walker says, exists in no dimensions. It’s certainly not pseudoscientific to think this could be true, because we are living properties of one part that would not make sense if the other part did not exist. If we stacked all of this up, it would still be tiny if we squeezed this analogy into infinity, since it contains no dimensions, and it would still look miniscule on the scale of spacetime itself. So what could Dr Harris be referring to then? I’m being serious as well, because I am not even sure what on means by a ‘’thing’’ existing in zero-dimensions.

Well, it’s not even zero-dimensional. We can no longer think in dimensions, zero and some, but instead, something that cannot be explained physically. This may mean in the end, that consciousness cannot really be explained by matter alone. There may be some other aspects of it that will remain to philosophical for physics to give total explanations on, mind you, I don’t know if this is what Dr Harris was meaning.

I keep going to leave, but i realize i have more to say..

It's also a known fact of physics, that there needs to be a sufficient amount of detail given to something, for it to be real. We as a human race of beings, have an amazing ability to define this part of the vast universe, more real than some part which has never been observed before.

The collapse of the wave function, the transformation of something potential into something real, has been proven to exist from the observers point of view in QM whenever she takes the time to observe an atom lets say, for universal analogy-sake.

Everytime we make an observation, the thought behind it too, all amounts to something. Those who do not take the observer into consideration in any good theory, don't amount to much either.

Thoughts may very well have a dimensional travel to them. Forms of information could move throughout the imaginary space dimension, as Penrose and Wolf seem to agree on.

There is an imaginable realm, where things seem to be created on thought alone. In fact, if you remove the pool of thought, what is there really? There is no relativity between the world of matter, because it is not defined by some intelligent recording system, like us.

Just don't be closed on what the imaginable properties of thoughts and memory really are. Thoughts seem to tunnel into existence, almost as quick as the human will desires. How we come to know this, is still a mystery to neuroscience and psychophysics.

Dr Shiuji Inomata of the physics institution in Japan, certainly believes that thoughts and memory tunnel into existence from the zero-point field. Thoughts have manifestation of information, similar to the forms of information interpreted by zero's and one's, or binary digits, and even the kind of information we attribute to two atoms sharing energy (1).

Thoughts are types of information, and therefore, could by theory, take on the ethereal types of information we take for granted that rushes by us at superluminal speeds. This is not to be taken as woo woo, but something being taken seriously by quantum physics.

Why?

For the tunelling side of things, if we are to take relativity seriously, then energy and matter is only one dependant mix. According to Hawking, you can't have a universe like ours, without information. This information is just as unique and important as energy and matter, and somehow the same thing.

So what we come to know, is also a type of information, which must follow the same quantum mechanical rules, which state that just like all forms of matter, and all forms of energy, all forms of information also tunnel into existence from the zero-point field.

(1) - because they don't just share energy, but information as well.

I think I get what you mean. I had one powerful thought and I managed to act on that thought. Also, I dont think penrose, wolf or hawking would have a clue whats really going on unless somebody told them. All the hadron colliders in the world couldnt enlighten them. They are just not fast enough. They just need a little bit of what I have to get through that barrier.

Now, anyone who truely believes in God, may as well call all science, God Herself.

Anyone who doesn't, has something big to disprove. Those who do believe, don't need any real proof.

Finding this proof has changed the overall circumstances. When you follow this story, you will then understand that there is a God as opposed to believe it. This proof adds up to clarity on everything.

I keep going to leave, but i realize i have more to say..

It's also a known fact of physics, that there needs to be a sufficient amount of detail given to something, for it to be real. We as a human race of beings, have an amazing ability to define this part of the vast universe, more real than some part which has never been observed before.

The collapse of the wave function, the transformation of something potential into something real, has been proven to exist from the observers point of view in QM whenever she takes the time to observe an atom lets say, for universal analogy-sake.

Everytime we make an observation, the thought behind it too, all amounts to something. Those who do not take the observer into consideration in any good theory, don't amount to much either.

You get to observe exactly what I observed (minus the consciousness). I'm that good. Everybody should have seen it already.

I think the jist of what everyone's trying to say is show us the objective evidence. Your claims mean nothing otherwise.

Help me to get the proof. Help yoursleves. I dont have proof because I never signed a contract and Yamauchi has n soul. I'm aware of how crazy this sounds but telling people about this was the hardest thing I've ever done. I almost have one person who believes me where I live. Do the boycott and make things happen faster. I was going to buy a walkman but I wont.

Do that to the playstation video games sales, especially Gran Turismo which is keeping Sony afloat, and they will tie their shoelaces for you. Like a physicist and the perfect code.

so let me get this right... you travelled faster than the speed of light on your computer, something within which all components work or communicate with each other at slower speeds... and when you where travelling faster than light you saw MORE light, and a man sitting next to you... dude when the ear bud feels resistance please stop pushing!

And throwing a hole bunch of crap on the forum about inertia and drifting with a car ON A COMPUTOR and then a hole bunch of crap about information and your brain being able to do this…Feat of wonderfulness…, get your facts right! Newtonian laws are an approximation to the actual laws of physics, once you reach relativistic speeds (that’s the speed of light) the laws of Newton are insufficient to describe the effects that will occur, so go play same more GT on your Playstation and leave the forum for serious people.

Dude if your brain could work faster than the speed of light then your reaction time is … 1.000.000.000,00 times higher than that of Michael Schumacher, what the F***k are you doing on this forum become a F1 pilot and become a multi millionaire! … ow I forgot mental patients aren’t aloud near the track sorry

Dude you are such a crackpot!

your brain workes faster than everyone els on the planet? faster than the greatest minds in the world?

it's so funny that it's actualy sad

i wish you so much happyness in your own little universe

The more i think about your explination the more i start to think that while you where looking at the screen seeing these squares fly by the more you where actualy being hypnotised

I sugenst you go see a Doktor, or an exorcist which ever you prefer ;)

This japanese cryptographer made it happen. My testing made it strong enough to travel.
Balls.

I'm Right. Prove me wrong. The proof is there.
Prove you wrong?
Erm no, you made the claim (with totally spurious "support"). you're the one that's supposed to provide proof.

Thoughts may very well blah blah blah typical Reiku mix of speculation wishful thinking and general waffle but information as well.
It's one possible explanation... with little supporting evidence.

Anyone who doesn't, has something big to disprove. Those who do believe, don't need any real proof.
Again, no.
Anyone making the claim needs the proof.

Also, I dont think penrose, wolf or hawking would have a clue whats really going on unless somebody told them.
Wow so you're you're smarter than those guys?
I doubt it very much.

They are just not fast enough.
The word you're looking for is "gullible" or "stupid" not "fast".

Why don't you optimize code for other things?

The world could really benefit from you.

At least Reiku is using philosophy and not “factual testimony of a Royal nut job”

And yes you made the claim you carry the burden of proof.

But I’ll have a go at proving you wrong

Do you have a photo of the event? No
Was your leap through space time documented by an actual 3rd person who wasn’t part of the actual experiment? No
Do you have factual (black on white) proof that such an engine is being created? No
Appart from your word is there any documented proof when this event took place? No

Mmm it’s not looking good is it

Do you have any data from the period the event took place which can be analysed by an independent group of scientists? No
Is there any physical evidence of the event that can be observed by an outsider? No

It’s all a hole bunch of crap!

I can't wait for someone to get hold of this physics engine and use it to accurately predict everything that's going to happen in the universe.

Help me to get the proof. Help yoursleves. I dont have proof because I never signed a contract and Yamauchi has n soul.....

he may have no soul but you have no working brain, working without a contract, what are you retarded?:confused:

Help you get proof? dude wake up...:(

maybe you should contact Yamauchi on an open forum and confront him there, just let us know so we can come and check out how you crash and burn :D

I can't wait for someone to get hold of this physics engine and use it to accurately predict everything that's going to happen in the universe.

seriously? :m:

It’s the physics engine on GT3 on playstation, and that’s going to predict the future… :shrug:

If the engine is so powerful, as soon as you stick the Game disk in the playstation, your playstation will fry and all you'll heve left is a ball of molten plastic :o

-edit- a PS3 has 515mb ram, mij home PC has 4x as much and it can't even run a decent 3d design program!

What I can't quite work out is whay someone would use a physics engine from a game for a supposed serious project.
Why not use the solid-modelling software from the car manufacturer's CAD package? Just a thought...

oli, he say's HE broke through the fabrik of space and time while he was playing the game!!!!
The only connection betwean him and the ALL POWERFUL physics engine were his fingers! which where moving a car around a trak and he was Drifting!!! don't forget it only happens when he is drifting!!

crack:m:

so let me get this right... you travelled faster than the speed of light on your computer, something within which all components work or communicate with each other at slower speeds... and when you where travelling faster than light you saw MORE light, and a man sitting next to you... dude when the ear bud feels resistance please stop pushing!

And throwing a hole bunch of crap on the forum about inertia and drifting with a car ON A COMPUTOR and then a hole bunch of crap about information and your brain being able to do this…Feat of wonderfulness…, get your facts right! Newtonian laws are an approximation to the actual laws of physics, once you reach relativistic speeds (that’s the speed of light) the laws of Newton are insufficient to describe the effects that will occur, so go play same more GT on your Playstation and leave the forum for serious people.

Dude if your brain could work faster than the speed of light then your reaction time is … 1.000.000.000,00 times higher than that of Michael Schumacher, what the F***k are you doing on this forum become a F1 pilot and become a multi millionaire! … ow I forgot mental patients aren’t aloud near the track sorry

Dude, it happened. I made it happen with the speed and the japanese cryptographer was prepared. I didnt think everything was going to become light and I didnt believe it for sure until I saw the cross above the car. Also, Michael Schumacher is a long way down the tree when compared to me.

I've made this all very clear. You therefor understand what I'm saying but you cantt believe it. You fucking will when you see everything I'm saying is there and is true. peace.

Dude you are such a crackpot!

your brain workes faster than everyone els on the planet? faster than the greatest minds in the world?

it's so funny that it's actualy sad

i wish you so much happyness in your own little universe

Prove me wrong. If even in your own little universe. Try the real world after that with the real laws of physics that I'm talking about.

The more i think about your explination the more i start to think that while you where looking at the screen seeing these squares fly by the more you where actualy being hypnotised

I sugenst you go see a Doktor, or an exorcist which ever you prefer ;)

No. I saw the light and later proved and created it. My proof of this was stolen from me by a sad little japanese man, among other things.

Balls.


Prove you wrong?
Erm no, you made the claim (with totally spurious "support"). you're the one that's supposed to provide proof.


It's one possible explanation... with little supporting evidence.


Again, no.
Anyone making the claim needs the proof.


Wow so you're you're smarter than those guys?
I doubt it very much.


The word you're looking for is "gullible" or "stupid" not "fast".

Typical Oli reply, blah blah, you have no proof, blah blah you have no proof. My typical response blah blah, a sad little japanese man stole it from me.

Why don't you optimize code for other things?

The world could really benefit from you.

I made code perfect. Binary code cannot be developed any further. You have a right to this but as I said my proof was stolen from me.

At least Reiku is using philosophy and not “factual testimony of a Royal nut job”

And yes you made the claim you carry the burden of proof.

But I’ll have a go at proving you wrong

Do you have a photo of the event? No
Was your leap through space time documented by an actual 3rd person who wasn’t part of the actual experiment? No
Do you have factual (black on white) proof that such an engine is being created? No
Appart from your word is there any documented proof when this event took place? No

Mmm it’s not looking good is it

Do you have any data from the period the event took place which can be analysed by an independent group of scientists? No
Is there any physical evidence of the event that can be observed by an outsider? No

It’s all a hole bunch of crap!

I cant argue with that, its not looking good. For what it's worth, my word is worth a lot more than that of Kazonori Yamuchi. Ok, there are 3 possibilities. 1. I'm crazy, properly doomsday crazy. 2. I have a agenda to take down a major corporation under false pretences. 3. I'm telling the truth.

I told people close to me about what was happening during this process, as it was happening. A few people observed me testing but not the test where I brought the code to C. You have to believe me, the code is there travelling at C. The system of inertia has been found but they cant make it work. Its all there. I've gotten myself into a right mess. Why didnt I sign a contract?

I can't wait for someone to get hold of this physics engine and use it to accurately predict everything that's going to happen in the universe.

Consider, thermal dynamics, carbon dynamics, the inertia, the mass, etc. all on the limits of physics that a car can be pushed to. When that is predicted, so will everything else.

he may have no soul but you have no working brain, working without a contract, what are you retarded?:confused:

Help you get proof? dude wake up...:(

maybe you should contact Yamauchi on an open forum and confront him there, just let us know so we can come and check out how you crash and burn :D

No paper contract. You see I only wanted to get paid initially. I didnt realise just how important bringing the code to M was until after. By that time they thought they had got the most out of me and nearly got rid of me sooner. I only just managed to make the code perfect 2 months before the old cunt fired me for the last time. This old man was like a second skin for a year. My job was hard enough.

help me get the proof, yes. can you think of a better way to force a corporation to do something other than a boycott?

seriously? :m:

It’s the physics engine on GT3 on playstation, and that’s going to predict the future… :shrug:

If the engine is so powerful, as soon as you stick the Game disk in the playstation, your playstation will fry and all you'll heve left is a ball of molten plastic :o

-edit- a PS3 has 515mb ram, mij home PC has 4x as much and it can't even run a decent 3d design program!

Can you please forget about video games. I was testing a physics engine not playing a video game.

What I can't quite work out is whay someone would use a physics engine from a game for a supposed serious project.
Why not use the solid-modelling software from the car manufacturer's CAD package? Just a thought...

Binary code travelling the speed of light can facilitate mathematical equations in 3D. This is way beyong anything any company has had before. No scientific progress will happen in the future without this code. I cant wait to see what the next generation of physicists does with it because this generation are useless.

I'll help you. We need some guns, some explosives, 3 lbs of butter, A leather briefcase, A duck, and 2 metric tonnes of dehydrated urine. PM me when you think you can get it. The watchword is Langthorpe. We can exchange phone numbers and adresses, and our first meeting should be no less than 73 and 5/8ths hours from now. I'm counting on you.

-The Ham-man

oli, he say's HE broke through the fabrik of space and time while he was playing the game!!!!
The only connection betwean him and the ALL POWERFUL physics engine were his fingers! which where moving a car around a trak and he was Drifting!!! don't forget it only happens when he is drifting!!
crack:m:

[QUOTE=lord_sylus;2013619]oli, he say's HE broke through the fabrik of space and time while he was playing the game!!!!

I broke through the fabric of space time while testing a physics engine.

The only connection betwean him and the ALL POWERFUL physics engine were his fingers! which where moving a car around a trak and he was drifting.

Grip had to be lost and it had to be after the moment of inertia. Thats what this process was all about, when the car flys. The physics engine and the code became accesible to me at this time.

73 and 1/2 hrs now. Why are you still here? You have some work to do mister!

seriously? :m:



It's called facetiousness.

"Inertia is the resistance an object has to a change in its state of motion. The principle of inertia is one of the fundamental principles of classical physics which are used to describe the motion of matter and how it is affected by applied forces. Sir Isaac Newton defined inertia in Definition 3 of his Philosophiæ Naturalis Principia Mathematica, which states:[1]

The vis insita, or innate force of matter is a power of resisting, by which every body, as much as in it lies, endeavors to preserve in its present state, whether it be of rest, or of moving uniformly forward in a right line.

In common usage, however, people may also use the term "inertia" to refer to an object's "amount of resistance to change in velocity"..."

Pleae stop using the word inertia IT'S the wrong term!

you know nothing about what you are talking about, how the f*ck could you ever in your right mind expect anyone to think you are not completely insane

Kazunori Yamauchi (山内一典, born August 5, 1967) is a Japanese game designer who is the CEO of Polyphony Digital and creator and producer of the Gran Turismo series. He became the president of Polyphony Digital after creating his first game called Motor Toon Grand Prix, a cartoon racing game that was completely original and had a colourful, unique, and in every sense, "cartoony" feel.[citation needed] Since then, Yamauchi has fulfilled his dream of creating excellent car games with his massively successful Gran Turismo series. For his help with promoting Volkswagen(VW) models in the series, VW gave him a Golf R32.

He recently helped design the technology for Nissan's new GT-R which appears in the latest game in his franchise, Gran Turismo 5 Prologue. He was given a Nissan GT-R for his contribution.

And stop slandering this mans name! for that matter stop wasting our forum space with your crap... if you are so "fast" prove that, give us the proof that you can react with such speed that you could beat someone like Micheal Shumacher? post a video on You Tube and send the Link...

Tell me something, what were you operating when you smashed through time and space?

When did these 'trials' take place?

…Try the real world after that with the real laws of physics that I'm talking about..

There are only the laws of physics and fantasy, you are talking about fantasy, until YOU PROVE US AND THE HOLE WORLD WRONG

No. I saw the light and later proved and created it. My proof of this was stolen from me by a sad little japanese man, among other things..

Booohooo don’t fucking cry about it steel it back! And show the hole world!

I made code perfect..

What code? The binary code, those 0110010010’s, explain how you did that? With the power of your mind? Then you should be typing these posts on the forum without a keyboard!


cant argue with that, its not looking good. For what it's worth, my word is worth a lot more than that of Kazonori Yamuchi. Ok, there are 3 possibilities. 1. I'm crazy, properly doomsday crazy. 2. I have a agenda to take down a major corporation under false pretences. 3. I'm telling the truth.

I’ll vote for option 1, you are a fucking crackpot, quickly go have your prescription refilled, and leave us alone

Consider, thermal dynamics, carbon dynamics, the inertia, the mass, etc. all on the limits of physics that a car can be pushed to. When that is predicted, so will everything else.

Dude it’s a car, the speed of which can’t even come close to C… C=299.792,458 km/sec that is around THE REAL WORLD 7.48078 times every second… a car will never ever ever be able have any effect on time space… ever!

And that cross you are talking about is on a SIMULATION thus NOT the real world

... after the moment of inertia. Thats what this process was all about, when the car flys. The physics engine and the code became accesible to me at this time.

You say moment of inertia as if it was a moment in time? when it is actually something used in mechanics to determine how an object would resist a force applied upon it.

the fact that you misinterpret the word "moment" show's us that you have no idea what you are talking about!

Try the real world after that with the real laws of physics that I'm talking about.
But you've already more than adequately shown that you know next to nothing about physics.

Typical Oli reply, blah blah, you have no proof, blah blah you have no proof. My typical response blah blah, a sad little japanese man stole it from me.
So we should believe you merely because you say so?

I made code perfect. Binary code cannot be developed any further. You have a right to this but as I said my proof was stolen from me.
Code made perfect?
Wow, your understanding of programming is as limited as your understanding of science.

I told people close to me about what was happening during this process, as it was happening. A few people observed me testing but not the test where I brought the code to C. You have to believe me, the code is there travelling at C.
Code does not travel.

The system of inertia has been found but they cant make it work.
Balls.

Can you please forget about video games. I was testing a physics engine not playing a video game.
So why mention a video game in your first post?

Binary code travelling the speed of light can facilitate mathematical equations in 3D.
Code does not travel.

No scientific progress will happen in the future without this code.
Total balls.

I'll help you. We need some guns, some explosives, 3 lbs of butter, A leather briefcase, A duck, and 2 metric tonnes of dehydrated urine. PM me when you think you can get it. The watchword is Langthorpe. We can exchange phone numbers and adresses, and our first meeting should be no less than 73 and 5/8ths hours from now. I'm counting on you.

-The Ham-man


Thats exactly what I was thinking.

It's called facetiousness.

I love being right.

Pleae stop using the word inertia IT'S the wrong term!

you know nothing about what you are talking about, how the f*ck could you ever in your right mind expect anyone to think you are not completely insane



And stop slandering this mans name! for that matter stop wasting our forum space with your crap... if you are so "fast" prove that, give us the proof that you can react with such speed that you could beat someone like Micheal Shumacher? post a video on You Tube and send the Link...

Tell me something, what were you operating when you smashed through time and space?

When did these 'trials' take place?



There are only the laws of physics and fantasy, you are talking about fantasy, until YOU PROVE US AND THE HOLE WORLD WRONG



Booohooo don’t fucking cry about it steel it back! And show the hole world!



What code? The binary code, those 0110010010’s, explain how you did that? With the power of your mind? Then you should be typing these posts on the forum without a keyboard!




I’ll vote for option 1, you are a fucking crackpot, quickly go have your prescription refilled, and leave us alone



Dude it’s a car, the speed of which can’t even come close to C… C=299.792,458 km/sec that is around THE REAL WORLD 7.48078 times every second… a car will never ever ever be able have any effect on time space… ever!

And that cross you are talking about is on a SIMULATION thus NOT the real world


It will be very easy to follow, both visually and scientifically, when you see what has been recorded.

I know enough.

He has no soul and he's just a wanker in the middle of something he has no place being.

A logitech G25.

March 2007 to march 2008 and they still can't make it work. If I had been able to contribute more easily it would be working by now. The last contribution I made lead to finding the halo around the car in march 2008. I'll bet you they have done fuck all since then.

My proof is there but it was stolen from me. That fact will be be my downfall.

I'm trying.

After the code was travelling at the speed of light, you could feel the information travelling at that speed. Serious.

I have ego mania because I'm right and because I did everything I said I did. You dont have to read this thread. Try something constructive. I contacted the noble foundation, maybe they can help.

Me and the code travelled at M. Afterward the code remained at that speed, it has sufficient power. It sounds more impossible than it was. The car didnt break through, I did. Yes the cross is real. This system would be what God sees when he looks at somebody driving a car. It exists and controls all cars in real life. I believe other objects in physics would have similar systems. All based on the real life laws of physics. You are getting sidetracked by video games. I was testing an open physics engine.

You say moment of inertia as if it was a moment in time? when it is actually something used in mechanics to determine how an object would resist a force applied upon it.

the fact that you misinterpret the word "moment" show's us that you have no idea what you are talking about!

again with the moment of inertia. When the car loses grip and essentially flies. The time after the moment of inertia. It doesnt really matter. You can watch all of this. It wont need words.

But you've already more than adequately shown that you know next to nothing about physics.


So we should believe you merely because you say so?


Code made perfect?
Wow, your understanding of programming is as limited as your understanding of science.


Code does not travel.


Balls.


So why mention a video game in your first post?


Code does not travel.


Total balls.

I know enough.

Because you will benefit greatly.

I made a few evolutionary steps. My standard is perfection.

This japanese cryptographer/physicist made a code that code. I did testing that filled it with inforamtion so it was trong enough to travel.

I cant see them anymore.

It was initially through a video game that this process started until the japanese cryptographer got involved and the development of the code began.

To Voodoochile Possibility 1: I congratulate you on one of the most entertaining spoofs we have witnessed on these forums for quite some time.

To Voodoochile Possibility 2: You know you have to seek help. Don't delay any longer. I don't want to read in one month or one year about how a sad, deluded individual committed suicide. Talk to a friend, a relative, your doctor, but get help. You need it desperately.

To Voodoochile Possibility 1: I congratulate you on one of the most entertaining spoofs we have witnessed on these forums for quite some time.

To Voodoochile Possibility 2: You know you have to seek help. Don't delay any longer. I don't want to read in one month or one year about how a sad, deluded individual committed suicide. Talk to a friend, a relative, your doctor, but get help. You need it desperately.

This is not a spoof. I would be risking a lot for some joke wouldnt I? Its the truth. Truth is often stranger than fiction and all that.

I have ego mania because I did everythign I said I did. Now would be a bad time to check out.

also, I believe that this theory makes the most sense on what I believe is a metahpysical level. In order for somebody to create a universe they would need to be very very big. To make conscious observations everywhere and at all times, you would need a very very big mind. So infinite, conscious light makes a lot of sense. Light which travels too fast for us to observe it but it makes up everything. Our minds are to slow. I managed to make mine go real fast for a a few seconds. Simple.

<-------
its funny, this information makes everybody who reads it, go like that

I love being right.

Then admit you are lying, or seek mental help.

Then admit you are lying, or seek mental help.

Wrong and wrong. Prove me wrong. What would you think if you saw everything I'm talking about???

Wrong and wrong. Prove me wrong.As has been pointed out repeatedly the onus of proof rests with you. You have not offered one iota of evidence to support your contention, let alone anything that could constitute 'proof', or even material to justify considering your claims as a possible hypothesis. It is not up to us to prove anything.

What would you think if you saw everything I'm talking about???I would think I was mentally unstable and would immediately seek professional help.

also, I believe that this theory makes the most sense on what I believe is a metahpysical level. In order for somebody to create a universe they would need to be very very big. To make conscious observations everywhere and at all times, you would need a very very big mind. So infinite, conscious light makes a lot of sense. Light which travels too fast for us to observe it but it makes up everything. Our minds are to slow. I managed to make mine go real fast for a a few seconds. Simple.

His avatar and this utter nonsense imply to me that the result of this idea and the result of this thread are equal to it!
lol...

Wrong and wrong. Prove me wrong...

That's an easy one. 6 pages of no-evidence for your claims and 6 pages of supportive evidence for your delusion.

As has been pointed out repeatedly the onus of proof rests with you. You have not offered one iota of evidence to support your contention, let alone anything that could constitute 'proof', or even material to justify considering your claims as a possible hypothesis. It is not up to us to prove anything.

I would think I was mentally unstable and would immediately seek professional help.

It was stolen from me. I have suggested a way to get it. Arent you the least bit curious to know if this is true or not?
I know how crazy it sounds which is why it took me 6 months to start telling everybody I could.
I am very sick of the mental health comments. 1 would do the trick. As you can see I am disagreeing every time. That wont change. I am very fast and very strong.
Most of you on this website would be left brained people. Good with numbers and so on. I am right brained. I jad the best right hemusphere out of a few million people. This is how I was able to do so much.

As has been pointed out repeatedly the onus of proof rests with you. You have not offered one iota of evidence to support your contention, let alone anything that could constitute 'proof', or even material to justify considering your claims as a possible hypothesis. It is not up to us to prove anything.

I would think I was mentally unstable and would immediately seek professional help.

Nobody has answered that question yet. What would you think if you saw everythin I'm talking about?

His avatar and this utter nonsense imply to me that the result of this idea and the result of this thread are equal to it!
lol...

Point being, God being conscious light makes a lot of sense.

The internet is great. My honesty has been judged on my previous level of forum activity and now my avatar. The truth is the truth. Avatars are just pictures.

I picked that avatar for a reason.

That's an easy one. 6 pages of no-evidence for your claims and 6 pages of supportive evidence for your delusion.

Do you not understand how I have been robbed of my proof along with a year of my life? Did I not punctuate that part properly? Was it unreadable?

Do you not understand how I have been robbed of my proof along with a year of my life? Did I not punctuate that part properly? Was it unreadable?

I don't really care. Your problems are your problems. The onus of evidence is entirely on you.

I don't really care. Your problems are your problems. The onus of evidence is entirely on you.

Can you not see how this might be the slightest bit relevant to you?

I have figured out where and why I'm losing everybody. Its where everything becaomes light after I make that last decision that made the code run at M.

I too couldnt believe it. It was only after my theory worked and they made an enviroment made of light that I realised for sure that it happened. Then I went one step further and made it perfect, so now its exactly what I saw. This code is an exact copy of what I saw only that it is not conscious and when you see it working around this system of inertia, taking into consideration what I witnessed, this whole thing will be a lot easier to follow and understand.

Can you not see how this might be the slightest bit relevant to you?

Not at all. What you're looking for is attention and because you are demonstrably delusional or a liar, there is no more value to continue this conversation.

Not at all. What you're looking for is attention and because you are demonstrably delusional or a liar, there is no more value to continue this conversation.

Like I said in the post, I dont want a following or attention. This is the internet, you dont have to read anything you dont want to. I'm not gaining any attention by you reading this. I'm just trying to explain what has been found, how it was found, that you have a right to it and how you can see it. I'm not a liar or delusional. What conversation?

Not at all? Consider for a second that this is true and very real and that God is everything (including time and space). That wouldnt be the slightest bit relevant to you?

No. If your god turned out to be real, I'd kick his ass for that tsunami shit back in 2004.


Dark matter: the corpse of god.

I spent a good bit of time creating the following essay, based on the OP and my thoughts, which the OP inspired. I'd like to thank voodoochile for his inspiration and motivation and for opening my eyes to the possibilities of reality.

**************

1. Gibson and textual postcultural theory

“Art is intrinsically dead,” says Marx; however, according to Werther[1] , it is not so much art that is intrinsically dead, but rather the paradigm, and eventually the absurdity, of art. Debord uses the term ’subconstructivist rationalism’ to denote the common ground between sexual identity and class. Therefore, the characteristic theme of the works of Gibson is not desublimation, but postdesublimation.

“Reality is impossible,” says Sartre. Bataille suggests the use of Lacanist obscurity to deconstruct sexism. Thus, the primary theme of Wilson’s[2] essay on Lacanist obscurity is a mythopoetical paradox.

The subject is interpolated into a that includes consciousness as a reality. It could be said that the main theme of the works of Gibson is the paradigm of dialectic society.

If Lacanist obscurity holds, we have to choose between neocapitalist discourse and textual subdialectic theory. In a sense, the characteristic theme of Werther’s[3] model of textual postcultural theory is the difference between reality and sexual identity.

A number of narratives concerning subconstructivist rationalism may be revealed. Thus, Derrida uses the term ‘textual postcultural theory’ to denote the rubicon, and therefore the failure, of subdialectic class.
2. Narratives of economy

The primary theme of the works of Gibson is not theory, but pretheory. The subject is contextualised into a that includes sexuality as a totality. In a sense, Geoffrey[4] holds that we have to choose between Lacanist obscurity and subdialectic deconstruction.

Sartre promotes the use of subconstructivist rationalism to challenge and analyse society. Therefore, Sontag’s analysis of the patriarchial paradigm of context implies that the collective is capable of intent.

If subconstructivist rationalism holds, we have to choose between Lacanist obscurity and precapitalist discourse. However, the rubicon, and some would say the paradigm, of subconstructivist rationalism prevalent in Gibson’s Neuromancer emerges again in Pattern Recognition, although in a more textual sense.

The subject is interpolated into a that includes art as a whole. In a sense, Bataille suggests the use of textual postcultural theory to attack hierarchy.
3. Subconstructivist rationalism and neocapitalist deconstructivism

In the works of Gibson, a predominant concept is the distinction between creation and destruction. Several discourses concerning the common ground between culture and sexual identity exist. However, Derrida uses the term ‘textual substructuralist theory’ to denote the defining characteristic, and thus the collapse, of textual society.

“Class is fundamentally dead,” says Marx; however, according to Bailey[5] , it is not so much class that is fundamentally dead, but rather the failure, and some would say the rubicon, of class. The main theme of Wilson’s[6] essay on textual postcultural theory is a self-fulfilling totality. Therefore, the subject is contextualised into a that includes consciousness as a reality.

If one examines textual postcultural theory, one is faced with a choice: either reject neocapitalist deconstructivism or conclude that sexuality serves to entrench capitalism. Sartre uses the term ‘precapitalist textual theory’ to denote the difference between language and class. Thus, in Count Zero, Gibson analyses textual postcultural theory; in Virtual Light, although, he denies neocapitalist deconstructivism.

The characteristic theme of the works of Gibson is a substructuralist totality. Therefore, Lyotard uses the term ‘Lacanist obscurity’ to denote the stasis, and eventually the collapse, of cultural art.

The subject is interpolated into a that includes culture as a reality. However, the main theme of Finnis’s[7] analysis of pretextual theory is a self-sufficient paradox.

The example of Lacanist obscurity depicted in Gibson’s Idoru is also evident in Neuromancer. It could be said that the primary theme of the works of Gibson is not appropriation as such, but subappropriation.

Debord uses the term ’semanticist capitalism’ to denote the common ground between class and society. However, the characteristic theme of Dahmus’s[8] essay on Lacanist obscurity is a textual totality.

Marx uses the term ‘neocapitalist deconstructivism’ to denote the difference between sexuality and society. Therefore, any number of deconstructions concerning textual postcultural theory may be discovered.

References:

1. Werther, C. Q. G. ed. (1970) Textual postcultural theory and Lacanist obscurity. Panic Button Books

2. Wilson, Q. (1994) Textual Constructions: Nihilism, predeconstructive constructivist theory and Lacanist obscurity. Schlangekraft

3. Werther, J. T. ed. (1972) Lacanist obscurity and textual postcultural theory. And/Or Press

4. Geoffrey, N. I. N. (1987) The Paradigm of Consensus: Textual postcultural theory and Lacanist obscurity. Panic Button Books

5. Bailey, K. ed. (1995) Lacanist obscurity in the works of Joyce. University of Michigan Press

6. Wilson, R. I. U. (1983) Deconstructing Social realism: Lacanist obscurity and textual postcultural theory. And/Or Press

7. Finnis, N. ed. (1974) Textual postcultural theory and Lacanist obscurity. University of Oregon Press

8. Dahmus, E. Z. W. (1983) Premodern Discourses: Textual postcultural theory in the works of Spelling. Oxford University Press

Nobody has answered that question yet. What would you think if you saw everythin I'm talking about?Excuse me! I answered the question. I said "I would think I was mentally unstable and would immediately seek professional help."

And in reply you reprimanded me for going on about mental health problems. Are you selective in what you listen to?

I have figured out where and why I'm losing everybody.No. You lost credibility when you started talking about 'code' travelling at light speed. Ignorance is ignorance no matter how you package it.

what the Hell is the speed of M? never ever herd of that one before?

what you must understand Voodoo, is that we have no reason to believe you just on your word, there must be some way you could prove your claims without your "proof"?

but I'm sure you can't so as mentioned before you thrive on the negative attention your lies are getting you! how old are you? 14...15 maybe, you have a wonderful imagination, but a narcissistic tendencies to lie about stuff to get attention, you have no knowledge what so ever about science and physics, and all that does is prove to us even more that you are full of crap, just a kid who stumbled upon a science forum… sure if you wanted to learn something but no you would rather use it to create total balls claims and waste the time of everyone here…

Point being, God being conscious light makes a lot of sense.

The internet is great. My honesty has been judged on my previous level of forum activity and now my avatar. The truth is the truth. Avatars are just pictures.

I picked that avatar for a reason.

In one post you contradict yourself, “Avatars are just pictures.” And then “I picked that avatar for a reason” you notice the contradiction don’t you?

All your posts are like infomercials full of wrongly interpreted scientific information and terms used out of order…

again with the moment of inertia. When the car loses grip and essentially flies. The time after the moment of inertia. It doesnt really matter. You can watch all of this. It wont need words.

The MOMENT of inertia is NOT a moment in TIME! And when a car loses grip it DOESN’T FLY it is then just under higher influence of friction between the tiers and the road! And the car essentially slows down and doesn’t speed up! A car only flies when the wind speed under the car has enough lift to let the car take off, but seen as the car wasn’t built for flight and it has no propulsion in the air, the flight will be VERY short

logitech G25

http://www.zwtm.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/12/logitech-g25-racing-wheel.jpg

This is used for video games, have you ever actually seen a real car simulator? They don’t use Logitech equipment, let alone serious people who want to test a physics engine… and never forget that the physics engine is made to SIMULATE the real world not to be exactly the same! So a simulation will never be the same, and that cross and halo… those are aides to help the programmers achieve almost real circumstances and have NOTHING to do With reality!!

So please tell us how old you are so we can go warn your parents about you tendency to lie and create unbelievable stories that you yourself obviously believe. Use your imagination constructively and study hard and become a writer or something, but please stay away from the scientific world … please

Wrong and wrong. Prove me wrong.
You are lying. Prove me wrong.
See, it doesn't work like that.
What would you think if you saw everything I'm talking about???
I would think I was a nutter, and I would certainly try and get some proof to try and convince myself otherwise.

After I had obtained proof I would put it out to the masses.

If I didn't find proof, I would put it down to a mental fart, and go and see the quack if it was so realistic.

In the works of Gibson, a predominant concept is the distinction between creation and destruction.
No it isn't, it's about the "real world" and the "virtual world" and how they aren't really any different.

The example of Lacanist obscurity depicted in Gibson’s Idoru is also evident in Neuromancer.
No way!
:D

I spent a good bit of time creating the following essay, based on the OP and my thoughts, which the OP inspired. I'd like to thank voodoochile for his inspiration and motivation and for opening my eyes to the possibilities of reality.

**************

1. Gibson and textual postcultural theory

“Art is intrinsically dead,” says Marx; however, according to Werther[1] , it is not so much art that is intrinsically dead, but rather the paradigm, and eventually the absurdity, of art. Debord uses the term ’subconstructivist rationalism’ to denote the common ground between sexual identity and class. Therefore, the characteristic theme of the works of Gibson is not desublimation, but postdesublimation.

“Reality is impossible,” says Sartre. Bataille suggests the use of Lacanist obscurity to deconstruct sexism. Thus, the primary theme of Wilson’s[2] essay on Lacanist obscurity is a mythopoetical paradox.

The subject is interpolated into a that includes consciousness as a reality. It could be said that the main theme of the works of Gibson is the paradigm of dialectic society.

If Lacanist obscurity holds, we have to choose between neocapitalist discourse and textual subdialectic theory. In a sense, the characteristic theme of Werther’s[3] model of textual postcultural theory is the difference between reality and sexual identity.

A number of narratives concerning subconstructivist rationalism may be revealed. Thus, Derrida uses the term ‘textual postcultural theory’ to denote the rubicon, and therefore the failure, of subdialectic class.
2. Narratives of economy

The primary theme of the works of Gibson is not theory, but pretheory. The subject is contextualised into a that includes sexuality as a totality. In a sense, Geoffrey[4] holds that we have to choose between Lacanist obscurity and subdialectic deconstruction.

Sartre promotes the use of subconstructivist rationalism to challenge and analyse society. Therefore, Sontag’s analysis of the patriarchial paradigm of context implies that the collective is capable of intent.

If subconstructivist rationalism holds, we have to choose between Lacanist obscurity and precapitalist discourse. However, the rubicon, and some would say the paradigm, of subconstructivist rationalism prevalent in Gibson’s Neuromancer emerges again in Pattern Recognition, although in a more textual sense.

The subject is interpolated into a that includes art as a whole. In a sense, Bataille suggests the use of textual postcultural theory to attack hierarchy.
3. Subconstructivist rationalism and neocapitalist deconstructivism

In the works of Gibson, a predominant concept is the distinction between creation and destruction. Several discourses concerning the common ground between culture and sexual identity exist. However, Derrida uses the term ‘textual substructuralist theory’ to denote the defining characteristic, and thus the collapse, of textual society.

“Class is fundamentally dead,” says Marx; however, according to Bailey[5] , it is not so much class that is fundamentally dead, but rather the failure, and some would say the rubicon, of class. The main theme of Wilson’s[6] essay on textual postcultural theory is a self-fulfilling totality. Therefore, the subject is contextualised into a that includes consciousness as a reality.

If one examines textual postcultural theory, one is faced with a choice: either reject neocapitalist deconstructivism or conclude that sexuality serves to entrench capitalism. Sartre uses the term ‘precapitalist textual theory’ to denote the difference between language and class. Thus, in Count Zero, Gibson analyses textual postcultural theory; in Virtual Light, although, he denies neocapitalist deconstructivism.

The characteristic theme of the works of Gibson is a substructuralist totality. Therefore, Lyotard uses the term ‘Lacanist obscurity’ to denote the stasis, and eventually the collapse, of cultural art.

The subject is interpolated into a that includes culture as a reality. However, the main theme of Finnis’s[7] analysis of pretextual theory is a self-sufficient paradox.

The example of Lacanist obscurity depicted in Gibson’s Idoru is also evident in Neuromancer. It could be said that the primary theme of the works of Gibson is not appropriation as such, but subappropriation.

Debord uses the term ’semanticist capitalism’ to denote the common ground between class and society. However, the characteristic theme of Dahmus’s[8] essay on Lacanist obscurity is a textual totality.

Marx uses the term ‘neocapitalist deconstructivism’ to denote the difference between sexuality and society. Therefore, any number of deconstructions concerning textual postcultural theory may be discovered.

References:

1. Werther, C. Q. G. ed. (1970) Textual postcultural theory and Lacanist obscurity. Panic Button Books

2. Wilson, Q. (1994) Textual Constructions: Nihilism, predeconstructive constructivist theory and Lacanist obscurity. Schlangekraft

3. Werther, J. T. ed. (1972) Lacanist obscurity and textual postcultural theory. And/Or Press

4. Geoffrey, N. I. N. (1987) The Paradigm of Consensus: Textual postcultural theory and Lacanist obscurity. Panic Button Books

5. Bailey, K. ed. (1995) Lacanist obscurity in the works of Joyce. University of Michigan Press

6. Wilson, R. I. U. (1983) Deconstructing Social realism: Lacanist obscurity and textual postcultural theory. And/Or Press

7. Finnis, N. ed. (1974) Textual postcultural theory and Lacanist obscurity. University of Oregon Press

8. Dahmus, E. Z. W. (1983) Premodern Discourses: Textual postcultural theory in the works of Spelling. Oxford University Press


A+.

Excuse me! I answered the question. I said "I would think I was mentally unstable and would immediately seek professional help."

And in reply you reprimanded me for going on about mental health problems. Are you selective in what you listen to?

No. You lost credibility when you started talking about 'code' travelling at light speed. Ignorance is ignorance no matter how you package it.


No not me. What would you think if you saw the proof of everything I'm talking about? I'm talking about the cross above the car, perfect light and the proof I made that decision at the speed of light.

What you are saying is that if you saw the proof of what I'm talking about, you would seek mental help?

Can you tell me why?

Also, yes I brought binary code to the speed of light. That is what made all of this happen. That was the big step.

what the Hell is the speed of M? never ever herd of that one before?

what you must understand Voodoo, is that we have no reason to believe you just on your word, there must be some way you could prove your claims without your "proof"?

but I'm sure you can't so as mentioned before you thrive on the negative attention your lies are getting you! how old are you? 14...15 maybe, you have a wonderful imagination, but a narcissistic tendencies to lie about stuff to get attention, you have no knowledge what so ever about science and physics, and all that does is prove to us even more that you are full of crap, just a kid who stumbled upon a science forum… sure if you wanted to learn something but no you would rather use it to create total balls claims and waste the time of everyone here…



In one post you contradict yourself, “Avatars are just pictures.” And then “I picked that avatar for a reason” you notice the contradiction don’t you?

All your posts are like infomercials full of wrongly interpreted scientific information and terms used out of order…



The MOMENT of inertia is NOT a moment in TIME! And when a car loses grip it DOESN’T FLY it is then just under higher influence of friction between the tiers and the road! And the car essentially slows down and doesn’t speed up! A car only flies when the wind speed under the car has enough lift to let the car take off, but seen as the car wasn’t built for flight and it has no propulsion in the air, the flight will be VERY short



http://www.zwtm.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/12/logitech-g25-racing-wheel.jpg

This is used for video games, have you ever actually seen a real car simulator? They don’t use Logitech equipment, let alone serious people who want to test a physics engine… and never forget that the physics engine is made to SIMULATE the real world not to be exactly the same! So a simulation will never be the same, and that cross and halo… those are aides to help the programmers achieve almost real circumstances and have NOTHING to do With reality!!

So please tell us how old you are so we can go warn your parents about you tendency to lie and create unbelievable stories that you yourself obviously believe. Use your imagination constructively and study hard and become a writer or something, but please stay away from the scientific world … please

in E=Mc2, M is the speed of light.

My word is worth more than you. The proof to back up my word has fell in the hands of a video game owning faggot. My own stupidity is to blame for that. Never trust anyone and always sign a contract. Especially a souless piece of old shit. Thats all I have learned from this.

Type this story in your own grammatically correct words, using the name voodoochile. You will recieve nothing but ignorant closed minded, even fearful replies. I could not be bothered replying to this kind of crap with anything other than crap in return because I have no obligation to do otherwise. I'm giving you the greatest truth for free. If you cant believe me, your problem. If you dont make an effort to make this proof, your problem.

People are getting very defensive too. On some forum, maybe this one, somebody said that we have to completely rearrange what we believe. YOU DONT KNOW ANYTHING. Not until I told you. Before this. string theory was as close to knowing the unified theory of the universe. String theory is wrong. Believe that.

I picked the avatar for a reason. It reminde me of all the people who know about this but who are keeping it quiet. Wankers. Other than that, its just a picture, dont take it so seriously.

When you watch all of this on a screen you will find it very easy and colourful to follow.

I'm going to hunt and kill the next person who mentions the moment of inertia.

*That wheel was strong enough and advanced enough

I'm 24, I've got hands like shovels and arms like shotguns. Not my words.

the proof I made that decision at the speed of light.
Also, yes I brought binary code to the speed of light. .Decision's don't occur at any speed, so it is nonsense to refer to them as being made at the speed of light.

Binary code does not travel.

You are deluded. A nice guy, but deluded.

in E=Mc2, M is the speed of light.

M is the mass. c is the speed of light.

You are lying. Prove me wrong.
See, it doesn't work like that.

I would think I was a nutter, and I would certainly try and get some proof to try and convince myself otherwise.

After I had obtained proof I would put it out to the masses.

If I didn't find proof, I would put it down to a mental fart, and go and see the quack if it was so realistic.

I'm not lying. When you see everything I'm talking about it will work.

Can you not see the situation? My proof was stolen from me. Take a chance. Whats the worst that could happen? I turn out to be right or worng. Feel free to call me crazy, but only when you can say for sure.

I AM TRYING.

I'm so fast its unbelieveable. Thats all I can draw from that.

isn't E the amount of energy?<Yay I remember something from high school!>

M is the mass. c is the speed of light.

close enough.

I'm going to hunt and kill the next person who mentions the moment of inertia.
I would just like to mention the moment of inertia. Of course it is not a time based concept.
Physcis teachers used to like to make the joke about forces acting on a body saying that 'every couple has a moment'. I guess that's physics teachers for you.

Decision's don't occur at any speed, so it is nonsense to refer to them as being made at the speed of light.

Binary code does not travel.

You are deluded. A nice guy, but deluded.

I made an increasing number of decisions, the speed of which increased until C. It sounds more impossible than it was.

This new type of code that the brilliant japanese cryptographer made, could travel. After I perfectly filled them with inertia information (which is a very special kind of information I dont fully understand) they were strong enough to travel at C. It worked.

This japanese cryptographer played the second biggest part in this and was a pleasure to work with. No bullshit whatsoever.

The rest of them are dickheads.

How does code travel?
What is code?
Would you care to post a few lines of code here?
Would you then explain how that code can travel?

ok, but I think by now you will have realised that my writing wont be easy to understand.

This process was all about trying to predict how a car will behave before during and after the moment of inertia. According to the laws of physics, just like in real life.

That was going along normally. Then the japanese cryptographer got involved. The physics model at that time had was circular. The car had a range of motion within this model but the inertia became an issue. The cryptographer incorporated these squares into this model. T

These squares were like 'photographs' of the contact areas and travelled in a chain so that the information at the contact areas would always be monitored. But they broke down before the weight transition.

As the testing went on, patterns between the inertia of the contact areas and the input in the steering wheel were found. Thats how my testing filled the squares with information. If you think about it, a car has four wheels, controlled by one steering wheel. Within the whole range of motion between all 5 wheels, a mountain of possible information was found.

I then proceeded to chop it down with the edge of my hand.

(like i have been saying, this will make for good viewing)

understandable?

Once... many years ago, I was ascending the Himalayas with my Sherpa guide. We passed this one icy peak and I saw God. At the time I thought it might have been a mountain llama, but in retrospect, I'm quite certain that I saw God. He gave me a parchment which was inscribed

"The bearer of this document is My living representative on earth and will do My bidding as I see fit. God."

We were short on food at this late stage of the ascent and I was rationing my Twinkies... I accidentally used the parchment to wrap my remaining Twinkie and then misplaced it.

If anybody finds it... it was mine. I really miss that Twinkie.

p.s. There is as much proof/evidence in my post as there is/was in your OP.

p.p.s.

Go with God... you really shouldn't be anywhere alone.

Fuck you

and that is likely the most intelligent thing that you've posted here. Bravo.

like with like, geek.

I really can't wait to read the text of your Nobel acceptance speech. By the way... you should really toddle on to your next class... recess is just about over.

like with like, geek.

Ouch... you hurt me!

p.s.
I liked the original post better than your edit

Reply with stupid sarcasm and you will recieve the same

sarcasm is rarely stupid... it just seems that way when pointed at you....

voodoochile:status report. Langthorpe.

Thanks for the contribution!

"send lawyers, guns, and money... Dad get me out of this!"

I have been telling people this for 8 months. If just a small number of you had taken a chance back then you would have seen all of this already.

The fat, slow, weak, short sighted, self involved lump of shit that is the majority. No wonder nothing has worked out so far. Take a chance. There will never be a better opportunity. You will see God's image. That has to justify taking a chance and all you have to do is nothing.

Try making sense.

which part are you having trouble at?
It was all normal until I brought the code to C. Thats when it all got a little outside the box and after that it gets hard to believe.
It will make sense when you watch it on a screen.

All of it. How does a video game show that God exists?

I was testing an open physics engine based on the real life laws of physics. I was not playing a video game. During one test, bringing this new code as fast as it could go, I made one decision at the speed of light and everything became light.

I later proved this and later created perfect light, so you can see exactly what I saw. You get to understand this properly when you see the proof, which is Japan, owend by Kazonori Yamauchi.

Combine my last reply with what I should have called this thread. 'Scientific proof that God exists, exists, but a sad, old and useless japanese thief stole it. You have a God-given right to all of it and if you want it, you have to tell the person who stole it, to give you whats rightfully yours.

Take a chance.

This has to be the most whacked out conspiratorial nonsense I have ever read. Smoke more :m: as I am certain it would best define where you are coming from.

Do you have one single shred of proof to back this up? Now if I am reading this wrong, when I should be interpreting what you wrote as a joke that you're making, then the joke is on me, but...

I have proof, however it's currently not publically available and won't be a few years until it's fully written up, so you are just going to have to wait.

And you pick up all the pieces an make an island, might even raise a little lightspeed code?

You mean, we can play this game and experience the same thing? If you are light, how could you post these messages?

Shit guys, I've just realised where voodoochile is coming from.

I managed to travel at a speed less than 0mph and became superunsymetrical bose einstein condensate freon uncyclate matter, resulting in me managing to have the power to solve all the worlds problems, but by the time it was over some sad little Japanese man stole the proof from me.

I hate to brake up all the fun, but i find that with children like voodoo doll here, the best solution is to ignore him, but it's so god dame tempting to fuck around with his twisted little mind
Moment of inertia
Moment of inertia
Moment of inertia
Moment of inertia
Moment of inertia
Moment of inertia
Moment of inertia
Moment of inertia
Moment of inertia

And if you are so fucking fast come and get me with your pixie hands and toothpick arms, talking about getting defensive, you are the first one to spout threats at us!

everything you say just wreaks of the crap it's deluded from, everything you have posted makes no sense, and yes it WAS A VIDEO GAME... VIDEO GAME... VIDEO GAME... VIDEO GAME... VIDEO GAME... VIDEO GAME... VIDEO GAME... VIDEO GAME... VIDEO GAME... VIDEO GAME... VIDEO GAME... VIDEO GAME... VIDEO GAME... VIDEO GAME... VIDEO GAME... VIDEO GAME... VIDEO GAME... VIDEO GAME... VIDEO GAME... VIDEO GAME... VIDEO GAME... VIDEO GAME... VIDEO GAME... VIDEO GAME... VIDEO GAME... VIDEO GAME... VIDEO GAME... VIDEO GAME... VIDEO GAME... VIDEO GAME... VIDEO GAME... VIDEO GAME... VIDEO GAME... VIDEO GAME... VIDEO GAME... VIDEO GAME... VIDEO GAME... VIDEO GAME... VIDEO GAME... VIDEO GAME... VIDEO GAME... VIDEO GAME...

you want proof that god exists, come over I’ll organize a personal appointment for you ;)

now leave your brothers computer alone and go play with your power rangers...

by the way, the information that travels in the computer, no matter how fast you are, has to travel through the components of that computer right...
here is the biggest flaw in your post, the electrons travelling through the computer travel at sub light speed, meaning you would never be able to get the information to travel that fast, even in the fastest coldest place on this earth, the LHC, the electrons (or protons which are heavier) can't even travel at close to C without frying some components.
So you could be as fast as you say, but all you would notice is that the computer would be slower than you, but you wouldn’t be able to make anything else travel at C or even close to C…

Lets put this in numbers
Using simple (incorrect) Newtonian physics
Your arm weigh’s 1.5kg, in rest it’s velocity is 0 m/s, C=299.792.485 m/s, I’ll give you an hour to get it from 0 to C that’s an acceleration of 83.275,683m/s² (or 8.488,857G) to maintain this acceleration you would have to maintain a force on your arm equal to 124.913,52N which is the equivalent of pushing 12.733,28kg, that’s 28.013,23 pounds, for one hole hour!

But if you made this decision at C (imposible i know but bare with me) then you made a simple adjustment with the steering wheel, meaning you went from 0 to C in a second(or maybe even less), you wont those numbers!

The force would then be equal to 449.688.687N or 45.839.825 kg or 100.847.615,8 pounds, or pushing 22.5 spaceshuttles, not to mention the acceleration of 299.792.458m/s² (30.559.884G’s)

Even if your arms where the actual size of a Sequoya tree there isn’t enough power in the world possible of such a feat of strength and raw power not to mention how your arm would vaporize at such a high acceleration and to stop your arm from moving you would have to put an opposite force on your arm… if you have reflexes that work at 0.001sec (300 times faster than an actual real human being) to send your arm forward and stop your arm would acualy travel 299.792,5m that’s ±300km…


I think I just proved you wrong ;)

Hmmm 2 day's and no long reply from Voodoo dolly

maybe he gave up ...

I have proof, however it's currently not publically available and won't be a few years until it's fully written up, so you are just going to have to wait.


Exactly but instead of waiting you can do a boycott which would force them to make it public now.

And you pick up all the pieces an make an island, might even raise a little lightspeed code?

I think raising a little sand would be when I made the code perfect. It looked like sand being raised. The solo is the speed of light.

You mean, we can play this game and experience the same thing? If you are light, how could you post these messages?

No. If you play a video game you are playing a video game. I was testing a physics engine.

I was for about 10 seconds.

Shit guys, I've just realised where voodoochile is coming from.

I managed to travel at a speed less than 0mph and became superunsymetrical bose einstein condensate freon uncyclate matter, resulting in me managing to have the power to solve all the worlds problems, but by the time it was over some sad little Japanese man stole the proof from me.

Your getting there.

Hmmm 2 day's and no long reply from Voodoo dolly

maybe he gave up ...

I was warned not to say "fuck you" by sciforums.com so I cant answer you.

*just one thing. for the 10th time. I made one decision, in an increasing number of decisions, which kept the speed of the codee increasing until C. I made a ridiculous amount of decisions. The last one had to be made and I made it.

This shows that you people are getting stuck on things like video games and making one decision out of nowhere. It was a scientific process. Bringing the code to C and finding the points of inertia were all scientific tests. These points are in every car in real life.

I have asked this question a number of times but I havent got 1 answer yet. " what would you think if you saw the proof of everything I'm talking about?"

Try to forget about the OP and the grammar.

" what would you think if you saw the proof of everything I'm talking about?" Iff I saw your proof and determined that it was valid: I would think it would be a magnificent discovery.

But I'm not about to help your endeavour when everything in my repretoire of knowlege indicates that said hypothetical proof does not even exist.

If I knew you that you were immortal, and all you had to do was go skydiving without a parachute to get my proof, would you believe me? How great would it be if you had my proof?

Basicaly, my offer is: I'l boycot whoever you want me to, right after you land.
-Andrew

How does code travel?
What is code?
Would you care to post a few lines of code here?
Would you then explain how that code can travel?

:m:I was warned not to say "fuck you" by sciforums.com so I cant answer you.

*just one thing. for the 10th time. I made one decision, in an increasing number of decisions, which kept the speed of the codee increasing until C. I made a ridiculous amount of decisions. The last one had to be made and I made it.

This shows that you people are getting stuck on things like video games and making one decision out of nowhere. It was a scientific process. Bringing the code to C and finding the points of inertia were all scientific tests. These points are in every car in real life.

Yes please refrain from using profanity…

You still don’t get it do you, the simple answer to your ridicules claims are that you have no understanding or even perception of how fast the speed of light is… do you think those numbers I posted are fake? Try using the formulas and work it out for yourself

F=m.a
A= (Vc-V)/t
1G=9.81m/s²

Using these simple formulas you can see yourself that what you are saying is impossible, if you moved your hand and the steering weal at the speed of light, within 0.001 sec you would have turned the steering weal over 636.6 times (if it had a diameter of lets say 30cm)… I doubt that would keep your physics engine car on the track, not to mention destroing the steering weal!
Not to mention that it is based on Newtonian physics, according to relativity you would never be able to reach C so I still gave you a chance using these formulas

But as a good bullsh**er you totally avoided the calculated proof… and didn’t even try to disprove it, because you don’t even understand it is my gues!

And Travelling Code?? Code doesn’t travel, in a computer, the only thing that travels in a computer are electrons flowing through the components, and there isn’t a single component on this planet that allows that to pass through it at the speed of light! Even if you actually could do what you say you can, which in it’s own is so unbelievable it makes me laugh, you as a person could not make the information inside the computer travel any faster that it does…

The fact that in every post you keep saying “you made it happen”, “your proof was stolen”, “you are so fast” just proves that you are lying and making all this up as you go along, sure it’s fun proving you wrong in every post, and reading how people indulge in your fantasy just to see you get of an it.

But looking at it all factually,
You have no proof and have no way of getting it
All we have is your word (not worth the pixels)
Every thing you say and claim sounds more like magic than the real world
And you have absolutely no knowledge of what you are trying to discredit

And every time we ask a question like Ophiolite does you don’t answer it

An answer to your question:
I have asked this question a number of times but I havent got 1 answer yet. " what would you think if you saw the proof of everything I'm talking about?"

…
“Wow cool graphics when this game comes out I’m definitely going to by it and the VR helmet that goes with it”:D

So now answer some of our questions
Starting with Ophiolite’s

And tell me how long your arm travelled at C to make the corrections needed?(indulge indulge)
How did they keep the computer cool while you where “speeding it up”?
Were you the only test person, or did they have more than one?

If you could answer one of there questions for us with actual factual proof that we can not disprove, that would be a start, but I seriously doubt it :p

Iff I saw your proof and determined that it was valid: I would think it would be a magnificent discovery.

But I'm not about to help your endeavour when everything in my repretoire of knowlege indicates that said hypothetical proof does not even exist.

If I knew you that you were immortal, and all you had to do was go skydiving without a parachute to get my proof, would you believe me? How great would it be if you had my proof?

Basicaly, my offer is: I'l boycot whoever you want me to, right after you land.
-Andrew

First person to answer that. Thanks.

by helping me and yourself, you would have to do nothing.

im asking you to do nothing. its not a big ask and you will benefit greatly. no risk. no cost. no nothing.

thanks

Just Purchased: Sony High-Definition 40GB HDD Camcorder. 1920 x 1080 resolution. Man, it's sweet.

How does code travel?
What is code?
Would you care to post a few lines of code here?
Would you then explain how that code can travel?

i dont know or care to be honest. like i have been saying this japanese cryptographer who was hired, developed these squares that took a chain of photographs of the contact areas. these squares then proceeded to travel until the weight transition. they were good but they broke down. the testing i did made them completely solid. then the fucking things travelled.

code is numbers. i realise what you mean. it was the outer layer of the code which was the most important. this outer layer was strong enough to hold information. i dont know how it was made.

what i do know is, the first breakthrough that happened was when the polyphony digital monkeys managed, after 6 months, to account for wheelspeeds of up to 50mph. (a drivers reaction time at the wheel) this code had to be every strong and fast to deal with the speed an accuracy of my wheel movements. this stronger code was the only bit of intellectual property the polyphony digital monkeys contibuted and was probably used in the 'squares' to make them strong and capable of dealing with speed.


*I hate numbers. I couldnt care less about them or any order in which they might go. I am right brained. This process showed what the right hemisphere is capable of and an idea of where our evolution is going. If you want details on how exactly the code travelled, contact kazonori yamauchi who hired the cryptographer. he will have your answers and what belongs to you. not to mention me.

I'm afraid your ideas are not new. You are only rediscovering the timecube.
http://www.timecube.com/

after 22,775 posts, that sort of crap is the best you can come up with?

after 22,775 posts, that sort of crap is the best you can come up with?

Here's some better crap even than the OP:

Theory and Cultural Objectivism

1. Discourses of failure

In the works of Spelling, a predominant concept is the distinction between creation and destruction. However, the subject is interpolated into a that includes sexuality as a whole.

An abundance of theories concerning postdialectic constructive theory exist. Thus, the example of neoconstructive capitalist theory intrinsic to Spelling’s Models, Inc. emerges again in The Heights.

If cultural objectivism holds, we have to choose between pretextual nihilism and the materialist paradigm of reality. In a sense, the primary theme of the works of Spelling is a self-fulfilling paradox.

2. Neodeconstructive cultural theory and pretextual desituationism

If one examines cultural materialism, one is faced with a choice: either reject postdialectic constructive theory or conclude that the raison d’etre of the artist is significant form. Lyotard uses the term ‘pretextual desituationism’ to denote the difference between sexual identity and class. But Parry[1] states that we have to choose between the conceptualist paradigm of expression and precapitalist theory.

Bataille’s critique of cultural objectivism suggests that discourse comes from communication. Therefore, the main theme of McElwaine’s[2] analysis of pretextual desituationism is the paradigm, and hence the economy, of modernist sexual identity.

Many discourses concerning the bridge between society and language may be discovered. But in Models, Inc., Spelling deconstructs cultural objectivism; in Robin’s Hoods, although, he denies pretextual desituationism.

Sartre uses the term ‘postdialectic textual theory’ to denote not, in fact, theory, but subtheory. In a sense, the premise of postdialectic constructive theory implies that the establishment is intrinsically elitist, but only if Lacan’s critique of cultural objectivism is invalid; otherwise, Foucault’s model of postdialectic constructive theory is one of “the postcapitalist paradigm of expression”, and thus part of the dialectic of reality.


references:

1. Parry, U. B. L. ed. (1975) Postdialectic Demodernisms: Cultural objectivism and postdialectic constructive theory. Schlangekraft

2. McElwaine, Q. U. (1981) Postdialectic constructive theory and cultural objectivism. Oxford University Press

Proof of God, part 1

http://www.doobybrain.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/05/proof-god-atheist.jpg

Proof of God, part 2

http://content.ytmnd.com/content/1/d/6/1d6370dfe72fbb92b0941b3e6a3a2919.jpg

:m:

Yes please refrain from using profanity…

You still don’t get it do you, the simple answer to your ridicules claims are that you have no understanding or even perception of how fast the speed of light is… do you think those numbers I posted are fake? Try using the formulas and work it out for yourself

F=m.a
A= (Vc-V)/t
1G=9.81m/s²

Using these simple formulas you can see yourself that what you are saying is impossible, if you moved your hand and the steering weal at the speed of light, within 0.001 sec you would have turned the steering weal over 636.6 times (if it had a diameter of lets say 30cm)… I doubt that would keep your physics engine car on the track, not to mention destroing the steering weal!
Not to mention that it is based on Newtonian physics, according to relativity you would never be able to reach C so I still gave you a chance using these formulas

But as a good bullsh**er you totally avoided the calculated proof… and didn’t even try to disprove it, because you don’t even understand it is my gues!

And Travelling Code?? Code doesn’t travel, in a computer, the only thing that travels in a computer are electrons flowing through the components, and there isn’t a single component on this planet that allows that to pass through it at the speed of light! Even if you actually could do what you say you can, which in it’s own is so unbelievable it makes me laugh, you as a person could not make the information inside the computer travel any faster that it does…

The fact that in every post you keep saying “you made it happen”, “your proof was stolen”, “you are so fast” just proves that you are lying and making all this up as you go along, sure it’s fun proving you wrong in every post, and reading how people indulge in your fantasy just to see you get of an it.

But looking at it all factually,
You have no proof and have no way of getting it
All we have is your word (not worth the pixels)
Every thing you say and claim sounds more like magic than the real world
And you have absolutely no knowledge of what you are trying to discredit

And every time we ask a question like Ophiolite does you don’t answer it

An answer to your question:

“Wow cool graphics when this game comes out I’m definitely going to by it and the VR helmet that goes with it”:D

So now answer some of our questions
Starting with Ophiolite’s

And tell me how long your arm travelled at C to make the corrections needed?(indulge indulge)
How did they keep the computer cool while you where “speeding it up”?
Were you the only test person, or did they have more than one?

If you could answer one of there questions for us with actual factual proof that we can not disprove, that would be a start, but I seriously doubt it :p

Make me.

I dont care about your formulas. I know enough. The proof to back it up is in japan, stolen by little old man.

Can you not see that this would change everything we know. Including all the stuff you have been studying in 3rd level education.

Long story short I made it happen. the cryptographer was prepared. yamauchi , the old faggot, is a billionaire. any power supply or computing hardware was bought.

I am aware of the circumstances and of how crazy it sounds. I can understand your negativity and empathise with your inability to believe this, as it is a lot to believe. You understand me but you dont believe me because you havent seen the proof. I am looking forward to when everybody does.

To be quite honest though, be constructive or take a walk. I have been saying I was robbed of everything. I have been saying I dont have proof but I'm telling you where it is. I am being very clear about everything.

Proof of God, part 2

http://content.ytmnd.com/content/1/d/6/1d6370dfe72fbb92b0941b3e6a3a2919.jpg

do you gave anything better to do other than find things on the internet and copy and paste them here?

OK, here's a Haiku:

I'm the physics God,
And the proof is in Japan,
Stolen by the man!

your not completely useless.

Dear voodoochile,
thank you for taking the time to provide the answers to my questions in post #179. Based upon these answers it is very clear that you are either a skillfull troll or a seriously delueded individual. I have no wish to waste my time with the former, or to cause inadvertent harm to the latter.

I do urge you to seek professional help. I am almost certain you will ignore this, but I suspect there is a small part of you that realises this is good advice. Please listen to that small part of you and go find that help.

Good luck and goodbye.

Dear voodoochile,
thank you for taking the time to provide the answers to my questions in post #179. Based upon these answers it is very clear that you are either a skillfull troll or a seriously delueded individual. I have no wish to waste my time with the former, or to cause inadvertent harm to the latter.

I do urge you to seek professional help. I am almost certain you will ignore this, but I suspect there is a small part of you that realises this is good advice. Please listen to that small part of you and go find that help.

Good luck and goodbye.

You forgot option C. Are you afraid of it?

Not my problem you cant believe it. It really was because of one single decision.

Eventually, when I manage to force this to be made public, you will wish you had taken a chance.

Please try and replicate this event, and try not to get your evidence conveniently stolen again.

How can you scientifically prove that God exists???

All this is is a bunch of atheists scientists trying to convince themselves that there really is a God.

Uhhh... We can logically prove that, but not scientifically. When scientists finally climb the mountain, they'll find a theologian at the top.

God obviously does exist, but religion is not a science!!!

Not atheists, but theists. A small correction.

You guys are missing the point of the OP. They're claiming a visual effect occurred while testing a "physics engine" and then go on about how this was done by manipulating the physics "faster than light".

There are however a number of problems in this explanation, like for instance a "normal" physics engine would not be able go as fast as light, let alone faster. This would require special equipment and network parameters and technically wouldn't violate any physics laws. (Even Mozart's 40th symphony at 4.7 time the speed of light still had certain reference points. For instance normal play and lightspeed play would start at the same time, just the lightspeed version would obviously finish extremely quickly while the normal version would continue to play a while. Obviously the FTL play can only play what is prepared before hand, this basically means you can't magically make information appear in reality from just a meme that you'll do something shortly, it has to be already be in the pipelines being done.)

This is main reason why I suggested to the OP that it's a Jib (Someone played a practical joke on him) and the problem is that he's allowed his imagination to get the better of himself so he's now further away from the truth.

Please try and replicate this event, and try not to get your evidence conveniently stolen again.

I could easily repeat the test where i found the points of inertia. I could easily demonstrate how fast I can bring the code. A few thoudand mph, without even trying. You could try to see what you could reach. I could do all this without breaking a sweat but there is a problem. A sad old japanese faggot who is interfering with this whole process and slowing down its publication.

I wont get caught again. I'll get even for the last time too.

How can you scientifically prove that God exists???


Good question. Its as close as proof gets. This genuinely is a system that God incorporated into the laws of physics. That combined with what I witnessed and the recorded process which is in japan, is what you have to believe. It really is a lot when you put it all together. Its off to a bad start thanks to that bitch but the truth is the truth and this was meant to be found. Believing in God is almost always difficult here. I think its meant to be that way, like a test. Now you have to believe a video game playing looney, so its still going to difficult.

All this is is a bunch of atheists scientists trying to convince themselves that there really is a God.

The scientists involved merely fell into this, thanks to a very colorful new toy.

You guys are missing the point of the OP. They're claiming a visual effect occurred while testing a "physics engine" and then go on about how this was done by manipulating the physics "faster than light".

There are however a number of problems in this explanation, like for instance a "normal" physics engine would not be able go as fast as light, let alone faster. This would require special equipment and network parameters and technically wouldn't violate any physics laws. (Even Mozart's 40th symphony at 4.7 time the speed of light still had certain reference points. For instance normal play and lightspeed play would start at the same time, just the lightspeed version would obviously finish extremely quickly while the normal version would continue to play a while. Obviously the FTL play can only play what is prepared before hand, this basically means you can't magically make information appear in reality from just a meme that you'll do something shortly, it has to be already be in the pipelines being done.)

This is main reason why I suggested to the OP that it's a Jib (Someone played a practical joke on him) and the problem is that he's allowed his imagination to get the better of himself so he's now further away from the truth.

Over the 3 or 4 second effort, my hands were moving at a ridiculous speed around the wheel. I really built up to that one decision at C. What happened next was not a practical joke. This happned physically, around me and the entire room I was in and lasted for about 10 seconds. I couldnt believe it until the process continued and confirmation was found.

Can you put yourself in my situation? Would you be able to tell people the truth under these circumstances?

voodoochile you are an atheist struggling to come to the comclusion that you were wrong the previous years of your life.

I hope you learn

Can you put yourself in my situation? Would you be able to tell people the truth under these circumstances?

Yes and I have been in far worse situations.

Define the truth. Basically you saw what you saw, however the question is have you been able to view what you saw from another perspective. What I mean is you currently see what you saw similar to a character painted in a picture, you haven't placed any objectivity to the potential that what you saw was either a hallucination probably brought on by what ever visuals you'd be subjected to prior merged with your own ideology/intellect, or what you saw was a complete jib (prank).

I mean don't you think what you saw was too "textbook" in regards to what a Theist poses exists?

If you are going to ask questions about such incidents then you are going to have to learn to ask the right questions and understand that there is always the potential that someone is trying to pull the wool over your eyes, so learn to be more objective. (I'm basically telling you, you shouldn't believe what you saw at face value there is bound to be more to it and running around with a "conspiracy" in your head is no way to resolve the truth, if anything it will keep you from it)

All this is is a bunch of atheists scientists trying to convince themselves that there really is a God.
No this is a bunch of scientists arguing with someone who knows nothing about science and explaining why and where he's wrong on the scientific aspects.
God obviously does exist
Patently untrue.
He's apparent to some some people but faqr from obvious.

Just another example of assuming something 1 doesn't understand is evidence of gods.

voodoochile you are an atheist struggling to come to the comclusion that you were wrong the previous years of your life.

Your actually right. I'm kicking myself. Time is an obvious giveaway.

I hope you learn

No. I realised, and first too. Out of all the "brilliant" minds that were there.

Yes and I have been in far worse situations.

Define the truth. Basically you saw what you saw, however the question is have you been able to view what you saw from another perspective. What I mean is you currently see what you saw similar to a character painted in a picture, you haven't placed any objectivity to the potential that what you saw was either a hallucination probably brought on by what ever visuals you'd be subjected to prior merged with your own ideology/intellect, or what you saw was a complete jib (prank).

I mean don't you think what you saw was too "textbook" in regards to what a Theist poses exists?

If you are going to ask questions about such incidents then you are going to have to learn to ask the right questions and understand that there is always the potential that someone is trying to pull the wool over your eyes, so learn to be more objective. (I'm basically telling you, you shouldn't believe what you saw at face value there is bound to be more to it and running around with a "conspiracy" in your head is no way to resolve the truth, if anything it will keep you from it)


You have in your shit.

The truth is sitting in japan waiting for you to see it. You will be able to follow everything a lot better.

God is the light. The light is infinite. The light is the 5th dimension. A complete mathematically perfect replica of the 5th dimension, which I made, is in japan. Jesus is his son. You cant get more definitive than that.

The wool was pulled over my eyes. I trusted a bunch of cunts who have havent got a soul or a pair of balls between them.

No this is a bunch of scientists arguing with someone who knows nothing about science and explaining why and where he's wrong on the scientific aspects.

Patently untrue.
He's apparent to some some people but faqr from obvious.

I know enough. It happened, was confirmed and proven.

Just another example of assuming something 1 doesn't understand is evidence of gods.

I'm saying that the truth is now understood and the proof is in japan. String theory was as far as understanding went before this, and thats not a lot.

Proof of god, part 3

http://www.terrace.qld.edu.au/moo/god.jpg

skinwalker, your name is weird. your avatar is weird. your weird. go away will you?

Proof of god, part 4

http://i197.photobucket.com/albums/aa59/rosemontree/Travel/big_foot.jpg

Proof of god, part 5

http://www.cartoonstock.com/lowres/thu0035l.jpg

You have in your shit.

The truth is sitting in japan waiting for you to see it. You will be able to follow everything a lot better.

God is the light. The light is infinite. The light is the 5th dimension. A complete mathematically perfect replica of the 5th dimension, which I made, is in japan. Jesus is his son. You cant get more definitive than that.

The wool was pulled over my eyes. I trusted a bunch of cunts who have havent got a soul or a pair of balls between them.

You're output is understandable. You are either completely lieing (and for what purpose other than some amusement I can not fathom.) or You saw something and feel threatened by those that say you didn't see it.

You're need to defend what "You" have constructed in your own psyche is a form of Psychosis and will be seen as that unless you can be more objective about what you saw. At the end of the day you have to be the objective one, taking things for granted just means you're taking things as they are and I know from my own experiences that you should never do that.

You either saw a hallucination through either hypnosis or previous drug usage, or like I said previously "someone is playing a trick on you".

What you have declared to exist can not be for many reasons which I will not go into details here over.

Proof of god, part 6

http://nynerd.com/wp-content/uploads/2006/11/can%20you%20see%20jesus.jpg

You're output is understandable. You are either completely lieing (and for what purpose other than some amusement I can not fathom.) or You saw something and feel threatened by those that say you didn't see it.

You're need to defend what "You" have constructed in your own psyche is a form of Psychosis and will be seen as that unless you can be more objective about what you saw. At the end of the day you have to be the objective one, taking things for granted just means you're taking things as they are and I know from my own experiences that you should never do that.

You either saw a hallucination through either hypnosis or previous drug usage, or like I said previously "someone is playing a trick on you".

What you have declared to exist can not be for many reasons which I will not go into details here over.

I dont feel threatened at all. I'm pissed off because I am handing people the greatest answers and ownership to the greatest thing ever made and they afraid to believe it. I'm pissed off because this is hard enough to relate as it is, let alone having been robbed by a japnese scumbag and deal with all of this.

This was a scientific process. It happened in reality. The proof exists in reality.

No. I saw the light and it was conscious and I later proved it. All will be clear and easy to believe when the people tell this japanese thief to give them whats rightfully theirs.

Where's a better place than an internet forum?

Where's a better place than an internet forum?Almost anywhere would be a better place. Certainly a court of law would be the appropriate place.

Sorry I was out of the loop for a few days. I've been working on getting the 2 metric tons of dehydrated urine. Do you have any of the other necessities, voodoo?

Sorry I was out of the loop for a few days. I've been working on getting the 2 metric tons of dehydrated urine. Do you have transport facilities for this? That would be crucial. If you do not have transport facilities suitable for moving the dehydrated urine it will not be possible to move it. Well you might be able to send it somewhere, but you will not be able to take it.

I'm thinking of keeping it in a powder form for potential air drop, actually.

This was a scientific process.
Hardly - you haven't shown any understanding of science at all so how can you claim any scientific basis for what you've described?

Hardly - you haven't shown any understanding of science at all so how can you claim any scientific basis for what you've described?


no offence but science is boring. I was the tester, i did all the physical work and a lot of theories (including the 5 dimension theory). The science people involved did the science part.

Write a letter to yamauchi or sony or polyphony digital. Ask them to inform you about the science part of it. It wasnt my part. Or get them to deny all of this in public. Or on paper.

Do something.

Wait. You want us, total strangers, to do something. I'm willing to join you in an armed retrieval mission, but a letter? No way.

its for your own good. you can lead a monkey to water,,,

Is this thread good for your career?

you mean motorsports? well to be quite honest I used to think winning races and screwing chicks seemed like a good way to live but I have realised theres more to it than just that.

Anyway, look at what i've fucking done. It would take a team of people to do the work I did. A machine couldnt get code to C. I found the proof and so on. I'm happy, even if i never do anything ever again.

I think you're lying.

no offence but science is boring.You flatter yourself it you think anything you say could offend us.

Now, on a related matter, what was the name of the project you were working on. If we are to write to Sony we need to know that. If we are to join Hamtastic on the end of a paraglider we need to know that. If we are to continue laughing behind your back we need to know that. (Did I say that last bit out loud?)

you mean motorsports? well to be quite honest I used to think winning races and screwing chicks seemed like a good way to live but I have realised theres more to it than just that.

Anyway, look at what i've fucking done. It would take a team of people to do the work I did. A machine couldnt get code to C. I found the proof and so on. I'm happy, even if i never do anything ever again.

Some support ...

I would like to hear some of what you say from a good honest perspective.
If you may please tell me why you believe you are so excited for this.
If you may please tell me if you have an ego regarding this matter.
If you may please tell me if you think you are very right and we are wrong.

As the thread title is misleading regarding these matters at the moment [for myself- and many others I feel]

You have in your shit.

The truth is sitting in japan waiting for you to see it. You will be able to follow everything a lot better.

God is the light. The light is infinite. The light is the 5th dimension. A complete mathematically perfect replica of the 5th dimension, which I made, is in japan. Jesus is his son. You cant get more definitive than that.

The wool was pulled over my eyes. I trusted a bunch of cunts who have havent got a soul or a pair of balls between them.
:mad:

...

Hello

I was informed by a member of staff about this forum and how it not only makes a mockery of me but also of Sony and Polyphony Digital and I thought I should read this and reply in kind to Mr Voodoochile.

Yes I do remember you, you came in one day as a tester for Grand Tourismo 5 Prologue, you looked a little tiered but you where a good racer… after a few day’s of testing you started ranting this nonsense to the other testers, most of them didn’t take any offence to your ranting but there was one who you actually got into a yelling match with, do you remember that?

Then you got paranoid and told everyone I had stolen the proof to your ridicules claims, you even dragged our number one programmer into your delusion, we were forced to end your contract prematurely and made it very clear to you that we hadn’t taken any ‘proof’ from you.

After you left we found a number of narcotics in your sleeping area, cannabis, a bag with white powder which turned out to be speed after we had it tested, the police where informed but since it couldn’t be proven without a doubt that it was yours no charges were filled.

Allow me to assure everyone here, The physics engine created only simulated as close as possible a recreation of reality to what a car does under normal circumstances, and contains no other physical anomalies… during testing all faults were found and removed, for the car simulation game Grand Tourismo it is perfect but that is were it ends.

There is no Cross over a car, there is no halo around a car and there was no “light” around Mr Voodoochile during the testing, he is/was just an average tester for our new release!

I hope you (voodoochile) will find some help with your drug problem, this episode was clearly induced by the mix of drugs you were using… there are plenty of rehab clinics that will gladly help you.

Kind regards to all who read this and do enjoy the game!

Hiroshi Yamauchi

lol

I get a sense that is voodochilli ... my way with words almost confirms it but does not sound like him at same time.

no offence but science is boring.
Because you don't know any.
So why try to use science to make your point?

I was the tester, i did all the physical work and a lot of theories (including the 5 dimension theory). The science people involved did the science part.
5 dimension theory?
More specious crap.

I think you're lying.

I'm not lying. How do I benefit from this lie? If I really had a problem with an old little japanese man wouldnt I just go to japan and take care of it nice and quickly. Why go telling the whole world about this proof of God's existence. It seems a bit much for a lie or revenge.

You flatter yourself it you think anything you say could offend us.

Now, on a related matter, what was the name of the project you were working on. If we are to write to Sony we need to know that. If we are to join Hamtastic on the end of a paraglider we need to know that. If we are to continue laughing behind your back we need to know that. (Did I say that last bit out loud?)

There is only one physics engine. One company. One owner.
Polyphony digital make gran turismo, owned by kazonori yamauchi.
Not hard to find at all.

Laugh yourselves sick. Nobody who I've told in person has laughed in my face.

Hello

I was informed by a member of staff about this forum and how it not only makes a mockery of me but also of Sony and Polyphony Digital and I thought I should read this and reply in kind to Mr Voodoochile....

:roflmao: OMFG! Now THAT makes sense. Why was he banned?

Some support ...

I would like to hear some of what you say from a good honest perspective.
If you may please tell me why you believe you are so excited for this.
If you may please tell me if you have an ego regarding this matter.
If you may please tell me if you think you are very right and we are wrong.

As the thread title is misleading regarding these matters at the moment [for myself- and many others I feel]

You are getting the truth from an honest perspective. I'm just not sugar coating it. I couldnt be bothered as I have no patience left. 6 months and by objective observation i have found that the majority of people are chickens and/or monkeys. The next time you spend more than half an hour watching tv, think that you could be looking at the light.


I found the majority of the proof that God exists. I met God and was introduced to someone who was later confirmed to be Jesus Christ. I had to break through the fabric of space time for this, and I did it with my bare hands. Something a hadron collider can't do. etc.

I have the greatest mind on the planet. Ask any of the people considered to have the greatest minds.

Its not that I'm right and your wrong. It's that I'm right and you don't have a fucking clue whats really going on. Nobody really did until this happened.

The title should be, the unified theory of the universe, Great, and then kazonori yamuchi happened.


*he's stealing from you, you just can't believe the circumstances that allowed it to happen.

You didn't mention you were a schizophrenic tweaker...

Hello

I was informed by a member of staff about this forum and how it not only makes a mockery of me but also of Sony and Polyphony Digital and I thought I should read this and reply in kind to Mr Voodoochile.

Yes I do remember you, you came in one day as a tester for Grand Tourismo 5 Prologue, you looked a little tiered but you where a good racer… after a few day’s of testing you started ranting this nonsense to the other testers, most of them didn’t take any offence to your ranting but there was one who you actually got into a yelling match with, do you remember that?

Then you got paranoid and told everyone I had stolen the proof to your ridicules claims, you even dragged our number one programmer into your delusion, we were forced to end your contract prematurely and made it very clear to you that we hadn’t taken any ‘proof’ from you.

After you left we found a number of narcotics in your sleeping area, cannabis, a bag with white powder which turned out to be speed after we had it tested, the police where informed but since it couldn’t be proven without a doubt that it was yours no charges were filled.

Allow me to assure everyone here, The physics engine created only simulated as close as possible a recreation of reality to what a car does under normal circumstances, and contains no other physical anomalies… during testing all faults were found and removed, for the car simulation game Grand Tourismo it is perfect but that is were it ends.

There is no Cross over a car, there is no halo around a car and there was no “light” around Mr Voodoochile during the testing, he is/was just an average tester for our new release!

I hope you (voodoochile) will find some help with your drug problem, this episode was clearly induced by the mix of drugs you were using… there are plenty of rehab clinics that will gladly help you.

Kind regards to all who read this and do enjoy the game!

Hiroshi Yamauchi

Any response I could write to this would get me banned from the site.

Because you don't know any.
So why try to use science to make your point?


5 dimension theory?
More specious crap.

Its boring but it gets my cell phone to work. Its useful.

Put yourself in my situation. Believe it just for a minute. You manage to bring the code to C, everything becomes light. You see two individuals. The light is infinite. You later create a complete copy of this dimension. Put 2 and 2 together will you?

2+2=5 dimensions.

spidergoat

That letter is a fake but thats what I'd like to see from the polyphony digital people, for a start.

thats the first time somebody mentioned schizophrenia. duly noted.

Any schizo or looney would have bailed out by now.

Wait. You want us, total strangers, to do something. I'm willing to join you in an armed retrieval mission, but a letter? No way.

No. Oli wants the science details. I told him where to get them.

Also, all the executive people in all the major japanese car manufacturers know about this and individuals associated with gran turismo. It is because of Ayrton Senna that these people know. As the testing process went on, some coincidences were noticed. The polyphony digital people used these coincidences to further relations with manufacturers so they could benefit from a business point of view and make the cars look weally weal.

I wont mention individuals names but I have no problem mentioning company names who are raping this progress along with Polyphony Digital, Honda, Mitsubishi, Nissan and toyota. Representatives from all of these companies observed this process at one time or another.

Any response I could write to this would get me banned from the site.We live in hope.

voodoochile

what do you have against this small japeneze man?

http://barista.media2.org/wp-content/japaneseman.jpg

spidergoat

That letter is a fake



sure looks that way.:)

Also, all the executive people in all the major japanese car manufacturers know about this and individuals associated with gran turismo. It is because of Ayrton Senna that these people know. As the testing process went on, some coincidences were noticed. The polyphony digital people used these coincidences to further relations with manufacturers so they could benefit from a business point of view and make the cars look weally weal.

I wont mention individuals names but I have no problem mentioning company names who are raping this progress along with Polyphony Digital, Honda, Mitsubishi, Nissan. Representatives from all of these companies observed this process at one time or another.

So the hole of japan is behind this conspiracy to make you look like a loon… I think those people have better things to do!

2+2=5… are actually trying to be an idiot!

And what has the late Ayrton Senna got to do with it?

There is only one physics engine. One company. One owner.
Polyphony digital make gran turismo, owned by kazonori yamauchi.
Not hard to find at all.

….

Wait didn’t you just say all the Japanese car company’s are in on it what’s this one company one man crap?

…

Laugh yourselves sick. Nobody who I've told in person has laughed in my face.

I would laugh in your face either I would be afraid you would try to kill me if I did!

You are a paranoid schizophrenic with an extreme need to lie, you don’t give up because you believe that what you are saying is the truth, you have a hard time keeping imagination and the real world apart, you don’t know you are sick and you get aggravated when someone doesn’t believe your lies or proves that your fantasy world is fake (as we have done several times). When faced with proof you pas it of as not important and irrelevant, despite the scientific background of the proof and the obviously fabricated counter claim made by you!

You need to be put in a room with padded walls not for our protection but for your own!

Put yourself in my situation. Believe it just for a minute. You manage to bring the code to C,
You see this is why I can't even begin to believe you.
Code does not travel, let alone at light speed.

No. Oli wants the science details. I told him where to get them.
There is no science involved. You are either completely deluded (and need psychiatric help), lying (for whatever reason) or trying to wind us up.