|
|
View Full Version : Saturn Occultation May 22 2007 - Attention: this is NOT a NASA photoshop job MattMarr 05-22-07, 06:59 PM Brightest Moon ever, three days after close encounter with brightest Venus ever, occults Saturn, like 10 Sep 2001. Attention: this is NOT a NASA photoshop job. It is a real photo... http://moon-signs.blogspot.com/2007/05/saturn-occultation-may-22-2007.html Nikelodeon 05-23-07, 02:25 AM No, its a definate NASA photo job. The shadows are all wrong. Sock puppet path 05-23-07, 03:22 AM Wow that's impressive....so the illuminati made it happen?:confused: redarmy11 05-23-07, 04:12 AM What the FUCK'S this got to do with the omnipresent threat of the Illuminati!?? Do your fucking job, Matt!!! :mad: phlogistician 05-23-07, 04:15 AM Wow that's impressive....so the illuminati made it happen?:confused: The illuminati, and the "Rand Corporation, in conjunction with the saucer people, under the supervision of the reverse vampires." No other such conjunction of conspiracists could bring around such a conjunction of celestial bodies. orcot 05-23-07, 04:38 AM http://www.astronomics.com/main/images/imgs12_27_2004/saturn-size.jpg That's not so unusual (it is a good picture tough). the picture is quit big and the size of the moon indicates a large magnification... so you must gave some impresive equipment. phlogistician 05-23-07, 05:12 AM [IMG]...the picture is quit big and the size of the moon indicates a large magnification... so you must gave some impresive equipment. Hmmm, 'brightest moon' in the same shot as the rather far away and not very bright Saturn, .... why does this present a problem? Communist Hamster 05-23-07, 05:46 AM You have forgotten that MattMarr rejects Heliocentrism. Check his post history. orcot 05-23-07, 05:52 AM Hmmm, 'brightest moon' in the same shot as the rather far away and not very bright Saturn, .... why does this present a problem? hmm your right it chould have taken a long exposure to make the saturn pic and a short exposure for the moon. Altough with's todays technology a mounted digital cam that calculates it's own expore time depending on the ... different objects... It's proberly a fake right? Never the less the aparent sizes seem abouth right phlogistician 05-23-07, 07:29 AM You have forgotten that MattMarr rejects Heliocentrism. Check his post history. Ah yes, he probably snagged the picture with his camera phone, as we approached close enough on one of our epicycles. draqon 05-23-07, 10:06 AM look illuminati, I am tired of this ****. |