Roger_Explosion
11-13-05, 08:03 PM
I've been thinking about the Wow signal (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wow_signal) lately, and the various possiblities about what it could be, and I have a few questions if anyone here is knowledgeable about it.
I've read an article that said that it was 'undoubtedly artificial'. I'm curious as to how they can be so sure it is artificial, and not some cosmic event that we are currently unfamiliar with. Pulsars seemed artifical too before we figured them out.
Secondly, I am curious about a theory that the guy who discovered it has postulated, that it was in fact terrestial in origin, but bounced off something in space, like a satellite or something. I've done a bit of research, and the frequency band that the signal was detected in (1420.356 MHz by one account, and 1420.456 MHz by another) is actually reserved by the National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA) for radio astronomy, so no one, civilian or otherwise is allowed to use that area of the spectrum. I don't know how long it's been reserved for though, ie. whether it was reserved in 1977 when the signal was detected. a quick google search though reveals that NASA seems to use the 1400-2400 MHz range for radio telemetry (http://www.scsc.navy.mil/mission/telemetry.htm), which would fit the bill perfectly, eg. if they detected a telemetry signal bounced off a solar array on a satellite or something. If the satellite were rotating or something at the time, the signal would only appear for a brief period and might not appear on the second receiver, if the satellite had rotated away from the receiver. But yeah, as I said, their telemetry systems are certainly capable of using those frequencies, but whether they ever do or not I don't know.
Even assuming that it wasnt NASA however, it could just as easily have been a russian satellite or something.
Is there any way to determine, from the brief signal that we received how far away the transmitter was? like, for example, it lasted 72 seconds exactly, which is how long it took the receiver to pass over that section of sky, and it grew in strength then faded exactly as it should. So doesnt that make the possiblity of it being a satellite unlikely? Because if it were in a prograde orbit the signal would have been shorter than the 72 seconds detected, because the satellite would be moving across the sky, and surely the scientists would have known if there was a satellite in geosynchronous orbit at that exact location in the sky.
What other space based objects could reflect radio signals of terrestrial origin? Could a meteor or something like that? What about space junk?
It seems to me that the precise length of the signal makes a local source unlikely. But I'm not very knowledgeable about these things, and I've only been looking into it for the last half an hour or so :) I'm sure that much more knowledgeable astronomers have spent a lot more time looking into it.
So without knowing enough much about the technicalities of it, it's difficult to apply Occam's razor in this case :)
What do you guys think? Do you have any theories?
I've read an article that said that it was 'undoubtedly artificial'. I'm curious as to how they can be so sure it is artificial, and not some cosmic event that we are currently unfamiliar with. Pulsars seemed artifical too before we figured them out.
Secondly, I am curious about a theory that the guy who discovered it has postulated, that it was in fact terrestial in origin, but bounced off something in space, like a satellite or something. I've done a bit of research, and the frequency band that the signal was detected in (1420.356 MHz by one account, and 1420.456 MHz by another) is actually reserved by the National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA) for radio astronomy, so no one, civilian or otherwise is allowed to use that area of the spectrum. I don't know how long it's been reserved for though, ie. whether it was reserved in 1977 when the signal was detected. a quick google search though reveals that NASA seems to use the 1400-2400 MHz range for radio telemetry (http://www.scsc.navy.mil/mission/telemetry.htm), which would fit the bill perfectly, eg. if they detected a telemetry signal bounced off a solar array on a satellite or something. If the satellite were rotating or something at the time, the signal would only appear for a brief period and might not appear on the second receiver, if the satellite had rotated away from the receiver. But yeah, as I said, their telemetry systems are certainly capable of using those frequencies, but whether they ever do or not I don't know.
Even assuming that it wasnt NASA however, it could just as easily have been a russian satellite or something.
Is there any way to determine, from the brief signal that we received how far away the transmitter was? like, for example, it lasted 72 seconds exactly, which is how long it took the receiver to pass over that section of sky, and it grew in strength then faded exactly as it should. So doesnt that make the possiblity of it being a satellite unlikely? Because if it were in a prograde orbit the signal would have been shorter than the 72 seconds detected, because the satellite would be moving across the sky, and surely the scientists would have known if there was a satellite in geosynchronous orbit at that exact location in the sky.
What other space based objects could reflect radio signals of terrestrial origin? Could a meteor or something like that? What about space junk?
It seems to me that the precise length of the signal makes a local source unlikely. But I'm not very knowledgeable about these things, and I've only been looking into it for the last half an hour or so :) I'm sure that much more knowledgeable astronomers have spent a lot more time looking into it.
So without knowing enough much about the technicalities of it, it's difficult to apply Occam's razor in this case :)
What do you guys think? Do you have any theories?