What was Roman banned for this time? I seem to have missed something.

Was he banned?

for doing something awesome?

If that were the case I should be banned every day!

pfff!

:p

Oh I found it... 20 minutes of searching (like 6 or 7 pages into his post history): http://www.sciforums.com/showthread.php?p=1142710#post1142710

Roman has been banned for 3 days for spamming and for antisemitic comments in another thread.

That whole thread is hilarious.

if by hilarious, you mean funny.....then yes.

Hey Devil...You are banned too. You are just too AWESOME to be an american in belgium.

im not banned.
you are banned..


take THAT!!!

http://sciforums.com/showthread.php?t=57842

Trolls enter here

did you see this?

ToR, Leopold and perplexity admit that they are trolls. They are the only ones who entered so far.

im not banned.
you are banned..


take THAT!!!

'Take that' gave us Robbie Williams. The only man who can save us from Britney Spears.

ToR, Leopold and perplexity admit that they are trolls. They are the only ones who entered so far.

since you have me on ignore i would appreciate it if you didn't mention my name in your posts

thank you

somebody please quote this so spurious will see it.

spuriousmonkey: leopold99 just called you an "unfettered dutch pervert" (I'm quoting). He said your army's rubbish and that America could batter you with it's eyes closed. He also mentioned something about "all dutch women being crackhead prostitutes" but he only muttered this, so I'm not sure if I caught it properly.

spuriousmonkey: leopold99 just called you an "unfettered dutch pervert" (I'm quoting). He said your army's rubbish and that America could batter you with it's eyes closed. He also mentioned something about "all dutch women being crackhead prostitutes" but he only muttered this, so I'm not sure if I caught it properly.

He would be misinformed then. The prostitutes in Holland are all foreigners brought into holland by the modern slave trade to have sex with unwashed Dutchmen and foreign tourists. Their drug of choice is heroin and cocaine and not crack.

since you have me on ignore i would appreciate it if you didn't mention my name in your posts

thank you

somebody please quote this so spurious will see it.



Don't concern yourself leo with what this poor excuse for a scientist has to say with regard to you or anyone for that matter. His opinion has no validity, his posts are trolly and irrelevant, a poor side kick to devil inside. As with all double acts, you get a funny guy and a straight guy. Devil being the funny one obviously. As with all straight guys they wish they were the funny ones, he wants the lime light so bad, let him have it? See it as charity.

I like you more than Spurious monkey leo

Meanwhile, he said you were his favourite American a while back, what went wrong, did he tell you love could be measured scientifically like he did me, did you dare dispute as did I? oh dear...........

http://sciforums.com/showthread.php?t=57842

Trolls enter here

did you see this?

ToR, Leopold and perplexity admit that they are trolls. They are the only ones who entered so far.


.

How amusing

If this 'not quite a troll' did NOT 'enter here', then how did it manage to view the posts and compile this list?

Piss poor excuse for a scientist, piss poor. Transparent, dull and ..................not worthy of further comment.

http://sciforums.com/showthread.php?t=57842

Trolls enter here

did you see this?

ToR, Leopold and perplexity admit that they are trolls. They are the only ones who entered so far.



'Take that' gave us Robbie Williams. The only man who can save us from Britney Spears.
I'm a Troll.
What of it?
What else can one be in a forum of this kind?
I have a forum where I go and participate in more seriously discussion in.
This is my FUN FORUM.

I only wish everyone puts me on their ignore list.
That'll teach me.

here is his comment

Those Jews got exactly what they deserved.

here is his comment

Haha. Silly Roman.

Thanks for the digging.

i was posting in the same thread before it was locked

I never got banned for posting gay porn..

I never got banned for always being right.

How amusing

If this 'not quite a troll' did NOT 'enter here', then how did it manage to view the posts and compile this list?

Piss poor excuse for a scientist, piss poor. Transparent, dull and ..................not worthy of further comment.

ad hominem. Trolling.

so... spurious hates leopold and ToR hates spurious

ahhh whats going onnn

spurious had his country dissed by leopold, i dont know about ToR but i think it might be down to the whole perplexity saga

spurious had his country dissed by leopold, i dont know about ToR but i think it might be down to the whole perplexity saga


No, I asked him if he could prove scientifically that his wife and kids loved him and he said (rather ridiculously) that love could be proved scientifically, and it was downhill from there.

ah ok, cheers ToR i never really understood why you fell out

i do of course realise why we fell out rather badly :(

ah ok, cheers ToR i never really understood why you fell out

i do of course realise why we fell out rather badly :(

you and I haven't fallen out devil, we have spats now and again, due no doubt to the age difference , but I hold no ill will to you, I enjoy our banter. you are intelligent for a whipper snapper.

meanwhile an extract to what I mentioned before:


Love has a biological basis, whatever you may think. You can formulate a hypothesis and test it. You can quantify and qualify it. You cannot do that with God. Or the feeling that god is evident.

You can explain it biologically of course like the guy is trying to do with the god gene why some people have the need for religious feelings and feel stronger religious feelings than average. That isn't linked to a real concept though. Love is. Love is a biological tool used to cement bonds. religion is a byproduct of other processes.

It's from the God gene thread he went erm.......nuts basically, I must've hit a nerve :) so what's new, that's my job eh!

you and I haven't fallen out devil, we have spats now and again, due no doubt to the age difference , but I hold no ill will to you, I enjoy our banter. you are intelligent for a whipper snapper.

meanwhile an extract to what I mentioned before:




It's from the God gene thread he went erm.......nuts basically, I must've hit a nerve :) so what's new, that's my job eh!
well, you're a much better person than i, i wouldnt have taken some of the shit you took from me

ouch

well, you're a much better person than i, i wouldnt have taken some of the shit you took from me

ouch

Well thats because I know your 'shit' is really soft and squishy and thus easy to 'digest' (eruk)

the type I can't abide are by nature 'shitty' rather than hormonally driven to 'shit' (I am hormonally driven thus one monthly....)


Now before you vomit over the frequency of reference to 'shit' you brought up 'shit' not me!

regards to the better person thing, you're doing good for your age, you'll be a virtual saint when you're my age!

it is your job to hit nerves? psychologist or something?

it is your job to hit nerves? psychologist or something?


The 'it's my job' is an expression here in the uk, example a woman may nag her husband and say 'it's my job' because being a woman, she is 'expected' to nag.

Myself I generally hit nerves thus ' it is assumed to be my job' in that this is what is expected of me.

a poor side kick to devil inside. As with all double acts, you get a funny guy and a straight guy. Devil being the funny one obviously. As with all straight guys they wish they were the funny ones, he wants the lime light so bad, let him have it? See it as charity.

im not sure where you get this idea......i would normally accept a compliment, but i must object to you publicly placing me above the monkeyman in respect to our tag-team of destruction antics.
more people could learn from his irreverent antics, and false (purposefully) "holier than thou" behavior.

he is the funny one. im just a poor sap who has no social contact in real life due to cultural isolation (i REFUSE to assimilate into belgian culture).

I never got banned for always being right.
i got banned for calling a spambot a retard.

go figure.

im not sure where you get this idea......i would normally accept a compliment, but i must object to you publicly placing me above the monkeyman in respect to our tag-team of destruction antics.
more people could learn from his irreverent antics, and false (purposefully) "holier than thou" behavior.

he is the funny one. im just a poor sap who has no social contact in real life due to cultural isolation (i REFUSE to assimilate into belgian culture).

nice try at being pal to the monkey devil, but you cannot dictate what someone finds funny, and he lacks humour in most of his posts that attempt it. You give him too much credit, for a 36 yr old he is very childish and spiteful. A 'man' is slightly more tolerant and forgiving. You may be isolated but you have not lost your humanity up your ass :)

You may be isolated but you have not lost your humanity up your ass :)
no, but i cant find my dvd remote control......

i got banned for calling a spambot a retard.

go figure.

as your recent nemesis Ron explained,

Sciforums will apply the rules to all of the members some of the time
Sciforurms will apply the rules to some of the members all of the time

But Sci forums will not

apply the rules to all the members all the time

no, but i cant find my dvd remote control......

see funny guy! :D

your recent nemesis Ron
he isnt my nemesis. i frequently agree with him, actually.

the problem is that he comes off as a pretentious, elitist prick.

it doesnt matter how correct someone is....if they are acting in such a fashion, i fucking hate their soul until it stops.


after that, its peaches again.

he isnt my nemesis. i frequently agree with him, actually.

the problem is that he comes off as a pretentious, elitist prick.

it doesnt matter how correct someone is....if they are acting in such a fashion, i fucking hate their soul until it stops.


after that, its peaches again.

nope, you have misconstrued Ron

he is 'real' and unafraidedly so, this honesty many find here unwelcome.
I myself find a similar reaction to my own honesty. It is not about ego or pretence at all, but rather the lack of it, that allows for honesty to be displayed thus.

Ego ensures that one accomodates expectations and maximises one's public display to ensure thier popularity, rather than apparrantly actively seek to diminish it.

are you seriously going to tell me that that guy doesnt think the world of himself?

WTF people. Stay on topic. This was about Roman :(

.......
Out of curiosity, why can Roman not be antisemitic but others can be anti-American and get away with it? Because Jews got what they didn't deserve but Americans do?

I hate morons. I say we kill them all. Am I going to be banned? How about we replace "morons" with "Jews." Now I will get banned.

Death to poor blacks. Death to the rich whites.

Which of the two exclamatory statements (assuming equal strength of arguments for both cases) is more likely than the other to get me banned?

are you seriously going to tell me that that guy doesnt think the world of himself?

I am

just because someone challenges you to entertain their point of view when it is controversial, sometimes argumentary or opposing a pals authority, doesn't mean he considers his view is 'the' view, just that there is a 'general view' and that this 'general view' is not being upheld. Contradiction, double standards, injustice.

Ron is a justice fighter if you like.

I gave up fighting for justice a while ago. I found it was self defeating, no one likes the truth, they don't want the truth, the truth hurts, and they hurt you if they hear it!

Forums are a great opportunity for expressing the truth without receiving 'pain' :) so why waste that opportunity being 'dishonestly nice?'

WTF people. Stay on topic. This was about Roman :(

.......
Out of curiosity, why can Roman not be antisemitic but others can be anti-American and get away with it? Because Jews got what they didn't deserve but Americans do?

I hate morons. I say we kill them all. Am I going to be banned? How about we replace "morons" with "Jews." Now I will get banned.

Death to poor blacks. Death to the rich whites.

Which of the two exclamatory statements (assuming equal strength of arguments for both cases) is more likely than the other to get me banned?

I remind you of this philosophy



Sciforums will apply the rules to all of the members some of the time
Sciforurms will apply the rules to some of the members all of the time

But Sci forums will not

apply the rules to all the members all the time

WTF people. Stay on topic. This was about Roman :(

hey, until he gets back, roman can suck on my ballsack.


Out of curiosity, why can Roman not be antisemitic but others can be anti-American and get away with it? Because Jews got what they didn't deserve but Americans do?

I hate morons. I say we kill them all. Am I going to be banned? How about we replace "morons" with "Jews." Now I will get banned.

Death to poor blacks. Death to the rich whites.

Which of the two exclamatory statements (assuming equal strength of arguments for both cases) is more likely than the other to get me banned?
i dont think he was being honestly antisemitic. it was a tongue in cheek remark. however, advocating anyone's death based on circumstances that they have zero control over should not be tolerated on a forum where we all have an equal voice. racism is specifically against the rules.

in answer to your question: the one about niggers.

watch me get banned now. :p

Damn. I thought he was banned because of ME. He said "Shut up fag." in a thread and I had hoped that was the reason.

WTF people. Stay on topic. This was about Roman :(

.......
Out of curiosity, why can Roman not be antisemitic but others can be anti-American and get away with it? Because Jews got what they didn't deserve but Americans do?

I hate morons. I say we kill them all. Am I going to be banned? How about we replace "morons" with "Jews." Now I will get banned.

Death to poor blacks. Death to the rich whites.

Which of the two exclamatory statements (assuming equal strength of arguments for both cases) is more likely than the other to get me banned?

I find it strange too.

Substitute any group you like, Americans, neo-cons, Republicans, Muslims, etc.

Whether it's a political or religious group.

Maybe because anti-Semitism is so much more prevalent?

That would seem to be an argument for coming down hard on any apparent evidence of it.

What do you think?

im eating mint ice cream.

so... spurious hates leopold and ToR hates spurious

ahhh whats going onnn

I don't hate anyone. I just put leopold on ignore because he is being an ass without being funny.

That's a crime against humanity.

And ToR is under the impression that I used to agree with her dumb shit because I once said her titties were nice. She tought that meant we were pals. I only said her titties were nice because I couldn't think of anything else to say about her that is nice.

Well, fuck me. I won't make that mistake anymore.

Anyway, I'm not going to refute the silly claims ToR made. It's all based on selective quoting.

I don't hate anyone. I just put leopold on ignore because he is being an ass without being funny.

That's a crime against humanity.

And ToR is under the impression that I used to agree with her dumb shit because I once said her titties were nice. She tought that meant we were pals. I only said her titties were nice because I couldn't think of anything else to say about her that is nice.

Well, fuck me. I won't make that mistake anymore.

Anyway, I'm not going to refute the silly claims ToR made. It's all based on selective quoting.

Actually I never thought Spurious and I were pals on account of I have never liked him. I am honest when I say he never impressed me with any of his posts. I merely humoured him with an occassion response to his drooling, becuase he makes a spiteful troll, and I believe in keeping my friends close and my enemies closer. I don't respect Monkey nuts never have, never will. I merely tolerated him, as it made for a quieter life. His posts are childish, lack authority and dull.

Regards selective quoting, anyone can check that God gene thread and they will find I quoted exactly.

he thinks love can be scientifically proven...details on a postcard (or back of a stamp) please.

Oh and re nice things about spurious that would be...................

nada

Actually I never thought Spurious and I were pals on account of I have never liked him. I am honest when I say he never impressed me with any of his posts. I merely humoured him becuase he makes a spiteful troll, and I believe in keeping my friends close and my enemies closer. I don't respect Monkey nuts never have, never will. I merely tolerated him, as it made for a quieter life. His posts are childish, lack authority and dull.

Regards selective quoting, anyone can check that God gene thread and they will find I quoted exactly.

he thinks love can be scientifically proven...details on a postcard 9or back of a stamp) please.

Nice. You made my case for me. Now I can lean back.

What really happened in that thread:

God may not be evident to you, but he is to me.

No he isn't. If he would be evident to you he would be evident to hapsburg. You carry the illusion that god is evident to you.

As I said before, why do you especially an atheist presume God is evident to everyone? Maybe he is exclusive.

God is evident to me. This you cannot dispute as you are not me, do not know me. Thus your 'illusion' comment made in absence of any proof to the contrary is worthless. I could say that your belief that your wife loves you is an illusion, it is not real and neither is the love you imagine your child has for you. Just becuase I have not felt or seen your wifes love for you does not mean it does exist for you.


In fact, Love is a thing we cannot see and cannot prove the existance of so in fact it could be described as an illusion in every scenario could it not. The love you think you receive is NONE existant. You may think you feel it but that's just an illusion. You are nothing but cold cells that respond to stimuli, your life has no meaning, you are born to reproduce and then to die and fertilise the soil. Bleuh, poo to that.

Meanwhile
I think it is quite possible God is not part of everyones existance. Controversial but as we know so little of such things there is no reason to decide that God is one and one for all.

You can see these things actually. And measure them.

can you see and measure love? What does it look like? How can it be measured?

facial expressions and gifts of self or other won't cut it as a scientific reply.

Love has a biological basis, whatever you may think. You can formulate a hypothesis and test it. You can quantify and qualify it. You cannot do that with God. Or the feeling that god is evident.

You can explain it biologically of course like the guy is trying to do with the god gene why some people have the need for religious feelings and feel stronger religious feelings than average. That isn't linked to a real concept though. Love is. Love is a biological tool used to cement bonds. religion is a byproduct of other processes.

you do not know what I man when say God is evident to me, thus again you cannot dismiss what I say. You simply have no proof to the contrary. One man may find a dinosaur bone and then have it disintigrate in his hands before any other living being see's it. Does this mean it never existed, it was an illusion? Your lack of experience with God does not imply lack thereof for me.

You don't tell us what evident entails so god exists?

The fossil bone is actually real. You are grasping at straws. You keep coming up with bad analogies in the hope your illusions are real.

The fossil is only real to the one man who experienced it, there is nothing left to demonstrate to anyone else he is not just telling lies. Other fossils exist sure, but his?

I'll say it again, your lack of experience with God , the fact he is absent in your life, does not mean he is absent in mine. You are unaware of an interfering presence, this is your short sightedness. I am not short sighted. This is the only difference.

Many religious people base their belief in God on what they have been taught. I do not. I base it 100% on my own experience. Hence I have no religion, I am tolerant of them but I do not support them, I do not hold with what they preach or their ideas of how the world came about. My idea of God is based on the knowledge that there IS an interfering force in my life.

For all I know we each have an individual god and yours may just be considerably lazier than mine, I have no idea how the 'system' works. No one can presume to know what God is is, one God, many Gods, what form they/it takes, what it's purpose is. The limit/lack of limits of power.

This interefernce may not be so for everyone or others may just rely on fortunate or misfortunate coincidences a little too easily. Mountains are there to be climbed beucase the rewards at the top are great.

I don't know why terrible unspeakable things happen to some underserving people, I cannot know. Maybe there are some who are meant to be taught the lessons so that WE can save the rest, not God?

Imagine A Doctor with a million patients, he cannot treat them all himself, so he must teach some to assist him. While he is teaching the few to assist the many, the many keeps growing, so the situation gets out of control , but it does not mean that the Doctor stops teaching or trying to encourage greater numbers of people to help themsleves and each other.

When atheists let go of the 'God' that has been preached about in religion, maybe they can examine their own lives more closely to see where the real God fits into it. This applies to theists too actually. Believing in God through a series of indoctrinated beliefs is not the same of recognising God in your life.

Why don't you sit in quiet contemplation and look over your own life. Look at those things that you have wished for and came to you in unusual circumstance. Look at the sufferring you went through but the lesson you learned at the end of it and how it benefited you or others.

You accept you are loved by your wife and child, accepting you are loved by an unseen force..why so hard? There is a resource you are not tapping by your lack of recognition.

I think you should have a hard look at the research you quoted and come maybe to the conclusion that you have a high immunoreactivity to MVAT2, which means that you are suspectible to 'religious' experiences.

I don't have to reflect on my life. I'm not a dumbass robot who just started to think about his life after being told by ToR. There is absolutely nothing in my life that indicates a divine authority.

The only reason strange things happen to me (people ask me why these things never happen to them) is because I let them happen. That's life. Nothing more.

In conclusion: you have a physiological characteristic that makes you think you know the truth. Just accept what you are (an animal) and take back control of your brain. Or not.

But don't lecture anyone with your vague shit on god.

Back it up either by argument or 'evidence' that is evident.

The fossil might disintegrate btw but the dust can still be collected. The dust is real. Moreover, there are more of these fossils that do not disintegrate. Moreover fossils do not disintegrate. If they are brittle they are photographed before excavation. If a fossil would disintegrate by touch it actually isn't a fossil.

in other words: analogies suck if they are your only evidence that is evident.

Spurious I don't actually believe the existance of a God gene, I think life from birth is what predisposes people to the 'need' for an ominpotent being.

I have not had a religious experience. That is not what I refer to. Everything you say is based on your understanding of God from a religion based perspective, thus none of it actually applies to me. I have said my understanding of god is not based on anything taught thus my experience and religious belief is likely to differ.

Meanwhile re your snotty attack at my lack of evdience, where is yours?
Your 'evidence' is that you have had no experience of it, well my evidence is that I have. If this form of 'evidence' is good enough for you, then it is also good enough for me.

I do not need to take control of my brain, there is nothing wrong with my brain. Your ad hom implication that there is demonstrates your absence of argument re the point.

re your accustaion I am lecturing people with my vague shit on god. :) Show me the lecture. I saw a reply from me to your post, nothing more. Who is 'seeing things' now?

You don't like the reply, well this is your opinion and it's yours to have. Just as my opinion is mine to have. I am not going to accuse you of speaking for the masses or to the masses though, I see it as it is, dialogue between two people, nothing more than that. So no need for you to get all defensive and pissy.

I am not lecturing you to believe in god, I don't really care who does and who does not. It HAS zero impact on my life, thus is not my concern. Why would it be? I have never understood why the religious feel the need to spread the word. It's a personal thing. The only reason I suggested you consider the events of your life, so you can learn to identify when this interference manifests and how, was so you could then utilize it to your own benefit.

I have been told in this forum (in past) that I have no right to believe in god that I am stupid, a retard, a dumbass for doing so and yet all the evidence of my life suggests I am not a dumbass, a retard, stupid. Rather the people so quick to fire off these insults are. So while you are telling me NOT to tell you what I believe in (even though you implied a desire to know) don't try to 'INSULT' me into believing what you believe in/or lack thereof.

I am not a sheep. I will not follow, neither will I be bullied.

I have nothing to prove, only a desire for stimulating dialogue.

I see this has run its course.

I don't need evidence for the existence of god. I never claimed I had any. That was you.

I said God was 'evident' in my life. There is a difference.

I said I am aware of an interfering presence.

I do not offer my personal experience as evidence to the world as if I could do so in such a way as to withstand scientific scrutiny I'd be a multi bazziliionaire!

Regardless, believe or don't believe it's no concern of mine.

So, who lost it in this thread?

Spurious just lost it by looks of it, glad he think I'm worthy of his time, he's not worthy of mine, I couldn't be arsed to provide a link even.

so tell us how is love measured again great scientist of piss?

Spurious just lost it by looks of it, glad he think I'm worthy of his time, he's not worthy of mine, I couldn't be arsed to provide a link even.

so tell us how is love measured again great scientist of piss?


You did actually lose it. I never strayed from a scientific discussion.

You did actually. I never strayed from a scientific discussion.

how is love measured again?

that remark is hilarious given the fact you rarely contribute to any scientific discussion except as a troll. Or to post links to news clippings, woopie doodah day.

how is love measured again?

that remark is hilarious given the fact you rarely contribute to any scientific discussion except as a troll. Or to post links to news clippings, woopie doodah day.

It seems you are losing it again. Who was it again who hit a nerve?

It seems you are losing it again. Who was it again who hit a nerve?

how is love measured ?

The list is endless.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/science/hottopics/love/brain.shtml

I found a site suitable for your level.

The list is endless.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/science/hottopics/love/brain.shtml

I found a site suitable for your level.

bullshit research tut tut, back to invisibility worthless troll

bullshit research tut tut, back to invisibility worthless troll

Is that your scientific assessment? I'm sure everybody is now convinced I am the lunatic here.

...

Take this somewhere else, please.

Am I not allowed to defend myself?

You may, but this thread was about Roman and, in general, banning for statements like those he made.

Threads deviate from their original topic all the time.

It's just natural for forum discussions. Whether there is trolling or not involved.

Therefore you are justified?

I'd say either start a new thread or take this to PM.

You make it seem like I started this.

Topic closed.

you two are both being dumbshits.

shut up, retards. :p

Who do you mean by both dumbshits? There have been so many in this thread. I lost track.

die zotte lambik toch!
http://i3.photobucket.com/albums/y51/Triton6/Triton/lambik.jpg

Who do you mean by both dumbshits? There have been so many in this thread. I lost track.

i dunno.
everyone that isnt me, i guess.

at least ronnie didnt show up here trying to save the day by telling us how much shittier we are then him.

at least ronnie didnt show up here trying to save the day by telling us how much shittier we are then him.
Well, we are. Especially americanos stuck in flanderen. Except Lambik of course. He is cool.

lambik is a bitch.

A cool bitch!

not as cool as roman.

i'm lovin' it how you can bring a thread back on topic.

They should appoint you jesus of sciforums.

Where is Roman btw? I haven't seen him post lately.

he is currently in purgatory.
ill have my dad let him out tomorrow.
no problem.

Send my regards to your daddy. And a box of sulphur cigars.

he quit a month ago.

absolute hell to be around now.
no pun intended.

I don't respect Monkey nuts
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA ROTF HAHAHAHA
jesus christ TOR you can be absolutely hilarious. :cool:

I just put leopold on ignore because he is being an ass without being funny.

huh?
you wanna hear funny?

question - why do the dutch screw 29 year olds?
answer - because they couldn't find 21. HAHAHAHA

or this:
forget it you ain't worth the blood pressure.

so....

jesus, moses, and buddha are playing a round of golf in heaven.

moses steps up to the tee, winds back, swings....the balls sails through the air, bounces once, and goes right in the hole. HOLE IN ONE!!!

buddha steps up to the tee, winds back, swings....the balls sails through the air, bounces twice, and goes right in the hole. HOLE IN ONE!!!

jesus steps up to the tee, winds back, swings....and slices the ball into the trees. the ball bounces off of a tree, hits the ground, rolls onto the fairway, off the other side of the fairway, hits another tree, bounces into a sandtrap, rolls out, skips itself across the water hazard, rolls up onto the green, and goes right in the hole. HOLE IN ONE!!!!

moses and buddha share a quick glance with eachother, and moses clears his throat.
"Enough with the miracles, just play the FUCKING GAME!!!!"

bada bum!!

How can you make a belgian go totally nuts?

Put him in a round room and tell him there is a frietje (fry) in the corner.

haha!
indeed. its amazing how much fries they eat, but there are very few native belgians that are fat.

just goes to show that americans are lazy.

How amusing

If this 'not quite a troll' did NOT 'enter here', then how did it manage to view the posts and compile this list?

Piss poor excuse for a scientist, piss poor. Transparent, dull and ..................not worthy of further comment.


ToR,

Do you have a thing for trolls?

haha!
indeed. its amazing how much fries they eat, but there are very few native belgians that are fat.

just goes to show that americans are lazy.
adding to this:
i actually lost about 15 pounds when i moved here.
must be all the mayonaisse i eat.

couldnt possibly have anything to do with riding a bicycle everywhere.

adding to this:
i actually lost about 15 pounds when i moved here.
must be all the mayonaisse i eat.

couldnt possibly have anything to do with riding a bicycle everywhere.

It's because the Belgians put Speed in their tap water.

A belgian is on a holiday to scotland. During a walk he meets a sheepherder with lots of sheep. The belgian asks the sheepherder: "If I can guess how many sheep you have can I have one?". "yes", says the scottish sheepherder. The belgian immediately says "167 sheep" and guess what? It's exactly the right number. The belgian thanks the shepherd and picks a nice sheep and walks away with the animal over his shoulder. The shepherd comes running after our belgium friend and asks: "if I can guess from which country you are can I then have my dog back?"

haha...die domme belgen toch!

yeah.
i drink bottled water though.

I think Banbot's Hypothesis holds.

I think Banbot's Hypothesis holds.

Ironically this statement at this point in the thread is a direct application of Banbot's Hypothesis to this thread in question.


Is there really much left to say about Roman? He got banned. The ban was confirmed. The cause of the ban was produced. The cause was confirmed.

Close thread.

Well I brought up another subject that relates the the Roman ordeal. However, you chose not to respond to it and continue your banter.

I can see why no moderator repsonded to it.. it's camouflaged.

So, isn't this one of these things that should be PM'ed?

Not always. Sometimes they delete posts and threads without complaints because it is obvious that they are spam or trolling behaviour. See for example the incident with Q and ToR. ToR's threads and posts got deleted without intervention.

edit:

she deleted her post.

dont make threads about me.

thats all i have to say.

dont make threads about me.

thats all i have to say.

I was a naughty boy.

the things that i say.....are baffling.

What the fuck, a thread about me?

Ah geeze guys.

apparently there were 3 or so posts about you in this thread. But at least someone got upset by all the posts not mentioning you.

I like the Scanners avatar.

What the fuck, a thread about me?

whadya do this time roman?

apparently there were 3 or so posts about you in this thread. But at least someone got upset by all the posts not mentioning you.

Damn straight.

Haha, thanks Absane!

Sciforums is a big game of Penis. And sometimes I shout Penis too loud. Then James punishes me.

change your avatar to my explodey head guy, absane.

be part of the Cool Kids' Club!

can i use the sacred avatar?

change your avatar to my explodey head guy, absane.

be part of the Cool Kids' Club!

Well, when you suggested I have an animated avatar, I was thinking of making Barney's head explode (just to copy you.. I am unoriginal). However, I have no experience in image manipulation.

So I'm seeing this girl who's 6'1". I'm like 5'9". It'd be awkward if I didn't like her so much.

Well, when you suggested I have an animated avatar, I was thinking of making Barney's head explode (just to copy you.. I am unoriginal). However, I have no experience in image manipulation.
that is an excellent idea!

here is his comment: Those Jews got exactly what they deserved.
That's anti-semetic? What was the context?

about 9/11

Seeing as how this is my thread, I'm going to talk about me.

I think everyone is exactly like me, except then I realize that I am like, way cooler than everyone else.

I'm having trouble reconciling this. How can everyone be like me when I'm better than everyone?

I think everyone is exactly like me, except then I realize that I am like, way cooler than everyone else.

I'm having trouble reconciling this. How can everyone be like me when I'm better than everyone?

I'm also cooler than everyone else. So I am like you.

Well, when you suggested I have an animated avatar, I was thinking of making Barney's head explode (just to copy you.. I am unoriginal). However, I have no experience in image manipulation.

I couldn't resist since I thought it would be something amusing and well I came up with this, not as good of course as Monty Python but none the less "Something completely different".

Http://www.chatsoba.com/images/absane.gif

LMAO! Excellant work Stryder :D

Do I have permission to use it?

I think everyone is exactly like me, except then I realize that I am like, way cooler than everyone else.

I'm having trouble reconciling this. How can everyone be like me when I'm better than everyone?
I think I am cooler than I really am, and therefore, I am also like you.

Yeah feel free to use it Absane. I won't charge.... any more than 1% revenue per click.... J/k

Thank you for explaining that conundrum to me, cole and spurious!

great.

I've been banned before. I just keep coming back. Because I have so much faith in the SciForums administrators. I just know they'll grow up some day and stop banning me for no reason.

People are quick to assume the worst about you around here. All I did was post *************** (http://www.***************) in a thread asking how much SciForums was worth. My answer was AU$1.99 which is what I paid for the link. I wasn't expecting to be demonised and attacked. If Dave W had merely asked politely I would have gladly transferred it over to him. In exchange for $1.99 ofcourse. I'm not a Troll but I am cheap.

I wasn't expecting to be demonised and attacked
Sounds brutal. What did they do exactly?

PS What's with the weird Bindi Irwin obsession? And the cybersquatting.

What's a troll?

A troll is a fearsome member of a mythical anthropomorph race from Scandinavia. Their role ranges from fiendish giants – similar to the ogres of England – to a devious, more human-like folk of the wilderness, living underground in hills, caves or mounds. In Shetland and Orkney tales, trolls are called trowe, adopted from the Norse language when these islands were settled by Vikings.

Or...

In Internet terminology, a troll is often someone who comes into an established community such as an online discussion forum, and posts inflammatory, rude, repetitive or offensive messages designed intentionally to annoy or antagonize the existing members or disrupt the flow of discussion, including the personal attack of calling others trolls. Often, trolls assume multiple aliases, or sock puppets.

I think I relate more to the first definition than the last....

I think about D&D during sex. Am I normal?

I think about D&D during sex. Am I normal?

Are you an american male specimen under the age of 21?

Yes.

Then you are normal bordering on predictable.

I think about D&D during sex. Am I normal?

live roleplay or board game

The roleplay one.

live roleplay or board game


Live roleplay is sexier. I see them sometimes here. Big girls with big swords. And geeky boys dressed as hobbits covered by a matrix jacket.

Live roleplay is sexier. I see them sometimes here. Big girls with big swords. And geeky boys dressed as hobbits covered by a matrix jacket.

No, this isn't anything like that.

My mind just can't stay focused on what I'm doing. I'm thinkin' "should I do the archetypical half-orc barbarian into frenzied berserker and dip a couple levels of fighter for bonus feats, or play a human barb and go straight barbarian to FB?"

Then I start comparing pros and cons "well, humans get bonus skill pts, and if I don't dip ftr, then I can keep my barb d12 HD. Orcs also get a charisma penalty which hurts intimidation checks, but that +2 str is nice...."

I got screened for craziness today.

The lady said I probably have bipolar disorder.

Well, did she invite you to attend a therapy session involving Dianetics?

Then I start comparing pros and cons "well, humans get bonus skill pts, and if I don't dip ftr, then I can keep my barb d12 HD. Orcs also get a charisma penalty which hurts intimidation checks, but that +2 str is nice...."
Haven't you ever heard about guys who think about basketball during sex so they don't "finish" too fast? Wasn't that in a movie? I can't remember.
Anyway, same thing may apply here.

I got screened for craziness today.

The lady said I probably have bipolar disorder.
I have PROOF that you are crazy , never mind the screening -

Yah, I bet my penis is like 3x bigger than your's, too.
I know you must be intelligent enough to do elementary arithmetic, so you must be crazy.

Just let go of the penis obsession for a while, and perhaps you will be more sane. And you won't lean.

Haven't you ever heard about guys who think about basketball during sex so they don't "finish" too fast? Wasn't that in a movie? I can't remember.
Anyway, same thing may apply here.

I wasn't worried about finishing too fast, I was worried I would be gimping my character!

And I think it was baseball, not basketball.

I have PROOF that you are crazy , never mind the screening -


I know you must be intelligent enough to do elementary arithmetic, so you must be crazy.

Just let go of the penis obsession for a while, and perhaps you will be more sane. And you won't lean.

Let go of my penis, preposterous!