Ok, I'm really getting the distinct impression you've got serious comprehension issues.
If I have serious problems, then Earth is doomed because of what normal people are. I hate to brag, but I have the best grades in my Algebra class, and I have gotten on the honor roll 18 times in a row with little effort. I had been using the venn diagram successfully without instruction since the second grade, and five years later, most of my peers were failing miserably at the exact same thing with heavy instruction during the seventh grade, and every one of them said that I could have taught that class better than the teacher when they finally came to me for help. I have been able to provide reference for spelling, grammar, and definitions correctly from memory alone countless times. This year, I was in a bet with a teacher on the spelling of asterisk, and to hint you as to the result, the teacher is pretty good at push-ups. I was in both the spelling and geography bees in 6th and 7th grade(I hate to make excuses, but exhaustion prevented me from entering in the 8th). I could do multiplication AND division in kindergarten. I was an uncommon person in my elementary school for being in gifted and talented programs since the third grade. In all of my group work in school, I willingly put most of the work on my own shoulders for reasons as small as my group members being too lazy (and I earned those groups some mighty fine grades, too).

On the other hand, just last year, one of the more average students at my school claimed that being able to open a locker 'at random (any idiot could have figured out it wasn't really at random)' was valid justification for the claim that another student at my school was god. I tried to say to him that opening a locker that had been tinkered with anyway was not even relevant to whether or not someone was divine, but he didn't listen.

[remainder deleted]

Umm... where did this come from? Someone seems to have recorded my most egotistic moment here from when I was trying to defend myself by simply telling what was true on one of the many situations in which (Q) was insulting me. Is this some kind of an attempt to make more people think I am a bad person?

If I have serious problems, then Earth is doomed ...



Ok -Rokkon ...........

We believe you ....earth is doomed ...........
Just remember - PLEASE no more Colombine action ...OK ...

And yes , ofcourse , being able to open a locker is NOT valid proof of the existence of god ..........:m: :p

I sense sarcasm.

Great. Now everyone thinks I'm an ***.

Well I didn't see the meat of your post because the net police are on full fledged mind guarding duty, but Lemme just say this all will pass.

You will be done with school someday and you will get a job where you will inevitably do well. All those fucking peons will be probably working for you or sucking your ass for help so they don't lose their job. It all evens out in the end. If you are really that smart etc you really should not waste it(in whatever manner you explained - that got deleted(((HEY THIS IS GETTING REDICULOUS)))). You could really do us all a favor by staying the course and perhaps making a real contribution to society. Yes, probably the earth is doomed anyway.

Well I didn't see the meat of your post because the net police are on full fledged mind guarding duty, but Lemme just say this all will pass.

You will be done with school someday and you will get a job where you will inevitably do well. All those fucking peons will be probably working for you or sucking your ass for help so they don't lose their job. It all evens out in the end. If you are really that smart etc you really should not waste it(in whatever manner you explained - that got deleted(((HEY THIS IS GETTING REDICULOUS)))). You could really do us all a favor by staying the course and perhaps making a real contribution to society. Yes, probably the earth is doomed anyway.

Umm... are you serious? I'm not really good at understanding social cues.

I seem to have missed a forum drama. Could somebody give a brief summary?

Oh, one of the moderators was being a jerk on another thread, repeatedly insulting my intelligence, among other things, so I decided to tell him otherwise... and I kinda went overboard, and now the egotistical post is the only thing that is on the first post here... and now, thousands of people are going to think I'm an egotistical ***.

http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20070717104936AAC7EYE

Yes, I have the same account name for just about everything.

This planet sucks!

what exactly happened? was text deleted or added to this post?

peace.

We all face adversity in our lifetime. Some more than most.

It is easy to say to oneself that if I kill myself, 'that'll show them'. Reality says that it does not. Yes it will bring the actions of others to the front, but at the end of the day you have not shown anyone anything. It is best to be alive and attempt to show them that way, thereby ensuring you are around to see any changes that take place.

Rokkon, you are a young, intelligent and vibrant individual. Do not extinguish your flame because of the actions of others against you, especially when it is done on an internet forum.

now i am even more confused.


peace.

what exactly happened? was text deleted or added to this post?

peace.

Yeah, I didn't even know about this thread until recently, and I don't mean to complain, but I'm wondering why my most egotistical moment was the only thing used to describe me. I had actually stated the text used in the first post on another thread, trying to defend myself against attacks from (Q), and I might have gone overboard with my defense.

Yeah, I didn't even know about this thread until recently, and I don't mean to complain, but I'm wondering why my most egotistical moment was the only thing used to describe me. I had actually stated the text used in the first post on another thread, trying to defend myself against attacks from (Q), and I might have gone overboard with my defense.

so a mod pasted that text into your original post? you didnt make this thread?


peace.

so a mod pasted that text into your original post? you didnt make this thread?


peace.

Correct.

Moderators should not manipulate threads, especially if the intent is to embarrass a member...shame on the perpetrators.

Correct.

thats pathetic, whatever mod done this is a fool. what was the point in this? thats just stupid. how childish.


peace.

Moderators should not manipulate threads, especially if the intent is to embarrass a member...shame on the perpetrators.

i agree totaly, its a joke. and they give infractions for personal attacks? this is worse than a personal attack, its abusing your powers to violate and shame somebody.

how sad.

peace.

I'd have to say this is a pretty nasty use of mod powers. You guys should seriously take away Q's mod powers.

It was actually James R on behalf of Spidergoat, which makes the crime far worse considering that JR is a supermod.

james that was low you little fairy. and you give me infractions all day long when you do things like this? your not a very good moderator are you.


peace.

Actually this thread had already been reported. I was hoping it was going to be fixed before having to bring it up publically (fixed being by Rokkon's Second post.)

Obviously one Moderator has over stepped their bounds especially since this is apparently effecting Rokkon so.

Rokkon, please bear with us for a little longer we'll have this cleaned up for you, so you don't need to go concerning yourself about "other things", okay?

(And yes it "is worth it", you just need to look *beyond* the forums a bit more to see that, go express yourself with artwork, Poetry, write stories, animation, photography, filmmaking etc ;) Remember the words artists weren't necessarily their for an audience but doing it just for themselves because they saw something "worthwhile". )

no stryder let the thread stay, so it can expose the mod in violation. dont cover it up so the majority of people are unnaware of what happened.


let it stay to show people how james R rolls.

peace

It was actually James R on behalf of Spidergoat, which makes the crime far worse considering that JR is a supermod.

Oh no that makes perfect sense to me - going back to lurk mode...

I don't think James R and Spidergoat realised that this thread was "Manufactured" by another moderator.

That was my original thought because certain things pointed at (Q), however (Q) doesn't moderator the majority of forums that Rokkon posts in which only leaves a few moderators with the power to miscreate posts.

(I nearly grilled (Q) good and proper over this)

no stryder let the thread stay, so it can expose the mod in violation. dont cover it up so the majority of people are unnaware of what happened.


let it stay to show people how james R rolls.

peace

I think it should be up to Rokkon to decide whether this thread stays/remains open and everyone should respect his decision whatever it is he decides. It does affect him directly after all.

And ditto to what stryder said.:)

I think it should be up to Rokkon to decide whether this thread stays/remains open and everyone should respect his decision whatever it is he decides. It does affect him directly after all.

And ditto to what stryder said.:)

but if the thread is closed then the mod will not be exposed to the majority of people who post on the forum.

and its always good to expose a corrupt person of power. maybe lock the thread but keep it open to viewing. im sure rokkon can see why its good to expose the person who did this to him, instead of sweeping it nicely under the rug of no return.


peace.

I have to admit someone tried the "Look at yourself through the Looking glass" method of dealing with Rokkon's arguements, where by Rokkon is more shocked by what he see's as being himself. However this has only ever been jokingly discussed in regards to some posters (not Rokkon but a Notorious poster that deals with Conspiracy issues) which makes it odd that it's developed here.

Rokkon, Heres a question for you. When you posted to this thread did you Search posts by yourself or about yourself to find it?

I ask as this thread does date from February looking at James R's moderation of it, the only recent activity was the attention you brought to it.

Also it does appear that the post was created by Rokkon himself, so technically he has control over it.

Correct.
This is your thread according to the OP.
I would love to hear what was the original content of first post.


Moderators should not manipulate threads, especially if the intent is to embarrass a member...shame on the perpetrators.

thats pathetic, whatever mod done this is a fool. what was the point in this? thats just stupid. how childish.


peace.

I'd have to say this is a pretty nasty use of mod powers. You guys should seriously take away Q's mod powers.

It was actually James R on behalf of Spidergoat, which makes the crime far worse considering that JR is a supermod.

There is no way to manipulate threads this way. Even I, as an admin cannot manipulate threads and posts, i.e. create thread under other members' username.
Only edit or delete (soft or completely).

Potential abuse could be editing whole content and replacing it with another to change meaning of the post or particular thought in the post.


As you could noticed, this thread has been made by Rokkon in December 2006, and edited on 1st January 2007. James deleted one part on spidergoat's suggestion, which is normal part of moderator's activities. He didn't edited whole post.


Anyway, I would like to hear some explanations regarding this, since this thread has been resurrected.

no stryder let the thread stay, so it can expose the mod in violation. dont cover it up so the majority of people are unnaware of what happened.


let it stay to show people how james R rolls.

peace

As far as letting this thread stay, I would say yes, but with various changes made in the future to try and clear up any confusion or misunderstanding. I also would like to mention my abnormally un-photographic memory, which would cause me to forget various things stated here. According to history's greatest military strategist, Sun Tzu, it is best to make sure you know what your opposition is doing, therefore I believe it would be best to keep this thread active as a reference, and to, as said before, make changes on this thread to set things straight.

As for what I think of James R, I am having mixed feelings. Currently he is reviewing various posts made by (Q) on other threads which I have started, and may be trying to make it up to me.

I wanna say we should open a singles / dating forum. Also there should be a cooking forum for those who wanna share reciepes. We can also add a forum for relationships and sex. Yes, those are the explanations I gots... oh wait nevermind I see you weren't askin for that kinda stuff but somethin differen

woot!

...?

Rokkon, Heres a question for you. When you posted to this thread did you Search posts by yourself or about yourself to find it?

I ask as this thread does date from February looking at James R's moderation of it, the only recent activity was the attention you brought to it.

Also it does appear that the post was created by Rokkon himself, so technically he has control over it.

I went through my profile to access other threads by me, and I found the thread on the list. I was rather surprised to see it, and rather upset when I had read what was on what appeared to be my own post. I do not recall making this thread, only that I had posted the same words found in the original post in a different thread, as explained before.

Oh, I made this thread using Rokkon's own post. I had no alterior motive other than to move Rokkon's personal exegesis to a more suitable location. I believe the thread where it was posted originally was under "Rokkon's Rules", and this post was a violation of his own rules, being off topic and personal.

It is unusual to start a new thread by transferring posts from another thread, but I do do it sometimes. Sorry for the confusion Rokkon, I should have explained this at the time. Maybe I did and you forgot.

Plazma is incorrect that it's impossible to make a new thread under another user's name.

Oh, I made this thread using Rokkon's own post. I had no alterior motive other than to move Rokkon's personal exegesis to a more suitable location. I believe the thread where it was posted originally was under "Rokkon's Rules", and this post was a violation of his own rules, being off topic and personal.

It is unusual to start a new thread by transferring posts from another thread, but I do do it sometimes. Sorry for the confusion Rokkon, I should have explained this at the time. Maybe I did and you forgot.

Plazma is incorrect that it's impossible to make a new thread under another user's name.

Indeed it is possible to *split* a thread, however the time thread in which you did it wasn't recent if my understanding is correct. Well I'm sure some sensationalist paparazzi impersonationist's will thrive at that occurance so pull down your blinds and be careful when you decide to venture out. (The only cure for paparazzi is yet a greater story)

ok i dont know whats going on here after readin the follow up posts, so.


screw you guys im going home.


peace.

I picked out this one statement by Rokkon in his other thread and made it it's own thread. I didn't mean anything by it. Indeed, I was the one that enforced Rokkon's rules in the General Philosophy forum out of sensitivity to Rokkon's sensibilities.

Plazma is incorrect that it's impossible to make a new thread under another user's name.
Yes, my mistake. I don't use Split option, so I overlooked this.

Anyway, spidergoat opened that thread to point Rokkon on breaking of his own rules, not to expose him as an bad person or anything else.

I guess this discussion could be closed now, if there's no further questions.

I picked out this one statement by Rokkon in his other thread and made it it's own thread. I didn't mean anything by it. Indeed, I was the one that enforced Rokkon's rules in the General Philosophy forum out of sensitivity to Rokkon's sensibilities.

Why bring it up 5 months after the fact, if there was no ulterior motive?

Yes, my mistake. I don't use Split option, so I overlooked this.

Anyway, spidergoat opened that thread to point Rokkon on breaking of his own rules, not to expose him as an bad person or anything else.

I guess this discussion could be closed now, if there's no further questions.

That is sooo lame Plazma, you're not talking to kindergaarten.

Why bring it up 5 months after the fact, if there was no ulterior motive?
Ask Rokkon.


That is sooo lame Plazma, you're not talking to kindergaarten.
What do you expect me to say?

That we are forging conspiracy masterplan in Moderator forum and pick members at random to screw them in the head with our twisted games? You want to hear that?

No tablariddim. Your excuses for further attacks on moderators are lame.

I provided the most reasonable explanation for all this mess.


If you don't believe me, I'll repeat: Ask Rokkon.

Or at least read his link again.

Apologies, I never realised that he brought it out of hibernation, presumably he missed it when it was still a current thread.:o

No problem.

Take care!

INITIATING OPERATION WHOREALLYDUNNIT STEP 2 BACKUP!!!

Everyone! To Yahoo Answers! NOW! I can't stay here long; I'm technically grounded from this website until December 27th, 2010, so I have to be quick!

From the Yahoo link:

"I posted this question here prior to seeing the what upset me, and I was originally trying to refer to (Q)'s repeated attacks against religion!"

Well, that's a relief.

Whoah, this is a big mess... I told my mom about what I said here, and then, she told me that I can't go to sciforums again until I'm 18.

I'm technically grounded from this website until December 27th, 2010

He's just a kid. Give him a break!

He's just a kid. Give him a break!

You could replace 'kid' with any number of categories; woman, muslim, lab tech, etc.

Where do you draw the line?

woman, muslim, lab tech, etc.



:rolleyes: lab tech?


Where do you draw the line?

suicidal?

suicidal?

Come now, you can't have been taken in by a 14 year old drama queen? :bugeye:

Y'know, I do believe this is not the right place for this discussion.

As you were. :shrug: