I will try to answer you in a timely fashion. If I do not answer you immediatly it is most likely because I'm away or thinking of the best way to answer you.
I'm talking to anyone who might have a question to which they do not have a answer. Also Xev did youy read my other post?
Hey binary, here's one thats been eating away at me forever... where does pocket lint come from? seriously, one second your pockets are empty, the next there is lint in them! Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!
Pocket lint is supposedly an accumulation of dead skin cells, hair and strings of fabric.Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!
Wait a minute -- you're proffering yourself as the Free Thoughts Guru, yet you think physics is based on the decimal system? I think we need another Guru. Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image! - Warren
Binary: Some questions What's the square root of e? Does he love me? How much wood could a woodchuck chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood? What are you wearing?
No I think I was trying to get get someone to ask a qeustions about it so I could know it was read. Now as for phjysics being based on the decimal system I only included this to see how much anyone else understood about physics on the mathematical level. It is now obvisous that I need to explain in greater detail. First I would like to start by saying I not only have a functional model of the atoms but also so numerical defination system in the base is 22 but there are only 6 true numbers, depending on what you percieve as a true number, by which theoriticaly any relation in all 3 dimensions can be defined Thus covering the entire structure of the 4th dimensional percption (AKA 3d space).
Physics is not limited to any number system. I could do the same calculations in Roman numerals or hexadecimal or in decimal. The only change would be how I manipulated the numbers. What?! Dude...whatever you're smoking, I want some.
No I'm not a ravimng lunatic. lol But I guess you need me to explain more. Lets start with the charges. The first and one of the important principles to understand is that in the binary universe it is neccisary for there to be opisities or inverses. One way to veiw this is by considering a plane. On a plane like... oh gosh you probably don't understand the one dimension? Please tell me how you think the universe is structured so that I can save time, and stop making guess on how much you know.
Oh, I see. So there are two kinds of electrical charge... because the universe is binary. Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image! Why, then, are there three kinds of color charge? - Warren
Ahhhh...... Dude. Common consensus is that there are four dimensions - length, width, breadth and time. Kaluza-Klien theory postulates either 11 or 22 dimensions. Some M theories have 26 or higher. There's more than one dimension. What's chroot wearing? Warren: Oooh ooooh ooooh! I know! Because Time Cube is four simultaneous cubic dimensions!
A good answer, young one. Yes, my love, ignoring Time Cube is evil. Professors are evil bastards for suppressing Time Cube. Why then, is there only one gravitational charge? And why does the gravitational charge also happen to be the constant of proportionality between force and acceleration? Id est, why is mass both a gravitational charge and a measure of inertia, while electrical and colour charges have nothing to do with inertia? Oh, and Binary, here's another question for you: where does the energy exist in an electrostatic system? Does it exist in the field? If so, then how do you account for the fact there there would be infinite energy in the field of a single, isolated point charge? If not, then where is the energy? - Warren
Finally I can see the area miscommunication!ThnX!! You see the reason you don't understand me is because you have yet lay down your present concept of complex structures. There are not there kinds of color "charge" there is only one and and a infinite resolution of variant copy. You see the error you and most "scientist" make is in your approach. You can no build a building from the top down. You must first work out in incosistances in the foundation. In this case it is even more direct given that all other percieved dimensions and there "percieved" laws are no more than complexs ofg the one dimesional unit and it charateristics.
Warren: "Evil Ass Educators Suppress Time Cube, and dumb ass students condone such evil. Cubeless institutions are spreaders of evil, and students lack mentality to challenge it." That help? Binary: We are not high on jimson weed and crack, yes. That's so nice. I'm sure you're going to explain what you mean. Right? Que? Your evidence for this (which in in contradiction to proven physical theories) would be what? Do you care to explain what any of that means? I mean, I don't gibber Ia R'yleh! Cthulhu fhtagn! Ph'nglui mgwl'wamh Cthulhu R'yleh wgah'nagl fhtagn! and expect people to understand me.
