Throughout history men and woman have been attempting to unravel the question of what is truly helpful VS truly useless. There are many attempts to find common ground from people of a variety of backgrounds, yet as each of us is unique just how easily can it be done. On SciForums.com we see a multitude of people from all areas of life, be it geographical differences or psychological all are special. With the advent of computer technology and free speech being stiffled at every angle by (free choice) we then must ask ourselves to whom an what do we as people answer. I see the forums here as more accepting then many of the others I've come accross, in truth I don't quite know how it functions but certainly it has interesting topics. So I submitt to everyone here that although things seem clear-cut in every possible way they may indeed not be. I think the site itself is wonderfully robust an offers a great deal but the question as to how much is enough must be addressed, after-all if a poster does indeed begin a thread must they not have a guideline for it, otherwise in the Cesspool it goes?
