We are judged by what does not exist, the abstract, than what exists, here and now the real. We identify ourselves through the social code that we are taught from birth, that give grounding to the abstract, despite its inherent falsehoods, we should instead judge on what exists, here and now, or what at least we believe to exist. Are we ? Can we?
The problem here is that mankind is still living an instinct driven, animalistic, fear based existence. So judgment is essential to our survival because of where we are at with respect to evolutionary development. Your thoughts here are admirable and deep, but I do want to point out that they are assumptive based in the framework of the looking glass self. That's a a VERY hard thing to view externally and I don't pretend to be a swami in the least. Most all of our internal instincts are psychologically processed, crafted and projected from this externalized thread work. This is what you are referring to via the allusions to programming and perception. Instincts & Belief Judgments & Fear Survival & Existence all based in the physical cycle of pro creation and life span.
Thanks, I get what you're saying. I find that Judgement is warped by fear and Belief superseding instinct, but only in group situations, we base our perceptions apon each other do we not ?, Is that also due to our place on the Revolutionary path ?, The herd mentality ?, Instead of judging by what we believe to exist, here and now, we rely apon others, as well as things that do not exist.
It's easiest to look at in a linear context. Instinct is an actuated healthy reaction that insures survival. It's a projected mechanical externalized feature of the will. But, if it's projected, what is it's driving force? That force motive is fear. Fear is the the primary emotional link to our survival. Fear is a driver, Instinct is the program and the Will is the flow of energy that makes the combined functionality of both a working reality within us. Belief is a cognitive reflection of our fear driven, survival instinct motivated, affirmed rationalizations of what we define as reality. It's how we make sense from one moment to the next. Judgments are refined cognitive determinations made in accord with our beliefs. It's easiest to hold onto the notion that we are much like cameras. No matter how well we are able to focus on our surroundings, we are developing those interpreted images inside ourselves prior to all other externalized processes or tests. Emotions like fear and love color and influence our film as it's being developed. Judgments are assessments of our rationalized snap shots. They are based on the specific architectural relationship of what individual components comprise our functional interpretive skills and abilities.
Its beyond our control not have a unique perspective from which we juge... because our prespective is derived from the combinaton of the unique genetics each of us received... an the unique inviroment each individual has.!!!
we need social guidelines to make society function. really, the only difference between humans and animals is that we have abstract notions, societal arrangements, belief systems... that we make judgments, we plan, we think beyond the concrete. we need to do these things. they may be fallacious and ridiculous at times, unjust and pitiless at other times, but we need all of those to operate in our world.
