RAPEX for every girl, death to every love/sex seeking boy?

RAPEX is this thing which women insert in their vagina and than when sexual intercourse happens the penis is stuck inside this plastic thing with sharp needles...which than causes penis to bleed everywhere. Of course this is all justifiable since every intercourse is a potential rape. So do you agree to this idea?

http://www.rapestop.net/

Yes this a great idea and will stop many rapists....ofcourse its only good if the girl uses to prevent a rape...not against just any regular guy...

This doesn't prevent rape. It only makes the consequences painful for the rapist.

I guess rapists will just switch to anal rape.

Rapists inherently don't care about hurting people; they'd probably beat the crap out of someone who used such a device. I doubt it would be of any consolation to the victim that her attackers penis was messed up.

Silly invention!

No benefit as a deterrent: attacker can check for and remove device if he knows about Rapex.
No benefit as counter measure: attacker may become violent.

This is cool, so how will they know if i screwed someone, i mean not only the boy get good experience he also gets jailed, Hehe.

What Blue UK said.

What Blue UK said.

Whatever,

i am asking how do they know that i screwed up an unsuspecting guy ?

What if the guy isn't unsuspecting, checks first, then hurts you?

Shitty poll options, by the way.

What if the guy isn't unsuspecting, checks first, then hurts you?

Seems like u always check out your girl friend first.

Seems like you haven't really thought this through... have you.

It is not a given that the average rapist would in fact know about rapex, the shock and pain it presumably induces would afford the woman a few valuable minutes in which she could escape. Of concern, is the safety of this contraption in regular use.

RAPEX for every girl, death to every love/sex seeking boy?

RAPEX is this thing which women insert in their vagina and than when sexual intercourse happens the penis is stuck inside this plastic thing with sharp needles...which than causes penis to bleed everywhere. Of course this is all justifiable since every intercourse is a potential rape. So do you agree to this idea?
OMFG draqon.
have you been hangin with them terrorists again?

Women (we all will) soon be carrying cameras that send data to a hosting site. If a rapist or Mugger approaches you, you can just say. Look the police now have a copy of your face, do you you want to be arrested for attempted (whatever), or (whatever).

Most rapists do not wear masks, but if they do then the police can (with a court order) search through all nearby person cams and trace the individual back to their home.

It will be the public that introduces "big Brother", and it has begun already. I suppose parents will make their children wear cameras so they can monitor them like they already do with GPS and their cars.

Rapists might still attack, but only once.

TIP: invest in Camera technology.

There's no excuse, and I know I'm going to get stick saying this, but a lot of women ask for it.

They'll flaunt themselves in skimpy clothing, flirt with men for drinks when they have no desire to get to know them - free drinks - and generally be bitches. Some do. Not all do. Men are delicate creatures, too. More so than many women seem to feel. We have urges, which yes, we should be able to control, but some men just can't.

Not every woman is a skanky whore out for what she can get and not every man's a rapist.

You wouldn't start showing off an expensive camera to strangers in a poor neighbourhood would you?

At best they're going to get upset with you. At worst you'll get stabbed and someone will jack your camera.

That's the way I see it.

As for sticking some needle filled contraption up your cooch on the off chance you'll be raped... wow. Maybe you should see a doctor about your paranoia or stop hanging around where you feel at threat/getting into those situations.

Rape is a very hard crime to judge ,without witnesses, however serial rapists
should have their tackle cut off.

Installing more police cameras all over the cities would help prevent rape and other crimes. And even if it didn't prevent them, the cops would have the tapes on which they can find the criminals.

See? More cameras, not less! Thousands of them, every ten feet, on every street, on every corner, on every building, ....thousands of them, ....NO, millions of cameras ...cameras filming everything that anyone does out in public, ...EVERYTHING.

Baron Max

There's no excuse, and I know I'm going to get stick saying this, but a lot of women ask for it.

They'll flaunt themselves in skimpy clothing, flirt with men for drinks when they have no desire to get to know them - free drinks - and generally be bitches. Some do. Not all do. Men are delicate creatures, too. More so than many women seem to feel. We have urges, which yes, we should be able to control, but some men just can't.

Not every woman is a skanky whore out for what she can get and not every man's a rapist.

You wouldn't start showing off an expensive camera to strangers in a poor neighbourhood would you?

At best they're going to get upset with you. At worst you'll get stabbed and someone will jack your camera.

That's the way I see it.

As for sticking some needle filled contraption up your cooch on the off chance you'll be raped... wow. Maybe you should see a doctor about your paranoia or stop hanging around where you feel at threat/getting into those situations.

I can see he an I agree on this topic. I'm afraid many woman are unfeeling creatures and treat us men like trash, they laugh at us when we want sex or need it... now listen closely cuz I will say it many times...

Woman that are raped are not deserving of it, the question is are men deserving of this sort of horror? Does this device have a justification when rape may occur? One causes injury the other pain? One causes pleasure the other perhaps irreperable damage?

Hummm... so are we basically going to start saying you can't even look at a woman without being imprisoned or crying sexual harassment?

Interesting..

I do suspect this may be a result of evolution, perhaps those less fortunate to have woman desiring them will simply die off... it would make sense and I certainly can't say I'd mind dying off my genes suck anyway...

Won't be a problem for me. I don't rape girls.

I wonder though--how many girls will use these condoms on their boyfriends after they've fought and the guys are thinking "oh great, make-up sex." and then clamp! Oh, you know it's gonna happen. Probably first in the trailer parks.

Posted by DarksidZz:

Woman that are raped are not deserving of it, the question is are men deserving of this sort of horror? Does this device have a justification when rape may occur?

Women. The plural of woman is women. I've seen you write it that way many times and I thought I should let you know. Anyway, YES, it is justifiable. I mean, the woman is being raped, and assuming it's by a male, you're concerned that it's unfair to the rapist that his dick is damaged? Once she is under attack, she should do what she can to end the situation.

Honestly though... once words catches on that women are sporting these condoms from hell, the rapists are going to reach down and inspect the area before they penetrate. Then if the rapist finds one of these condoms, he will likely laugh, remove it and then do his thing. Who do you think would be nicer? A rapist who found and removed a Rapex condom or one that found nothing?

Sounds like a good idea in theory, but in real use, I could see it backfiring in a major way. Haven't we already had threads about this?

It is a sign of the times, may be one should have a witness, quasi chaperon
to sexual consent but, the mates system would kick in, in the end it is one persons word against the other, when it comes down to nuts and bolts it is the two persons morality, belief in honesty that counts.

I just thought about something really weird, beyond weird.... let's say the woman uses one of those things but when Ken comes over she forgets to take it out? Ummmm won't Ken be really really pissed off? How can we be certain the females will remember to remove these before sex?

How can we be certain the females will remember to remove these before sex?

The device will be tied to her nipples with dental floss ....when the guy starts playing with her nipples and feels the string, he'll say, "Hmm, what the fuck is this string?" That will remind her to reach down and pull the device out of her hot, wet, steamy little pussy!

Then Ken can get on with enjoying the evening ....before he ultimately kicks her ass out on the street for being such a whore! :D

Baron Max

If "Ken" has sex with a girl who is dumb enough to forget about the razor-blade condom inside of her, maybe shredding his dick will be a reality check.

The device will be tied to her nipples with dental floss ....when the guy starts playing with her nipples and feels the string, he'll say, "Hmm, what the fuck is this string?" That will remind her to reach down and pull the device out of her hot, wet, steamy little pussy!

Then Ken can get on with enjoying the evening ....before he ultimately kicks her ass out on the street for being such a whore! :D

Baron Max
You should write a book or almanac. I'd pay for it anyway. I'm sure you'd make a few $k just from everyone here buying a copy. :D

If "Ken" has sex with a girl who is dumb enough to forget about the razor-blade condom inside of her, maybe shredding his dick will be a reality check.
lol, pretty fucking severe reality check, but yeah.

Looking at the product site again, it was developed in South Africa. I can see the reasoning a little more now. Rape is rife there. Wearing one of these all the time seems a little ridiculous though. I mean.. I don't know. The whole idea's just weird.

I'd be the first to rip of a rapists tackle, given the chance, but I'm not sure where these things have a place. And rape is so.. blurry. There's clear cases. There's cases where it's not entirely clear. And then there's very difficult cases - crazy chicks, for whatever reason, usually.

I hate the women who cry wolf though, they really fuck things up for other women.

I kind of take back what I said in my other post. Not entirely, but it's just too hard to call in some cases what's actually happened. Occasionally hearing about an entirely consensual liaison and the girl later filing charges gives me goosebumps. And then hearing about extremely violent men doing what they want to some poor woman or girl.

It's a shitty subject.

I guess rapists will just switch to anal rape.

not with ANEX they wont!.

peace.

This is such a stupid device. Simply checking and removing it automatically removes it's use.

I give it an F--

This thread went down a predictable path, didn't it. I see we still have a bunch of misogynists at sciforums.

One point worth making is that only a small percentage of rapes are "stranger" rapes. Most victims of rape are raped by people they know.

There's no excuse, and I know I'm going to get stick saying this, but a lot of women ask for it.

They'll flaunt themselves in skimpy clothing, flirt with men for drinks when they have no desire to get to know them - free drinks - and generally be bitches.

If a woman is smart enough to get a guy to buy her a free drink, then good luck to her. But "skimpy clothing" and dudding you out of drink money is no excuse for rape. You're living in the dark ages.

Men are delicate creatures, too. More so than many women seem to feel. We have urges, which yes, we should be able to control, but some men just can't.

Then they ought to get some therapy, or get themselves neutered or take some libido-inhibiting drugs or something. Why should a woman pay for a man's lack of self-control?


I'm afraid many woman are unfeeling creatures and treat us men like trash, they laugh at us when we want sex or need it...

You don't need sex. Some people are celibate their whole lives. You won't die if you don't have sex. My advice: if it all gets too much, try masterbation.

is it ok for a wild animal to rape anouther wild animal?


peace.

I have mixed feelings about this thing. Does it permanently mangle the penis? That is, if someone raped a woman who was wearing this thing, would his penis be destroyed?

If so, then isn't this cruel and unusual punishment? Castrating rapists in America (at least) has been deemed cruel and unusual---should some women take this issue into their own hands?

Second, if I am raping a woman, I am probably pretty pissed off. If I stick my penis inside of her, only to have it ripped to shreds, chances are I will be more pissed. If I know that I'm going to be caught anyway, what's to stop me from giving the woman a savage beating while I'm at it? Is it worse to be savagely beaten or killed, vice being raped?

I just thought about something really weird, beyond weird.... let's say the woman uses one of those things but when Ken comes over she forgets to take it out? Ummmm won't Ken be really really pissed off? How can we be certain the females will remember to remove these before sex?

I'm not a chick, but I would imagine that this thing isn't somehting that you would forget to take out. I'm pretty sure you'd remember it was there.

And if the rapist has HIV, there is no better way to INCREASE the chance of getting AIDS, than to let him bleeding all over inside her.

Excellent idea....

Feel free to spout off about how women ask for it here:

http://www.sciforums.com/showthread.php?t=59162

That way everyone else can stick to the topic.

(No, not you, Syzygys. No, not you, BenTheMan..)

This thread went down a predictable path, didn't it. I see we still have a bunch of misogynists at sciforums.
In retrospect, I knew it was a bad idea to write what I did.
I'll admit there's a little misogynism in me, but I was being impartial here. What I said does come up every time, but I think that goes to show there's a certain amount of truth to it.

One point worth making is that only a small percentage of rapes are "stranger" rapes. Most victims of rape are raped by people they know.
By "people they know". Is there a certain length of time they've known the person in those stats?

If a woman is smart enough to get a guy to buy her a free drink, then good luck to her. But "skimpy clothing" and dudding you out of drink money is no excuse for rape. You're living in the dark ages.It's a shitty thing to do. In no way deserving of rape, but when women collectively humiliate and belittle a sensitive guy who's on the edge, some day he might just snap.

I see you failed to quote my analogy. Didn't you see any parallels with it?

Then they ought to get some therapy, or get themselves neutered or take some libido-inhibiting drugs or something. Why should a woman pay for a man's lack of self-control?
True, they should. In general women should try to be careful though. It's self preservation, or safety if you will. Running on a wet floor might be ok nine times out ten, but it's dangerous and there's a chance you'll slip. Why take the risk for so little gain. A couple of seconds, a free drink, shits and giggles.

You don't need sex. Some people are celibate their whole lives. You won't die if you don't have sex. My advice: if it all gets too much, try masterbation.
Sounds like a painful existence.

It's a bad can of worms to open though, Sam. Once you get some, you want more. And more... And, well, it gets worse.

is it ok for a wild animal to rape anouther wild animal?

Let's sort out human morality first. Then we can work on animal morality. Ok?


I'll admit there's a little misogynism in me, but I was being impartial here. What I said does come up every time, but I think that goes to show there's a certain amount of truth to it.

No. It just says that it is a commonly-expressed opinion. Pretty much exclusively professed by males, which should tell you something.

By "people they know". Is there a certain length of time they've known the person in those stats?

It doesn't cover the "we met in a bar half an hour before" cases. It's the boyfriend-girlfriend, date-rapes, husband-rapes-wife, boss-rapes-employee cases. That kind of thing.

It's a shitty thing to do. In no way deserving of rape, but when women collectively humiliate and belittle a sensitive guy who's on the edge, some day he might just snap.

There's no conspiracy of women out to get sensitive guys, you know.

Anyway, the same argument could be used to "justify" mass shootings, like the recent one in Virginia. Would you buy it if the perpetrator (assuming he didn't die) argued after the crime that "society" collectively humiliated and belittled him, and one day he just snapped, and therefore his actions were excusable?

True, they should. In general women should try to be careful though. It's self preservation, or safety if you will. Running on a wet floor might be ok nine times out ten, but it's dangerous and there's a chance you'll slip. Why take the risk for so little gain.

I agree that women need to be careful, because there are some people who will take advantage of them. It's a sad commentary on the state of our society that how a woman dresses in public does matter. Things would not be that way if certain men learnt some self-control.

"Let's sort out human morality first. Then we can work on animal morality. Ok?"


sure thing.

peace.

And if the rapist has HIV, there is no better way to INCREASE the chance of getting AIDS, than to let him bleeding all over inside her.

Excellent idea....


couldent it spread more than just aids?

peace

If a woman is smart enough to get a guy to buy her a free drink, then good luck to her. But "skimpy clothing" and dudding you out of drink money is no excuse for rape. You're living in the dark ages.

...

Then they ought to get some therapy, or get themselves neutered or take some libido-inhibiting drugs or something. Why should a woman pay for a man's lack of self-control?

...

You don't need sex. Some people are celibate their whole lives. You won't die if you don't have sex. My advice: if it all gets too much, try masterbation.
All good points. However, all misogyny aside, there is a powerful fact of human (and all animal) nature that we should not forget. Your only objective reason for existence is to propagate your genetic masters into the next generation. Males of many species (most?) occasionally use rape as a means of accomplishing this. It is by no means unusual or abnormal. This does not condone rape in humans, but let's not trivialize the power behind such a behavior. It's not an "easy" problem to solve precisely because it is, most likely, part of the genetig programming of every male to use rape under the right circumstances (and polite modern human society is definitely not the right circumstances).

RAPEX for every girl, death to every love/sex seeking boy?

RAPEX is this thing which women insert in their vagina and than when sexual intercourse happens the penis is stuck inside this plastic thing with sharp needles...which than causes penis to bleed everywhere. Of course this is all justifiable since every intercourse is a potential rape. So do you agree to this idea?

Yo fuckfly,

Why don't you address the horrors of male rape which is indisputable by the fact that I was violated by a rapist? I can't even shit straight.

It's a sad commentary on the state of our society that how a woman dresses in public does matter.
I disagree. Not sad. Inevitable and preprogrammed. A simple fact of the competition your genes use to get into the future.

Things would not be that way if certain men learnt some self-control.
True but simplistic. The processes behind rape are deep and well ingraned in our genetic heritage. They are just less visible in our modern society (in most men).

Yo fuckfly,

Why don't you address the horrors of male rape which is indisputable by the fact that I was violated by a rapist? I can't even shit straight.

Because the thread isn't about the horrors of rape. And because Rapex can't be used anally.

It's a sad commentary on the state of our society that how a woman dresses in public does matter.

I don't understand how that's sad. How people dress matters. What's the big deal?

I don't understand how that's a sad commentary. How people dress matters. What's the big deal?
Read this (http://www.sciforums.com/showthread.php?t=59162). Call back in a few hours or so.

I have mixed feelings about this thing. Does it permanently mangle the penis? That is, if someone raped a woman who was wearing this thing, would his penis be destroyed?
It's a condom-style device which contains microscopic barbs that hook onto the penis. It can only be removed by surgery. Since the barbs are microscopic I'm guessing that non-sugical removal would be painful in the extreme, with possible scarring, but not permanently disabling.

Warnings from South Africa:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-rape_female_condom

Although the condom is not yet on the market, men in South Africa have become accustomed to inserting their fingers into the vagina to feel around for the condom first, even before consensual intercourse. Some men have expressed new interest in anal intercourse, which is physically more dangerous, especially during rape.

It clearly matters how people dress. Ther is an effect on males that is enhanced/diminished base on a females attire (and vise versa). Rape is not tolerable in our society and rightly so. But let's not deny that dress has some effect. The way a female decides to enhance herself has a direct effect on the level of stimulation of normal males. The idea that all rape is about power and abuse is a fallacy. Do some or most males ejaculate during rape? Yes? Then it serves a genetic prerogative to propagate. The male dosen't have to recognize why he rapes as long as the genes move forward. And then the genetic predisposition for rape will be preserved in the species.

The idea that all rape is about power and abuse is a fallacy.

You're correct that it is not all about power. But power is the primary motivator for rape, not sex.

No, not you, BenTheMan..)

I bet you're one of the blokes who asks for it...

What?

Although the condom is not yet on the market, men in South Africa have become accustomed to inserting their fingers into the vagina to feel around for the condom first, even before consensual intercourse.

This is a logical first step.

I am trying to wrap my head around what this thing will actually accomplish. It's a mutually assured destruction scenario at best---the woman is still violated, but now the attacker has a whole new world of problems to contend with. At worst, it just pisses the attacker off, resulting in the woman being murdered. Most likely, of course, is that the attacker takes two seconds to check the woman, and rapes her anyway.

What?

You probably dress right provocatively.

True, but it's different for us men. We like being raped.



(Still no 'deadpan' icon I see.)

You're correct that it is not all about power. But power is the primary motivator for rape, not sex.

Do you have evidence for this?

In retrospect, I knew it was a bad idea to write what I did.
I'll admit there's a little misogynism in me, but I was being impartial here. What I said does come up every time, but I think that goes to show there's a certain amount of truth to it.

Yes it does. The whole notion of 'she was asking for it' tends to come up quite a bit. Sometimes they will say it because of the way she was supposedly dressed (from sexy clothing to tracksuit, business clothes, jeans, hell, anything at all really), because she smiled at him, because he just knew she wanted it because of the look she gave him, because, because, because...

At the end of the day there is no excuse.

By "people they know". Is there a certain length of time they've known the person in those stats?
Nope. You have instances of date rape, marital rape, boyfriend rape, friend rape, parental or family rape. The "people they know" instances tends to indicate a notion of trust between the rapist and his/her victim.

It's a shitty thing to do. In no way deserving of rape, but when women collectively humiliate and belittle a sensitive guy who's on the edge, some day he might just snap.

Still never an excuse.

True, they should. In general women should try to be careful though. It's self preservation, or safety if you will. Running on a wet floor might be ok nine times out ten, but it's dangerous and there's a chance you'll slip. Why take the risk for so little gain. A couple of seconds, a free drink, shits and giggles.
Yes. However, no matter how careful a woman might be, she can still find herself a victim of rape.

Not every woman is a skanky whore out for what she can get and not every man's a rapist.
It is also not excuseable to rape a "skanky whore". And you are quite correct, not every man is a rapist. In fact, the majority aren't rapists.

You wouldn't start showing off an expensive camera to strangers in a poor neighbourhood would you?
No. But how exactly is a woman to cover herself so as to not draw attention to herself? Lets not forget, women get raped wearing a range of clothing. What is sexy for one person will be a total turn off to another. That's the thing with the clothing issue. Not everyone will be aroused by the same thing. For example, a rapist might be turned off by a woman wearing tight and revealing clothes, but might be turned on by a woman wearing a pair of baggy jeans and a large sweatshirt.

There's no excuse, and I know I'm going to get stick saying this, but a lot of women ask for it.

Of course they do pho. That's the excuse rapists always use.

They'll flaunt themselves in skimpy clothing, flirt with men for drinks when they have no desire to get to know them - free drinks - and generally be bitches.
Refer to above statements.

Men are delicate creatures, too. More so than many women seem to feel. We have urges, which yes, we should be able to control, but some men just can't.
Yes and? Does that mean that women should simply not leave the house because some men out there might not be able to control themselves?:rolleyes:

After all, as I said before, not all men are attracted to the same thing. So how exactly should women conduct themselves and what should they wear to ensure they cover all bases for all the men out there who have no self control?

Maybe you should see a doctor about your paranoia or stop hanging around where you feel at threat/getting into those situations.
What about the women who are raped in their own homes, places of employment, schools, etc?:rolleyes:

Then it serves a genetic prerogative to propagate. The male dosen't have to recognize why he rapes as long as the genes move forward. And then the genetic predisposition for rape will be preserved in the species.
He cannot propagate his genes without the woman's menstrual cycle being exactly at the right time. He also has to contend with the fact that his victim might be on the pill. So a tad stupid wouldn't you say?

I hope that those men who dishonored me in this forum, that their wife or girl friend or someone will use this RAPEX on them while having sex.

I hope that those men who dishonored me in this forum, that their wife or girl friend or someone will use this RAPEX on them while having sex.

you dont hold grudges much do ya :). death and penis mutilation a small price to pay for insulting singularity.




peace.

Can the thing be turned inside out? It looks to be made of flexible latex. Some rapist might try it, if he found it beforehand....

"You wouldn't start showing off an expensive camera to strangers in a poor neighbourhood would you?"


sorry but that comparison is so funny, im sorry it just is,

seriously though isnt rape a part of animal nature? the male wants to plant his seed, and the woman only wants certain males to plant the seed, males who she sees fit to carry on the gene code, women look for healthy strong men naturaly to have babies with,


i not talking about ethics or morals here, im just talking about nature and animals, and we are animals are we not?


peace.

This is cool, so how will they know if i screwed someone, i mean not only the boy get good experience he also gets jailed, Hehe.

What Blue UK said.

Whatever,

i am asking how do they know that i screwed up an unsuspecting guy ?

What if the guy isn't unsuspecting, checks first, then hurts you?

Seems like u always check out your girl friend first.

Seems like you haven't really thought this through... have you.

I hope that those men who dishonored me in this forum, that their wife or girl friend or someone will use this RAPEX on them while having sex.

Your only contributions to this thread are the above. The only one that answered you was Redarmy and he did not dishonour you in any way, shape or form.

You sound like a very vindictive person who is always on the defensive; to date, you've wished people to die (before you:rolleyes: ) and wished for people to suffer a horrendous injury while attending to their loved one, and all because...what exactly?

You have some very serious issues about interacting with people, I suggest you visit a psychoanalyst or even a psychiatrist, before you do something horrible to someone.

You have some very serious issues about interacting with people, I suggest you visit a psychoanalyst or even a psychiatrist, before you do something horrible to someone.

And she doesn't know shit about physics.

True, but it's different for us men. We like being raped.

Sometimes, but it depends on who is doing the raping.

Singularity sounds like the kind of girl who'd decide telling the police somebody raped her, when in fact it was consensual, was a good idea.

I've got to go out just now, so I'll answer in depth later on.

You're right, Bells. Ultimately there's no excuse. There are different variables though and I don't think it's as clear cut as some people like to think. Situational differences between different cases. But yes, there is still no excuse.

You, Bells and JamesR, are right that it's not always the girl in a club wearing skimpy clothes that gets raped, but generally that's the one I hear about. I suppose I'm a little naive.

I agree that there are some situations that can't be helped whatsoever. Boss - employee. Family member, etc. How can we limit the risk for this kind of rape though? It's something I'd never like to hear about again, despite what you might have taken from what I've said. In my mind I was trying to think of ways to minimise the risks for the situation that I thought was most likely - strangers and pubs/clubs.

Anyway, gtg just now.

couldent it spread more than just aids?


Sure. Even worse...

And she doesn't know shit about physics.

Why dont u try answerin this U Psycho ?

http://sciforums.com/showthread.php?p=1387441#post1387441

Or do u want to fuck me instead ? Before u answer just check out the poll carefully.

Why dont u try answerin this U Psycho ?
Possibly because you ignore every answer you're given?

I hope that those men who dishonored me in this forum
The only person that's caused your "dishonour" is yourself. But keep it up.

CHILDREN, behave.

Deterrent. That thing has barbed hooks. I think it will work...moreso after the media starts reporting the results.

thing is the guy dies from blooding and painful realization that he can never have kids. And whats more...on his graveyard, it will be marked "Raped innocent girl"

website faqs say otherwise, providing he seeks professional care. I wish I had thought of it. Genius.

website faqs say otherwise, providing he seeks professional care. I wish I had thought of it. Genius.

guess what professional helps mean...death if not treated.

Do you know the pain that there is when blood streams away from you and there is nothing there remaining for you in this world...

This thing is a weapon and should be treated as a weapon only...on par with a gun.

guess what professional helps mean...death if not treated.

Do you know the pain that there is when blood streams away from you and there is nothing there remaining for you in this world...

This thing is a weapon and should be treated as a weapon only...on par with a gun.

I hope they create a RAPEX TAEZER

Female protection. It's her space. Providing she isn't enticing a victim, I see no reason why she shouldn't.

Sometimes, but it depends on who is doing the raping.
No it doesn't. I was being facetious. I assume you are too. Being serious about it, we both know that rape is sex without consent. Since enjoying it implies consent on some level, I think we can safely say that no-one - male or female - enjoys being raped... can't we.

I hope they create a RAPEX TAEZER

Even better.

Even better.

Ya with RAPEX TAEZER there will be no blood and we can do it again and again to him :o

Then they ought to get some therapy, or get themselves neutered or take some libido-inhibiting drugs or something. Why should a woman pay for a man's lack of self-control?

James R, if you can tell me of some that will work, particularly herbs and such I'm willing to give that a try, my constant obsession with girls behinds is hurting me and getting me depressed :(

James R, if you can tell me of some that will work, particularly herbs and such I'm willing to give that a try, my constant obsession with girls behinds is hurting me and getting me depressed :(

stroking helPs :p

singularity put one of these on and seduce darksiddz, post the experience on youtube. now thats entertainment,

peace

Women. The plural of woman is women. I've seen you write it that way many times and I thought I should let you know. Anyway, YES, it is justifiable. I mean, the woman is being raped, and assuming it's by a male, you're concerned that it's unfair to the rapist that his dick is damaged? Once she is under attack, she should do what she can to end the situation.

You see, that's why I won't ever find one, I can't even describe them plural-like :( I will attempt to notice it more, sorry.

singularity put one of these on and seduce darksiddz, post the experience on youtube. now thats entertainment,

peace

I wouldn't encourage her mate. She seems the kind of vindicative bitch who would do something like that, just to 'set an example to men' or some bullshit reason that makes sense in her (less than likely) pretty little head.

Or do u want to fuck me instead ?

Maybe. Are you hot?

I wouldn't encourage her mate. She seems the kind of vindicative bitch who would do something like that, just to 'set an example to men' or some bullshit reason that makes sense in her (less than likely) pretty little head.


i will draw up some plans for an anti rapex device. so that men can defend themselves against women, you know that spikey pit in star wars? thats the mental image i get for some reason,




penis

the penis protector 5000 XLR, no rapist should leave home without it.

http://men.style.com/slideshows/mens/standalone/features/moststylish/0042h.jpg

the penis protector 5000 XLR, no rapist should leave home without it.

Does it include a vibrator for the woman's pleasure? Or do you have to pay extra for that?

Hmm, but then again, why should any rapist give a shit whether the woman enjoys it or not?

Baron Max

Does it include a vibrator for the woman's pleasure? Or do you have to pay extra for that?

Hmm, but then again, why should any rapist give a shit whether the woman enjoys it or not?

Baron Max

it includes outward thrusting spikes for the womans comfort.

the rape assist 900.


peace.

Do you have evidence for this?

Yes. Just look at the range of rape victims. 90 year olds are raped. Children are raped. Men are raped by other men who do not identify as homosexual. etc. etc.

Sometimes [men like to be raped], but it depends on who is doing the raping.

If you honestly think you'd enjoy being raped, you have no idea what rape is.

Stick to physics.

I concur. Rape is no small matter, nor would I like to be raped. Ben, before you go saying you'd "like" to be raped, try it sometime. Don't blame anyone but yourself for the inevitable trauma that follows.

Main thing about rape: it's against your will. So I guess if you're thinking with your smaller head all the time, nothing will be against your will. Pfft.

If these barbs are so small, would they even get through a condom? Cause if not then its pretty useless anyway.

if only the genital shape is interchangeably, i mean mr.p belongs to women
and V to men, no rape will occur.

if only the genital shape is interchangeably, i mean mr.p belongs to women
and V to men, no rape will occur.

Obviously u r a conman and not a woman. Mr. P cant have babies and these days we dont even need men to have babies and we can select the babies to be females too.

So u men are an endangered specie.

Try raping us and we will taezer your mr. P

Obviously u r a conman and not a woman. Mr. P cant have babies and these days we dont even need men to have babies and we can select the babies to be females too.

So u men are an endangered specie.

Try raping us and we will taezer your mr. P

:confused: i am only saying that if only the genital shape is created/developed
the other way around, then no rape will occur. just a thought.

rapists would start using the backdoor instead when this rapex thing catches on...

Do you really want to carry 2 rapex around ??

Yes. Just look at the range of rape victims. 90 year olds are raped. Children are raped. Men are raped by other men who do not identify as homosexual. etc. etc..

Maybe they get off on old people and kids?

...dont even need men to have babies and we can select the babies to be females too.

So u men are an endangered specie.

Then who'd pay for your extravagances and make you feel like a princess!?

Oh... the butch one over there!

Then who'd pay for your extravagances and make you feel like a princess!?

Oh...

http://www.history.navy.mil/ac/posters/wwiiwomen/45-127-b.jpg

:)

If you honestly think you'd enjoy being raped, you have no idea what rape is.

Stick to physics.

Damn James, do I have to explain every joke to you?

Ben, before you go saying you'd "like" to be raped, try it sometime.

I guess with so many "sometimes women are asking for it" assholes in this thread, it's impossible to make jokes.

MOD HAT - this thread is on the verge of a flame-war, and is far from conducent to intelligent discussion. if you can give me good reason to re-open it them PM me, otherwise; thread closed