Quantum computing: Entanglement may not be necessary

Discussion in 'General Science & Technology' started by Vkothii, Feb 7, 2009.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Vkothii Banned Banned

    Messages:
    3,674
    Universal Turing machines and one-way quantum computing circuits are an insight into a universal principle. Which is a universality of quantum logic one.
    Which there (cough) appears to be some resistance to elsewhere in the logic space.

    The idea of mixed and pure states in the quantum world has to be related to the idea of exclusivity, which implies inclusivity.
    You have to prepare an entangled state to measure it; you have to give everyone two coins to measure their distribution, when you select them.
    With entangled states, you measure one by preparing two initially, then "mixing" or distributing them - entanglement as a resource. Entanglement has an entropy.

    http://www.iop.org/EJ/abstract/1367-2630/9/6/204
    http://www.physorg.com/news147698804.html
    http://www.google.co.nz/search?hl=en&q=one-way+quantum+computation+entangle+resource&btnG=Search&meta=
     
  2. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. Vkothii Banned Banned

    Messages:
    3,674
    This means that the expansion and inflation observations are the information encoded in the CMB by the radiation, which includes polarization. This is the generator of some state in QM terms. The spatial code in distant observations encodes the last scattering angle.

    ...each is a one way computation, so both encode a mixed state, geddit?
     
    Last edited: Feb 7, 2009
  4. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. godat55 Registered Member

    Messages:
    1
    very good
     
  6. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page