"Foundations of the Universe" by M. Luckiesh, D.Sc. Director of
Lighting Research Laboratory, General Electric Company,
printed in 1925, page V:

"In the far-off stellar crucibles we see the same laws being
obeyed as in our laboratories. As we trace down to the
almost infinitesimal constituents of the extremely minute
atom we find that apparently IT DOES NOT EXIST AT ALL as the
realistic matter which we have SUPPOSED IT TO BE.

There at its very foundation it seems to consist of electric
charges which probably SIMULATE THE MOTION OF CELESTIAL
BODIES. It is becoming more and more certain that the
apparent complexity of nature is due to our lack of
knowledge. As the picture unfolds it promises a MARVELOUS
SIMPLICITY."

Even though this was written in 1925 it seems to lend credence to my argument that Celestial Mechanics are the same as Quantum Mechanics and actually do follow the same principals and structure.

http://micro.magnet.fsu.edu/primer/java/scienceopticsu/powersof10/

Compare this graphic with the powers of 10 at 10-15.

http://universe-review.ca/I03-02-apm.jpg

Why do Scientist deny this is beyond me, it is just plain common sense. :confused:

Now if we argue that two Vector Dimensions exist that we are able to observe i.e. Quantum and Celestial this would not eliminate other Dimensions that we can not observe.

Each Dimension is based on size and frequency and momentum of matter, they contain variables and breaking points, whereby multiple building blocks can exist to build larger or smaller structures within each said Dimension until a barrier is approached, then E=M creates a building block of the next dimension larger or smaller.

I have a graphic that will illustrate the motion of matter and its angular momentum energy.

http://fred.mitchellware.com/fractals/gallery01/mggs_9-star-spoke-npppppppp-balanced_02_medium.png

Now we can join QM and SR by creating a UT incorporating this understanding and by understanding forces of energy or matter in motion. This will certainly lead to an understanding of Gravity.:)

Even though this was written in 1925 it seems to lend credence to my argument that Celestial Mechanics are the same as Quantum Mechanics and actually do follow the same principals and structure.

of course they follow the same principals, just "look" at the atom, it's just like the solar system!!

Now we can join QM and SR by creating a UT incorporating this understanding and by understanding forces of energy in motion this will certainly lead to an understanding of Gravity.:)

i already solved what gravity is when i was 15, it's another "form" of magnetism. rotation generates "gravity"

of course they follow the same principals, just "look" at the atom, it's just like the solar system!!

Ah... no it isn't. As a minimal amount of reading of a first-year quantum mechanics introductory text will tell you.

Ah... no it isn't. As a minimal amount of reading of a first-year quantum mechanics introductory text will tell you.

I know it is hard not to believe everything you read, I think of this every time I read the Bible.

Yet I know the tendency of Nature is to repeat itself.

Because everything is energy, everything in the observable Universe must be the same in structure, no matter how large or small.

The answer is simple and not complicated.

Sometimes we like to complicate things that should be simplified.

This image illustrates how I envision energy in vortex motion creating bent Space within the individual vortices.

If you could envision the eye of an Hurricane only dealing with the distortion of the fabric of Space.

http://fred.mitchellware.com/fractals/gallery01/mggs_9-star-spoke-npppppppp-balanced_02_medium.png

The answer then would unfold like this due to the cyclonic motion of energy, energy is compressed.

When energy is compression it over speeds past the speed of light until it precipitates in the form of matter.

Once energy forms matter in its compressed state it is held together by its own centrifugal forces.

When the energy slows within the atom to the speed of light then the matter decays.

Ah... no it isn't. As a minimal amount of reading of a first-year quantum mechanics introductory text will tell you.

This is what we know of energy.

There may also be other possible variations within energy wavicles which at present we can not detect. For example it appears that energy wavicles have different characteristics such as being open ended, closed loops, and twisting vibrations.

Why do Scientist deny this is beyond me...
Clearly.

Clearly.

The Universe is defined by mass, energy, space, and time. Of course, we don't understand what "mass," "energy," "space" and "time" are in terms of other notions. Except the physicists can tell us how to "measure" them. That is physicist's concepts of mass, energy, space, and time are phenomenologically: measures. Physicists know a great deal about the most likely relationship between them ( in a statistical manner - i.e., we don't know the underlying ontological relationship).

A dissipative/replicative structure as a model is defined as a "typed" system, where the type excludes subsystems. A dissipative/replicative structure is primarily a matter of kind, not a matter of degree. One must remember that a dissipative/replicative structure is A MODEL, not the actual natural system. There are two types of material dissipative/replicative structures: microsystems and macrosystems. Initially, macrosystems and microsystems are defined at the major level of material complexity. A microsystem, M, of major material complexity N is contained in a macrosystem of major material complexity N or lower. M can be contained in (and composes part of) a microsystem Mc, which is of major complexity N+1 or higher.

Macrosystems: Our Universe, Milky Way Galaxy, Sol: Solar system, Jupiter, Earth, Gaia, Hypersea, Metaman.

Microsystems: a gluon quanta, an electron quanta, a proton particle, an omega particle, a helium atom, a carbon-12 atom, a water(H2O) molecule, a prion molecule, a Halococcus cell, a Hyella cell, a Tridacna organism, a butterfly organism, an ant colony (family), a human family, a Mayoruna tribe (society), The US government (society), Microsoft corporation (society), The World Wide Web (cybersociety).

Subsystems: photon, gamma rays, superconducting electron pair, Einstein-Bose condensate, ion, cation, Ryberg atom, a viriod, a virus, a gamete, a skin cell, an ant, an orphan, a website, in bankruptcy dot.com company, a viral email joke.

Distribution in energy is: matter (or constant information) in "energetic" motion (random information in process). Distribution in space is a fixed amount of matter (or information) in more space(patterned information in process). Distribution in time and structure is: correlation of "bits" of matter in time (patterned and random information in process).

In other words, communication is the changing of patterned information, whether it be random (nothing pattern) or ordered (something pattern). Dissipation is a form of distribution of communication, where the encoding or decoding of information is based on either communication in energy, time&structure, or space. Replication is a form of distribution of communication, where the encoding or decoding of information is based on either communication in energy, time&structure, or space.

All systems are formed by matter in motion. It is the motion that is replicate in nature.

Motion of matter creates the distortion of space and the effect of Gravity as we understand it. To measure Gravitational waves, is to measure the curvature of space.