SkinWalker has remained unchecked in his massive campaign of Stalinistic censorship, he has barraged me with more infractions today, so the big strike three is probably on the horizon.

Maybe a permaban is in store this time, so I just want to say it has been great fun, exposing the Darwinistic fraud, and demonstrating the veracity of Genesis history, so thanks for the ride guys, I've learned alot, and I'm sure that so too have many of you, right Skin and James R?

Goodbye Jimmy, all the best.

Fix your eye.

What were the infractions for?

Uh, let's see, "trolling, baiting, meaningless posts," I forget them all.

the last time you was banned i tried to contact you from the contact link on your homepage. i never heard from you.

i've made the following post:
http://sciforums.com/showpost.php?p=1416878&postcount=109
the admins are going to wonder why skinwalker doesn't challenge it.
he'll be a fool if he does.

one thing i can't stand is an abuse of power.

Privat Message to me from leopold99:

http://sciforums.com/showthread.php?...51#post1415151

yeah man it's real easy hiding behind the internet isn't it.

i reported your post and i am praying you get banned for your insensitive comment. i've even requested it.
so if you do you'll know who did it to you.

So banning me for suggesting that you need a nice, sweet, tasty smoke is not abuse of power?

I've learned alot

No, you haven't.

Ice was awesome. I liked him. I hope he's not banned for good. He is less offensive than all the people who have personally attacked me since day one. And they're still here.

SkinWalker has remained unchecked in his massive campaign of Stalinistic censorship, he has barraged me with more infractions today, so the big strike three is probably on the horizon.

Maybe a permaban is in store this time, so I just want to say it has been great fun, exposing the Darwinistic fraud, and demonstrating the veracity of Genesis history, so thanks for the ride guys, I've learned alot, and I'm sure that so too have many of you, right Skin and James R?

Just make another account. Everybody else does it.

Ice was awesome. I liked him. I hope he's not banned for good. He is less offensive than all the people who have personally attacked me since day one. And they're still here.
Pfft. Please don't play stupid. Every attack you have recieved by every member here has pretty much been justified.

What part of 'I look like Christie Brinkley, but I'm 10 years younger and much hotter, yet I'm a devout Chrisitan' that annoys the shit out of people, do you not understand?

A serious question: Seriously, why do you feel the need to tell everyone that you are hot, yet won't post a picture? Why do you just expect everyone on here to take your word for it? Why? Can you answer those questions? Or are you just going to post some bullshit line/excuse dodging the questions altogether and make some more statements about how hot you think you are.

Surely you can't be that stupid. Surely not.

As for IAC, I personally don't think he should be banned, even in light of the senseless, one-liner 'make us all dumber for reading them' posts he constantly makes. I think they carry good entertainment value if they aren't taken seriously.

Lets take a moment of silence on the demise of that patient long suffering poster.:(

Surely you can't be that stupid. Surely not.

We haven't seen anything to the contrary, thus far.

I already said I finally fought back attacks from Grungy/Gangrene (whatever the hell his name was) after days of abuse. He's the one who started the
sh!t over my user title "PoliticallyIncorrectHottie." I've been defending it ever since. Most of my comments are tongue-in-cheek. And there is never an excuse for personal attacks against members. Not here or anywhere else. Lighten up.

I already said I finally fought back attacks from Grungy/Gangrene (whatever the hell his name was) after days of abuse. He's the one who started the
sh!t over my user title "PoliticallyIncorrectHottie." I've been defending it ever since. Most of my comments are tongue-in-cheek. And there is never an excuse for personal attacks against members. Not here or anywhere else. Lighten up.
You still don't get it do you?
I don't think anyone here, for one second, believes that ANY of your comments, especially about how 'hot you are' are tongue in cheek. You have a fucked up way of joking if you are. I'm not going to reiterate why you catch shit from everyone here. It should be blatantly obvious.

Ice is a bit of a retard, but why ban? Can't you just place him on ignore?

Ice is not a tard. He is awesome.:bawl:

Sandy, IAC used demeaning and evasive tactics on this site throughout his entire stay. He didn't join up on this site to effect people's beliefs or help people. He came here because of his immense arrogance combined with pure boredom (what did he do all day besides banter on sciforums?) in an attempt to show his "brilliance" (stupidity).

Just out of curiosity Sandy, do you believe the earth is 6,000 years old and that it was created in 6 literal days or do you believe the hebrew term "YOM" was used in Genesis to represent a period of time, and not a 24 hour day (the hebrew language was very limited).

Ice justified his stay on this forum when he was used as a punching bag by Satyr. I've never laughed so hard!

He is less offensive than all the people who have personally attacked me since day one. And they're still here.

Weren’t you the person who started a thread containing all sorts of inflammatory lies about Muslims in the US, where almost every single thing you said was directly contradicted by the survey that you yourself linked to? Where it was clear that you were either deliberately lying about the results of the survey or hadn't bothered to actually read it before you started a thread about it? If that’s your ordinary sort of behavior, I’m not at all surprised that people are attacking you.

That survey has been in the news for a week. The most recent was this:

http://www.debbieschlussel.com/archives/2007/05/meet_your_moder.html

This is truly a sad, sad day for sciforums.

When the forum administrators show such little regard for the majority of their membership by excluding one of its most noticeable and glaring representations, it speaks volumes concerning their respect for the constituency they serve.

As an example of human stupidity and psychological retardation IceAgeCivilization became a poster-child for what is occurring in western culture and within its prime example, the United Stated of America.

His participation here, beyond the frustrating simplicity and archaic superstitions, served as an ongoing, interactive example of all that should be avoided in thought and what happens to the mind when it is fed fear-based superstitions and ignorance-based ideals.
In other words he belongs here, amongst his own kind.

Sheep should be corralled so we know where we can find them.

An added consideration is the entertainment value he provided, if one can overcome the frustration of dealing with such childish minds.
It’s like watching a lobotomized rat trying to run the maze: both amusing and disturbing at once.

Having bloodied my fists on his thickness more than once I can honestly say that he taught me to avoid such pointless practices and to use with obtuseness as an example of a mediocre mind.

I say the double-chinned retarded freak should stay.

Otherwise I’ll be forced to use lightgigantic as my new plaything and he’s not as much fun.

Huh? :s

What's he done that's so bad? I read his posts, they seem alright to me.... what's the scoop? Just cuz he thinks the Earth ain't millions of years old?

That survey has been in the news for a week. [/url]

Yeah, but in your thread you said things like "OMG, 25% of muslims support suicide bombings!" when in fact the survey said only 8% of muslims thought they were "sometimes acceptable". If you spread inflammatory lies AND provide a link to a study refuting your lies in the very same post, don't be too surprised when people call you on it.

Huh? :s

What's he done that's so bad? I read his posts, they seem alright to me.... what's the scoop? Just cuz he thinks the Earth ain't millions of years old?

I'll sum up what Satyr has been saying for a long time: IAC lacks intelligence.

Of course, there are a lot of idiots on this forum. But he was the perfect example. What got him banned was that on top of being a blatent idiot, he also did a lot of trolling.

Rip Iac

That survey has been in the news for a week. The most recent was this:

http://www.debbieschlussel.com/archives/2007/05/meet_your_moder.html

How come this trolling is allowed if IAC can't troll?

How come this trolling is allowed if IAC can't troll?
Trolling is good sometimes. Now you know who 'Sandy' is.

Yeah, but in your thread you said things like "OMG, 25% of muslims support suicide bombings!" when in fact the survey said only 8% of muslims thought they were "sometimes acceptable". If you spread inflammatory lies AND provide a link to a study refuting your lies in the very same post, don't be too surprised when people call you on it.

Read the damned report. Can't you comprehend it? A refusal to answer counts as support in my book.

"More than one in four Muslims (or 26%), aged 18-29, said "Suicide Bombing is Justified." 2% percent of them say it can often be justified, 13% say sometimes, and 11% say rarely. Add to that, the 5% don't know/refused to answer this easy, instinctive question, and it's even worse--for a total of 31%--almost a third of young American Muslims, who support homicide bombings. This younger group of Muslims is the most radical, the study found, and it's the largest group of Muslims in America. It is also the future of "America's" Islam."

http://www.debbieschlussel.com/archives/2007/05/meet_your_moder.html

WHY ARE YOU DEFENDING AMERICAN MUSLIMS WHO SUPPORT TERRORISTS AND SUICIDE BOMBINGS :confused:

Ice is a bit of a retard, but why ban?

Because he was cluttering up sciforums with useless rubbish, rather than adding useful content.

I am opposed to the banning of IceAgeCivilisations, just as I would be opposed to the banning of SpuriousMonkey. It would be deadly dull if everyone here had generally the same perspectives, opinions, and experiences. If 'useful content' is a requirement, you may as well save everyone's time and ban 99% of the members forthwith.

Ice was fun. And nice. I didn't see him personally attack anyone. I think that is the only reason anyone should ever be banned: constant personal attacks. It ruins the whole forum. It hijacks the threads. It's like kindergarten.:rolleyes:

He was a gentleman to me since day one. He never was suggestive or rude.

I will miss him.:(

Ice was fun. And nice. I didn't see him personally attack anyone. I think that is the only reason anyone should ever be banned: constant personal attacks. It ruins the whole forum. It hijacks the threads. It's like kindergarten.:rolleyes:

He was a gentleman to me since day one. He never was suggestive or rude.

I will miss him.:(Shut the fuck up!!!!

Satyr meet sandy... sandy meet satyr.

If ever there was a match made in heaven.. it would be you two.:)

Satyr meet sandy... sandy meet satyr.

If ever there was a match made in heaven.. it would be you two.:)
Sandy would demolish Satyr. Saytr is all fluff with no substance. :)

Shut the fuck up!!!!

Great, you just added another reported post to sandy's daily list of about 20 reports.

Thanks, satyr.

Satyr meet sandy... sandy meet satyr.

If ever there was a match made in heaven.. it would be you two.:)

Oh, I called this one a LONG time ago. Back when Sandy was brand new to this forum, I warned her that one day, Satyr is going to be her new best friend.

Great, you just added another reported post to sandy's daily list of about 20 reports.

Thanks, satyr.
Who cares about Sandy's reports?
I found Satyr's response hilarious!! Like - poor guy. :D

Great, you just added another reported post to sandy's daily list of about 20 reports.

Thanks, satyr.Just write it up and send it in the mail, officer.


2inquisitive
Sandy would demolish Satyr. Saytr is all fluff with no substance. I believe you and …Sandy and IceAged have about the same amount of “substance” and the same level of understanding of “substance”.

I don’t know if she could “demolish me” but I’ll let her crank my shaft if she promises not to spit up.

My only concern, at this point, is who will replace the departing retard and provide a focus for all my misanthropic scorn….perhaps you are volunteering, deary?

Please, oh please, post something “substantial” for us.
I would love to dissect its nothingness and expose the void between your verbiage.

Or, perhaps, Sandy can expand upon her appreciation for mentally deficient, double-chinned imbeciles still stuck in the intellectual middle-ages, so that her “substance” can become more apparent.

I gave up on lightgigantic and his pretentious, self-righteous pseudo-civilized banter.
He’s no fun at all and he doesn’t want to play ball with me.

Maybe it has something to do with the epistemology of the ontology of picking the “correct” authorities that teach the “correct” epistemology that makes the bullshit he has filled his tiny mind with, an ontological possibility.

All this while keeping the authority of his senses closed.
I don’t know, I always picked my authorities and those I considered “experts” by their past successes and performances.
This moron picks them on faith.

I kick his @ss.

http://www.googlefight.com/index.php?lang=en_GB&word1=sandy&word2=Satyr

:bravo:

Next...:D

Behold the awesomeness of Satyr!

I kick his @ss.

http://www.googlefight.com/index.php?lang=en_GB&word1=sandy&word2=Satyr

:bravo:

Next...:D

Of course you are going to win every google fight. Half the internet porn stars are called sandy. Because it has a nice "whory" ring to it.