View Full Version : Pressure. Only right force of nature


JukriS
05-06-08, 12:25 PM
All the phenomens can be explained by one force and this force is the
pressure. (Donīt forget the power of thought! You also can move yourself by
the power of thought! Quite right. You get yourself to move with the help of the muscles .
You so you send message of your brains to your muscles and you get yourself to move?
What is power/force of this thought, which get you to move there where you want?).

We can describe by people what happens in the atomcores all the time. For
example one thousand people can go to the space and curl up close to each
other. Now we have made an energyconsentration of people that covers a
certain spot of the space. We know that the biggest part of the atoms is
empty space. Also between people there exists empty space that does not
expand or curve.

Now these people can begin to straighten or in other words to open up and
this way they push themselves away from each other. One can observe the
hardest pressure in the middle of this human energyconsentration and people
who locate in the middle must do an enormeous job so that they wounīt
flatten in the centre. These people in the centre sweat the most. This is
excactly the same thing that happens without gravitation for example in the
centre of the earth and in the centre of the sun.

The density of the human energyconsentration reduces and the people push
themselves away from the centre of the human energyconsentration. Now for a
little while we can observe a phenomen of gravitation without a drawing
force (that actually does not exist) on the surface of the human
energyconsentration.

In my opinion the space does not expand or curve. If it would expand, could
you describe how does the space expand?

It is easy to describe how the energy all the time turns into a less dense
energy in the atomcores, so I think that it is time to forget all about the
magical expanding and curving of the space. You can also forget all the
spare spacedimentions, the dark substance and the dark energy.

So the space does not expand or curve!

The atomcores expand and open up expanding electrons and expanding photons
and they beam their expanding energy as waves away from themselves. This is
how it goes!

When you look at the galaxy, you can understand that the energy inside the
galaxy is denser than outside the galaxy. If you look at a star, you can
understand that energy inside the star is denser than outside the star. This
way you will know for sure that the energy inside the atomcore is denser
than outside the atomcore. It is not difficult to understand that the energy
inside the protons / neutrons is denser than outside of them and the energy
inside the qvarks is denser than outside the qvarks and so on...

It it also easy to realize that outside the visible universe the is an area,
where is really much more energy than the visible universe has all together
and the energy some where out there is much denser than than it is in a
visible universe. Still in that area far away from the visible universe
there is no centre point where the energy would be denser than outside it.

That three-dimentionally expanding energyconsentration that bems energywaves
with the nature of the galaxies, is formed also from separate
three-dimentionally expanding energyconsentrations ect. And so the smaller
separate energyconsentrations we talk about, the denser and denser the
energy is all the time.

So the atomcore does not have a centre point, where the energy would be
denser than outside it. There is no centre point also at the universe,
outside which the energy would be less denser.

Because the MOVEMENT takes place towards a less dense area, then the visible
universe MOVES as an entity away from that one point that is really far away
from the visible universe and where the energy is much denser than it is in
a visible universe.

JukriS
05-06-08, 01:26 PM
Why persons believe to the additional space dimensions? They say that two dimensional mortal was not can understand three space dimensions. Who understand two dimensional mortal, to the object or macrocosm? Even though mortal would be how thin ever, so in any case it is three-dimensional. If you take away as the thickness's completely, no left behind remains anything. Therefore is futile to justify on the two dimensional matters additional space dimensions. Not two dimensional matters exist. We don't needs additional space dimensions to explain how macrocosm seriously functioned.

JukriS
05-06-08, 01:27 PM
Take a look some my videos.

http://www.youtube.com/profile_videos?user=Etimespace&p=r

1. Idea from Kuopio, is first new video.

2. No gravity. Kuopio

4. bending light. Kuopio

With good english

Other one is with my terrible english, sorry about that

spidergoat
05-06-08, 01:35 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tnmQWMLv53Q

http://www.onesimpleprinciple.com/l2

JukriS
05-07-08, 11:39 PM
Kopernikus told us, Sun is not a take round, it is Earth who take a round two way. Galileo Galilei start to proof that with some new mathematic (?) and Newton was a man who maked more some mathematic for that Kopernikus Idea.

I am not going to making any mathematic for that new and only right Idea. i just waiting new Galileo Galilei and new Newton.

By the way. That own mathematic i already have!

Energy = Energy Condition grid/cobweb/lattice/mesh, which expands in the background space which does not expand or arches.

That energyconditiongrid it is lattice where energy is different density energy and that energy expanding all a time.

We have name for that phenomena and it is Entropy!

You already know that?

JukriS
05-08-08, 11:37 PM
Can you tell can energy of the visible macrocosm moves away about that space in which it now is, together in the moment? If can, so then we don't needs expansive space? In any case light speed is to us maximum speed! Simplest theory wins. Current marginal, to be expanding and arching space, dark substance, included theories of the dark energy and additional space dimensions really are not simple. According to my thought, exists only space and energy. Space every does not expand or arches. Energy which can be in the smaller area space which does not expand or arches, whereby energy is denser. So that same energy can be by the big in the area space which does not expand or arches, whereby energy is less denser. Person of this all can understand, unlike simsalabim additional space dimensions. Sorry now only, but you have brainwashed yourself hands flapped with the theories!

If not, Lets TOLD ME, HOW SPACE EXPANDING OR HOW SPACE BENDING? With out flapped hands!

Thank you

By the way. I can explain light bending easy way with out bending space. Einstein never told how space bending!