Palestinian realocation program created and designed by Avatar

problem: palestinians demand their own land thus threatening the territorial integrity of Israel

solution: give palestinans land*

*that land would be located in Iraq in close neighbours with their arab fellows and no mean Israel military police holding order and not allowing suicide bombing. Iraq would be made a federative country with a strong palestinian independance.

Just be adding more trouble to a nation already in shambles and that already requires humanitarian aid to survive.

YOu realise the most obvious reply is to give the Israelis their own land somewhere, like an island somewhere? Or perhaps repatriate them all to the country many of them or their ancestors came from?

Not that I think either solution is good, both sides are just going to have to get on and live together.

both sides are just going to have to get on and live together.
which is even more impossible - they'd like to see each other dead
thus my solution is more rational and would lessen the killings of innocent people

Most of the proposed solutions to this conflict have been rational. It would also be rational to exile the Israelis to an island. big deal. You think you can get them all to agree?

There are in fact 4 nice and easy ways to end this conflict.

Why not send all the Israelis to the USA? Our country loves jewish, dont listen to what you hear otherwise,and we especially love those from Israel. In fact, we love Israel. We support israel. WE WANT ISRAEL LIVING WITH US

The Israeli's are going to stay where they are for a long while. They have enough military might to expell every Arab from the Levant. The thing is that of course the Zionist won't do that. So what is Israeli's solution supported by the US is... taken from their former ally... if you guessed Bantustans your right. I am not sure that Israel will ever really accept a Muslim Arab state totally independant, and the Palestinean people will never be independant, even if they have a seat at the UN, simple. Economic dependance on Israel. She holds the reigns on this one. And another question of mine is will Palestineans have a road linking the W.bank and Gaza? To expell the Arabs or the Jews is in my view wrong. We have to face facts that they are going to have to live together or die together.

Latvian Neo-Fascist who needs to be re-occupied FAST!! :

Palestinian relocation program


Remove people from their history , from the land of their ancestors ? Why , for some European COLONISTS ? How about a razzia in Tel-Aviv instead ? Thats your re-location right there , relocate from earth right back to HaShem .

Your Arab hate is welcomed in Gaza where although oppressed , raped and abused , the native peoples of Palastine STILL have controll . Tell that to your disco-buddys in Israel , tell them how they are bound to be hit every day , as for the peoples of Palestine have gone crazy because of 55 years of slaughterings , they have gone so crazy 15 year old high-school girls blow themselves up to make the zionists go away , have you any idea what you are getting in 10 years because of this ? And then what ? Holocaust ? Palestinian Endlosung ?

There already is no chance for peace , but at least admit you want war instead of coming up with DISGUSTING solutions , what if Stalin would have relocated your peoples right into Kazachstan or Siberia ?

I am for peace , and I offer equality , while you are disgustingly shoving it off because : I like jews better than arabs !!!!!!

Racist !!!!

In my opinion Israel can choose because it has authority (and not just a little bit) , it has chosen war for the last 55 years . It has chosen for war THIS YEAR 2003 when electing the child-murderer Arik Scheinerman for their prime minister . Has anybody ever took a closer look at this man , he is damn Satan himself !!!
http://www.davidduke.com/writings/ariel_sharon.jpg

No all those zionazi's dont want peace , they want their zionazi state ......well thats not gonna happen , not in peace .

A true solution I believe would be :
1)Execution of zionazi regime and hostile supporters . (ok u can RE-LOCATE them as well)
2)Stop migration to Israel
3)Right to return for all Palestine natives .
4)Social equalization of all the non-hostile peoples inhabiting Palestine

That way you can get :

1)Creation of Democratic state of "bilingual name"
2)Right to inhabit this state peacefully for ALL (yes including the European colonists , they can become honorable citizens) peoples of Palestine .
3)Religious freedom + Linguistic freedom +Cultural freedom


Why not send all the Israelis to the USA? Our country loves jewish, dont listen to what you hear otherwise,and we especially love those from Israel. In fact, we love Israel. We support israel. WE WANT ISRAEL LIVING WITH US


Just your own Jews , not all the Israeli's .......


which is even more impossible - they'd like to see each other dead


Not everybody is like that , and not everybody would be like that .
Fact is Israel has a national-socialistic government colonizing a peoples brutally and promoting apartheid .


There are in fact 4 nice and easy ways to end this conflict.


You mention exile to an Island (thats not gonna be possible , have u any idea what the zionists had to do to get where they are today ? They're not giving up , and they won all the wars so ..........)

What are the others ?

Nico

The Israeli's are going to stay where they are for a long while


but not in peace , the peoples of palestine are extremizing into violence , and we all know what some hamas-kiddo's are living into ......

In 10 years its exploded there , there isnt really peace on their side as we speak , but by then its simply no longer disneyland anymore , peoples cant deal with that psychologically , check a dude like Gill-W , he's all busy with bullshit hobby's , blabla-ing like any other disneylander , but what u think he'd be doing if there would be a bomber in his town any other day ?

Israel has to show itself by then if it doesnt want to fall into anarchy ......

could someone inform the russians that the latvians are misbehaving. i propose a recolonization

:D

hehe
I admit I wanted to spark discussions a little with this topic, but really - both sides have extremists and supporters, so there can be no peaceful solution. And relocation is better than a slaughter imho

Originally posted by NenarTronian
WE WANT ISRAEL LIVING WITH US

You go ask every hate group in the U.S. in texas and montana... then we'll talk.


Prisme

in texas and montana


How about the state of New York ?
They already own it , why not make it official ?
:rolleyes:

Hm, seems Prisme did not note the extreme sarcasm and distaste that i posted with...

The only way to peace for the region in my view is to return to the 1948 borders. Why not? If the US wants to have all this cred. in the Middle East, correct? Well then some major sacrifices have to be made.

1) Israel, will have to de-colonize the W.Bank and Gaza.
2) The Palestineans must fight terrorism.
3) Israel must neogiate with Syria over the Galiee and the Golan.
4) Syria reconizes Israel's right to exist, peace treaty.
5) US aid to the Palestineans increases to Israel levels so it evens out.
6) If neither side does their job funding (aid) is cut.
7) Promise ecoomic incentives to both states if they co-operate.
8) The Arab world reconizes Israel but only at 1948 borders
9) Jerusalem becomes a internationa city (both can their capitals in there but no one reconzies it)
10) UN peace keepers patrol the border btwn the two.
11) Both finally realize that they can't have everything they want, ie right of return, or W.Bank water.

Of course this won't happen thanks to the USofA at the UN vetoing everything mentioned above. The Military complex in the US wants this thing to continue. And it will.

http://www.anxietycenter.com/images/israel-unpartition-map.gif

A dream :m:

Quote by Neo-fascist Latboy, founding member of the Sci forums Fascist Brigade:


problem: palestinians demand their own land thus threatening the territorial integrity of Israel

The problem Latboy is that your head has been fried by Fox news.

The Palastinians HAD their own land, they only DEMANDED it when it was taken from them.

...so u want the oppressed to take it in the ass, but instead of fighting...u want them to say: "ohh yes please....give us some more shafting"

wake up.

The problem Latboy is that your head has been fried by Fox news.
actually I don't watch tv...
and my name is Avatar

Neo-fascist Latboy, founding member of the Sci forums Fascist Brigade
a proud tear from my eye

Avatar:

which is even more impossible - they'd like to see each other dead

you're completely blind to the insidious role the US has been playing in all this, aren't you??

nico:
the only option which really has any sort of viability, is a north south split. Palastine is in the northern part , and israel is in the southern. The split axis would go through jerusalem, simply because such a 50/50 split happens to go thru Jerusalem. Have a no mans land around jerusalem, and (i say this with great aprehension) make it under UN control.

No I didn't see the sarcasm and I'm not sure if anyone did. I guess your post could of been easily taken as being sincere.

To split the area (Israel, Palestine), in too a North and South axis would create more problems then before. Firstly the Israeli's get desert let's face facts, most of the industrial and commercial heart of Israel is in the north, not to mention the Agricultural and Tel Aviv would also be spilt in two? What about Gaza? That is the worst soultion you could have.

nico, i discussed this already in another thread with flores, i think it was in the thread "Palastinians want no peace" it's near the end. Flores actually suggested a one third : two third split in favour of israel, thus israel would get jerusalem, tel aviv would be in the south no prblem there.
as for Gaza, the bulldozers are sorting that problem out as I type this, there is very little left of Gaza my friend.

nico, i discussed this already in another thread with flores,

That's nice :)

Flores actually suggested a one third : two third split in favour of israel, thus israel would get jerusalem, tel aviv would be in the south no prblem there.

SO in essence we would be in a worse situation, all Jerusalem would be Israel and everything below it ,Desert. This rather odd little belief is laughable, but I ain't laughing. Instead of a North South why not a East, West? The Israeli's get the West of Jerusalem ,and the Palestineans everything East? The problem I can see is that the Israeli's would get much more.

http://www.lib.utexas.edu/maps/middle_east_and_asia/israel.gif

I'd say we give the Pals the Northern region, the West Bank, Then from Beersheba, then from Dimona (nuke plant Israel won't give that up then down to Elat? How about that?

To split the area (Israel, Palestine), in too a North and South axis would create more problems then before. Firstly the Israeli's get desert let's face facts,


first u decide against a north/south split then u decide for it.
make your mind up.

re:fantasy posts, they're all fantasy posts, reality ain't in sciforums.

first u decide against a north/south split then u decide for it.

I never said I agreed with the North South split, I don't know where you found that one. No, there is no real split here it's really all or nothing in the end anyways to argue over this is kinda stupid. But if Levant had to be split up I would go for the East- West solution.

right, u already starting with a long narrow sausage shape piece of land, then ur going to divide into east/west parts, essentially giving two even more narrow slivers of land, and jerusalem would still be the sore point. ain't gonna happen.

all or nothing? yes, everything back to the palastinians, call it palastine, make the ashkenazim citizens, and that ain't gonna happen either.

The Land I would give to the Pals wouldn't be so bad they have to ports one in the north and they would get the argiculutraly viable Northern region. Then they get all of the W.Bank except of Al Quds (Jerusalem), then divert Dimona to the port of Elat, that sounds pretty good to me. But to give the Pals the North (ie. Haifa), is a non starter the Israeli's built that industrial area and Tel Aviv would have to split in two that ain't going to happen. The Pals would have most of the water and that is going to be a big problem with Israel.

ok i'll mention it to Yasser next time I see him.

seriously, east/west north/south, is irrelevant rigth now. First the IDF has to stop all atrocities, next dissmantling of all settlements, next getting the zionists to even recognise Palastinian sovreignty.

but i still think a north/south split is better. Take tel-aviv and draw a straight border to the northern tip of the dead sea. see, they get tel aviv, and jerusalem. They loose Haifa?....oh my heart bleeds for them, and as for the desert in the south , that'll be their problem, it's their promised land, so let 'em do whatever.

To a hard core Zionist Isreal is from th Nile to the Euphrates in Iraq. That is the promised land, and a North South split would make the Zionist poorer, and at least a East West split will keep the economic balance in place. I reconize that the economic balance is unfair but we can't have it broken. I agree that the IDF has to stop these invasions, and human rights abuses but don't you think also that the Pal's should stop commiting suicide attacks? It's a two way street, I don't you are happy when you see Ramallah occupied I'm not, but I am not happy when a Pal goes and kills innocent people. Now I think first thing is first the settlements HAVE TO GO! They have so many problems that.. well there isn't a word in the english language.

don't you think also that the Pal's should stop commiting suicide attacks?


effects dont stop when there is a cause for them

not the other way around

nico, absolute first things first, there must be a complete cesation of IDF activity, and the Israeli govt must enforce complete withdrawal of IDF from gaza, and occupied terrortories, then all bulldozing in Rafah must stop.
Once this has happened lo and behold! you will see a dramatic reduction in suicide bombings

I agree with both of you guys I don't Israel either, and they should get the hell out of Pal's land. But who will they do that if the suicide bombers give them the excuse to go back in with more force? If the suicide bombings stop and they are still in there doin all that stupid shit then they should get what they get. But who's going to flinch first? The biggest thing that get's me mad from the Israeli side is that the Pal's should fight terror alone with a shot security force? That pisses me off.

nico, as I said:

1)stopping of all IDF activity.
2)complete withdrawl of IDF from all occupied terratories.
3)dissmantling of settlements.
4)stopping of the Bulldozers in Rafah.

these are crucial, tangable , realistic. pragmatic, acheivable actions, that the Israeli govt can take, to show it's intention.
If 1 to 4 happens, I guarantee the bombings will stop. The IDF is the main problem.

see my thread "Rafah"

The situation isn't an easy one is it, reminds me of the Depche mode song "get the balance right", LOL. Well the problem with the IDF leaving from the Israeli perspective is that if they leave then more terror attacks happen what option do they have? Sit back and enjoy the show? No so what does Israel do to protect herself? I think this is a question none of you ask yourself enough.

Originally posted by Avatar
which is even more impossible - they'd like to see each other dead
thus my solution is more rational and would lessen the killings of innocent people

Abdulla: So what's wrong with the AIPAC/ZOA zealots buying up some of that choice Treblinka and Autzwich real estate and relocating the Zionists to a familiar place where they can be close to old friends and relatives?

Avatar you are indeed unique--I'm glad you are here in the US and not land speculating in the territories or knee deep in the WHITE SLAVE trade or ECSTASY export business back in your sick country. :(

AbdullaTheBomber....

Originally posted by nico
The situation isn't an easy one is it, reminds me of the Depche mode song "get the balance right", LOL. Well the problem with the IDF leaving from the Israeli perspective is that if they leave then more terror attacks happen what option do they have? Sit back and enjoy the show? No so what does Israel do to protect herself? I think this is a question none of you ask yourself enough.

Abdulla: The REAL truth is that Sharon dreads the day when there will be no more Palestinian violence because then he will have painted himself into that corner he so much dreads: "Making concessions for peace with the Palestinian's!"

Today his IDF thugs murdered a couple of more Palestinian children and a 65 year old elder--and what does that buy Sharon? More Palestinian violence--and what does that buy Sharon--more settlement expansion and land aquisition.

This thug Zionist Kosher pig needs killing--desperately!

AbdullaTheBomber....

Originally posted by Abdullathebomber

Avatar you are indeed unique--I'm glad you are here in the US and not land speculating in the territories or knee deep in the WHITE SLAVE trade or ECSTASY export business back in your sick country. :(

AbdullaTheBomber....

Actually Avatar is in Latvia not the US. And he's actually not pro U.S. and surely isnt oblivious to what the US has been doing re: israel and palestine

Originally posted by nico
The situation isn't an easy one is it, reminds me of the Depche mode song "get the balance right", LOL. Well the problem with the IDF leaving from the Israeli perspective is that if they leave then more terror attacks happen what option do they have? Sit back and enjoy the show? No so what does Israel do to protect herself? I think this is a question none of you ask yourself enough.

"the israeli perspective" is the main problem here, it's clouded, biassed, and non objective. Which Israelis are u speakin gof? the ones living comfortably in Telaviv? they actually think the IDF sittin gthere in gaza and westbank is "protecting" then from suicide bombings. The reality is the the suicide bombings are as a direct result of the murderous atrocities comited BY THE IDF in the first place.

Ariel bombardement and his cronies "claim" they want peace, well the balance of power is in their hands, they have the responsibility of making the first tangible moves.

I concede the fact that the IDF is one of the major reasons that Pal. suicide bombers go out there are kill other innocents. But what does Israel do? Would it stop if the settlements began to go away = it be subdue but it would start again. The problem with this IDF thing is that yes they are horrid, but some Pal. groups want Israel go to into the sea and they will not stop. So what does Israel do?

Originally posted by NenarTronian
Actually Avatar is in Latvia not the US. And he's actually not pro U.S. and surely isnt oblivious to what the US has been doing re: israel and palestine

Abdulla: Been to Latvia--nice decent suffering people ( Nazi's & Russian's ), so what is it with this Latvian Darth Vader, err, err, I mean Avatar-The-Terrible?

Humm, and I thought the Nazi gene pool in Latvia had been decimated by all the free sex and porn shops that now exist there. ( Interesting, huh--under Communisum very little of this moral corruption existed---sez something for Communism, huh folks? ( East Germany, same phenomeon ).

Avatar--you hate the Arabs, huh?

Wazzamatta, one of them rape your sista? :eek:

AbdullaTheBomber....

but some Pal. groups want Israel go to into the sea and they will not stop. So what does Israel do?

this is an example of the cloudy nonsensiacl biassed missrepresented perspective that the israelis use as justification to maintain the status quo.

"some pal groups" yes some, and on a demograohic statistical front, these "some pal groups" represent a fairly small cross section of the Pal population, both in terms of actual numbers and ideology, yet it is these "some pal groups" activites and views that get paraded on fox news ( i use fox news as a generic term reffering to all biassed pro-zion media) for such a statistcal minority they sure do get a hell of a lot of media coverage. why? so ariel bombardment can comtiniu to paint an un true picture, to continue to justify him not doing anything productive to the pal cause, and so the cycle perpetuates...on and on.

u ask what should israel do? i've given 4 clean cut objectives that it can and should start with.

this is an example of the cloudy nonsensiacl biassed missrepresented perspective that the israelis use as justification to maintain the status quo.

yet:

"some pal groups" yes some, and on a demograohic statistical front, these "some pal groups" represent a fairly small cross section of the Pal population

But they do exist? They are ready and able to attack aren't they? Yet it's bias view? I think the only plausible solution is for the West is to arm and fund the P.A to fight terrorists within her own territory.

great, now u want the Palatinains to fight amongst themselves?:rolleyes:

the west? which west? certainly not the US and Britain...so who?

and in any case that is the most absurd statement I've heard since reading Avatar's posts. he has the excuse of being thick,..I thought u were a little mote intelligent than that.

these groups are not part of the equation, they detract from the real issue, and divert everyones attention from what realy is happening.

Israel has the the balance of power, it is holding all the cards. it has to make "some" concessional move.

great, now u want the Palatinains to fight amongst themselves?

If not the Israeli's would correct? Some things are painful to do, but peace must be found somehow. If not the P.A who would do it?

the west? which west? certainly not the US and Britain...so who?

Meh! I guess the EU would be more able to do that. That name Britain... makes me sick they are such lacky's.

and in any case that is the most absurd statement I've heard since reading Avatar's posts. he has the excuse of being thick,..I thought u were a little mote intelligent than that.

I refute that my post had at least valid and debateable points.

these groups are not part of the equation, they detract from the real issue, and divert everyones attention from what realy is happening.

Granted but you can't reallt ignore them, they are well funded by Iran and Syria,etc. And they must have a fanatical power base so no you can't discount them. I agree that their dream of a only Pal. Palestine is that a dream, but they have to be dealt with.

Israel has the the balance of power, it is holding all the cards. it has to make "some" concessional move.

And I agree with this, the Israeli's began the agression in 1967 and they have to make the first move.

Originally posted by nico

And I agree with this, the Israeli's began the agression in 1967 and they have to make the first move. [/B]

that is bollox

The Arab states had been preparing to go to war against Israel with Egypt, Jordan and Syria being aided by Iraq, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, Sudan and Algeria.

On 27 May the President of Egypt, Abdel Nasser, declared: "Our basic objective will be the destruction of Israel. The Arab people want to fight."

Egypt signed a pact with Jordan at the end of May declaring an attack on one was an attack on both. This was seen by Israel as a clear sign of preparation for all-out war.

Israel took decisive action claiming the element of surprise was the only way it could stand any chance of defending itself against the increasing threat from neighbouring states.

And I agree with this, the Israeli's began the agression in 1967 and they have to make the first move.



BINGO!

there u have it.:m:

edit: actually they started before 1948...but hey...whats a few decades heer and there when dealing with oppression

Originally posted by Abdullathebomber
Abdulla: Been to Latvia--nice decent suffering people ( Nazi's & Russian's ), so what is it with this Latvian Darth Vader, err, err, I mean Avatar-The-Terrible? forgot also 600 years of Germans

Avatar--you hate the Arabs, huh?
Wazzamatta, one of them rape your sista? :eek:
AbdullaTheBomber....
no - I just dislike the methods they are using which to my mind are cowardly to say the least - arab terrorists that is
Humm, and I thought the Nazi gene pool in Latvia had been decimated by all the free sex and porn shops that now exist there. ( Interesting, huh--under Communisum very little of this moral corruption existed---sez something for Communism, huh folks? ( East Germany, same phenomeon ).
:D how do the sex shops corrupt morals? *laughs*
it's called free trade ;) so people can get what they want

Originally posted by bhudmaash
BINGO!
there u have it.:m:
On 27 May the President of Egypt, Abdel Nasser, declared: "Our basic objective will be the destruction of Israel. The Arab people want to fight." ;)
see my post

The 1967 war was in a sense a defencive one yes, but the ISraeli's went too far. Not only were they now secure from the Arabs but the Israeli's stole their lands. That is what made that war of 1967 aggressive, Israel had doubled her size and she had captured the entire city of Jerusalem (Al Quds). All of this Avatar was and still is illegal according to the UN S.C. Resolution 242:

http://ods-dds-ny.un.org/doc/RESOLUTION/GEN/NR0/240/94/IMG/NR024094.pdf?OpenElement

So Israel did start the agression.

So Israel did start the agression.
if not that alliance against Israel there would be no agression ;)
"Our basic objective will be the destruction of Israel. The Arab people want to fight."
so they got what they want - fighting

Avatar:
and u read mine, the first link I've already put as a thread starter and dedicated to you.


http://www.deiryassin.org/faq.html

http://www.geocities.com/youth4sa/palestinehistory.html

Avatar:

if not that alliance against Israel there would be no agression

so the world for u started in 1967??

u truly have no grasp of history,...or reality for that matter.


so they got what they want - fighting

what they "want"???....u have no conception of what they "want"

"they" "want" their "land" back, and not to be oppressed anymore, "they" actualy want "peace"

I've read those articles
so the world for u started in 1967??
u truly have no grasp of history,...or reality for that matter.
I reffered to a post where the year 1967 was mentioned and replied according to it

Originally posted by bhudmaash
"they" "want" their "land" back, and not to be oppressed anymore, "they" actualy want "peace"
they want peace through civilian blood not diplomacy
they chose their way to peace, well let them walk it
sooner or later there will be a Palestine (larger or smaller) besides Israel anyway, they are just making it harder to become, because Israel won't hold its hands down while it is being attacked by terrorists as would any country do

Avatar why are you defending a war that was expansionist? Israel had won the war, she just wanted to experiance the Zionist dream of the Nile to the Euphrates. Now really why did Israel need the Gaza strip, the entire Sinai, the W.Bank, the Golan, and then later on S. Lebanon? Expansionist, now 1948 that was Arab agression, and a armistace was signed with the present borders. 1967 in my view was the cornerstone of the current conflict.

Originally posted by nico
Avatar why are you defending a war that was expansionist? Israel had won the war, she just wanted to experiance the Zionist dream of the Nile to the Euphrates. Now really why did Israel need the Gaza strip, the entire Sinai, the W.Bank, the Golan, and then later on S. Lebanon? Expansionist
because those are strategically very important locations in order to secure the lands of Israel from further attacks.
water supply and highlands as the first of importance

why dont u just "forget" it?
after all it was just in the past

because those are strategically very important locations in order to secure the lands of Israel from further attacks.
water supply and highlands as the first of importance

I think the current conflict proves this little argument null and void. The expansion into these regions is the cause of the current conflict. Now we all know that Syria isn't going to attack Israel anymore so why keep the Golan? The water supply of whcih you speak of isn't Israel it's Arab and ISrael is stealing their water, you support that rogue action?This is the strategic safety of which you speak of?

http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/palestine/images/israeli_land-use_gaza_west-bank.jpg

The water supply of whcih you speak of isn't Israel it's Arab and ISrael is stealing their water, you support that rogue action? yes - because you can not live without water and then the people of Israel would start to suffer
although with curent technology I think it's possible to get water by tube from across med sea
a lot more xpensive though

yes - because you can not live without water and then the people of Israel would start to suffer
although with curent technology I think it's possible to get water by tube from across med sea
a lot more xpensive though

But somehow those ever so magical Arabs can live without it? Too bad for Israel it's call International law and she dosen't have the soverignty to steal other people's water, and Israel is rich enough to build de-salinazion plants. Too bad you don't see me crying, she stealing that's a sin and that deserves a punishment.

Israel has highly larger population density

Does it? You think that they have more people living per km2 in Haifa than in Gaza? And if the situation is so dire why do Israeli's have swimming pools? Why do the settlers get running water? Most Israeli's live in Tel Aviv- Haifa corridor, then Pals. live mostly in Bantustans. You tell me?

http://www.us-israel.org/jsource/images/maps/israel_pop.jpg

And that map was to prove what? not only did it omit the Pal. territory it prove my point right that most people live within the Tal- Aviv- Haifa- Jerusalem corrdior.

And guess what's underneath that corridor?

http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/palestine/images/gaza-west-bnk_water.jpg

A nice thick and rather juicy coastal aquifer. ;)

not only did it omit the Pal. territory it prove my point right
so yes - you're right
do you think I should have falscified the data? :D