Amp
02-12-03, 12:28 PM
G'day all,
Here are some of the changes GW considers important enough to do we can call it Stuff good old bush has also done:
1. cancelled plans for lowering allowable arsenic levels in drinking water, exposing potentially thousands to water poisoning.
2. curbed federal funding of stem cell research to only 60 cell lines.
3. chose candidates on the scientific advisory council by ideology (eg. opposition to abortion etc) instead of professional credentials.
4. Systematically ignored scientific advice when making decisions, when it goes against what they think.
5. expanded commercial logging, reduced protection of wetland nature sanctuaries, opened restricted areas to oil drilling.
6. border restrictions for foreign researchers, and encouraged censorship of scientific literature, and creation of "sensitive but unclassified" classification (incidentally, even the Reagan administration rejected this as impractical and damaging to science).
7. provided funding to fight against freedom of information cases.
8. removal of articles opposing the government's line on issues such as contraception and abortion from government linked websites.
Here are some of the changes GW considers important enough to do we can call it Stuff good old bush has also done:
1. cancelled plans for lowering allowable arsenic levels in drinking water, exposing potentially thousands to water poisoning.
2. curbed federal funding of stem cell research to only 60 cell lines.
3. chose candidates on the scientific advisory council by ideology (eg. opposition to abortion etc) instead of professional credentials.
4. Systematically ignored scientific advice when making decisions, when it goes against what they think.
5. expanded commercial logging, reduced protection of wetland nature sanctuaries, opened restricted areas to oil drilling.
6. border restrictions for foreign researchers, and encouraged censorship of scientific literature, and creation of "sensitive but unclassified" classification (incidentally, even the Reagan administration rejected this as impractical and damaging to science).
7. provided funding to fight against freedom of information cases.
8. removal of articles opposing the government's line on issues such as contraception and abortion from government linked websites.