We republicans need someone to combat Clinton. Come on O.J.!

Run! Run!

I'd vote for OJ over Hillary Clinton.

who is OJ?
Anyways I would vote for Hillary over anyone.

I'd vote for OJ over Hillary Clinton.

Thats nice, how many figers do i have up?

Draqon:

Go back to Russia.

Draqon:

Go back to Russia.

I would love to...but I can't, gotta get my aerospace degree in USA...than I will go.
It is a hard life.

who is OJ?
Anyways I would vote for Hillary over anyone.

It's not who but waht. edit[too mean]

We republicans need someone to combat Clinton. Come on O.J.!

Run! Run!

OJ should be President of hell.

What's everyone's problem with OJ Simpson, the man was a great athlete, have you ever watched any of his old games? Haters.

What's everyone's problem with OJ Simpson, the man was a great athlete, have you ever watched any of his old games? Haters.

yeah he just killed some people from his family...thats all.

yeah he just killed some people from his family...thats all.

How do you know?

yeah he just killed some people from his family...thats all.

Liar, he wasn't guilty. :p

What's everyone's problem with OJ Simpson, the man was a great athlete, have you ever watched any of his old games? Haters.

So was Ted Bundy, do you like him too?

Liar, he wasn't guilty. :p

His law team dazzled with child like "what-if's"

OJ Simpson was proven innocent in a court of law. He is not guilty of any crime whatsoever.

So was Ted Bundy, do you like him too?
Never heard of him..
His law team dazzled with child like "what-if's"
Is that illegal?

`
Fuck that scum-sucker.

If he ran for President I'd make like Rober DeNiro in Taxi Driver...
http://img145.imageshack.us/img145/2706/c11baj7.jpg
:cool:

On the other hand... at least he aint Shitlary...
;)

Yes please, he should do it , yes yes

OJ should be President of hell.

Assuming you don't believe in God (no one here does); hell exists for a murderous black man, but heaven doesn't exist for all creationists?

`
Fuck that scum-sucker.

If he ran for President I'd make like Rober DeNiro in Taxi Driver...
http://img145.imageshack.us/img145/2706/c11baj7.jpg
:cool:

;)

yeahhhh, now your talkin'

Liar, he wasn't guilty. :p

...and got away with it really well.

So here we have a president. The daily news media read: another journalist who had conducted invesigation died...for no apparent reason...conclusion: she commited suicide out of the blue.

yeah he just killed some people from his family...thats all.

LIAR!

http://myspace-905.vo.llnwd.net/00007/50/90/7990905_m.jpg

If the glove doesn't fit, you must acquit!

Wonder if that glove would've fit Micheal Jackson...

He deserves to be shot just for the crapola movies he made.

LIAR!

http://myspace-905.vo.llnwd.net/00007/50/90/7990905_m.jpg

If the glove doesn't fit, you must acquit!

and the president faked his involvement in anything about the killing of the journalist...the sedan numbers of his car seen near the scene of the murder...were not his at all, although that was his car and the numbers were of his car...
fake evidence.

Isn't that circumstantial evidence anyway?

I think the fact he's proven he can get away with murder makes him an ideal candidate for the presidency of the united states.
Everyone is all over bush's ass.
His inability to get away with murder is arguably his greatest shortcoming.

For the record, OJ was proven guilty in that courtroom, it's just that the defense also proved that a cop unnecessarrily planted fake evidence, and for some reason (jury too simple to make sense of a complicated situation) that made him innocent.
If nothing else it served as a dramatic illustration of the flaws with democracy, reminding us that most people really aren't qualified to have any say in anything.

Which party is he running for? The Republican party?

Well I guess rednecks would vote for anyone if they weren't a Democrat, right? :rolleyes:

Draqon:

Go back to Russia.

He's a citizen of the US (or so it appears, judging by his snotwuh). What right to you have to tell a citizen of the US to go back to some other country, just because you don't like what they think? My, we're being unhospitable and perhaps even anti-democracy, aren't we?

OJ Simpson was proven innocent in a court of law. He is not guilty of any crime whatsoever.

Courts do not find people innocent. They find them not guilty. And yes, there's a difference.

He's a citizen of the US (or so it appears, judging by his snotwuh). What right to you have to tell a citizen of the US to go back to some other country, just because you don't like what they think? My, we're being unhospitable and perhaps even anti-democracy, aren't we?


yeah. show'emm. thanks pal. I cheered when democratic party aced these elections.

yeah. show'emm. thanks pal. I cheered when democratic party aced these elections.

The democrats are losers that stand for nothing. The republicans need a lesson.

Michael Jackson for president! eeeeeeeeeeeeeheeeeeeeeee shamon motherfucker!

The democrats are losers that stand for nothing. The republicans need a lesson.


:mad: :mad: :mad:

yeah. show'emm. thanks pal. I cheered when democratic party aced these elections.

Me too. :)

The democrats are losers that stand for nothing.

What rock have you been living under until now? :bugeye:

Firstly, Democrats won the House, Senate, and several governorships, and are now the majority party in all three fields. If there's a loser in this scenario, it's the Republicans.

Secondly, they do indeed stand for something. I believe a bit of research would reveal this.

Michael Jackson for president! eeeeeeeeeeeeeheeeeeeeeee shamon motherfucker!

Oh boy, we're going to have to abolish the congressional page system before we let Michael anywhere near the District of Columbia. Let's not get ahead of ourselves. :p

The democrats were crying "IMPEACH! IMPEACH!" before the election. Now they are like "oh no, we won't do that."

What I heard is what they are going to do is put up those issues that seem to matter to people and go "look! Bush won't work with us and he won't get the republicans to help us. Let's put a democratic president in office and we'll get things done!"

Mrs. Clinton wants to cut and run from Iraq. That is scary.

The democrats were crying "IMPEACH! IMPEACH!" before the election. Now they are like "oh no, we won't do that."

... What?

What I heard is what they are going to do is put up those issues that seem to matter to people and go "look! Bush won't work with us and he won't get the republicans to help us. Let's put a democratic president in office and we'll get things done!"

And if he actually isn't? I wouldn't put it past him.

Mrs. Clinton wants to cut and run from Iraq. That is scary.

She's coming to her senses? Nice!

Mrs. Clinton wants to cut and run from Iraq. That is scary.
What's scarier is you seem too want to sentence our soldiers to die in the middle of a civil war we are incapabel of sorting out, for no other reason than your pride.

What's scarier is you seem too want to sentence our soldiers to die in the middle of a civil war we are incapabel of sorting out, for no other reason than your pride.

Well the war is going bad. Yes. However, I feel it is more dangerous to just leave at this point.

What I think should have been done with Saddam would be to put him back as "president of Iraq" under supervision. His job would be to stabilize Iraq. He wouldn't be dictator anymore but I'm sure he could fix it. He would have to live with a new form of government.

That's what we were doing! (more or less)

OJ Simpson was proven innocent in a court of law. He is not guilty of any crime whatsoever.

you should read this book I have about reading people. It explains this trial situation and why the jury arrived at their decision... which was most likely incorrect.

He wasn't proven innocent, Prince James. In the US, you are simply ASSUMED innocent until PROVEN GUILTY. If you cannot prove something is the case, that doesn't show it's negation has been proven. All that was shown in court is that it is damn near impossible to prove he was guilty.

He wasn't proven innocent, Prince James. In the US, you are simply ASSUMED innocent until PROVEN GUILTY. If you cannot prove something is the case, that doesn't show it's negation has been proven. All that was shown in court is that it is damn near impossible to prove he was guilty.

you contradict your own statement. He was indeed innocent and he was not proven guilty, as with no proof of guilt the evil culprit gets away with stains of blood within his skin, untouched...unharmed...its were judicial system crumbles.

He was found guilty in a civil court. Well, he settled rather than get sued for a kajillion dollars.
Funny how with enough money you can get away with anything.

It might have sounded weird, but I know I am right.

No proof of X doesn't mean X's negation must be true. We assume innocence... if you are not proven guilty, that doesn't mean he wasn't guilty. We just didn't prove it.

It might have sounded weird, but I know I am right.

No proof of X doesn't mean X's negation must be true. We assume innocence... if you are not proven guilty, that doesn't mean he wasn't guilty. We just didn't prove it.

yes. you are correct.

I'm now watching on TV a thing about OJ Simpson, he has written a book detailing how and why ...if he had killed them....he would do it!

He says it is fiction, but his publisher considers it a confession. The book is called

'If I did it'

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/15066202/

"O.J. Simpson is confessing. Hypothetically, that is.

The former football great, who was acquitted in criminal court 11 years ago of killing his ex-wife, Nicole Brown Simpson, and her friend, Ron Goldman, reportedly has been paid a whopping $3.5 million to write about the double murder that shocked and riveted the nation in 1994, according to a detailed report in the new National Enquirer.

But Simpson is not actually confessing to the murder — rather, he’s writing a “hypothetical” book — which the Enquirer reports is tentatively being called “If I Did It.” "

I'm now watching on TV a thing about OJ Simpson, he has written a book detailing how and why ...if he had killed them....he would do it!

He says it is fiction, but his publisher considers it a confession. The book is called

'If I did it'

No doubt it will net him millions,

yeah the FoxNews..."Friends" had been bluttering about the book and how noone should read it because all it is...is money from media attention, poking the same exact spot were once an injury was done...creating pain...dismay...attention...

I'd piss on his book and mail it back to him.

I'm now watching on TV a thing about OJ Simpson, he has written a book detailing how and why ...if he had killed them....he would do it!

He says it is fiction, but his publisher considers it a confession. The book is called

'If I did it'

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/15066202/

No doubt it will net him millions,

probably he wishes that he would have done it that way the first time round :bugeye:

He needs to be careful, In the Uk that double jeopardy law was changed by a mother seeking justice for her daughter and she DID IT! So now her daughters killer has gone to prison for life after 11yrs (or whatever it was!). If the law is changed in America, OJ could still find himself in prison, maybe that's why he wants to be president, so he can prevent the law from changing!

I'd piss on his book and mail it back to him.

but before ud piss on the book, you will have to buy it...and that is all HE wants.

but before ud piss on the book, you will have to buy it...and that is all HE wants.

No, I'm going to steal it.

No, I'm going to steal it.

the court will find you guilty and transfer some of the funds to OJ for emotional distress.

TheoryOfRelativity:

It won't be changing. It's part of the fifth amendment. The first ten are pretty much never going to be revoked.

TheoryOfRelativity:

It won't be changing. It's part of the fifth amendment. The first ten are pretty much never going to be revoked.

proof insanity is alive and well in the white house

TheoryOfRelativity:

Having double Jeopardy basically lets the government prosecute everyone they want as much as they want until they get a conviction. It's a sure fire way to set people up for unjust imprisonment.

Basically speaking: If they can't get a case on you -one time-, then you don't deserve to go to prison. Obviously the evidence was scanty enough to get you off one time...

TheoryOfRelativity:

Having double Jeopardy basically lets the government prosecute everyone they want as much as they want until they get a conviction. It's a sure fire way to set people up for unjust imprisonment.

Basically speaking: If they can't get a case on you -one time-, then you don't deserve to go to prison. Obviously the evidence was scanty enough to get you off one time...


so for you guilt is irrelavant, it's a case of available evidence at the time?

no evidence no punishement deserved?

And should more evidence come to light later or a confession, we should disregard it?