Walter L. Wagner
10-09-06, 08:40 PM
Conflicting reports have placed yesterday's North Korean nuclear weapon test as between 1/2 kiloton and 15 kilotons or more. The low end would possibly indicate a poor or less-than-complete fission of the weapon.
Not yet reported is whether it was a Pu-239 bomb, or a U-235 bomb. Reportedly, North Korea was using its nuclear reactor fuel rods to extract Plutonium. However, the reactor was designed for energy production, not weapons-grade Plutonium production. It has long been predicted that the Plutonium from such reactors would have an excess of Pu-240, compared to the Pu-239 which is produced when U-238 is neutron irradiated. Pu-240 serves as a fission 'poison'.
Perhaps this test, if the low-yield holds up under analysis, is indicative that their Plutonium is a poor-grade bomb material. Reportedly too, North Korea continues along the lines of U-235 enrichment ala Pakistan's completed route, and Iran's pending route.
Any insight from weapons physicists?
Not yet reported is whether it was a Pu-239 bomb, or a U-235 bomb. Reportedly, North Korea was using its nuclear reactor fuel rods to extract Plutonium. However, the reactor was designed for energy production, not weapons-grade Plutonium production. It has long been predicted that the Plutonium from such reactors would have an excess of Pu-240, compared to the Pu-239 which is produced when U-238 is neutron irradiated. Pu-240 serves as a fission 'poison'.
Perhaps this test, if the low-yield holds up under analysis, is indicative that their Plutonium is a poor-grade bomb material. Reportedly too, North Korea continues along the lines of U-235 enrichment ala Pakistan's completed route, and Iran's pending route.
Any insight from weapons physicists?