...TK/OBE/AA/RS/WI predicted I would tonight pop in and create this thread.

Why not?

:p

Well, maybe that´s becasue the creation of this thread has equal significance to an ant taking a dump.
Ohhhh....was I mean? Naaah.....:D

1.they don't like showing off their powers.
2.this thread wouldn't be here, if they had predicted it.
someone explained this in Pseudoscience.

remember, psychics need pure goal...and uri geller needs spoons.



;)

...the creation of this thread has equal significance to an ant taking a dump.
At least both the ant and the thread's creator are capable of a publicly demonstrable, functional talent. :D :D

But then, that was the point of the thread, no?

:p

And the talent is...?

...understandably under-appreciated in this demographic.

Ive known you would post this thread for months (a really neet trick since ive known about this site just over a week) i just didn't tell anyone. ;)

Neutrino_Albatross submitted:

Ive known you would post this thread for months...i just didn't tell anyone.
Still more compelling evidence that the Invisible and the non-Existant indeed do look very much alike.

:p

I of course knew you would say that. ;)

As I was equally pretty sure that you would respond just as you did.

Now, is that to say that I am every bit as adept at prediction as are y'all?

And if I have the same demonstrable "special talent" as y'all claim to have, what does that say about the "specialness" of y'all's claim to being "special"?

Nothing at all :D

But i guess im notr perfect i guessed wrong what that last post would be :(

Oh well 2 outa 3 aint bad ;)

Nothing at all
Understandably under-appreciated in my demographic.

:D

No others up to my challenge?

Where are all those special powers able to take on and vanquish just one mere mortal?

But you are doing that so well all by yourself, so why should we interfere with the perfect process? ;)

But you are doing that so well all by yourself,...
Can you be more specific, perhaps cite a few actual examples that might support your hypothesis?

Ad hominem innuendo so easily comes to the intellectually lazy. ;)

Sure, if you can reveal what your "publicly demonstrable, functional talent " is.....:eek:

Sure, if you can reveal what your "publicly demonstrable, functional talent " is....

Is it not obvious?

To annoy? :bugeye:

To annoy?

Try again. This time, consult your cards.

Something is terribly wrong here. Suddenly I´m Satan and you Xev, God???? Nooo, it´s the opposite universe, how did we get here??? :eek:

Q, I will only consult my cards if you ask in the other thread. :)

Xev,

I'm God, you know

Whoa,

In another thread you determined that Monica Lewinski is god. Are you Monica? ;)

Mr.G:
And if I have the same demonstrable "special talent" as y'all claim to have, what does that say about the "specialness" of y'all's claim to being "special"?

Who of us said to be *special*?
We only said WE COULD USEOUR PSYCHIC POWERS...

We didn't tell you that we are special...
Just friggin' train it if ya can.
You have 'em 2 ya know...

Sure, some psychics thinks it are gifts, but it's just a thing you are born whit, and whit luck, naturally enabled.

Just stop being naive and learn to do it for yourself...
Remember that science is on it's way whit psychic abilities...
Like I friggin said once...
go to PsiPog *www.psipog.org* (http://www.psipog.org) and swing by the LPSC section.
And try soms mind-training site's...

JUST FRIGGIN' DO IT and don't ask me for prove, I am just redirecting ya...

Greetz

Just friggin' train it if ya can.

I would much prefer to train my mind to think. After all, that is it's one true purpose and the extent of it's ability.

Try training your mind to think. You'll soon discover it takes up all of your time. ;)

Bebelina:
Sure, if you can reveal what your "publicly demonstrable, functional talent " is.....

To lead others to neglect their powers, all in the name of "rationalism" and "thinking". These so-called skeptics spend all their time "thinking" and waste their lives and lose their chance to experience the mystical.

Q:
I would much prefer to train my mind to think. After all, that is it's one true purpose and the extent of it's ability.

Your mind's true purpose is to find and serve God! Your athiestic "reason" will leave you cold and purposeless!

"Reason" leads to rejection of the TRUTH and to being ensnared by evil forces!

Try training your mind to think. You'll soon discover it takes up all of your time.

It does. It is better to find the TRUTH than to "think".

Your mind's true purpose is to find and serve God! Your athiestic "reason" will leave you cold and purposeless!

"Reason" leads to rejection of the TRUTH and to being ensnared by evil forces!

Where do I search for God ? Where is he ? I've searched my whole life to find Mother Goose, but to no avail. Right now my purpose is to sip an ice cold Margarita in the blazing sun. My "reasoning" in this case is flawless. ;)

One thing is true, the 'evil forces' of tequila are ensnaring me. btw - I'm running out of strawberries. :D

It does. It is better to find the TRUTH than to "think".
Ah so by not thinking ill find the truth. That makes sense.
*note use of sarcasm*

Well, it's not all jibberish you know. It's not that easy to give up the thought, and "think" with the heart instead, that takes training too.
Just try yourself for a while, meditate on not thinking, empty the mind, and see what happens, can you do that?
Ensnared...what a word. :D

Psy-learner,

We didn't tell you that we are special...
No, but y'all sure as hell intimate that you are special. Specially comedic, as it turns out.

...like Just friggin' train it if ya can. You have 'em 2 ya know...
Well, I have 2 of 'em. You're still looking.

...gifts, ...you are born whit,...naturally enabled.
Yes. But, what about yours?

Just stop being naive...
You, first.

...and learn to do it for yourself...
You don't need two of 'em to do it yourself. ;)

FoxMulder,
...so-called skeptics spend all their time "thinking" and waste their lives and lose their chance to experience the mystical.
Anyone can do "mystical". "Mystical" is pedestrian thinking. Skepticism requires intelligence. "Mystical" requires only unfettered emotionalism.

It is better to find the TRUTH than to "think".
By your own definiton, that's not much of an insightful thought, is it?

Bebelina,

...empty the mind, and see what happens,...
Lobotomy is the Path to Truth? Right. :rolleyes:

Yes, that's right! Have a lobotomy! :D
No, I don't claim that we will ever discover anything that could be called the truth. There is always more to know, and drawing conclusions too early will only lead to that you will dismiss several clues to what the truth might me.
There is information available beyond the thought. What is the thought really? It is brainpatterns generated in a lump of flesh, right? What generates the brain patterns? What makes the signals reach their destination? Where did the energy that started the whole physical universe come from to begin with?
If you can see beyond that by letting go of thought, then you are welcome to call it lobotmy if you wish, it makes no difference. :)

(Q)...
you make great comedy at the expense of others...
may i try?

maybe you are soo afraid of others being more tallented than you, you are desperate to find a weakness to exploit!
but as you can see the only people who come into your little game
as "Bebelina" has already 'called it'
are those who try to help
inspite of your arrogant and blinkered view of perverted scientifc thinking.
have you ever botherd to study
tesla or einstien?
they are people not fashion logos!
good luck in your search for self absolution!
may you stuble and fall on the foot path of life thus short that
the truck(that you may not be able to see) has 'no chance' to run you over!!!
:D
i wish you great learning :)

moulder you sound far too onto it to be posting in this forum! :D
why talk astro physics to a 4 year old child?
i dont mock you for trying just more so admire you for bothering in a seriouse manner :D

Bebelina your elegance in the face of ??? is as awsome as usual :)

groove on all
ps i hope i dont kill another thread :)
groove

rippleofdeath

(Q)...
you make great comedy at the expense of others

Not really, the comedy is already there for all to see.

may i try?

By all means, your comedy is as good as any others.

maybe you are soo afraid of others being more tallented than you, you are desperate to find a weakness to exploit!

I'm afraid of nothing. Besides, there are many others far more talented than me. No big deal. I exploit the irrational only.

but as you can see the only people who come into your little game
as "Bebelina" has already 'called it'
are those who try to help
inspite of your arrogant and blinkered view of perverted scientifc thinking.

Nice rant. I especially like the insult. I had no idea scientific thought was perverted. I suppose the irrational consider science perverted. That does anwer a few questions for me, thanks. :)

have you ever botherd to study
tesla or einstien?

No, just their works.

they are people not fashion logos!

Not true. I've seen pics of Einstein used for fashion logos plenty of times.

good luck in your search for self absolution!

If I'm to be absolved of anything, it would have to be for putting way too much tequila in the punch bowl this weekend. Everyone was practically swinging from the rafters. It was a madhouse !!

may you stuble and fall on the foot path of life thus short that
the truck(that you may not be able to see) has 'no chance' to run you over!!!

You say the nicest things. They make no sense whatsoever, but they're nice just the same. Thanks. :)

This is a funny thread.

moulder you sound far too onto it to be posting in this forum!
why talk astro physics to a 4 year old child?
i dont mock you for trying just more so admire you for bothering in a seriouse manner

FoxMulder has as much as admitted to being an escaped patient from a mental institution.

perverted scientifc thinking

Oooooh! Perversion and science, two of my favorite things!

Neutrino:

No, I'm not Monica, but while on the subject of perversion.....

Q, comedy is like art, it is often not there until someone points it out to you. Ah, that was cheap. :D I didn't really mean that. Apologies to all artists and comedians.

So the party was nice? I couldn't find Nassau, where is that btw? :o

Speaking about fashion logos, I saw a works by a designer named Watanabe in a magazine the other day, was it...Dave? :eek:

(Q)...?
where is the insult???

i do not know you well enough to insult you!

???maybe??? = question on stereo types of common (?human?)
behaviour.

example of perverted science
where are the laws of philosophy???
e=mc2 is used as a perversion by the masses to answer anything they do not know.
it is not understood by most people
as with human sociological science
now if i asked you what the oppersite to communism is
how many people would be thinking capitalism???

THAT as such is what i mean
the perversion is a defining word not a sexual inuendo!
i do understand that most people are slaves to thier limbic libido
but i dont see that as being a pre requisit to a scientific discusion.
we are more than reproduction!
its just not understood by the masses yet!
and untill then we will not be able to unleash the true power of "science"
and so science in its very nature is thus
"perverted"!
inclusive of the perversion in linguistics/and literature.
that led to the assumtion of the meaning of the word perversion!!!
am i ranting too much
a great word "ranting" it infers psychotic mentality!
i do notice these things!!!
maybe we could start a new thread
"the worst insult without swear words"!
that would be art!
:)

groove on all :)

ripple

example of perverted science
where are the laws of philosophy???

Are you referring to the two competeing theories within Metaphysics; the Regularity Theory and the Necessitarian Theory under the Laws of Nature ?

e=mc2 is used as a perversion by the masses to answer anything they do not know.
it is not understood by most people

That's the problem, more people should take the time to try and understand what it means. In it's most basic form, it simply means that mass can be converted to energy and vice-versa. How is that considered a perversion of science ?

as with human sociological science
now if i asked you what the oppersite to communism is
how many people would be thinking capitalism???

You may be right there, but the distinction is a fine line. Communism is a form of government, therefore it's opposite should also be a form of government; democracy. But communism also takes into account the concept of economical state ownership, hence the tie in to capitalism which is based on economical private ownership.

THAT as such is what i mean
the perversion is a defining word not a sexual inuendo!
i do understand that most people are slaves to thier limbic libido
but i dont see that as being a pre requisit to a scientific discusion.
we are more than reproduction!
its just not understood by the masses yet!

Don't worry, you're use of the word 'perversion' did not leave me with visions of Bebelina and Xev undulating naked with each other atop a giant penis (although that vision IS burned into my mind :D )

and untill then we will not be able to unleash the true power of "science"
and so science in its very nature is thus
"perverted"!
inclusive of the perversion in linguistics/and literature.
that led to the assumtion of the meaning of the word perversion!!!

What do you mean, 'not able to unleash the true power of science?' If you mean that in the sense that the masses don't completely understand science, then it is the fault of the masses, not science. Wouldn't the burden of perversion then rest on the masses ?

am i ranting too much
a great word "ranting" it infers psychotic mentality!
i do notice these things!!!

Ranting is ranting, I'm not sure if there is a measurement for "rant magnitude." ;)

maybe we could start a new thread
"the worst insult without swear words"!
that would be art!

Good idea, however, I did at one time start a "Flame Me" thread. Perhaps you may want to find it and add your thoughts.

Bebelost

So the party was nice? I couldn't find Nassau, where is that btw?

The Bahamas. You missed a great party, btw. Everyone was anticipating your astral arrival. We had a betting pool set up for which outfit you'd be wearing from your website. I thought you might be naked since I didn't think you could astral project your clothes as well.

Originally posted by Xev

Oooooh! Perversion and science, two of my favorite things!


Come here, you leather-clad wench and...fill my beakers.

Bahamas...nice. And no clothes, that's right.

Originally posted by Bebelina
And no clothes, that's right.

:eek: *Adam is bowled over by the thought* :eek:

Astral projection has its benefits you know.

i do understand that most people are slaves to thier limbic libido
but i dont see that as being a pre requisit to a scientific discusion.

WOW! Perversion as a pre-requisite to scientific discussion. I like this thread very much.

Don't worry, you're use of the word 'perversion' did not leave me with visions of Bebelina and Xev undulating naked with each other atop a giant penis (although that vision IS burned into my mind

Don't make me hurt you, Q. You wouldn't like that.

Although Northie might.

I totally missed that. Q, please remove that image from your mind.

I totally missed that. Q, please remove that image from your mind.

You know you want me. :p

Bebelovely

And no clothes, that's right.

I totally missed that. Q, please remove that image from your mind.

Only if you astral project yourself over here and replace the image with another more interesting image. I could fill my pool with whipping cream and strawberries if you like. :D

heyya all
well i myself see no need to try to imagine a lesbian sex scene for personal plesure because i am not a lesbian!!!
hhhhmmmmm
which way is this thread being pulled?
or is that pushed?

(Q)... i must say, i am nothing short of 'astonished' at your brash
lude reference to your sexual problems on this board!
it seems you did not like your mother!
oh dear how sad for your x girlfriend!
but im sure you get what you pay for these days!
except love of coarse!
:D ((not to mention the abhorent thought of you having a wife and kids as victim or party to such laguage and psyche))

im almost turning to the dark side if i was not so sure of being correct!
:D
or you could be a women... "undulating" is rahter left brain for a sexualy disfunctional male!
in which case i "pity" your mother!
:D
ok...OK OK!
ENOUGH FREE COUNSELLING FOR YOU!
:D

back to topic!

i said>
e=mc2 is used as a perversion by the masses to answer anything they do not know.
it is not understood by most people

you said in reply>
That's the problem, more people should take the time to try and understand what it means. In it's most basic form, it simply means that mass can be converted to energy and vice-versa. How is that considered a perversion of science ?
-----------------------------------------------------
you are looking at the issue (i think)
from a student of science believing all that is taught as law in a college/university(extension to highschool)
e=mc2 is actualy used as a mental block!!!!!!!!!!!
people dont use it as would a gene in genetic engineering.
just like the-
tree falling in the woods (unseen)
would it make a sound?
THIS, is also a perversion of science in its nature of limiting of the required progresive thought to then proceed to the next stage!
BUT there is a limit to how much i will bang my head against the wall!
"rare blood type , you see;"
ahhhhhhhhh
the retarded english language that makes it almost impossible for me to accentuate on an upward tone at the end of a sentence.

not that i know any onthers :o
SOoo...
QUOTE... (again)
by (Q)...
"it simply means that mass can be converted to energy and vice-versa"
This in its very nature means that there is infact....
a law of philosophy!
i do not have the typing speed or the arrogance to assume people would read the legth of such a post to explain this!
but if you pay for your air ticket and my coffee then you got a deal!
-and if your in a hurry a few hits of speed
:D

peace... love... and missery to all greed merchants.
:)

ok...OK OK!
ENOUGH FREE COUNSELLING FOR YOU!

Don't you mean 'enough insults?'

i do not have the typing speed or the arrogance to assume people would read the legth of such a post to explain this!
but if you pay for your air ticket and my coffee then you got a deal!
-and if your in a hurry a few hits of speed

Why, so you can insult me face to face ?

If half your posts starts out with puerile, playground insults, why would you expect me to enter into conversation with you and debate the topic at hand ? Try again.

ripleofdeath:

"well i myself see no need to try to imagine a lesbian sex scene for personal plesure because i am not a lesbian!!!"

THANK YOU JESUS!

"hhhhmmmmm
which way is this thread being pulled?
or is that pushed?"

I think it might get pushed in a rather interesting direction. So far, we have lesbian sex scenes, Bebelina in a pool of whipped cream, and Xev with leather corset and bullwhip.

This is rather like flipping through the porn options on my cable! What's next, I wonder?

*Wander off to order a pizza* :p

Oh, and before I let my mind wander - or drag the pizza boy inside after introducing my female neighbor who came over to use the shower -

Riple, you're not half the man, and never will be even a third of the man that our Q is. Sod off.

Ok, that's enough!

Ripleofdeath is not insulting anyone here. You have to read his posts a little better and try to understand that not evrybody uses the same vocabulary as you do.

Over with nagging and complaining. I see no real insults here. It is more your imagination. Pay a little more attention to what actually is posted by Ripleofdeath and try to see it the way he wrote/meant it.

Riple, you're not half the man, and never will be even a third of the man that our Q is. Sod off.


Now, that is an insult. Quit it please. Thank you!

No need to go further into this. I mean it and do not wish to see another thread turning into trash!

You know the consequenses...

Banshee

Ripleofdeath is not insulting anyone here.

You're the last one anyone would expect to know the difference. :rolleyes:

I don't want to be picky here, but fair should be fair and this... "i must say, i am nothing short of 'astonished' at your brash
lude reference to your sexual problems on this board!
it seems you did not like your mother!
oh dear how sad for your x girlfriend!
but im sure you get what you pay for these days!
except love of coarse!" ...I would at least interpret as an insult.

Well, I predicted it would get nasty, so there you go Mr.G.. :D
Is he still with us?

Bebelucid

Thank you, M'Lady. Your support is appreciated. :)

Originally posted by Xev
I think it might get pushed in a rather interesting direction. So far, we have lesbian sex scenes, Bebelina in a pool of whipped cream, and Xev with leather corset and bullwhip.


You forgot the beakers.

*pout* :(

Northie: Quit whining, b-


*Sniffles*

Banshee's gonna censor that. I won't even bother typing the 'itch'

Banshee:
Now, that is an insult. Quit it please. Thank you!

No, it is a statement of fact. Ripleofdeath insulted the Q. I stated that he was not half the man - nor even a third of the man - that Q is.

If implying that somone has to pay for sex, and telling them that they had "sexual dysfunctions" is not an insult, what is?

This is actually also an insult: "I stated that he was not half the man - nor even a third of the man - that Q is. "
One insult does not justify another.

Once again, I make the inarguable point that no one here is so parapsychically adroit as to forecast that I would appear at this time to admonish all thread participants to <cough> stay on-topic.

heyya all :)

LOL :)

what a crazzy world this is!

Mr.G... thank you for making a point which i may have over lusterd with scientific relative off shoots...

mother = freud-ian thought
all that we do is only in the past = x girlfriend

sexual problems = "why start talkng about sexual acts that you
'say' you are imagining with these people"?

it is painting a picture for all the others to see!!!

why are you talking like this on this thread???

Xev... surely you don't think for a second that i am interested in
gaining your aproval or even more outragouse 'sexual desire'???

as banshee said...
why not go to a forum for people who want to talk sexualy and
"all that stuff"
this is a scientific forum
not a school playground
GROW UP
or are you intensionally trying to "TROLL"/DESTROY
this thread???

it certainly seems so!!!
you just did not seem to see past your pride and ego and sexual
gratification. (my perception...of coarse)

THIS IS MY INTERPRETATION FROM THE WAY YOU HAVE DE-STABILISED THIS THREAD AND THEN TARGETED ME!

who said i am a man???
this comment makes me think you are expecting all men to want you "in a lustful only for sex way"
too sad
please use another thread that is labbeled
"sexual fanatasy by text"
and i will be sure not to bother you in it!!!

peace love and well you know the rest.. well i at least hope so.
(Q) my offer is retracted!
i was mistaken!

Mr.G i am sorry your thread has gone down the "toilet"
:(
im out-ta here!

Originally posted by Mr. G
Once again, I make the inarguable point that no one here is so parapsychically adroit as to forecast that I would appear at this time to admonish all thread participants to <cough> stay on-topic.

But I did, that's why I mentioned your name.

...as banshee said...why not go to a forum for people who want to talk sexualy and "all that stuff" this is a scientific forum not a school playground
Hahaha. Hehe. As if Banshee is an authority on anything actually scientific. :rolleyes:
I guess that's why she only moderates pseudo- and para-type fora....a differerent kind of authority from knowing "scientific". :D

We return you now to the regular playground programming. ;)

Are you saying that parapsychology isn't a scientific genre? Because it is.

Originally posted by Mr. G

Hahaha. Hehe. As if Banshee is an authority on anything actually scientific. :rolleyes:
I guess that's why she only moderates pseudo- and para-type fora....a differerent kind of authority from knowing "scientific". :D

Well, I'm a graduate with top marks from the RAN Surface Warfare School, and now a comptuer engineering student. I have all sorts of qualifications and such. Yet I moderate nothing. The point here being that what Banshee moderates here at sciforums has no bearing whatsoever on her qualifications for anything. Note that Computer Science is not moderated by Porfiry, instead he moderates Free Thoughts. Does this mean Porfiry is a hippy wannabe who knows nothing about computers? So, yes, the point is that moderating Parapsychology does not make Banshee silly.

*Adam puts away his suit of armour and goes back to being a bastard...*

*Xev drops an icecube down Adam's suit of armour and giggles as he tries to get it out*

Mr. G
Senior Member

Registered: Oct 2001
Location: S. Floriduh
Posts: 752

quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
...as banshee said...why not go to a forum for people who want to talk sexualy and "all that stuff" this is a scientific forum not a school playground
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Hahaha. Hehe. As if Banshee is an authority on anything actually scientific.
I guess that's why she only moderates pseudo- and para-type fora....a differerent kind of authority from knowing "scientific".

We return you now to the regular playground programming.


__________________
The purpose of the mind, as of the mouth, is to open it in order to close it around something solid. --G. K. Chesterton

Cognite tute
========================================

* AND SO YOU HAVE POSTED IN THIS BOARD FOR WHAT REASON?
TO TRY TO OPPRESS SOMEONE?
TO TRY TO BE-LITTLE SOMEONE?
TO TRY TO "SELF ADMONISH THINE SINNS OF SOUL" TO MAINTAIN YOUR CONTRADICTORY ILLUSION OF SELF??????????????????????????????????????

i gotta ask!
why are you here?
on this site under this thread, insulting... of all people...
THE MODERATOR!
you got a weird sense of what you call learning...
maybe you seek to maintain your ignorance???
or just spread bad feelings???
please i do wish... that you prove my interpretation, "wrong"

:(

peace, love, and chocolates from above :)

why are you here? on this site under this thread, insulting... of all people...THE MODERATOR!
I was stating fact.

Fact 1: Banshee has no formal scientific training, no scientific-related work experience: "...Banshee is (not) an authority on anything actually scientific"
Fact 2: Banshee "only moderates pseudo- and para-type fora"--i.e.: not Physics & Math, Astronomy, Biology/Genetics, Earth Science, Human Science, etc.
Fact 3: Banshee's granted authority as a forum moderator is "a differerent kind of authority from...scientific" (authoritativeness).

Each of those facts, alone or taken together, serves to impeach your claim that this (or the other forum) is a "scientific" forum. Such facts do not mitigate your claim to being a forum moderator, nor your ability to control forum content as you see fit. The facts say nothing about your right to be a moderator, nor about your moderator performance. So, what you are probably feeling insulted by is the indirect expression of general disrespect for your claims to scientific "authoritay". ;)

heyya all :)

Mr. G...
LOL :D
i like south park aswell :)

but and it kinda seems like a big but...
you said...
Fact 2: Banshee "only moderates pseudo- and para-type fora"--i.e.: not Physics & Math, Astronomy, Biology/Genetics, Earth Science, Human Science, etc.
========
may i draw your attention to the concept of human!...
and in specific reference to parapsychology, psychology, psyciatry,

please explain why you use materialistic values and systems to judge things that are soo far removed from such constricted theory???

i would hope...oh soo much... that you would not profess to being a christian scientist!!!
for this would realy be an oxymoron!!!
or does the word sceptic mean to dismiss all things outside your ability to understand them?

+as long as you consider a fact to be so, you will no longer think of the possibilities of what it may be+
summational quote from my buddy albert E.

this concept of einstiens' outlines the nature of perversaty in modern/conservative science!!!
do you subcribe to this doctrine of arrogant dissmissal to all things boxed for the idiot masses to sprinkle on cornflakes and
allude to in awkward moments in lifts???
:D
please explain the scientific method you have used to conclude that Banshee is not an authority on these matters???
considering you have stated you do not believe in them are you not killing the cow to get the milk then complaining of long grass and no fuel???
Quote...again
"I was stating fact. "
parapsychology does not limit its self by the simple minded constraints of materialistic doctrination.

please expand...

:)

ripleofdeath;

Hmmm, how embarrassing. You may have suspected that I thought I was responding to a Banshee edit of my post (I was) because I was speaking to her, but having reread the post and noticing your handle, now I see I should have been responding to you and merely talking about her.

But, it does help me to answer your question:
...why...use materialistic values and systems to judge things that are soo far removed from such constricted theory???
Just as I misread your post, seeing what I expected to see and not what was actually there, a person willing/desiring to entertain any fanciful thought as if it were reality (e.g.: Unicorns exist but long ago they were taken away into space by aliens) also is capable of seeing only what they expect to see and not what is actually there (or not, as the case may be).

So, any person has to take some pause before concluding that what they think is real actually is real. And there you go. Suddenly there is "constriction" of thought because there is value to having confidence that you really are seeing reality and not just your fancy.

heyya all :)

Mr G
post of the nature of number 4
i must tell i do adore.
without perverse aplication

to treat all life as this in manner
may be chocolate to the nation :)

peace

:)