this new film is called 'Loose Change' you can see it here http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8260059923762628848&q=loose www.loosechange911.com unfortuneately i cannot see the video -system-limitations-, but would be interested from tose that can what your reviews are
hhmmmmwell.. it got ignored in te films forum, which is why i put it here oo....shit if I had accses to seeing video i'd be on it like YESTER day
it is from a group called "reopen911.org" its ok, mostly just criticizes the official story of what happened, with things we have all already heard. weird that you post that, i watched it for the first time 2 days ago Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image! :m:
I have seen the film; I like the film a lot and recommend it to any person who appreciates documentaries that take every effort (within all difficulties) to collect and present information based on facts. It is focused on presenting links between the events of 9/11 and the establishment. The viewer would ultimately have to make his or her own mind. The 9/11 issue will linger for generations to come, and hopefully somewhere in the future the realities and truth will be known. However, for those individuals, those are tired with the subject, and believe everything that the establishment tells them. It is not a recommended viewing; in fact it will be a total waste of time to them.
what i meant, i suppose is that in the realm of critical thinking, it is hardly groundbreaking. duendy, i would recommend watching it. you would probably enjoy it (or be enraged by it rather) like i did. mostly what i took away from the film were physics facts about the towers falling naturally being an impossibility.
thats what the video does: consults only first hand accounts, along with explanations on how the physics of the buildings falling that quickly just dont add up.
You said it! ...Yours and the establishment too. Right? What witnesses? The ones that made it out in time, the ones on the street? The ones on the helicopters, the ones that don’t get answers? The official 9/11 report is nothing more then a dossier of presumptions, possibilities and misleads. Basically just another theory! The Clinton impeachment was more costly to the tax payers then the 9/11 investigations.
okay people lets say that the events of 9/11 was an inside job the buildings were brought down by explosives now the question is why lets hear it
Why? Let's see. Hmmm. How about consolidation of power and money? Simple answer. Now, how about a simple question back at you. Consolidation of power and money for who?
a MASSIVE staged event--truly American Hollywood styleglitze as only the American mindset would choose to do--in heart of NYC, and crystal clar morn so as to....CREATE AN 'ENEMY' OFTHE PEOPLE. cant you debubnkers fukin SEE this? take your blindfolds off, and yer ear plugs out. aree yo even aware tat your freedoms--what you HAD as 'freedom', hah--are all going down the toilet??
No! my mouth is not that big., and by the looks of things you must have lots and lots of money. I can’t compete! No one is forcing you to argue with anyone. If you are certain to have the facts, then why are you wasting your time in this thread?? Perhaps because you’re not mentally stable, I mean that you may be having deep insight thoughts and doubts? is that why? Otherwise I don’t understand you well.
the buildings hit the ground after the start of collapse at near freefall speed. now, if the theory that fire weakened the steel is true, then every single floor on the way down (96 stories on one of them) would have caused a delay, as matter cannot occupy the same space as matter. the floors would have buckled, and the collapsing would stop for half a second or less. now, because there were so many floors between the top and the ground, the fall should have taken several minutes, NOT 10 seconds. freefall speed puts the fall at 8.6 seconds. if we are all such idiots, why dont you explain how 96 floors of "softened" steel only slows a freefall by 1.4 seconds? 'nuff said.
A note; The documentary starts with a flyby the statue of liberty with the twin towers on the background. It begging’s with the unclassified document of March 13 1962, called the Northwoods project. For many years this was referred to as “The Northwoods conspiracy”. In the 60’s and the 70’s you could get into serious trouble if you published or openly talk about it. If you did, you were labeled communist, or even worse, a Cuban spy. That document (like many other documents not currently qualified for declassification) shows how our government can withhold plans and evaluations of killing innocent people, under the excuse of “state security” from the eyes of its citizens, from the eyes of those that elect them, from the eyes of those that trust them and pay their wealthy lives. It is a memorandum for the secretary of defense with the subject; Justification for US military Intervention in Cuba. It goes on with “description of pretexts which would provide justification for US military intervention in Cuba”. It goes later with a December 1st, 1984 successful remote control of a Boing 726 that stayed on air for more then 16 hours, accomplishing approaches, landings, and takeoffs. 1999, NORAD had drills of jets as weapons, using as imaginary targets the world trade center and pentagon. There are many more interesting references (that can be independently checked) basically to explore the possibility that as unreal as it may sound. It is something that those in power have contemplated at one time or another with the rationalization that they know what’s better for us cost what ever cost. Once again, it is worth watching!
