"New World Order" "trials" and CIA agents playing the defense lawyers - Ramsey Clark

Discussion in 'World Events' started by MattMarr, Mar 19, 2006.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. MattMarr Banned Banned

    Messages:
    193
    "New World Order" "trials" and CIA agents playing the defense lawyers - the categories

    Let's resume how CIA agents playing the role of "oppositors" and "defenders" of the true oppositors are used in the "New World Order" "trials".
    All illustrated with the ultimate examples.

    Three cases of "New World Order" courts
    There are three cases to consider in the "New World Order" courts:

    1. CIA agents as defense lawyers of the oppositors.
    In this case, from the very start of the trial or after a certain point the illuminati media will only refer to the declarations of the "defense" lawyer

    2. Doubles (actors) playing the role of the oppositors.
    Of course in this case defense lawyers are always CIA agents as well.
    Note that this is the optimal case, since it even allows for TV footage of the "court" appearances of the "oppositors" (i.e. the doubles).

    3. It was not possible to use CIA agents as defense lawyers of the oppositors.

    So in both first categories (1 and 2) the script could be fully implemented, i.e. the public will only hear whatever the mass media serves them as the "defense" case.
    But a category 3 case means that the script could not be fully implemented.

    How CIA agents are used

    The illuminati use agents that the illuminati media sold previously as "oppositors" or even "defenders" of the true oppositors.
    The goal depends of in which of the three cases they are used:
    - case 1: to make credible that the oppositor (his supposed "client") really did those statements;
    - case 2: to make credible that the double used to impersonate the oppositor is real;
    - case 3: to achieve the same goal as in case 1, by continuing to use association techniques.
    So the illuminati media will continue to use the names of these CIA agents as "defenders", no matter what.

    The ultimate examples - the trials

    For case 1, see the "trial" of Timothy McVeigh and the Reichstag fire staged as OKC bombings, in the US.
    For case 2, see the "trial" of "Saddam Hussein" (i.e. the double playing the role of Saddam Hussein) in "Baghdad", ongoing.
    For case 3, see the "trial" of Slobodan Milosevic at the Hague, until 2006. Milosevic was aware it was vital to defend himself and refuse any defense lawyers the court tried to impose him. The attempts failed because considering his support in Serbia and Russia it would be too dangerous to sell the big lie that Milosevic did accept a defense lawyer.

    The ultimate example - the CIA agent Ramsey Clark
    Check how agent Ramsey Clark is used simultaneously in a case 2 (Saddam Hussein) and case 3 (to coverup the murder of Slobodan Milosevic), the day of the funeral of Milosevic and days after the case was closed.
    Notice that failed previous attempts to use Ramsey Clark to turn the "trial" of Slobodan Milosevic into a case 2 illustrate how o the illuminati media will continue to use the names of these CIA agents as "defenders", no matter what.

    --------------------------
    From CNN, 19 March 2006

    Ramsey Clark, a former U.S. attorney general and longtime Milosevic supporter who is now on Saddam Hussein's defense team, was also in the crowd.

    "It is critically important to remember his struggle to preserve Yugoslavia," he told AP. "He became president at a time of greatest crisis. Everyone knew his health was failing but he was not granted proper medical care. Amid the struggle, his heart gave up."

    http://www.cnn.com/2006/WORLD/europe/03/19/milosevic.funeral/index.html
     
  2. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. Light Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,258
    Mostly just more garbage - direct from a garbage source. Yuck! :bugeye:
     
  4. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. Communist Hamster Cricetulus griseus leninus Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,026
    Yes, MattMarr has lost his touch. this just isn't mad enough, not like "Hospitals kill old people" and "the Asian Tsunami saved us from nukular war"
     
  6. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page