Rape happens all the time unfortunately, but I wonder why this made news? As unbiased as journalism pretends to be, I believe articles try to reflect or emphasize some sort of moral value......or some sort of 'exception quality' which makes the tidbit special. There's really not a whole lot to say here. A rapist raped a bunch of people, and finally got caught. Is it any reflection on the air force, or even homosexuality? Does this mean the air force/homosexuals run rampant with boogeymen? Is the message of the tibit to display justice in action? Is this supposed to be a freak show?
Just plain ol' sensationalism, that's all. Something to get people upset and pissed off and angry and ......, so as to keep their minds off of something more important in their shitty little lives (of which they feel so egotistical about!). The news media leads us all around by the fuckin' nose. And some of y'all worry and are hypertense about the government doin' it! ...LOL! Baron Max
Hmm accusing profesional killers for raping colleags... I gues it's something a bit like friendly fire. Yes it's contraproductive and needed to be legally checked. Still it's nice that the amercan military does not discriminate against hiring homosexuals that's very open of them.
So, four people get raped and it's sensationalism, but a few Vietnam protestors act violently and all liberal Democrats are to blame. I see how you are.
Genji was actually originally posting this excitedly, so that isn't the thrust of it. This isn't an anti-Bush/conservative thing. Anyway, this guy is a malicious bastard that needs to be dealt with.
There is a misunderstanding of what an armed force is for. We simply can not leave our troops over there. To do so is to create the absolute best way of misusing a military force. As by definition "Force" is weakened over time. And antagonism is created. Thus it fails and creates hostilities. In other words, we will deserve anything they do to us as we will have created it. This is something we teach or children at school. "He hit me so I hit him back, so he hit me and I hit him back..." We know this goes nowhere as both sides get destroyed. I am not hear to educate people on how to manage an army. But if you wish to understand this, I invite you to get a good dictionary and define the following words: Note: As many dictionaries contain poor definitions, I will provide the applicable definitions. If you wish you may look for these so as not to find the wrong definition and think you now understand it. Force - The application of motion, communication or power to create a direct and immediate effect. Overwhelm - A surrendering of will to that of another due to the belief that too much force was received. Military - The armed force of any group used to overwhelm an opponent for defensive or offencive purposes. Antagonism - The creation of hostilities by converting anything received into a destructive force that is directed back at the sender. Intelligence - Military definition - The awareness of enemy forces, plans, recourses and efforts and how this is disrupted. This is also a senior branch of any successful military.
Extremely brave. American society is very backward and infected with religion that teaches and encourages shaming. The repeated homo incidents coming out of the big, brave, macho, gayfree US military is rapidly climbing. I'll wager that for every case reported 25 go unreported. I guess it's good gays aren't allowed in the military!!!
Genji: What does it say of your sexual orientation when the majority of these gay men are shown to be sexual deviants?
I don't think they are gay. This is hetero superiors shaming the young through homosexual acts. Recall Abu Ghraib?? How better can you beat down a man, gay or not, than by sexually humiliating him? Women have suffered at the hands of hetero men doing this to them for centuries. If any are gay they don't represent all of us, just as a serial hetero rapist doesn't represent all breeders. Recent news from Russia was army recruits are forced into prostitution by THEIR superiors for money. Who is the bad guy here? Straight Superiors.
Of Course. Forcing someone into sexual acts is a pathological behavior regardless of orientation. Consenting adults engaging in sex is not the same as a superior in a confined environment using sex to degrade those below him as at Abu Ghraib and all these incidents popping up in the US. If you think a closeted gay soldier would enjoy being raped in front of his company would be a turn on of some kind you have a patho problem as well. Like when straight men say women that suffered rape "enjoyed it."
Yes. But mostly the taboo associated with being forced to perform a homo sex act. What else could be more demeaning to a young breeder than to be forced into something homosexual to the amusement of someone else? If a pack of straight guys sought me out at a bar or something and knew I was gay and forced me to have sex with a woman to amuse them I'd feel demeaned, raped, humiliated and helpless. Precisely what it's meant to do.
