no, I am not talking about a multiverse, or Kalabe Yao shapes of curled up dimensions. i am talking about pants.

is it just me or do we need a better system of denoting the sizes of cloths? I am a very tall person (6'10" if you didn't know) and it is nearly impossible for me to find cloths in stores. however, ordering from magazines or ebay is a shitty option because there are more than 2 dimensions that determine how wearable pants are. saying 36/38 does not really help me find cloths I like.

I think we need to force cloths makers (or sellers) to provide more dimensions when selling through a non-local medium. waist size and inseem are obviously needed, but I propose other dimensions. such as total length, taper of the legs, width of the leg opening, with of leg at thy. perhaps more dimension I cannot think of at the moment.

and don't tell me to go to a big and tall shop. I should sue those bastards for false advertising. they have little to nothing that will fit me because the term "big and tall" really just means "fat".

we, as consumers, must demand that the internet be shopper friendly. I for one am about to go bitch some ebay sellers out for only listing 36/38.

thanks for listening to my rant =]

"I got a fever - and the only cure, is more dimension!"

Sorry. Can't you contact ebay sellers and ask for more details?

yes, but what about other stores, and magazines! we need a new standard for the Internet generation. 37/38 is not good enough when you can't try the pants on.

I agree completely. I usually wear pants 34/34, but sometimes the inseam is too high, or the legs are too thin, and I usually have to try on several pairs within the size range of 34/34 until I find a pair I like.