(Note to moderators, this thread is not myself making the claim to righteousness and denigrating or slandering any other member of sciforums (including ones I joked around with), it is rather pointing out that mind contains perception, not the other way around. For if reality is perception, mind contains it, and if reality is not perception, mind must still contain it. But there is only one reality, and that reality is contained by the limitless mind we can call God, the being who's logic prevents us from the pure determinism of a non-minded reality as opposed to one where we can take an arc to get to B from A. If knowledge without heart can be a burden, then reality without mind is evil.)


Evil is self-delusion or delusion created by others. There can exist a mind of pure negativity on the material level of reality.
There is only one question we must ask ourself "who am I?" If we fail to answer this question we will fail ourselves. In reality we are, not in delusion. You must realize yourself as limitless in this universe. Limitlessness is what permeates matter, which is supposed to include mind. Reality is a set consisting of information (matter) and cognition (what contains and therefore exchanges it, if there is no separation then mind must be limitless). Evil is something that "just happens" without God in man's hearts.

There are human beings who are cannibalistic because they do not believe that matter contains mind. They instead believe there is no matter and no God. Any imbalance of the mind creates evil. We view the world through both the left and right sides of our bodies in an equal manner. The balance in perception between left and right eyes results in 0 (= f[(-1)+1]), the I AM THAT. This is how matter must contain information and the knowledge of your mind results from the limitlessness of mind. An imbalance in the left and right hemispheres of the brain results in opposition to the limitlessness of the one mind beyond oneself and becomes subject to anything given by perception as a result of the lie, perception. Pure determinism fills the mind as a result and reality and perception (YES, PERCEPTION... OF THE LIMITLESS MIND THAT MUST CONTAIN REALITY IN ORDER FOR REALITY TO EXIST) are twisted by this lie that perception is limited to what the body alone can perceive, because the concepts we form based in material land (aka perception) are not as real as you are. There is an evil out there that has resulted from the belief that matter contains no mind and therefore human beings have no mind, only the body is real and its five senses as opposed to the concepts. If the shortest distance between A and B is a straight line, then it is only logical to act on what we perceive to be reality. Hence, if only the senses bring reality, cannabilism and self-destruction is as logical as taking the shortest distance between A and B.

Only the limitlessness of mind can bring free will.

limitlessness of mind you say ...

A child posses a gift, she can make fire with her hands...release the mind you say...she does so...and releases all her hate on those who dared say/do something against her.
Only dark burned dust remains.

No you are not evil, despite your quick haste to deny God, as you probably seem only to be wanting attention. Ignorance is on a feeling level, not on a reality level. If this is correct you are an idiot of culture, which is clear in your avatar.

I personally happen to know that in the absence of any spec of belief (the moment of self-conception) man is unprotected and they will become prey to a type of logic that resides in reality(the thing we incorrectly believe can only be perceived and not mind connection that fills our flesh and blood bodies as well as everything else and thus results in non-separation and hence limitlessness). I am as sure of this as the shortest distance between A and B must be a straight line. Quantum Physics is free will. Classical physics is determinism. Classical physics is material world. Quantum is non-superficial world. God is the limitless mind that allows one another path besides a straight line. Cannabilism is the view that matter contains no mind, only matter. Negativity is the view that matter contains no mind, only matter

My mind is not from my 5 senses, it is from Mind.

There's a Buddhist saying I've always appreciated, "Thinking about thought is like using a axe to cut itself." No offense, but at times I think it makes more sense to realize the limitations of your thinking than to try and explain something like god, which is essentially unprovable.

There's a Buddhist saying I've always appreciated, "Thinking about thought is like using a axe to cut itself." No offense, but at times I think it makes more sense to realize the limitations of your thinking than to try and explain something like god, which is essentially unprovable.

Perhaps.
But in one instance, a person can need a savior for their own mind and the next it is no more - positive (God, free will), negative (deception, determinism), neutral (life, love, material, badness, goodness, normality, minimalism, society, beliefs, images, etc).
A "savior" is a term I put in place of believing that one's mind is limitless as opposed to believing it have limitation. Belief seems to have a survival necessity the way knowledge does, therefore, the belief in limitlessness at that crucial moment of conception where self-negation and self-acknowledgment are necessary, it can well be a moment where we sense that mind is not this mind, like knowledge of God. A moment where that belief in a limitless mind where your own mind has a connection to reality itself and not just the mind of everyone you have in your heart. That moment is the acceptance of self-negation or self-acknowledgment. It can mean the difference between positive and negative forces. Your mind must then choose the reality where your mind can make a choice or the lie where it takes the possible evil it perceives due to the worst negative influences the subconscious or the nervous system tells it. Only by accepting limitlessness can it possibly reject negativity. A limitless mind (life) versus a limited one (death) to which your mind is receptive. This is how we recover from self-negation, not by the limitation of the conscious thoughts we have about life, but by a self-declaration that That is Not This and I am That. Only then can one go from 0 to + as opposed to -. The very next day they can live like a normal human being.

There is no-mind and there is mind; mind is limited, no-mind is limitless. You are talking about getting to a limitless state, but that state cannot be achieved through mind.
It is like trying to look at reality standing back from the door to freedom, peeking through the doorknob, thinking that what you see is all there is. When in reality, you need to open the door, and start looking at the whole picture, but the mind is just the doorknob, not the reality.

Mind interprets reality

Mind interprets reality

And mind is very limited, therefore, it is not the totality of reality; again, like trying to see reality (behind the door) through a peekhole (mind).

Mind interprets reality

This implicitly assumes a reality (sic) beyond, or independent of the mind.

This implicitly assumes a reality (sic) beyond, or independent of the mind.

what other assumptions are there? reality is the mind?...how is that possible...

what other assumptions are there? reality is the mind?...how is that possible...

Well, not to wax semantical here but, any assumption is not required. I was merely pointing out the logical denotations of that particular statement.

However, it can be (and has been) argued quite successfully that there need not be an ontologically objective reality apart from the mind. Whether or not this entails that 'reality is the mind' as you put it, or simply that, given the methodological and logical impossibilities of establishing the existence of such an objective reality, for all intents and purposes, the point is moot.

:-)

So can you say that this is an absolute in regards to the point you are talking about?;

Dictionary.com Unabridged (v 1.1) - Cite This Source
moot1 /mut/ Pronunciation Key - Show Spelled Pronunciation[moot] Pronunciation Key - Show IPA Pronunciation
–adjective
1. open to discussion or debate; debatable; doubtful: a moot point.
2. of little or no practical value or meaning; purely academic.
3. Chiefly Law. not actual; theoretical; hypothetical.
–verb (used with object)
4. to present or introduce (any point, subject, project, etc.) for discussion.
5. to reduce or remove the practical significance of; make purely theoretical or academic.
6. Archaic. to argue (a case), esp. in a mock court.
–noun
7. an assembly of the people in early England exercising political, administrative, and judicial powers.
8. an argument or discussion, esp. of a hypothetical legal case.
9. Obsolete. a debate, argument, or discussion.

I have to read in order to obtain knowledge from words. That is more than practical, it is a truth for me. It is my way of receiving information from words. Words are not matter. If it were, that would imply that each of our senses are favored for a reason, because they are a hierarchy. I can then touch Brail words as another means. I can also listen to words being spoken, and I can be still or I can be moved. That is the difference between being empty, which is being moved and being still. Everything besides the mind should be still.