View Full Version : Member: Imaplanck and the spread of sex discussions, crossed the line?


draqon
11-20-06, 08:38 PM
Discussing an issue is a normal natural way of life. Thus discussion of particular event as insignificant as it may seem, may pave way to a resolution that might not have been seen as needed in a particular situation.
Has member Imaplanck crossed the line...with the pics featuring women bottoms...recent thread on male and female genital interaction relation...and etc.?

phonetic
11-20-06, 08:45 PM
You don't like women's bottoms, draqon?

draqon
11-20-06, 08:51 PM
You don't like women's bottoms, draqon?

I allocate specific hours of the evening for those moments to cherish women shapes'.

phonetic
11-20-06, 08:56 PM
I allocate specific hours of the evening for those moments to cherish women shapes'. ;)

He did take it a little too far, I suppose, but not so far as to deserve a ban.
People make worse threads all the time.

draqon
11-20-06, 08:58 PM
;)

He did take it a little too far, I suppose, but not so far as to deserve a ban.
People make worse threads all the time.

thats why I myself voted: You, draqon, not a saint yourself :D

Absane
11-20-06, 09:39 PM
I would not say he has "crossed the line." I'm all for free speech. However, I have a hard time grasping "intelligent community" and "cock in pussy" at the same time.

I see no line as far as what we may discussm, but I do see a line between "intelligent" and "cock and pussy." Hence, I vote "yes."

Do we want to be an intelligent community or a community that has general dicussion, mostly dealing with sex?

Absane
11-20-06, 09:41 PM
You don't like women's bottoms, draqon?

"Let's not talk about XYZ."

"So you're gay?"

Typical conversation, online and off :(

redarmy11
11-21-06, 01:45 AM
A better title for this thread would have been: 'Why is draqon so repressed?'

Absane: I'm afraid that not wanting to talk about these things does imply that you, as a man, may indeed be what might be euphemistically termed 'a good listener'. Honey, I think you know what I'm saying.

S.A.M.
11-21-06, 01:50 AM
A better title for this thread would have been: 'Why is draqon so repressed?'

Absane: I'm afraid that not wanting to talk about these things does imply that you, as a man, may indeed be what might be euphemistically termed 'a good listener'. I think you know what I'm saying.


The kind that are "anal retentive" you mean?:p

Sandoz
11-21-06, 02:00 AM
The problem is not talking about sex, it's how.

Talking about sex is great, can't get enough, but if the thread is just "Sex. Discuss." then it's kind of bullshit.

imaplanck.
11-21-06, 04:21 AM
Why has Satrs thread not been taken down? it's cool though.

Anyway I recieved an infraction for the above incident, now I have 4 ! =)

Thanks James R, you are a good good leader and must be worshipped!

imaplanck.
11-21-06, 04:41 AM
What if I WAS TO SAY I MEANT inserting a male chicken into a cats pelt?????

outlandish
11-21-06, 08:19 AM
You don't like women's bottoms, draqon?

don't make me pull out that FCITA link again.

Absane
11-21-06, 10:09 AM
Absane: I'm afraid that not wanting to talk about these things does imply that you, as a man, may indeed be what might be euphemistically termed 'a good listener'. Honey, I think you know what I'm saying.

Lol.

I mean, it could be argued that people that talk only about sex must be trying to ignore their own homosexual tendancies. Much like when there is a screaming child on the plane, you likely are to put on your headphones and turn the music up real loud.

outlandish
11-21-06, 10:11 AM
Lol.

I mean, it could be argued that people that talk only about sex must be trying to ignore their own homosexual tendancies. Much like when there is a screaming child on the plane, you likely are to put on your headphones and turn the music up real loud.
so let me get this straight, you're saying that if a guy talks a lot about sex that implies that he's gay??

Absane
11-21-06, 10:18 AM
so let me get this straight, you're saying that if a guy talks a lot about sex that implies that he's gay??

No, I was just making a joke.

Originally all I pointed out is that it is erroneous to assume that some people don't want to talk about sex most of the time because they are gay.

imaplanck.
11-21-06, 10:18 AM
Or it could just be that only nerds wish to censor a little harmless banter through fear of getting embarrassed and wetting their pants..

Absane
11-21-06, 10:20 AM
Or it could just be that only nerds wish to censor a little harmless banter through fear of getting embarrassed and wetting their pants..

It's harmless banter that slowly brings a community down. I see it in real life just as much as I see it online.

outlandish
11-21-06, 10:21 AM
It's harmless banter that slowly brings a community down. I see it in real life just as much as I see it online.
god you're so gay.

phonetic
11-21-06, 06:01 PM
http://www.sciforums.com/avatars/avatar23352_37.gif planck's av

Um?

That may be going too far, considering I was banned for posting a pic of a man eating a banana.

imaplanck.
11-21-06, 06:08 PM
Its intended to dude, bye!

phonetic
11-21-06, 06:18 PM
But Why? :(

phonetic
11-21-06, 06:19 PM
And WTF is with this forced lower case?

BUT WHY?

imaplanck.
11-21-06, 06:24 PM
But Why? :(

because Ive been warned and will not obey.
.....................

jimmy will have another confirmed kill so he will be happy

James R
11-21-06, 07:53 PM
imaplanck. has been banned for 7 days for continuing to post pornographic material following several warnings, including adopting a pornographic Avatar.