Hello, Although arxiv blacklisted my name and I can not submit my paper without endorsement (I had 5 paper submitted within the year, I do not need the endorsement acreen according to arxiv policy), I am exciting to say, LONG LIVE ARXIV!! Due to humanbeing's sinfull nature, it is impossible to have mainstream journals to promote science. In the current business times, arxiv is the only way to promote science. The famous example is the math field medalist Grigory Perelman who published his papers only at arxiv. Otherwise his paper might be rejected by sinful journal referees. Arxiv introduced trackbacks. Then we are going to see that those non-crank trash papers will receive little trackbacks. It is easy to trackback. e.g., http://arxiv.org/trackback/astro-ph/0604084 The Accurate Tests of General Relativity Verified Flat Spacetime -- Flat-Spacetime Covariant Gravity, its Quantization and Solar Application ABSTRACT: Only when space is flat does there exist one coordinate system which has direct meaning of distances or angles, and if one coordinate system has direct meaning of distances or angles then the space must be flat. This is the famous Riemann theorem when he pioneered the concept of curved space. General relativity (GR) claims curved spacetime. However, when testing GR with data, all relativists consider Schwarzschild coordinates to have direct meaning of distances or angles. The gravitational wave calculation and the theoretical preparation for the forthcoming Gravity Probe B data play the same trick. Therefore, GR verified flat spacetime where the metric has no geometric meaning at all! For example, on a curved space, the sum of all angles of a triangle is not $\pi $, either greater or less than $\pi $. Two famous general relativity tests are about angles. All mainstream textbooks and papers calculate angles by directly using the coordinate $ \phi $. They indirectly assume the variance range of $\phi $ is 2$\pi $. Therefore, the sum of all angles of a triangle is $\pi $. That is, they assume flat space! All coordinate systems on a curved space are curvilinear. All coordinates are merely parameters. Real angles and distances have to be calculated by employing the coefficients of the space metric. Only when the space is flat will the metric reduce to the Pythagoras theorem. That is, only when the space is flat will the coordinates have direct meaning of spatial distances or angles. Therefore, I present flat-spacetime covariant gravity, its quantization and solar application
You're absolutely correct! None of the sinful referees or otherwise established mathematicians would have allowed anything Perelman did to get into a journal or receive any recognition. They got together in their secret clubhouse and decided the best way to let everyone know that Perelman is a crank is to give him a fields medal (at least try to give him one).
I have bad news for somebody. Special Relativity has flat spacetime. General Relativity has curly spacetime.
from http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/dp5/relativ.htm Einstein’s relativity theory is a central plank of 20th-century science and is commonly said to have passed every experimental test with flying colours. However, there are plausible alternative explanations for all the experimental data and astronomical observations currently cited in support of the special and general theories of relativity, and the internal inconsistencies and unwarranted assumptions of standard relativity theory have been pointed out by dozens of scientists. Pari Spolter writes: ‘Many physicists who believe Einstein’s theory of relativity to be flawed have not been able to get their papers accepted for publication in most scientific journals. Eminent scientists are intimidated and warned that they may spoil their career prospects, if they openly opposed Einstein’s relativity.’1 Distinguished British physicist Dr Louis Essen stated that physicists seem to abandon their critical faculties when considering relativity. He also remarked: ‘Students are told that the theory must be accepted although they cannot expect to understand it. They are encouraged right at the beginning of their careers to forsake science in favor of dogma.’2 William Cantrell identifies several reasons why Einstein’s relativity theory has remained so popular: First, the alternative theories have never been given much attention nor taught at any university. Second, the establishmentarians have invested a lifetime of learning in maintaining the status quo, and they will act to protect their investment. . . . Third, Einstein’s theory, being rather vaguely defined and self-contradictory by its own construction, allows some practitioners to display an aura of elitism and hubris in their ability to manipulate it. There is an exclusive quality to the theory – like a country club, and that is part of its allure. Fourth, to admit a fundamental mistake in such a hyped-up theory would be an embarrassment, not only to the physics community at large, but also to the memory of a man whose portrait hangs in nearly every physics department around the world.3 Some modern theosophical writers are fond of publicizing the fact that Einstein had a copy of Blavatsky’s The Secret Doctrine on his desk.4 Unfortunately, the presence of a Secret Doctrine on one’s desk is not known to confer instant infallibility, even if one actually studies it! G. de Purucker took a more critical stance: ‘The theory of Relativity is founded on unquestionable essentials or points of truth, but the deductions drawn in many cases by many Relativist speculators appear to be mere “brain-mind” constructions or phantasies’.5
