View Full Version : Let's be fair!


nico
09-13-03, 02:49 PM
UN makes new appeal for rich countries to end trade practices hurting poor

Pineapples produced in developing countries
11 September – Adding its voice to Secretary-General Kofi Annan’s plea for a fair agricultural trade deal for the world’s poorest countries, the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) today appealed to rich nations to dismantle tariff barriers and cut subsidies, calling it “vital” for food security in developing countries.

“If trade is to serve as an engine of economic growth and poverty alleviation, countries both in the North as well as the South need to broaden their production base on a fair competitive basis,” FAO Assistant Director-General Hartwig de Haen said in remarks prepared for delivery on the second day of the 5th Ministerial Conference of the World Trade Organization (WTO) in Cancún, Mexico.

“Food and agricultural trade is vital for food security, poverty alleviation and growth,” Mr. de Haen added, noting that food imports contribute to the supply of basic foodstuffs in many of the world’s poorest countries while agricultural exports were an important source of rural income and foreign exchange.

Many poorer countries that rely primarily on agriculture for their economic development will become increasingly dependent on aid, slip deeper into debt and face major food shortages unless they improve their competitiveness in agricultural products both domestically and internationally through investment and fairer trade, FAO warned.

The agency made 12 recommendations in a prepared statement, including tariff de-escalation, effective measures to counter possible negative effects of trade reforms in the least developed and net food importing countries, simplicity in international trade rules and increased support to help developing countries become more competitive in trade.

FAO noted that some 840 million people are chronically undernourished, 800 million of them in developing countries, and more than 70 per cent of the world’s extremely poor and undernourished live in rural areas, with agriculture representing the main source of income for about 2.5 billion people in developing countries alone.

“The markets for temperate zone products and basic food commodities continue to be substantially distorted due to government subsidies and protection, particularly in rich countries. Export subsidies on products exported by developed countries continue,” Mr. de Haen said.

“Enormous untapped agricultural potential exists in developing countries to meet the twin challenges of hunger and poverty. What we need is a renewed focus on effective North-South cooperation so that available resources are used efficiently,” he added.


At the very least the west should give up on it's punishing Argiculitral tariffs. Some countries depend on trade of there agricultural goods to the first world. But with all this subsidies and tariffs the poor. But I sadly don't think that those tariffs will ever go down, simply because the rich are too rich. Globalization of agriculture is the hardest sectoe to reform. So let's be fair and encourage real development not half-measures and aid.

Carnuth
09-13-03, 04:12 PM
whats with the poll? can anyone really say No?

Of course they should be treated fairly, and punishing tariffs be done away with, but how to do it in a way that the rich will agree to? - the rich are the ones holding the cards, how to do it with their consent? is that even possible?

nico
09-13-03, 04:16 PM
Carnuth if you look at the poll you can see that indeed greedy, ultra-capitalist pigs have voted no. The real question is why, explain your worthless selves.

Carnuth
09-13-03, 04:19 PM
ha i didnt cheat and look at the poll first! yeah id like to know why whoever voted no voted as such, possibly they were being ironic or more likely not bothering to read before playing a clown.

SuperFudd
09-13-03, 05:54 PM
Nico,
Your point is clear and maybe even valid as stated in your opening post but the pole question is vapid.
Equal to what? Each other? The fourth world? What?
It is not only yours but many other pole questions on this forum are poorly thought out.

hypewaders
09-13-03, 08:00 PM
The longer rich countries play Marie Antoinette, the more likely they will lose their heads.

nico
09-13-03, 08:21 PM
Obviously against the west, and her massive subsidies (not very capitalistic is it) and even tariffs against other nations. In the era of globalization we still have this stupidity. What pisses me off royaly is when the west tells the 3rd world to reform and change when you see NO action from the former. We have to face facts some countries will never develop, the least we can do is assist them get somewhere. And I yet to hear ppl's NO reasons.