View Full Version : Law of Attraction Can KMA!!!!


lixluke
07-25-07, 01:13 PM
I've been listening to hours upon hours of Esther Hicks's split personality, Abraham talking about Law of Attraction.

LOA means if you think/feel something with great intensity, your thoughts will transmit into the universe, and manifest in reality.

Dwell on really bad stuff, and create strong feelings to go along with it. Doing so is the equivalent of praying in a strong way for really bad stuff without even knowing you are praying. The universe will respond to these thoughts and feelings, and manifest them.

If you dwell and pray in a strong way for good stuff meanwhile engaging in strong feelings of praise and appreciation, the universe will respond by manifesting them.

Screw the universe. The universe can KMA!


Here is some bad stuff about this screwed up concentration camp life that I will dare the universe to manifest more of because I will kick it's ass either way. Idiots claim I am free. No I am not in jail, but despite the fact that I am living as a so called "free person", I would be a total moron to falsely believe that I am not f* incarcerated.

1. Everything costs so f* much.
2. Working long crappy hours in a crappy job that sucks crap just to barely make nothing.
3. Never being able to work in trade according to personal skills.


Things that should be affordable costs too damn much. An abode should not take 30 f* gd* years to pay off. It should not take 15, 10, or even 5 years to pay off. There is no reason an abode should not be so affordable that a working individual can buy one simply by saving up for 2 years or so. And they have the audacity to consider an individual free when it takes 30 years to pay for a bleeding place to live. Being free means owning a place to live is affordable no matter what profession I am employed in. Only an idiot would consider taking 30 years to pay for an abode to be affordable.

A decent transport vehicle necessary because of crappy city design that imposes motor vehicles as a necessity. Being free means I can afford a motor vehicle by saving up my money for a few months. Perhaps a student can work a fulltime summer job, save up, and have enough money to buy a brand new reliable car by the time school starts. If one wishes to opt for something fancier, perhaps save up a little longer. Taking years to pay for a flipping car is not what any intellect would call affordable, and is definitely not freedom.

Ever checked out organic food products? I personally HAVE to eat chemically grown veg-foods because I can no longer afford organic products. As much as I as a supposedly 'free human being' would like to overcome my bad eating habits for the sake of positive self improvement, it is unaffordnable to do so. Even if somebody wanted to change the way they eat, and opt for natural organic products, the costs are astronomical.

Affordable natural health care. Do I have access to affordable natural health care? Do you know how much massages, accupuncture, herbal treatments, healthy suuppliments cost? All medical whether natural or phamaceutical costs an arm and a leg to pay for. Literally for some.

Need I discuss education debt?




Next is the loooooooow pay wages for crap jobs. All jobs have 2 defining characteristics. 1. Importance to institutionalized system. 2. Desirability.

Let's consider a job that is very low in #1, and very high in #2. Acting. If we execute all actors today, will society still function? I believe so. It is negligible in characteristic #1. Is the fun, attention, fulfillment of acting desirable for people? I would say this is one job that is high on the #2 list. Acting is a high dirability low importance job. Yet some actors get paid tons of money.

Let us consider a job that is high in #1, and low in #2. Feild worker. Did you know that Americans hate this job so much that they would take no less than a high salary in order to do it? What is the solution? Raise the wages high enough so that an American will take the job? No1 Hire seasonal farm salves that will do the job dirt cheap. The point is that if a job has high #1 and low #2, people will not do them for crap pay.

If an American was offered the subminimum wage that a farm slave takes in order to do the job, would he do it? Likely not. What if an American was offered minimum wage? Likely not. What if an American was offered $20-$25 to do this undesirable feild work? Things might be a different story.




Next. finding work in my deired trade. Peroming arts. Can I consider my self free if I cannot work in my own field?




It's true. Considering myself free is absurd and obscene. I'm living in a f* gd* concentration camp. I can dwell on it as much as I want. LOA can give me even more of it. I still intend to kick its ass, and get the hell out of it.

original
07-25-07, 01:18 PM
Good day, leech. First, I think tents are cheap and campgrounds are public. You are not forced to live in a home that costs hundreds of thousands of dollars. There are other options. Second, why are you complaining about work? What do you do for a living?

Oh, and I too think that this "Law of Attraction" talk is nonsense. Someone at my job started telling me to thank the universe sincerely for everything good that happens to me, or it will stop doing good things for me. She was also a fan of Dr. Phil and Oprah.

Xpandngreal8y
07-25-07, 01:21 PM
i want to also throw out this caveat that loa almost never results into good turkey sandwiches... but has some nice side effects :D

lixluke
07-25-07, 01:39 PM
Good day, leech. First, I think tents are cheap and campgrounds are public. You are not forced to live in a home that costs hundreds of thousands of dollars. There are other options. Second, why are you complaining about work? What do you do for a living?
Does it matter? No matter what form of work available has the characteristics of crappy, not in my trade, lots of hours for barely any pay. Culminating in a complete inability to live a decent standard of living.

Sure an individual working for a living might reasonably consider himself free. But when the individual is working, and cannot afford a reasonable abode, transport, healthy food, regular physical treatments, education, that is far from making a living. One cannot even afford a decent standard of living, that is not freedom. That is not living off of the fruits of your labor. That is slaving so that the rich oppressors can sit back, and enjoy the fruits of your labor.

Working to make a living means "living". Able to afford an abode, transport, good products, health, being able to save money etc. Not living in a gd* tent. Working to live in a tent is not living. It's called being used as a slave to make a living for the rich and not for yourself. You are working for a living indeed, but not your own.

What makes you think that you know what you are talking about? What is the point you are trying to make by working to live in a bloody tent?

You have absolutely no concept of what a leech is. Get off of this discussion if you cannot participate correctly without making low level intelligence asshole comments.


BTW, I have addressed a bizillion gazillion times the irrelevance of ad-hom in discussions. Refrain from ad-hom statements such as "what do you do?" If you would like to know what people do for a living, save it for a different thread. Ad-hom is NEVER relevant to the facts of the topic. You can tell when individual does not know the concept of logic when some ad-hom inference appears in his response. Discontinue ad-hom, or get lost.

original
07-25-07, 02:06 PM
Sorry, but I call it as I see it. I think I've said before that to me Lix = Leech.

How is the question "what do you do" an ad hominem? How does that detract from this discussion? You're the one talking about wage slaves.

lixluke
07-25-07, 09:32 PM
Sorry, but I call it as I see it. I think I've said before that to me Lix = Leech.

How is the question "what do you do" an ad hominem? How does that detract from this discussion? You're the one talking about wage slaves.
Because I have stated over and over that any characteristic of people in a discussion is totally irrelevant to a discussion. I have proven this over and over. As people what they do, fine, but do it in the proper thread. It cannot be used in this context. You are not arguing the topic, you are arguing a person. People discussing a topic have uterly no relevance to the validity of the information being discussed.

State a point which you have yet not done. Then provide support.

Bells
07-25-07, 09:41 PM
Because I have stated over and over that any characteristic of people in a discussion is totally irrelevant to a discussion. I have proven this over and over. As people what they do, fine, but do it in the proper thread. It cannot be used in this context. You are not arguing the topic, you are arguing a person. People discussing a topic have uterly no relevance to the validity of the information being discussed.



Then don't use yourself as an example.

Sir. Brilliance
07-25-07, 09:48 PM
Why are you whining about being "free" anyway..? your apparent concept of being "free" is that everybody lives a happy life and can afford everything they want etc. etc... if you are just now figuring out that thats not the way it is... and that kind of "freedom" doesn't exist...you have much bigger problems....

superstring01
07-25-07, 10:02 PM
Why are you whining about being "free" anyway..? your apparent concept of being "free" is that everybody lives a happy life and can afford everything they want etc. etc... if you are just now figuring out that thats not the way it is... and that kind of "freedom" doesn't exist...you have much bigger problems....

Wow... I was thinking the same exact thing while reading the post. Damn... you beat me too it!

~String

lixluke
07-26-07, 08:16 AM
Why are you whining about being "free" anyway..? your apparent concept of being "free" is that everybody lives a happy life and can afford everything they want etc. etc... if you are just now figuring out that thats not the way it is... and that kind of "freedom" doesn't exist...you have much bigger problems....
I never said anything about affording everything they want. You do not know how to interpret clear statements. I clearly stated that people cannot afford a minimum standard of living. I never said that everybody should afford EVERYTHING. I said everybody should afford an abode, transportation, natural foods, and other basic necessities for living. Not basic necessities for surviving so that they can continue being a slave.

lixluke
07-26-07, 08:17 AM
Then don't use yourself as an example.
Learn some logic or get lost. I have already proven in many threads that ad-hom is irrelevant to discussion.