I didn't catch it last night, but someone told me that on Larry King with Dick Cheney, that he said instead of Condoleeze Rice running in '08, it's going to be Laura Bush instead. That they want a Bush "dynasty". I don't know if I can take more of the Bush family being in office. Man it started with Reagan/Bush in the early 80's, and it just isn't stopping! Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!uke: - N
From CNN: The odd thing is that this demeans Mrs. Bush. ____________________ Notes: CNN.com. Larry King Live. May 30, 2005. See http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0505/30/lkl.01.html
Clinton would eat her for dinner, get serious. Anyway, the real race is in 2006, not 2008. With enough democratic house members, we could get Bush impeached for going to war on false premises.
I remember accidentally watching FOX the Christmas past, and it was a report on the white house... basically it consisted of Mrs. Bush walking around the house with that retarded smile of hers and showing the press a giant gingerbread house she had "the cooks" make for her. "Great job on being a house wife you lazy bitch." but anyway... her lexicon and vocabulary are so damn bad that I think she would only embarrass herself if she ran for president in 2008, that is if her stupid facial expression doesn’t.
Everyone looks for any possible way to show their's rabid and illogical hate of President Bush. Damn, I think some of you freaks would shoot his dog if you got the chance.
Illogical? Let's see, squandering the budget surplus on tax cuts for the rich, invading a country that didn't attack us, trying to destroy senate filibuster rules and grab total power, letting energy companies write our energy policy then keeping their meetings secret, exploiting Terry Schaivo while letting poor black babies die in Texas for lack of funds, eroding the separation of church and state by giving billions to religious (christian) charities, not sending enough troops to their bogus war, not giving them the armor they need, taking away veterans benefits, sucking up to the gangster Putin, commiting massive voting fraud in 2000 and 2004 in Florida and Ohio... The list of grievances goes on and on, and no, his dog is innocent, but I would do his daughters doggy style.
"sucking up to the gangster Putin" Lets leave putin out of this its obviouse that he is atleast better than russia's last president.
You know, Bush is just a joke to democrats and thinking people. Sadly this last election showed us just what a minority we've become. There are enough crazy republicans and hicks out there to vote her in...and why not? As is Bush isn't a terrible candidate...we've already seen how illogical they can be.
You make the assumption that everyone who voted for Bush must be an ignorant redneck. Now that is arrogance incarnate.
That's right...republicans and hicks. I didn't disclude the upper class fools who voted with Bush. I didn't disclude any republicans as it were. I'm just stating an opinion in saying I think they're all crazy. At the same time, most certainly not discluding non-hicks.
Then I presume that I could say that everyone who does not support Bush is crazy... and be equally right?
People that support Bush are either getting a distorted world view from the lack of real news on TV, cable opinion shows that pretend to be news, conservative radio, or are wealthy people looking out for their own business interests, or cynically exploited sheepish christians.
If the validity of either opinion is what you mean, then you're talking nonsense. Opinions aren't truths or true in any sense as they are beliefs....those beliefs could be tied to facts...but thats a difference scenario.
