He sleeps with young boys, has them around all the time. If they were little girls instead, well, would you think something was wrong? Vote in the MJ poll.

Why is this in the Religion forum? Is it because it follows the Catholic doctrine so closely?

Anyways, Michael Jackson doesn't molest children, he makes love to them.

(He's probably guilty)

no i don't think the religous forum would be right, cesspool makes waaaay more sense

He's probably guilty, but come on, it's michael jackson.
He brought us thriller and the moonwalk.
I think the least we can do is let him fuck the odd kid here and there.
Somethings seriously wrong with the world when big superstars aren't allowed to do whatever they want.
Little known fact; Mamma cass used to love eating babies, everyone knew it at the time, but it was ok because she was mamma cass. If you give that much more to humanity than the average person, surely you can take that much more too. It's only fair.
Chuck berry had a fetish for food torture. He used to tape eggs to the backs of weasels, stick carrots in cracks in rocks and watch hungry donkeys desperately lick and gnaw at the rock for hours, that sort of thing.
This is a felony in the civilised world. But, chuck berry would actually recieve hungry animals as gifts from the president.
Elvis had a thing for smearing his feces on elderly people, you best believe he had free reign to satiate his desires wherever he wanted, whenever he wanted and on whomever he wanted.
He was the king. Are you going to lock up the king for putting his shit on some old geezer? Please, they should be so lucky.
These kids who were fucked by jackson should feel honoured.
Michael jackson's cock has been in THEIR ass.
Oh poor baby :rolleyes: I feel so sorry for you living it up at the neverland ranch, getting free alcohol and having an outlandishly fantastic time most could only dream about at perhaps the funnest address on earth, climaxing with a hot make out session and solid dicking from the great MJ himself.
Are you sure you didn't win some bizarrely awesome radio competition?
No? just extremely lucky huh?
Gee, let me get out my wallet you unfortunate "victim", haha, I mean right?
It's pretty ridiculous.

I am ashamed that this reply is even allowed to exist.

I have no more to say.

I think he was joking, correction i hope he was joking!!!

juss b cos he gave us some crappy hits , doesnt give him a right to molest young kids - that is pathetic !!!

Until the court finds him guilty I don't know and I really don't care. We pay more attention to this crap rather than things that need paying attention to in life. This society has its priorities set wrong and I just hope we can keep an eye on the REAL problems that we face rather than this MEDIA CIRCUS EVENT!

I would say that most of the people who would respond with a solid "guilty", or "not guilty" to this question are entirely unqualified to decide and should leave the answer to those who have seen all the evidence. If they sit around watching the trial all day, they may have received enough information to judge.

no offence but i find that there soooo much publicity over his case very disgusting, thats why i belive this thread deserves to stay in the cesspool.

Although i dont feel ashamed to say that i used to like his Music and i still do, and would continue to...(Thriller was hell of an album)

The poll is missing "I'll assume that he is not guilty until proven otherwise."

umm...yeah...thats a good point.

No I am not...

he did it. simple as that. he must be shot.

he did it. simple as that. he must be shot.

oh really, it's that simple?

please do tell why it's that simple?

because he is strange, so he must have.......

here's why its simple:
he's f***ed up, its obvious that he did it, and i dont want child molesters running around in the world, able to do it again.

true true true. Kill him! Stone him to death, bring back torture...screw justice!

here's why its simple:
he's f***ed up, its obvious that he did it, and i dont want child molesters running around in the world, able to do it again.

how self-righteous!!!

you should join the police force, or better yet, become a vigilante.

would you want a child raper living in your neighborhood, where he could molest you kids?

not really. You?

would you want a child raper living in your neighborhood, where he could molest you kids?

you kids? cos' i aint a kid.

or your kids? which i don't have.

In both cases NO i wouldn't want a child molester in my neighbourhood.

Especially one that actually IS a child molester,

which has not been confirmed in Mr. Jacksons case as of yet.

A child raper....strong words, no, not that either.

i think i would let my kid stay at Jacko's place for the night

it is a win win situation really.

yeh for $30,0000000, that'll def pay for the therapy.

i meant 'your'.
but what about other's children?
huh?
besides, wacko jacko is a freak. just look at him, he goes to court late, dressed in either his pajamas or as captain friggin' crunch!

i meant 'your'.
but what about other's children?
huh?
besides, wacko jacko is a freak. just look at him, he goes to court late, dressed in either his pajamas or as captain friggin' crunch!

Other people children are still important obviously. But it's not like Jacko is roaming the streets picking up kids at schools. Any parent who let there child sleep in his bed should be shot too.

But i'm still not prepared to say he's guilty. Innocent until proven.



His crime is being weird and freaky, that is also his punishment.

and so you think that obvious child rapists should be allowed to roam around and do the things they do?

and so you think that obvious child rapists should be allowed to roam around and do the things they do?

ummmm no?

what's an obvious child rapist anyways?

someone who's been convicted? or someone who runs around and says "i'm a child rapist?"

someone who looks like, seems to be, and/or is a child rapist. it ranges from a freaky-looking shifty eyed guy who drives to the corner and says "illl give you a ride home" to a guy who has actually done it has been proven to have done it before and wants to do it again.
jacko is on the lower end of the scale, closer to someone who seems to be a child rapist.

someone who looks like, seems to be, and/or is a child rapist. it ranges from a freaky-looking shifty eyed guy who drives to the corner and says "illl give you a ride home" to a guy who has actually done it has been proven to have done it before and wants to do it again.
jacko is on the lower end of the scale, closer to someone who seems to be a child rapist.
Wow.

Looking like a child rapist means you are one?

So if I looked like Jesus (theoretically), that means I am Jesus?

What if I looked like a mix between Jim Gaffigan and Brad Pitt with a beard? Does that mean I am some strange love-child belonging to Gaffigan and Pitt (with a beard)?

I'd say that sounds about right.

possibly.
who knows, but thats not the point.
the point is that jacko's a freak, and he probably did it. if you think he didnt, theres something wrong with you, because its blatantly obvious that he did it. he's such a freak. look at him, really, hes a freaky-freak freak.

Acting purely based on looks is a horrible way to be.

See: Britney Spears' record sales
Afterwards See: Britney Spears' musical talent

hmmm.
well, im out of ideas.
i just think he's guilty.
do i need a reason?

No of course not, I think he's guilty as well (my first post in this thread has letters written in white, highlight them to read).

That's what I was talking about when I said you should make good use of highlighting when reading posts on here.

oh. really?
sorry, then, lad.
who then is the slimely nut that said that "No, he just likes having young boys for friends, that's all"
...?

i just think he's guilty.
do i need a reason?

Nah! Who needs proof when we are convicting an individual, and basically deciding his future? Proof is for pussies.

i din't say "do i need proof"
i said "do i need a reason"