GundamWing
03-14-03, 06:39 PM
E = m*c*c
E = einstein
m = MacM
c*c = cooky-ness correction factor
i'm still trying to figure out what c*c means from a conceptual standpoint, but that's ok; no matter what it really means or even if the cooky constant is really a constant, it won't shake the foundations of my basic theory here.
Of course, we can never really know the exact value of c*c because of heisenberg's untenable uncertainty principle. Is MacM really a quack or not-a-quack... so far, experiments show that he demonstrates both, thus he is a quack-not-quack. I believe this is what is commonly known as Quantum weirdness.
I declare henceforth that all MacM posts be stored in the archives of this message board and locked up for posterity, hencewith, forthright, and for sure. :eek:
E = einstein
m = MacM
c*c = cooky-ness correction factor
i'm still trying to figure out what c*c means from a conceptual standpoint, but that's ok; no matter what it really means or even if the cooky constant is really a constant, it won't shake the foundations of my basic theory here.
Of course, we can never really know the exact value of c*c because of heisenberg's untenable uncertainty principle. Is MacM really a quack or not-a-quack... so far, experiments show that he demonstrates both, thus he is a quack-not-quack. I believe this is what is commonly known as Quantum weirdness.
I declare henceforth that all MacM posts be stored in the archives of this message board and locked up for posterity, hencewith, forthright, and for sure. :eek: