I've been thinking about this war....the pros and cons....US interests...the existing Iraqi regime and conditions of the country and I dare ask?

If you agree that Saddam Husseign is a plight for his country and people, then you must agree he must be removed. The Iraqi people could not remove him for the past 30 years. Please tell me alternative mechanisms for removing Saddam Hussein and which country would put up the expenses, it's people lives, and all the efforts to help another country in the hope for some non guaranteed future good mutual trading and interest exchange.

Who appointed the United snakes of shite and terrorism to be the police of our world ???

they did themselves

Originally posted by Helen
Who appointed the United snakes of shite and terrorism to be the police of our world ???

You don't answer my question Queen Helen, or do you prefer a disaster world full of tyrants that gas their own people, just because you so much despise police.

What appointed US to be police is it's status as the only super power in the world.....you know being a super power comes with responsbilities.....but I think you're not familiar with responsbile countries....you prefer disorganized zoos that treat humans like shit.

Ultimately Israel would have to take action against saddam before saddam was able to flex nuclear muscle (and he probably would, regardless of the consequences, cause he is not easily deterred by the prospect of hundreds of thousands dead people)

therefore I think Paul Wolvowitz should deserve a monument in Tel Aviv for being an outstanding citiczen, defender of the state and likud policy.....

"with special thanks to all the americans who were willing to put their lives and money in...".