This is not for myself, merely for all of you. I'm aware many find IAC's theories on the age of Earth ridiculious, equally so are many of Singularities ideas frowned upon. I therefore got it in my mind "what if I hold a contest, the question of who is more dellusional between them?"

I therefore invite conversation and discussion concerning this matter. As always I must inevitably include myself in this poll (for I possibly may be the most dellusional amoung you).... and so without great adue I give you the contest!

PS Feel free to post links to their rather outlandish material, it will help others compare them.

PSS I believe we never went to the moon, so there :p I also think the Earth is older than billions of years...

Singularity, I'm afraid I've chosen you to be the most dellusional amoung us. It's not because you think we never went to the moon, I agree with that.. it's simply your conspiracy theories are way, way out there. I think there is no illuminati, there is no secret government, you on the other hand do :shrug: I'm afraid I see no evidence for such organizations, however I also don't see evidence we went to the moon.. most of it's lies perpetrated by foolish unintellectual NASA types.

IAC presents himself with logic and brasen theory. I agree with his ideas to an extent, it may be possible the Earth is much more than a few billions years old, but equally so it may be much younger. Science must ultimately decide it who is right...

There you have it, and so between either of them Singularities conspiracy theories make him seem more dellusional than IAC's Earth concepts... this means IAC's ideas are more agreeable to me in the end.

Moderator warning: Posting personal attack threads may result in your banning.