To undo its greatest mistake?


This is the most intelligent thing i've ever heard here at this forum.

But I want a gay thread 2 but I don't no how 2 make 1? :(

This is the most intelligent thing i've ever heard here at this forum.

How would nature go about this?

most evolution is done by natural selection, as of yet, humans arent dying because of some genetic incapability, nature would try to respond to such things as global warming, rather than have the forsight to stop it.

unnatural slection

joke? or are you going to elaborate?

This is the most intelligent thing i've ever heard here at this forum.

It probably isn't...actually.

How would nature go about this?

Well, a very delicate and almost vanishingly small blueprint in all of matter and energy.

Reasonably, many scientists beieve that everything is predetermined (and is no longer a question reserved for epistemology or metaphysics.

Life unifies, coheres and grows so that it can become ''better'' machines. These machines though, like any biological, dead or living matter have restraints, so the information telling them what to do, must also have a mechanism telling them not what to do.

but nature doesnt work as one entity, various genes evolve from the knowledge they have, genes aren't omniscient, they can't detect that the wolrd is getting hotter because of CO2 emissions from the human industry.

It probably isn't...actually.

I don't think so.

Everyone has thus been blinded by ignorance, dogmatism and sheer down right flouting of truth.

Gay, is a natural selection.

If it was unnatural, and only found in humans, i would have believed that gayism was unnatural. But this is not true.

its natural, but not evolution.

but nature doesnt work as one entity, various genes evolve from the knowledge they have, genes aren't omniscient, they can't detect that the wolrd is getting hotter because of CO2 emissions from the human industry.
Yes, but CO_2 is only a theory.

There are even scientists who believe that this global warming is natural and happens over cycles.

there is no "gay gene", thats just crap

anyway I'm going to bed, you can carry on making up theories without reason but don't expect me to respond.

How would nature go about this?

It wouldn't. There will never be more homo's than hetero's.

Yes, but CO_2 is only a theory.

There are even scientists who believe that this global warming is natural and happens over cycles.

it does happen over cycles, but we're speeding it up.

I don't believe it's a product of natural selection, but rather, like aging, it is simply not sufficiently selected against, since some small number of gays do end up reproducing.

This is the most intelligent thing i've ever heard here at this forum.

What does that mean?

its natural, but not evolution.

In some sense though, it is an evolution. All types of evolution come from natural genetic mistakes.

This thread is going to attract the religious fundies of SF. lol I can't wait. Should be a one lol.

But I want a gay thread 2 but I don't no how 2 make 1? :(

get a piece of string and dye it pink. There ya go. gay thread!

get a piece of string and dye it pink. There ya go. gay thread!

Tie-die works better. lol

well, lots of species are doing fine with 1 sex. wasn't there a hammerhead shark and a komodo dragon that just reproduced without the other sex? Is nature going to 1 sex (and that 1 sex is female by the way)

just because it's natural to be gay doesn't mean it's right. animals can be gay and they can also kill, but that doesn't mean killing is right.

being gay is wrong because if you consider magnets: they are never gay. and magnets have a perfect moral because they're not smart enough to sin.

just because it's natural to be gay doesn't mean it's right. animals can be gay and they can also kill, but that doesn't mean killing is right.

being gay is wrong because if you consider magnets: they are never gay. and magnets have a perfect moral because they're not smart enough to sin.

Thats what I call polarised.

That's what i call dogmatic.