WHILE i am not one to deny the holocost...

i am also not so dumb as to NOT recognise that the jewish state organizations, have seriously milked it for as much as possible.

and no one seems to care about the fact that the NAZI'S didnt just kill jews.... they killed as many slavs... gypsies... and anyone they felt were inferior and worthy of elimination.... or didnt have the right papers.


the 6 mlllion jews... was only at most 50% of the killed.

yet they take all the credit... as if they only suffered.


dont get me wrong... im part jew... and i do practice judaism to a % degree... but... im not blind.



-MT

There is definitely an industry surrounded around it, as well as a wall of protection put up when anyone ever talks about it. The restriction of speech made okay by saying it is "anti-Semitic!". Anything against the Jews, rational or not, is a matter of "anti-Semitism" to them.

50 million died on the side of the allied forces and 12 million died on the side of the axis forces. That would be 9,7%. Also alot more slavs were killed then jews: an estimated 20 million. That is, if 6 million Jews were actually killed.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_war_2

20 million??

like i said... lots of slavs..... where is their story being told?

do they even speak of it in europe?? does anyone know...?


is this a USA type of media bias... or does this bias exist in europe?

-MT

Jeez, so many taboo topics all at once: we are all gonna lose our taboo-posting priviledges! Fine, I'll refrain from starting any more taboo threads so as to give this forum a break.

Excerpt from "The Culture of Critique" by Professor Kevin MacDonald http://www.csulb.edu/~kmacd/

Page xxxii, paragraph 3: It is interesting that developmental psychologists have found unusually intense fear reactions among Israeli infants in response to strangers, while the opposite pattern is found for infants from North Germany. (See endnote 14) The Israeli infants were much more likely to become "inconsolably upset" in reaction to strangers, whereas the North German infants had relatively minor reactions to strangers. The Israeli babies therefore tended to have an unusual degree of stranger anxiety, while the North German babies were the opposite — findings that fit with the hypothesis that Europeans and Jews are on opposite ends of scales of xenophobia and ethnocentrism.

Endnote 14. Grossman et al. and Sagi et al., in I. Bretherton & E. Waters (Eds.), Growing Points in Attachment Theory and Research. Monographs for the Society for Research in Child Development, 50(1-2), 233-275. Sagi et al. suggest temperamental differences in stranger anxiety may be important because of the unusual intensity of the reactions of many of the Israeli infants. The tests were often terminated because of the intense crying of the infants. Sagi et al. find this pattern among both Kibbutz-reared and city-reared infants, although less strongly in the latter. However, the city-reared infants were subjected to somewhat different testing conditions: They were not subjected to a pre-test socialization episode with a stranger. Sagi et al. suggest that the socialization pre-test may have intensified reactions to strangers among the Kibbutz-reared babies, but they note that such pre-tests do not have this effect in samples of infants from Sweden and the U.S. This again highlights the difference between Israeli and European samples.

Please use one of the existing threads on this subject.