Guantanamo

Discussion in 'World Events' started by Kunax, Feb 16, 2006.

  1. Kunax Sciforums:Reality not required Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,385
    UN has finaly finish there report on Guantanamo, highly critical of the camp the 54 page report demand all the prisinors be put before a judge or released and the camp closed.
    DK source .:

    US rejected the clains in the UN report of mistreatment and torture on Guantanamo and further refused to close the camp
    DK source .:

    The sword of the righteous is double edged, can the US, even if no torture is commited, just snatch people from aroud the world and put then in a concentrasion camp with out them self becomming terrorist!
     
  2. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. Dil_420 Banned Banned

    Messages:
    83
    yes couse non of them had anything to do with 9/11!
    Jews and goverment of united state did 9/11!
     
  4. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. Ophiolite Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    9,232
    Is Guantanamo just a means of keeping potential terrorists at bay?

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  6. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. spidergoat pubic diorama Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    54,036
    There is no guantanimo, that's just a myth to scare the a-rabs. Imagine, an army base in CUBA? Ridiculous!
     
  8. Dil_420 Banned Banned

    Messages:
    83
  9. hypewaders Save Changes Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    12,061
  10. Mr. G reality.sys Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    5,191
    None of you is a real-time world player.

    That's why all you can do is make comment after the fact.

    You're minor historians, not major players.

    There must be an appropriate government subsidy available to assuage your emotional insult.
     
  11. Prince_James Plutarch (Mickey's Dog) Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    9,214
    The question really ought to be: Why the fuck should we care about these scumbag terrorists?

    I'd raise the suggestion that they aren't even human beings. We should feed them to the dogs and bury the bones with pigs.

    The UN has quite the nerve when they were in a huge bribery scandal with Saddam Hussein. The UN has blood on its hands. Oh, anid its complete apathy to all the world's problems and utter failure.
     
  12. invert_nexus Ze do caixao Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    9,686
    Who's to watch the watchers?

    You'll care about the 'scumbag terrorists' the day that a group you are a part of (the intelligentsia, perhaps) are deemed 'scumbag terrorists'.
    But, of course, then it'll be too late.

    Guantanamo is a nasty blemish on the face of our country. Regardless of the fact that it's in Cuba, we can't hide our shame.
     
  13. Prince_James Plutarch (Mickey's Dog) Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    9,214
    Invert Nexus:

    I'm willing to take that risk to face certain existential crises.

    Our hands are tied. We need some form of information. Accordingly, we have to rough it out of them.

    We cannot let our enemy use our civilization and morality against us. I'd rather be "as bad as them" and victors than "keep the moral high ground" and lose.
     
  14. Mr. G reality.sys Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    5,191
    Let's put them up at your place.

    They're innocent, misunderstood, and deserving of better accommodations.

    What's your address, big boy?
     
  15. James R Just this guy, you know? Staff Member

    Messages:
    39,426
    Mr. G:

    Including yourself.

    And you comment on the comments. Hmm...

    And you're a minor commentator on the minor players.


    Prince_James:

    1. You prejudge the case. None of the "scumbag terrorists" you mention have been shown to be anything of the sort in a court of law.

    2. Your attempt to dehumanise obvious human beings does nothing except show what a poor example of a human being you yourself are.

    3. As invert_nexus says, you're also scarily short-sighted.
     
  16. iceaura Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    30,994
    So we will discard our civilization and morality, thereby becoming safer from our enemies.

    If we do that, who are our friends ?
     
  17. pjdude1219 The biscuit has risen Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    16,479
    by giving up are civilization and morality it means we have lost.
     
  18. Ichigo Registered Member

    Messages:
    2
    That made me chuckle, I'm sure Sami Al-Hajj agrees.

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  19. Simon Anders Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,535
    Hello. Good morning. Wake up. The US has sent home a large number of people from Guantanamo BECAUSE THEY HAD INSUFFICIENT EVIDENCE or none at all that these guys were terrorists. Thats why we have trials. To weigh evidence. Thats why the Supreme Court has just said what is happening there is illegal.
     
  20. Simon Anders Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,535
    The US Supreme Court disagrees with you. And fortunately you are a small player compared to them. Let us know when you have an actual argument to make.
     
  21. Simon Anders Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,535
  22. Prince_James Plutarch (Mickey's Dog) Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    9,214
    James R.:

    Terrorism is war, not crime.

    Evil people are not really worth that much consideration.

    I'm an American citizen, not a foreigner caught on foreign battlefields.
     
  23. Prince_James Plutarch (Mickey's Dog) Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    9,214
    Pjdude1239:

    Not at all. We return afterwards, drunken merry with all the blood of our enemies on our hands.
     

Share This Page